Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

FTC and States Sue Dollar General Over Advertised-Price Overcharges

Dollar General CorporationOctober 26, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut joined the FTC and attorneys general from 19 other states in suing Dollar General, alleging that it repeatedly charged customers more at checkout than prices displayed on shelves, tags, and advertisements. The complaint alleges years of overcharging and insufficient safeguards, but the release does not report a settlement, court order, or monetary penalty.

Contract Impact

Review retail, supplier, point-of-sale, and pricing-technology agreements for clear obligations to keep shelf labels, advertisements, websites, and checkout prices synchronized; controls and notice requirements for price changes; audit rights and recurring price-accuracy testing; escalation and correction timelines for pricing errors; and consumer refund or reimbursement responsibilities. Consider whether vendor warranties, indemnities, and complaint-reporting obligations adequately address repeated overcharges and known pricing-system problems. The release concerns alleged deceptive pricing, not a privacy violation, so it does not identify privacy-specific contract requirements.

Contract Search Terms

advertised price accuracyprice paritypoint-of-sale price synchronizationshelf-label auditpricing change controlsovercharge refundsconsumer complaint escalationpricing audit rights

Laws Cited

FTC ActGramm-Leach-Bliley ActConnecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Dollar General Corporation

Industry

Retail

Multistate Coalition

Federal Trade CommissionAlabama Attorney GeneralArizona Attorney GeneralArkansas Attorney GeneralCalifornia Attorney GeneralFlorida Attorney GeneralIllinois Attorney GeneralIowa Attorney GeneralKansas Attorney GeneralLouisiana Attorney GeneralMichigan Attorney GeneralMississippi Attorney GeneralNebraska Attorney GeneralNew Jersey Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Attorney GeneralOhio Attorney GeneralOklahoma Attorney GeneralTennessee Attorney GeneralUtah Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney General

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Dollar General Corporation"
Event Date
"10/26/2026"
Laws Cited
"The FTC and states allege these practices violate the FTC Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA)."
Laws Cited
"The FTC and states allege these practices violate the FTC Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA)."
Laws Cited
"The FTC and states allege these practices violate the FTC Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUPTA)."
Violation Types
"engaging in long-running deceptive pricing practices by routinely charging customers more at the register than the prices displayed on shelves, price tags and advertisements"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Dollar General Corporation

The FTC and 20 states sued Dollar General, alleging that it repeatedly charged customers more at checkout than advertised prices and failed to correct the problem despite consumer complaints and corporate knowledge. The complaint alleges violations of federal and state laws; the case is pending, and the press release does not report a penalty or final remedy.

CT

Meta Platforms, Inc.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and 13 other attorneys general sent Meta a letter after the No Kings Coalition’s Instagram account was mistakenly suspended during a nationwide election-related day of action. The letter asks Meta to explain the suspension, its use of human review, steps to prevent similar errors, and how users can seek redress; it does not announce a fine or impose a remedy.

CT

SunRun, Inc.

$500K

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced settlements with SunRun, Inc., Elevate Solar Solutions, and two salespeople over allegations of deceptive solar sales, including impersonating consumers and locking homeowners into long-term contracts without consent. SunRun must pay $300,000 and provide consumer relief; Elevate and the salespeople face a stated $200,000 penalty, with $100,000 suspended subject to ongoing compliance.

CT

Mylan

$8.0M

Connecticut announced an $8 million settlement with Mylan over allegations that it used agreements to delay generic EpiPen competitors and took other actions that inflated prices. Mylan also agreed to provide 10,000 free EpiPens; the release states that Mylan denies wrongdoing.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging DHS’s policy and practice of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests. The press release describes a court challenge, not a privacy enforcement action or monetary penalty.

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.