Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

State AGs Reach $49.5M Settlement with Blackbaud Over Data Breach

BlackbaudOctober 5, 2023New Jersey Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$49,500,000

Summary

Blackbaud, a software company, experienced a ransomware attack in 2020 that exposed sensitive personal information, including protected health data, due to inadequate security practices and delayed breach notification. A multistate investigation resulted in a $49.5 million settlement, requiring Blackbaud to enhance data security, implement breach response plans, and undergo third-party assessments.

Remedy

Blackbaud must pay $49.5 million to the states, implement and maintain incident response plans, provide assistance to customers for breach notifications, enhance cybersecurity training and resources, implement total database encryption and dark web monitoring, meet specific security requirements, and undergo third-party assessments for seven years.

Monetary PenaltyConsent DecreeAudit RequirementCompliance ProgramReporting Requirements

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor and customer agreements where Blackbaud acts as a data processor or service provider, particularly those involving protected health information (PHI) or other sensitive personal data. Key clauses to scrutinize include data security obligations (e.g., encryption, access controls), breach notification timelines and procedures, HIPAA compliance terms (including Business Associate Agreement requirements), audit and assessment rights, indemnification provisions, and data retention/deletion schedules. Given the settlement's focus on inadequate security and delayed notification, contracts may need amendments to mandate specific security controls (like multi-factor authentication), shorten notification windows (e.g., 72 hours), require regular third-party security audits, and impose clearer PHI handling and subprocessor management requirements to ensure compliance with state consumer protection and breach notification laws.

Contract Search Terms

HIPAA Business Associate Agreementdata encryption standardsincident response planbreach notification timelinesecurity audit requirementsprotected health information (PHI) handlingthird-party security assessmentsdata retention policysubprocessor managementsecurity incident reporting

Laws Cited

state consumer protection lawsstate breach notification lawsHIPAA

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Blackbaud

Industry

Technology

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Blackbaud"
Fine Amount
"$49.5 million"
Laws Cited
"state consumer protection laws, breach notification laws, and the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”)"
Violation Types
"by failing to implement reasonable data security and remediate known security gaps, which allowed unauthorized persons to gain access to Blackbaud’s network, and then failing to provide its customers with timely, complete, or accurate information regarding the breach"

Related Enforcement Actions

CA

Blackbaud

$6.8M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a $6.75 million settlement with software company Blackbaud over a 2020 data breach that exposed consumers' personal information including Social Security numbers, bank account details, and medical data. Blackbaud was found to have inadequate data security practices, failed to timely and accurately notify impacted individuals of the breach, and made misleading public disclosures about the breach and its pre-breach security measures. The settlement requires Blackbaud to pay penalties and implement enhanced data security and breach notification protocols.

NY

Blackbaud

$49.5M

Blackbaud, a cloud company providing donor management software, experienced a 2020 data breach exposing personal information of millions of donors through its nonprofit customers. A multistate investigation found Blackbaud failed to implement adequate data security and delayed breach notifications. As a result, Blackbaud agreed to pay $49.5 million and overhaul its security practices.

NJ

Match Group, Inc.

$650K

The New Jersey Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs announced that Match Group, Inc. will pay $650,000 and change its business practices to settle allegations that it misrepresented or failed to disclose its criminal background screening policies and practices to New Jersey users, violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Internet Dating Safety Act. Under a Consent Order, Match must accurately represent its screening policies, notify existing New Jersey members of updated disclosures within 150 days, and post clear and conspicuous disclosures and safety notifications about the limitations of criminal background screenings.

NJ

Amazon

On August 31, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs joined the FTC and a bipartisan coalition of 21 other states in suing Amazon, alleging that for over seven years the company secretly rigged its advertising auctions—converting advertised 'second price' auctions into first-price auctions with hidden 'soft reserve price' surcharges—overcharging more than 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses and extracting tens of billions of dollars. The complaint alleges Amazon actively concealed the surcharges, gave false and misleading answers to advertisers who asked directly about the auction format, and applied inflated upcharges on high-volume shopping days like Prime Day and Black Friday. The lawsuit was just filed; no penalties or remedies have been imposed yet.

NJ

Meta Platforms, Inc.

A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general led by New Jersey, California, Colorado, and Kentucky is taking Meta Platforms, Inc. to trial, alleging that Meta designed addictive features on Instagram and Facebook that harm minors' mental health, illegally collected data from children under 13 without the required protections under COPPA, and misled users about platform safety. Opening arguments begin August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No monetary penalty or final remedy has yet been imposed.

NJ

U.S. Department of Transportation

A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and Pennsylvania filed lawsuits against the Trump Administration, DOT, FMCSA, DHS, and AAMVA to prevent the unlawful demand for a database containing personal information of 17 million commercial driver's license holders. The lawsuits allege violations of federal privacy laws and the Administrative Procedure Act, and seek an emergency order to block the data transfer.