Court Rules
All enforcement actions
GuidanceLow Risk

New Jersey Governor and Attorney General Launch Junk Fee Crackdown Initiative

State of New JerseyJune 15, 2026New Jersey Attorney General

Summary

Governor Sherrill and Attorney General Davenport announced coordinated executive actions to reduce and eliminate junk fees in New Jersey. The initiative includes an Executive Order directing state agencies to review industries for junk fees and an Enforcement Statement from the Division of Consumer Affairs explaining how junk fee practices may violate the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

Remedy

The initiative includes an Executive Order requiring state agencies to report on recommendations to reduce or eliminate junk fees, and an Enforcement Statement putting businesses on notice about potential violations of the Consumer Fraud Act. Consumers are encouraged to report junk fees through new educational materials and a dedicated website.

Corrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor and customer agreements for clauses related to fee disclosure, pricing transparency, and add-on charges. Specifically, examine contracts with service providers, landlords, and financial institutions for provisions that allow hidden or mandatory fees not clearly disclosed in advertised prices. Review terms of service and checkout processes for dark patterns or fine print that obscure fee structures. Ensure compliance with the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act by requiring clear, upfront disclosure of all mandatory fees in vendor agreements and customer-facing materials.

Contract Search Terms

junk feeshidden feesbait-and-switch pricingmandatory feesfine print disclosureadd-on chargesprice transparencyconsumer fraudall-in pricingdeceptive pricing

Laws Cited

New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

State of New Jersey

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Governor Mikie Sherrill and Attorney General Jennifer Davenport announced coordinated executive actions aimed at reducing and eliminating junk fees in New Jersey"
Laws Cited
"the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act"
Violation Types
"Bait-and-switch pricing that excludes mandatory fees from the advertised price but then tacks them on later in the purchasing process"
Violation Types
"Hiding costs in fine print or using websites and apps deceptively designed to make them difficult to spot"
Document Urls
"https://nj.gov/infobank/eo/057sherrill/pdf/EO-19.pdf"
Document Urls
"https://www.njoag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Junk-Fees-Enforcement-Statement.pdf"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Amazon

On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.

NJ

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.

NJ

U.S. Department of Transportation

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.

NJ

Opportunity Financials, LLC

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general in sending comment letters to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board, urging them to deny OppFi's application to acquire BNC National Bank and obtain a national bank charter. The coalition argues that the charter would allow OppFi to circumvent state usury laws and offer high-cost loans with APRs up to 200%, harming consumers.

NJ

Sandoz Inc.

$400.0M

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 43 states and territories in announcing a $400 million settlement in principle with Sandoz Inc. to resolve allegations of widespread price-fixing and anticompetitive conduct in the generic drug market. Sandoz will pay approximately $469 million total including prior settlements, and has agreed to internal reforms to ensure fair competition.