Penalty Amount
$300,000
The FTC alleged that Elite Events and Tickets LLC, doing business as Smart Scalpers, violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act by circumventing security measures to bypass ticket purchase limits for over 2,400 events, reselling tickets at a profit. The proposed order requires payment of $300,000 (with a total penalty of $10.7 million partially suspended) and permanently prohibits the company and its owners from engaging in such circumvention tactics.
The order imposes a civil penalty of $300,000 (with a total penalty of $10.7 million partially suspended due to inability to pay) and permanently prohibits Elite Events, Kevin W. McKerley, and Aaron L. Fera from circumventing security measures, using multiple accounts, IP addresses, or multisession browsers to bypass ticket purchase limits, and from purchasing tickets using payment methods in names other than their own.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with ticket brokers, resellers, and any third-party that purchases tickets on their behalf. They should ensure contracts include explicit compliance with the Better Online Ticket Sales Act and other applicable laws, prohibit circumvention of security measures or purchase limits, require representations and warranties regarding lawful ticket acquisition, and include indemnification for violations. Additionally, they should review their own terms of service and purchase limits to ensure they are enforceable and include anti-bot and anti-circumvention provisions.
Entity
Elite Events and Tickets LLC
Industry
EntertainmentOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/07/ftc-takes-action-against-elite-events-bypassing-ticket-purchase-limits-violation-better-online
EliteEvents Complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/EliteEvents-Complaint.pdf
EliteEvents StipulatedOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/EliteEvents-StipulatedOrder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Elite Events and Tickets LLC, which also does business as Smart Scalpers or smartscalpers.com"
"imposes more than $10.7 million in civil penalties against Elite Events, Fera and McKerley, which will be partially suspended after payment of $300,000"
"violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act"
"circumvent a security measure, access control system, or other technological control or measure on an Internet website or online service that is used by the ticket issuer to enforce posted event ticket limits"
$600K
The FTC and Washington alleged that Riverside Payments and affiliates misrepresented savings and cancellation terms, concealed fees and auto-renewing contracts, and obtained consumers’ financial information using false or fraudulent statements. The proposed stipulated order requires a $600,000 payment, customer notice and a period to rescind agreements without penalty, and prohibits deceptive claims while requiring clear disclosures, informed consent for negative-option billing, and a simple cancellation method.
FTC staff announced warning letters to 25 healthcare plan marketers and lead generators about deceptive or unfair claims concerning plan benefits, coverage, costs, and enrollment incentives. The letters do not allege wrongdoing by their recipients or impose penalties; they encourage companies to review their advertisements for compliance.
The FTC summarized enforcement actions and other efforts targeting businesses and individuals allegedly impersonating government agencies or legitimate businesses. The release reports more than $80 million in consumer redress across prior actions and takedowns of 19 websites, but it does not announce a new settlement or impose a specific penalty.
The FTC and state and local co-plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging Toast imposed hidden and unauthorized fees, enrolled restaurants in add-ons without consent, obstructed subscription cancellations, and misrepresented customer support availability. The complaint is pending in federal court; the press release announces no monetary penalty or imposed remedy.
The FTC issued information orders to nine companies to examine whether they use personal data and other factors to set individualized consumer prices or gig-worker compensation. This is a study and information-gathering inquiry, not a finding that the companies violated the law; recipients must respond within 45 days of receiving the orders.
The FTC and 20 states sued Dollar General, alleging that it repeatedly charged customers more at checkout than advertised prices and failed to correct the problem despite consumer complaints and corporate knowledge. The complaint alleges violations of federal and state laws; the case is pending, and the press release does not report a penalty or final remedy.