Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical Risk

FTC Settles Vivint for $20M Over Credit Report Misuse

Vivint Smart Home, Inc.April 1, 2021Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$20,000,000

Consumers Affected

9,000

Summary

The FTC settled with Vivint Smart Home, Inc. for misusing consumer credit reports to qualify customers for financing without permission, harming innocent third parties' credit. Vivint agreed to pay $20 million, with over $4.7 million for consumer compensation, and established a Customer Service Task Force.

Remedy

Vivint must pay $20 million in total, with more than $4.7 million allocated for consumer compensation through a claims process, and establish a Customer Service Task Force to assist affected consumers.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review customer financing agreements, vendor contracts with financing partners, and sales representative guidelines/scripts. Key clauses to examine include: (1) credit check authorization provisions to ensure explicit, documented consent is obtained from the correct individual before pulling a credit report; (2) data sharing and third-party beneficiary clauses to prevent unauthorized use of another person's credit information; (3) cosigner or guarantor agreement terms to verify separate, informed consent is obtained from the cosigner; (4) representations and warranties regarding Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) compliance; and (5) audit rights to monitor FCRA adherence. Changes may be needed to mandate identity verification procedures that do not rely on substituting or adding third-party credit data, implement separate consent mechanisms for cosigners, and strengthen compliance certifications with specific FCRA requirements.

Contract Search Terms

credit report authorizationpermissible purposecosigner consentidentity verification processdata sharing agreementthird-party credit informationconsumer reporting agencyFCRA compliance clausecredit qualification processconsent for credit check

Laws Cited

Fair Credit Reporting Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Vivint Smart Home, Inc.

Also known as: Vivint

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Vivint Smart Home, Inc."
Fine Amount
"pay a total of $20 million"
Laws Cited
"Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
Violation Types
"using the credit history of another person with a similar name or adding a friend or relative of the customer as cosigner without their permission"
Event Date
"2021/04/"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.