Court Rules
All enforcement actions
InvestigationCritical RiskMultistate

Multi-State AGs Demand Equifax Halt Fee-Based Services Post-Breach

EquifaxSeptember 15, 2017New Jersey Attorney General

Consumers Affected

143,000,000

Summary

New Jersey Attorney General Christopher Porrino announced that New Jersey has joined a multi-state investigation into Equifax following a data breach affecting 143 million consumers. The multi-state group sent a letter demanding Equifax disable fee-based credit monitoring services and reimburse consumers for credit freeze fees with other bureaus, citing unfair practices and a months-long delay in breach disclosure.

Remedy

Equifax is demanded to disable enrollment links for fee-based credit monitoring services and to reimburse consumers for fees incurred when obtaining security freezes from other credit bureaus, such as Experian and Transunion.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review customer agreements for credit monitoring and identity theft protection services, focusing on clauses that authorize fee-based offerings, credit freeze procedures, and reimbursement policies. Specifically, examine terms permitting charges for security freezes, the differentiation between free and paid services, and breach notification timelines. Vendor agreements with other credit bureaus or data processors must include provisions for cost-sharing in breach scenarios and compliance with multi-state demands. Data processing agreements should enforce robust data security obligations and clear incident response protocols. Potential changes include amending contracts to waive credit freeze fees, disable promotional links for paid services post-breach, and enhance disclosure requirements to prevent delays, ensuring alignment with consumer protection standards.

Contract Search Terms

credit monitoring service clausefee-based service provisioncredit freeze fee reimbursementdata breach notification timelineunfair or deceptive practice clausesecurity freeze mechanismconsumer protection addendumdata security standardsdisclosure delay provisionreimbursement obligation

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Equifax

Industry

Data Broker

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Equifax"
Violation Types
"massive data breach with potential to impact 143 million consumers"
Violation Types
"months-long delay between the breach and Equifax’s public disclosure"
Consumers Affected
"143 million consumers"

Related Enforcement Actions

CA

Equifax

$175.0M

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, leading a multistate coalition of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, announced a settlement with Equifax over a 2017 data breach that exposed personal information of 147 million consumers, including 15 million Californians. The breach resulted from Equifax’s failure to apply a critical software patch and implement adequate security measures, with disclosure delayed for months after discovery. Equifax will pay $175 million in state penalties, up to $425 million in consumer restitution, and implement enhanced data security measures and ten years of free credit monitoring for affected consumers.

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Amazon

On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.

NJ

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.

NJ

U.S. Department of Transportation

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.

NJ

Opportunity Financials, LLC

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general in sending comment letters to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board, urging them to deny OppFi's application to acquire BNC National Bank and obtain a national bank charter. The coalition argues that the charter would allow OppFi to circumvent state usury laws and offer high-cost loans with APRs up to 200%, harming consumers.