Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow Risk

FTC Sues Amare Global Holdings for Misrepresenting Health Benefits of Dietary Supplements

Amare Global Holdings Inc.June 2, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC sued Amare Global Holdings Inc. and its principals for falsely claiming that dietary supplements like Kids Happy Juice and Kids Mood+ could treat or cure depression, anxiety, and ADHD in children and adults. The FTC also alleged the company misled recruits about their potential earnings as 'brand partners' in its multilevel marketing scheme.

Remedy

The FTC seeks to stop the defendants from making false, misleading, and unsubstantiated health claims and deceptive earnings claims, and to require corrective actions.

InjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house teams should review vendor, influencer, and brand partner agreements for clauses related to health claims substantiation, earnings representations, and compliance with FTC orders. Ensure contracts require distributors and affiliates to have competent and reliable scientific evidence before making product claims, and include indemnification for deceptive marketing. Also review supplier and manufacturing agreements for quality control and substantiation obligations.

Contract Search Terms

health claims substantiationdietary supplement marketingearnings claimsmultilevel marketing agreementbrand partner agreementscientific substantiation clauseprior FTC order compliancetestimonial disclosureinfluencer contractincome representations

Laws Cited

15 U.S.C. §45

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Amare Global Holdings Inc.

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Amare Global Holdings Inc."
Laws Cited
"violated the FTC Act"
Violation Types
"false, misleading and unsubstantiated claims"
Violation Types
"deceptive earnings claims"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman

The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Accelerated Debt Settlement Inc.; ADS Resolve LLC; Financial Solutions Group LLC; Unified Capital Services LLC; Mediwerks; Resolution Specialists LLC; and Futura Capital

$106.8M

A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.