Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

Multistate Settlement with Hyundai and Kia Over Missing Anti-Theft Technology

Hyundai and KiaDecember 16, 2025Oregon Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$4,500,000

Summary

Consumer protection case where Hyundai and Kia settled for selling millions of vehicles without industry-standard anti-theft technology, leading to a nationwide surge in thefts and public safety risks. The settlement requires free hardware fixes for affected vehicles and restitution for consumers.

Remedy

Hyundai and Kia must equip all future vehicles with engine immobilizers, offer free zinc-reinforced ignition cylinder protectors to eligible vehicle owners, provide up to $4.5 million in restitution to consumers whose cars were damaged by thefts, and pay $4.5 million to the states for investigation costs.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review customer sales agreements, dealer contracts, and vehicle warranty terms to ensure they reflect the settlement requirements. Specifically, examine clauses related to product specifications, safety compliance, warranty coverage, and defect remediation. Contracts may need amendments to mandate the inclusion of industry-standard engine immobilizers in all future vehicles, outline the provision of free hardware fixes (zinc-reinforced ignition cylinder protectors) for eligible models, and define processes for restitution to consumers whose vehicles were damaged due to the lack of anti-theft features. Additionally, verify that agreements with dealers or distributors address the free distribution and installation of these protective devices.

Contract Search Terms

engine immobilizeranti-theft technologyproduct safety warrantydefect remediationconsumer restitutionhardware fixignition cylinder protectorvehicle safety standardswarranty coveragetheft damage compensation

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Hyundai and Kia

Also known as: Hyundai, Kia

Industry

Automotive

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Hyundai and Kia"
Fine Amount
"Pay $4.5 million to the states to defray the costs of the investigation."
Violation Types
"lacked industry-standard, anti-theft technology"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Hyundai and Kia

$4.5M

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin announced a multistate settlement with Hyundai and Kia over the sale of millions of U.S. vehicles lacking industry-standard anti-theft engine immobilizer technology, which contributed to a surge in auto thefts. The settlement requires the manufacturers to equip all future U.S.-sold vehicles with immobilizers, offer free ignition cylinder protectors to eligible owners, provide up to $4.5 million in consumer restitution for theft damage, and pay $4.5 million to the coalition states. The 36-state coalition is led by Connecticut, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, with New Jersey as a co-lead.

CT

Hyundai and Kia

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong launched a consumer protection investigation into Hyundai and Kia for failing to equip vehicles with standard anti-theft immobilizers between 2011 and 2022, leading to high theft rates and public safety concerns. The investigation seeks records on the companies' decision-making and potential fixes, following a coalition of attorneys general calling for a federal recall.

OR

U.S. Department of Transportation

Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 21 attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the U.S. Department of Transportation, FMCSA, and AAMVA to block demands for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial drivers. The federal government threatened to withhold $10 million in funding unless the data was turned over, which the coalition argues violates privacy law.

OR

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield co-led a coalition of 10 states in a federal lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to block a rule that invalidates state laws requiring mortgage lenders to pay interest on escrow accounts. The lawsuit argues the OCC's rule oversteps federal authority, gives national banks a competitive advantage over state-chartered banks, and takes money away from homeowners.

OR

Nexstar Media Group

A federal judge ruled that Nexstar Media Group violated a court order requiring it to keep TEGNA Inc. operating as an independent company while a multistate antitrust lawsuit challenging the merger proceeds. The court found that Nexstar installed its own executives on TEGNA's board, failed to disclose the appointments, and lacked candor with the court. The court ordered Nexstar to comply immediately, file status reports, respond to discovery, and turn over board and financial documents, with a special master to oversee compliance.

OR

Administration for Children and Families (ACF)

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, joined by a coalition of 23 other states, the District of Columbia, and two governors, sued the Trump administration to block a new policy by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) that would allow federal officials to access private records of millions of TANF recipients. The coalition argues the policy illegally shares sensitive personal data, including Social Security numbers and immigration status, with other federal agencies and private organizations, violating the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause. The lawsuit seeks to declare the policy illegal and block it from taking effect.