Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

Attorney General Ellison pushes federal government to crack down more on illegal robocalls

Federal Communications CommissionJuly 14, 2026Minnesota Attorney General

Summary

Attorney General Ellison and 48 other attorneys general called on the FCC to strengthen rules to cut off scammers' access to legitimate telephone numbers. The coalition is responding to the FCC's proposed rules to combat illegal robocalls and texts, which cost Americans nearly $2 billion last year.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with telecommunications providers, voice service providers, and call routing companies to ensure they include robust robocall compliance obligations, prohibitions on number cycling, and requirements to implement STIR/SHAKEN authentication. Key clauses to examine include representations and warranties regarding compliance with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule, audit rights to verify call traffic legitimacy, indemnification for illegal robocall transmissions, and termination rights for non-compliance. Additionally, contracts should require vendors to maintain records of number assignments and call paths to enable tracing of illegal robocalls back to their source.

Contract Search Terms

robocall compliancetelephone number sourcingnumber cycling prohibitioncall path accountabilityvoice provider agreementanti-spoofing requirementscall authenticationSTIR/SHAKEN implementationillegal robocall indemnificationFCC compliance clause

Laws Cited

Telephone Consumer Protection ActTelemarketing Sales Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Federal Communications Commission

Industry

Telecommunications

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Federal Communications Commission (FCC)"
Laws Cited
"Telephone Consumer Protection Act"
Laws Cited
"Telemarketing Sales Rule"
Summary
"Attorney General Ellison and 48 other attorneys general called on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to strengthen rules that would cut off scammers’ access to legitimate telephone numbers"

Related Enforcement Actions

OR

Federal Communications Commission

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, leading a bipartisan coalition of 48 other state and territorial attorneys general, sent a letter urging the FCC to strengthen its 'Know Your Upstream Provider' (KYUP) rule so phone companies must properly vet, continuously monitor, and cut ties with upstream providers that facilitate illegal robocalls and caller ID spoofing. The coalition asks the FCC to set minimum vetting standards, require periodic re-checks rather than one-time contract reviews, strengthen caller ID authentication across the call chain, impose meaningful penalties, and mandate record-keeping for investigators. No fine or injunction was imposed; the letter notes Americans received more than 29.6 billion scam robocalls and texts last year and lost nearly $2 billion to these scams.

OR

Federal Communications Commission

Attorney General Rayfield and a coalition of 49 other attorneys general sent a letter to the FCC urging it to strengthen its Know Your Customer (KYC) rules to combat illegal robocalls. The coalition recommends requiring providers to understand customers' business, applying KYC standards to all providers, and collecting additional information on high-risk customers. No monetary penalty was imposed.

CT

Federal Communications Commission

Attorney General William Tong and 48 other attorneys general submitted comments to the FCC urging stronger rules to prevent scammers from accessing legitimate telephone numbers for illegal robocalls. The coalition is responding to the FCC's proposed rules and asks for measures such as stronger certification, reporting, and prohibitions on number cycling.

MN

C4D, LLC

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed a lawsuit in Hennepin County against C4D, LLC, its owners Travis Benoit and Steven Legatt, and related entity Five Points Properties, LLC, alleging 18 counts of violating the Minnesota Human Rights Act, federal lending laws, and state consumer-fraud and contract-for-deed laws. The complaint alleges the defendants sold homes through predatory contracts for deed with inflated prices, hidden finance charges, and large annual balloon payments that leave buyers immediately underwater and forfeit all equity upon default, while targeting Somali-American Muslims on the basis of religion and national origin — a form of 'reverse redlining.' The AG seeks an injunction, civil penalties, and cancellation or reformation of existing contracts; no penalty amounts have been determined.

MN

Omega Dental Care

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced the first round of restitution, issuing 8 refund checks totaling $38,634 to consumers harmed by Omega Dental Care, a defunct Eden Prairie dental clinic owned and operated by Anne Soberay. The refunds, paid from the state's Consumer Protection Restitution Account (CPRA), compensate consumers who paid out of pocket for dental services that were never provided. The refunds follow an earlier settlement between the AG's office and Omega Dental Care and Soberay. Note: this is a consumer protection (non-delivery of services) action, not a privacy enforcement action; no privacy violation types from the taxonomy apply.

MN

Midwest Car Search

$100K

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced that used car dealer Midwest Car Search and its owner Scott Spiczka agreed to reform their business practices and pay $100,000 to resolve allegations that they violated Minnesota's Used Car Law and other consumer-protection laws through five deceptive practices, including fake 'certified' claims, illegally added vehicle service contracts, denied warranties, missing Buyer's Guide disclosures, and operating under an unregistered trade name that exploited Spanish speakers. The settlement resolves the AG's April 23, 2024 lawsuit and makes permanent a prior court order requiring the dealer to cease the deceptive conduct. Note: this is a consumer-protection enforcement action, not a privacy matter, so violation-type mapping to the privacy taxonomy is approximate.