The FTC took action against Gravy Analytics Inc. and Venntel Inc. for unlawfully tracking and selling sensitive consumer location data without consent. The proposed consent order prohibits the sale or use of sensitive location data, requires deletion of historic data, and mandates compliance programs. This is part of the FTC's series of actions against data brokers selling sensitive location data.
The companies are banned from selling, licensing, or using sensitive location data except for national security or law enforcement. They must delete all historic location data and inform customers to delete or de-identify it. They must establish a sensitive location data program and a supplier assessment program to ensure consent, and are prohibited from making misrepresentations about their data practices.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements with data brokers or analytics providers, customer agreements involving location-based services, and data processing addendums (DPAs). Focus on clauses governing data sharing, consent requirements, data retention/deletion, and breach notification. Specific changes needed include: (1) explicitly prohibiting the sale, disclosure, or use of 'sensitive location data' (e.g., data tied to healthcare facilities, places of worship, military sites, labor unions); (2) mandating verifiable, opt-in consent for any collection or commercial use of location data; (3) requiring deletion of all historic sensitive location data; and (4) obligating vendors to establish a formal 'sensitive data location program' with internal compliance safeguards.
Entity
Gravy Analytics Inc. and Venntel Inc.
Also known as: Gravy Analytics
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/12/ftc-takes-action-against-gravy-analytics-venntel-unlawfully-selling-location-data-tracking-consumers
2123035gravyanalyticsorder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2123035gravyanalyticsorder.pdf
2123035gravyanalyticscomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2123035gravyanalyticscomplaint.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Gravy Analytics Inc. and its subsidiary Venntel Inc."
"violated the FTC Act"
"violated the FTC Act by unfairly selling sensitive consumer location data, and by collecting and using consumers’ location data without obtaining verifiable user consent"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.