Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium Risk

NJ AG Settles Bumble for $315K Over Background Screening Misrepresentations

Bumble, Inc.February 21, 2024New Jersey Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$315,000

Summary

Bumble Inc. agreed to pay $315,000 and update its disclosures to settle allegations that it misrepresented its criminal background screening policies to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and Internet Dating Safety Act. The settlement requires Bumble to clearly disclose its screening practices and safety limitations on its dating platforms.

Remedy

Bumble must pay a $315,000 civil penalty, update its website and app disclosures to accurately describe criminal background screening methods and limitations, and send email and pop-up notifications to all existing New Jersey users about the changes.

Monetary PenaltyCompliance ProgramCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing agreements, particularly the Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and any specific Safety or Dating Service Agreements. Focus on clauses describing security features, background screening processes, user safety measures, and limitations of liability. Required changes include ensuring all marketing and in-app representations about criminal background screening are accurately reflected in the contractual disclosures, clearly stating the scope, methodology, and limitations of any screening conducted, and obtaining explicit user consent where personal data is processed for such checks. Vendor agreements with third-party screening services should also be audited to ensure data processing aligns with disclosed practices.

Contract Search Terms

criminal background screening policysafety features disclosureuser consent to background checksrepresentation of security measuresprivacy policy - safety limitationsterms of service - background checksdata processing for screeningaccuracy of marketing claimslimitation of liability for screeningdisclosure of screening methodology

Laws Cited

New Jersey Consumer Fraud ActInternet Dating Safety ActDivision regulations related to internet dating services

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Bumble, Inc.

Also known as: Bumble

Industry

Social Media

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Bumble, Inc."
Fine Amount
"$315,000"
Laws Cited
"New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”)"
Laws Cited
"Internet Dating Safety Act (“IDSA”)"
Laws Cited
"Division regulations related to internet dating services"
Violation Types
"misrepresenting or failing to disclose its criminal background screening policies"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Amazon

On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.

NJ

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.

NJ

U.S. Department of Transportation

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.

NJ

Opportunity Financials, LLC

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general in sending comment letters to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board, urging them to deny OppFi's application to acquire BNC National Bank and obtain a national bank charter. The coalition argues that the charter would allow OppFi to circumvent state usury laws and offer high-cost loans with APRs up to 200%, harming consumers.

NJ

Sandoz Inc.

$400.0M

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 43 states and territories in announcing a $400 million settlement in principle with Sandoz Inc. to resolve allegations of widespread price-fixing and anticompetitive conduct in the generic drug market. Sandoz will pay approximately $469 million total including prior settlements, and has agreed to internal reforms to ensure fair competition.