Penalty Amount
$400,000
Consumers Affected
400,000
Dataium settled allegations that it used history sniffing to track consumers' online browsing without consent and sold personal data of 400,000 consumers to a data broker without notice. The settlement imposes a $400,000 monetary penalty, requires a privacy program, and mandates transparency and opt-out mechanisms.
Dataium must pay $400,000 (with $301,000 suspended subject to compliance), implement a privacy program, post clear privacy notices on its website, and cease collecting browsing history without explicit disclosure and an opt-out option.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with data analytics or data broker companies, customer contracts involving data collection, and data processing addendums. Specific clauses to scrutinize include data sharing provisions, consent mechanisms for online tracking (e.g., web tracking or history sniffing), privacy notice integrations, opt-out requirements, and third-party data transfer terms. Changes may be needed to mandate explicit consent for tracking practices, require clear disclosure of personal data sales to entities like data brokers, and enforce robust opt-out mechanisms to align with privacy laws and settlement mandates.
Entity
Dataium
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.njoag.gov/acting-attorney-general-announces-settlement-resolving-allegations-data-company-engaged-in-online-aeoehistory-sniffingae%c2%9d-data-analytics-firm-serving-auto-industry-allegedly-tracked-consumers/
New Jersey Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://www.njoag.gov/about/divisions-and-offices/division-of-consumer-affairs/
"Dataium, a Tennessee-based data analytics company"
"Dataium has agreed to a $400,000 payment to the State"
"violate the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act."
"Dataium allegedly used software code to track the Web sites visited by consumers without their knowledge or consent."
"sold the personal identifying information of 400,000 consumers to Acxiom without notice to those consumers."
"400,000 consumers"
$650K
The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.
On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.
A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.
A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general in sending comment letters to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board, urging them to deny OppFi's application to acquire BNC National Bank and obtain a national bank charter. The coalition argues that the charter would allow OppFi to circumvent state usury laws and offer high-cost loans with APRs up to 200%, harming consumers.
$400.0M
Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 43 states and territories in announcing a $400 million settlement in principle with Sandoz Inc. to resolve allegations of widespread price-fixing and anticompetitive conduct in the generic drug market. Sandoz will pay approximately $469 million total including prior settlements, and has agreed to internal reforms to ensure fair competition.