Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

CA AG Settles with Equifax for $600M Over 2017 Data Breach

EquifaxJuly 22, 2019California Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$175,000,000

Consumers Affected

147,000,000

Summary

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, leading a multistate coalition of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, announced a settlement with Equifax over a 2017 data breach that exposed personal information of 147 million consumers, including 15 million Californians. The breach resulted from Equifax’s failure to apply a critical software patch and implement adequate security measures, with disclosure delayed for months after discovery. Equifax will pay $175 million in state penalties, up to $425 million in consumer restitution, and implement enhanced data security measures and ten years of free credit monitoring for affected consumers.

Remedy

Equifax must pay $175 million in penalties to states, including over $18.7 million to California, and up to $425 million into a restitution fund for affected consumers, who may receive cash reimbursement for breach-related losses or free credit monitoring for up to 10 years. Injunctive terms require Equifax to implement a comprehensive Information Security Program, hire a Chief Information Security Officer, reduce unnecessary storage of Social Security numbers, establish a consumer assistance process for identity theft claims, and comply with data protection requirements. Equifax is banned from profiting off data collected in connection with the breach or settlement remedies.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsInjunctionCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with data brokers, credit reporting agencies, and third-party service providers to ensure robust data security clauses mandating timely software patching, encryption of sensitive personal information (including Social Security numbers), and comprehensive Information Security Programs. Breach notification clauses must be updated to require immediate disclosure of security incidents, aligning with state and federal notification timelines, and include obligations to provide consumer remediation such as credit monitoring. Data retention clauses should limit unnecessary storage of sensitive consumer data like Social Security numbers, and all contracts involving consumer personal information should require vendors to comply with applicable data protection laws and injunctive terms from enforcement actions.

Contract Search Terms

data security requirementsbreach notification timelinesoftware patch policySocial Security number retentionencryption of personal dataInformation Security Programbreach disclosure obligationscredit monitoring services

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Equifax

Industry

Data Broker

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Equifax"
Fine Amount
"pay another $175 million to states in penalties"
Event Date
"Monday, July 22, 2019"
Jurisdiction
"California Attorney General Xavier Becerra today announced a nationwide settlement against Equifax"
Violation Types
"improperly exposed the personal information of 147 million consumers"
Violation Types
"failed to apply a critical software fix and implement security measures that would have protected and encrypted consumers’ data"

Related Enforcement Actions

NJ

Equifax

New Jersey Attorney General Christopher Porrino announced that New Jersey has joined a multi-state investigation into Equifax following a data breach affecting 143 million consumers. The multi-state group sent a letter demanding Equifax disable fee-based credit monitoring services and reimburse consumers for credit freeze fees with other bureaus, citing unfair practices and a months-long delay in breach disclosure.

CA

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of 33 state attorneys general, led by Minnesota AG Keith Ellison, began trial against Meta Platforms, Inc., alleging the company knowingly designed and deployed harmful features on Facebook and Instagram that drive children and teens to use the platforms compulsively, while falsely assuring parents and the public that its platforms were safe for young users. The states also allege Meta illegally collected personal information from children under 13 without parental consent, violating COPPA. The trial opened before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with the states seeking monetary penalties and injunctive relief.

CA

Paramount Skydance Corporation

A coalition of 12 state attorneys general, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, obtained a temporary restraining order from a federal court in California to halt the proposed $110 billion merger of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. by Paramount Skydance Corporation. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

CA

California Privacy Protection Agency

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CalPrivacy) joined a coalition of 18 Attorneys General and state agencies in opposing the proposed SECURE Data Act, a federal privacy bill that would preempt stronger state privacy laws like the CCPA. The coalition argues the bill would weaken consumer privacy protections, limit enforcement remedies, and undermine California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP).

CA

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general began trial against Meta Platforms, Inc., alleging the company knowingly designed addictive features on Facebook and Instagram that harm children and teens, deceived parents about platform safety, and illegally collected personal information from children under 13 without parental consent in violation of COPPA. The states seek monetary penalties, an injunction to stop unlawful practices, and other relief. The trial is being litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

CA

General Motors

$12.8M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with multiple district attorneys and the California Privacy Protection Agency, announced a $12.75 million settlement with General Motors for illegally selling hundreds of thousands of Californians' location and driving data to data brokers Verisk and LexisNexis without notice or consent. The settlement includes the largest CCPA penalty to date, a five-year ban on selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies, and requirements to delete retained data and implement a robust privacy program.