Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Warning LetterLow Risk

FTC Warns Seven Companies Over Questionable 'Made in the USA' Claims

A&F Drum Company LLCJuly 6, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC issued warning letters to seven companies for allegedly misrepresenting products as 'Made in the USA' when they were imported. The letters urge compliance with the FTC's Made in the USA standard. No monetary penalties were imposed.

Remedy

The companies were warned to stop making unlawful 'Made in the USA' claims and to comply with the FTC's Made in the USA Labeling Rule. No monetary penalty was imposed.

Corrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor and supplier agreements to ensure that products are accurately labeled with their country of origin. Contracts should include warranties from vendors that products comply with FTC labeling requirements, indemnification clauses for false advertising claims, and audit rights to verify origin claims. Marketing and advertising contracts should also be reviewed to ensure that any 'Made in USA' claims are substantiated.

Contract Search Terms

Made in USAcountry of originlabeling complianceFTC Actfalse advertisingorigin claimsproduct labelingadvertising claims

Laws Cited

FTC Act Section 5FTC Act Section 45aMade in USA Labeling Rule
15 U.S.C. 4515 U.S.C. 45a16 CFR Part 323

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

A&F Drum Company LLC

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"A&F Drum Company LLC"
Violation Types
"misrepresented certain products as “Made in the USA,”"
Laws Cited
"Section 5 of the FTC Act, Section 45a and the Made in USA Labeling Rule"
Event Type
"issued warning letters to seven companies"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Riverside Payments Inc.

$600K

The FTC and Washington alleged that Riverside Payments and affiliates misrepresented savings and cancellation terms, concealed fees and auto-renewing contracts, and obtained consumers’ financial information using false or fraudulent statements. The proposed stipulated order requires a $600,000 payment, customer notice and a period to rescind agreements without penalty, and prohibits deceptive claims while requiring clear disclosures, informed consent for negative-option billing, and a simple cancellation method.

FTC

25 companies that market or generate sales leads for healthcare plans (recipients not named)

FTC staff announced warning letters to 25 healthcare plan marketers and lead generators about deceptive or unfair claims concerning plan benefits, coverage, costs, and enrollment incentives. The letters do not allege wrongdoing by their recipients or impose penalties; they encourage companies to review their advertisements for compliance.

FTC

Multiple impersonation-scam operators

The FTC summarized enforcement actions and other efforts targeting businesses and individuals allegedly impersonating government agencies or legitimate businesses. The release reports more than $80 million in consumer redress across prior actions and takedowns of 19 websites, but it does not announce a new settlement or impose a specific penalty.

FTC

Toast Inc.

The FTC and state and local co-plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging Toast imposed hidden and unauthorized fees, enrolled restaurants in add-ons without consent, obstructed subscription cancellations, and misrepresented customer support availability. The complaint is pending in federal court; the press release announces no monetary penalty or imposed remedy.

FTC

Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target, and Walmart

The FTC issued information orders to nine companies to examine whether they use personal data and other factors to set individualized consumer prices or gig-worker compensation. This is a study and information-gathering inquiry, not a finding that the companies violated the law; recipients must respond within 45 days of receiving the orders.

FTC

Dollar General Corporation

The FTC and 20 states sued Dollar General, alleging that it repeatedly charged customers more at checkout than advertised prices and failed to correct the problem despite consumer complaints and corporate knowledge. The complaint alleges violations of federal and state laws; the case is pending, and the press release does not report a penalty or final remedy.