Penalty Amount
$20,000,000
Consumers Affected
9,000
The FTC settled with Vivint Smart Home, Inc. for misusing consumer credit reports to qualify customers for financing without permission, harming innocent third parties' credit. Vivint agreed to pay $20 million, with over $4.7 million for consumer compensation, and established a Customer Service Task Force.
Vivint must pay $20 million in total, with more than $4.7 million allocated for consumer compensation through a claims process, and establish a Customer Service Task Force to assist affected consumers.
In-house legal teams should review customer financing agreements, vendor contracts with financing partners, and sales representative guidelines/scripts. Key clauses to examine include: (1) credit check authorization provisions to ensure explicit, documented consent is obtained from the correct individual before pulling a credit report; (2) data sharing and third-party beneficiary clauses to prevent unauthorized use of another person's credit information; (3) cosigner or guarantor agreement terms to verify separate, informed consent is obtained from the cosigner; (4) representations and warranties regarding Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) compliance; and (5) audit rights to monitor FCRA adherence. Changes may be needed to mandate identity verification procedures that do not rely on substituting or adding third-party credit data, implement separate consent mechanisms for cosigners, and strengthen compliance certifications with specific FCRA requirements.
Entity
Vivint Smart Home, Inc.
Also known as: Vivint
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/08/ftc-announces-claims-process-consumers-whose-credit-reports-were-misused-home-security-firm-vivint
Vivint
https://www.ftc.gov/Vivint
smart home monitoring company vivint will pay 20 million set
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/04/smart-home-monitoring-company-vivint-will-pay-20-million-settle-ftc-charges-it-misused-consumer
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Vivint Smart Home, Inc."
"pay a total of $20 million"
"Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)"
"using the credit history of another person with a similar name or adding a friend or relative of the customer as cosigner without their permission"
"2021/04/"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.