The FTC issued a policy statement announcing that it will not enforce the COPPA Rule against website and online service operators that use age verification technologies solely to determine user age, provided they comply with conditions such as limiting data use, ensuring security, and providing clear notice. This policy aims to incentivize age verification tools to protect children online.
Operators must not use age verification data for any other purpose, retain it only as necessary, disclose it only to secure third parties, provide clear notice to parents and children, employ reasonable security safeguards, and ensure the age verification method is accurate.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements for age verification services, customer terms of service for websites using such tools, and data processing addendums. Focus on clauses defining data collection purposes, ensuring age data is used solely for age determination without secondary uses like marketing. Examine data sharing restrictions, security obligations (e.g., encryption), notice provisions informing users about age verification, and data retention schedules. Contracts may need amendments to explicitly limit age data use, enhance security requirements, and update privacy notices to reflect COPPA-compliant age verification practices.
Entity
Operators of General Audience and Mixed Audience Sites and Services
Also known as: Online Service Operators
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/02/ftc-issues-coppa-policy-statement-incentivize-use-age-verification-technologies-protect-children
childrens online privacy protection rule coppa
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa
age verification workshop
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events/2026/01/age-verification-workshop
enforcement policy statement promoting adoption age verifica
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/enforcement-policy-statement-promoting-adoption-age-verification-technology
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"operators of general audience sites and services and mixed audience sites and services"
"Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
"COPPA Rule"
"collecting, using, or disclosing personal information collected from a child under 13"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.