Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow Risk

FTC Sues Amare Global Holdings for Misrepresenting Health Benefits of Dietary Supplements

Amare Global Holdings Inc.June 2, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC sued Amare Global Holdings Inc. and its principals for falsely claiming that dietary supplements like Kids Happy Juice and Kids Mood+ could treat or cure depression, anxiety, and ADHD in children and adults. The FTC also alleged the company misled recruits about their potential earnings as 'brand partners' in its multilevel marketing scheme.

Remedy

The FTC seeks to stop the defendants from making false, misleading, and unsubstantiated health claims and deceptive earnings claims, and to require corrective actions.

InjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house teams should review vendor, influencer, and brand partner agreements for clauses related to health claims substantiation, earnings representations, and compliance with FTC orders. Ensure contracts require distributors and affiliates to have competent and reliable scientific evidence before making product claims, and include indemnification for deceptive marketing. Also review supplier and manufacturing agreements for quality control and substantiation obligations.

Contract Search Terms

health claims substantiationdietary supplement marketingearnings claimsmultilevel marketing agreementbrand partner agreementscientific substantiation clauseprior FTC order compliancetestimonial disclosureinfluencer contractincome representations

Laws Cited

15 U.S.C. §45

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Amare Global Holdings Inc.

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Amare Global Holdings Inc."
Laws Cited
"violated the FTC Act"
Violation Types
"false, misleading and unsubstantiated claims"
Violation Types
"deceptive earnings claims"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.