Ascension Data & Analytics, LLC, a mortgage analytics company, settled FTC allegations that it violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's Safeguards Rule by failing to ensure its vendor adequately protected consumer data. The vendor stored sensitive mortgage information in plain text on a cloud server, leading to unauthorized access. Ascension must implement a data security program, undergo biennial assessments, and report future breaches.
Ascension must implement a comprehensive data security program, undergo biennial independent assessments of its data security program, have a senior executive certify annual compliance, and report any future data breaches to the FTC within 10 days.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, data processing, and service agreements where the vendor handles sensitive consumer financial data (e.g., mortgage information). Focus on clauses requiring data security measures, vendor oversight rights, audit provisions, breach notification obligations, and indemnification for data incidents. Specific changes may include: (1) mandating compliance with the GLBA Safeguards Rule; (2) requiring vendors to implement and document an information security program; (3) granting the company explicit rights to audit vendor security practices; (4) obligating vendors to report security incidents promptly; and (5) including contractual remedies for failures to protect data, such as termination rights or liability for breach-related costs.
Entity
Ascension Data & Analytics, LLC
Also known as: Ascension Data & Analytics
Industry
Financial ServicesOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/12/mortgage-analytics-company-settles-ftc-allegations-it-failed-ensure-vendor-was-adequately-protecting
1923126ascensioncomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1923126ascensioncomplaint.pdf
1923126ascensionacco
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1923126ascensionacco.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Texas-based Ascension Data & Analytics, LLC"
"Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s Safeguards Rule"
"stored the contents of the documents on a cloud-based server in plain text, without any protections to block unauthorized access"
The FTC settled with Ascension Data & Analytics, LLC for violating the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's Safeguards Rule by failing to ensure its vendor properly protected consumer data. The company must strengthen its security safeguards and increase oversight of vendors. No monetary penalty was imposed.
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.