Court Rules
All enforcement actions
InvestigationLow RiskMultistate

Connecticut AG Investigates Hyundai Kia for Anti-Theft Immobilizer Failures

Hyundai and KiaJune 20, 2023Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong launched a consumer protection investigation into Hyundai and Kia for failing to equip vehicles with standard anti-theft immobilizers between 2011 and 2022, leading to high theft rates and public safety concerns. The investigation seeks records on the companies' decision-making and potential fixes, following a coalition of attorneys general calling for a federal recall.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with parts suppliers to ensure contracts include specifications for anti-theft immobilizers and compliance with industry safety standards. Customer agreements, such as dealer contracts and end-user warranties, should be examined for clauses on product safety, recall obligations, and warranty coverage for theft-related damages. Specific clauses to focus on include product specification clauses, safety compliance warranties, recall notification procedures, and indemnification provisions. Changes may be necessary to incorporate mandatory anti-theft technology requirements, update warranty terms to address theft vulnerabilities, and strengthen recall coordination mechanisms to mitigate public safety risks.

Contract Search Terms

anti-theft immobilizerengine immobilizerrecall clausewarranty coverageproduct safety standarddefect notification

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Hyundai and Kia

Also known as: Hyundai, Kia

Industry

Automotive

Multistate Coalition

Coalition of 18 attorneys general

Official Sources

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Hyundai and Kia

$4.5M

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin announced a multistate settlement with Hyundai and Kia over the sale of millions of U.S. vehicles lacking industry-standard anti-theft engine immobilizer technology, which contributed to a surge in auto thefts. The settlement requires the manufacturers to equip all future U.S.-sold vehicles with immobilizers, offer free ignition cylinder protectors to eligible owners, provide up to $4.5 million in consumer restitution for theft damage, and pay $4.5 million to the coalition states. The 36-state coalition is led by Connecticut, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, with New Jersey as a co-lead.

OR

Hyundai and Kia

$4.5M

Consumer protection case where Hyundai and Kia settled for selling millions of vehicles without industry-standard anti-theft technology, leading to a nationwide surge in thefts and public safety risks. The settlement requires free hardware fixes for affected vehicles and restitution for consumers.

CT

SunRun, Inc.

$500K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced settlements with SunRun, Inc., Elevate Solar Solutions, and two salespeople over allegations of deceptive solar sales, including impersonating consumers and locking homeowners into long-term contracts without consent. SunRun must pay $300,000 and provide consumer relief; Elevate and the salespeople face a stated $200,000 penalty, with $100,000 suspended subject to ongoing compliance.

CT

Mylan

$8.0M

Connecticut announced an $8 million settlement with Mylan over allegations that it used agreements to delay generic EpiPen competitors and took other actions that inflated prices. Mylan also agreed to provide 10,000 free EpiPens; the release states that Mylan denies wrongdoing.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s policy and practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests. The press release describes a court challenge, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.