Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

Multistate Settlement with Hyundai and Kia Over Missing Anti-Theft Vehicle Technology

Hyundai and KiaDecember 16, 2025New Jersey Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$4,500,000

Summary

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin announced a multistate settlement with Hyundai and Kia over the sale of millions of U.S. vehicles lacking industry-standard anti-theft engine immobilizer technology, which contributed to a surge in auto thefts. The settlement requires the manufacturers to equip all future U.S.-sold vehicles with immobilizers, offer free ignition cylinder protectors to eligible owners, provide up to $4.5 million in consumer restitution for theft damage, and pay $4.5 million to the coalition states. The 36-state coalition is led by Connecticut, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, with New Jersey as a co-lead.

Remedy

Hyundai and Kia must equip all future vehicles sold in the United States with industry-standard engine immobilizer anti-theft technology and offer free zinc-reinforced ignition cylinder protectors to eligible vehicle owners and lessees. The manufacturers will provide up to $4.5 million in restitution to consumers whose vehicles were damaged by theft, and pay $4.5 million to the coalition states to cover investigation costs. Eligible consumers have one year from notice to schedule protector installation, and those with qualifying theft-related expenses incurred on or after April 29, 2025, may file restitution claims.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsInjunctionConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams at automotive manufacturers should review parts supplier agreements to explicitly mandate industry-standard anti-theft technology like engine immobilizers in all future vehicle production contracts. Dealer agreements must be updated to require free installation of zinc-reinforced ignition cylinder protectors for eligible consumers, with clear timelines for notification and service. Consumer lease and sales contracts should include disclosures about anti-theft features, restitution eligibility criteria, and claim filing processes. Additionally, compliance teams should review settlement consent decrees to ensure adherence to injunctive relief requirements, including restitution claim processing deadlines and reporting obligations to coalition states.

Contract Search Terms

anti-theft technology requirementsengine immobilizer clauseignition cylinder protectortheft restitutionconsumer restitution agreementmultistate settlement compliancefuture vehicle equipment mandatesinvestigation cost reimbursement

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Hyundai and Kia

Industry

Automotive

Multistate Coalition

ConnecticutMinnesotaNew HampshireCaliforniaDelawareIllinoisMarylandNevadaWashingtonArizonaColoradoDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMassachusettsMichiganMississippiNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth DakotaVermontWisconsin

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"automobile manufacturers Hyundai and Kia"
Event Date
"For Immediate Release: December 16, 2025"
Fine Amount
"Pay $4.5 million to the states to defray the costs of the investigation."
Is Multistate
"coalition of 35 other states"
Summary
"sale of millions of vehicles nationwide that lacked industry-standard, anti-theft technology"
Remedy Types
"Equip all future vehicles sold in the United States with industry-standard, engine immobilizer anti-theft technology;"

Related Enforcement Actions

OR

Hyundai and Kia

$4.5M

Consumer protection case where Hyundai and Kia settled for selling millions of vehicles without industry-standard anti-theft technology, leading to a nationwide surge in thefts and public safety risks. The settlement requires free hardware fixes for affected vehicles and restitution for consumers.

CT

Hyundai and Kia

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong launched a consumer protection investigation into Hyundai and Kia for failing to equip vehicles with standard anti-theft immobilizers between 2011 and 2022, leading to high theft rates and public safety concerns. The investigation seeks records on the companies' decision-making and potential fixes, following a coalition of attorneys general calling for a federal recall.

NJ

Trump Administration

A multistate coalition co-led by New Jersey won a federal court order rejecting the Trump Administration’s decision not to request funding for the CFPB. The order struck down that decision and directed the Administration to follow the law and fund the agency; no monetary penalty or privacy violation is described.

NJ

Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, MGM-15, and MGM-16

New Jersey’s Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs alerted the public that three synthetic kratom-related compounds became illegal to possess or sell in the state under a temporary federal scheduling order. The release describes a controlled-substance alert, not a privacy enforcement action, and identifies no company, privacy violation, or monetary penalty.

NJ

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)

$2.3M

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings agreed to pay $2,287,455 to participating states and strengthen its security and vendor-management practices following an investigation into the 2019 breach at its debt-collection vendor, AMCA. The breach potentially exposed information of more than 27.5 million people nationwide, including sensitive information belonging to approximately 10.2 million LabCorp patients.

NJ

Credit Acceptance Corporation (CAC)

$694.0M

New Jersey's Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs, along with 41 Attorneys General, reached a $694 million settlement with subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation over allegations it originated unaffordable loans its own systems predicted borrowers could not repay, employed aggressive debt-collection tactics, and failed to prevent deceptive vehicle-service contract and GAP product 'packing' by dealers. The multistate settlement stepped in after the CFPB permanently dropped its 2023 enforcement action against CAC in 2025. CAC will provide $60 million in cash restitution, $634 million in debt relief, an additional $15 million to the states, and implement injunctive lending reforms including loan off ramps, pre-loan disclosures, add-on packing safeguards, and a seven-year vehicle price cap. Note: this is a consumer-protection lending enforcement action, not a privacy matter; violation categories are best-fit mappings from the available taxonomy.