Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium Risk

FTC Returns Money to Consumers Harmed by Trend Deploy’s Deceptive Marketing

Frank RomeroAugust 1, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$672,000

Consumers Affected

9,419

Summary

The FTC is returning over $672,000 to consumers who were deceived by Frank Romero, operator of Trend Deploy, for violating the Mail Order Rule. The court order required Romero to pay the FTC, and the FTC is now distributing refunds to 9,419 affected consumers.

Remedy

Frank Romero agreed to a court order requiring payment to the FTC for Mail Order Rule violations. The FTC is using the funds to provide refunds to affected consumers.

Monetary Penalty

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review customer-facing terms of sale, shipping policies, and refund policies to ensure compliance with the FTC's Mail Order Rule. They should also review vendor agreements with fulfillment providers to ensure they can meet shipping deadlines and provide required notices to consumers. Clauses related to order fulfillment, shipping timelines, and consumer refunds should be updated to include explicit consent and notice procedures.

Contract Search Terms

mail order ruleshipping delayrefund policyconsent to delaynotice of delaydeceptive marketingFTC Actconsumer protection

Laws Cited

FTC ActMail Order Rule
16 CFR Part 435

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Frank Romero

Industry

Advertising

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"operator of Trend Deploy, Frank Romero"
Fine Amount
"more than $672,000"
Laws Cited
"Mail Order Rule Violations"
Violation Types
"deceptive marketing"
Consumers Affected
"9,419 checks"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Hims & Hers

The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.

FTC

Elite Events and Tickets LLC

$300K

The FTC alleged that Elite Events and Tickets LLC, doing business as Smart Scalpers, violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act by circumventing security measures to bypass ticket purchase limits for over 2,400 events, reselling tickets at a profit. The proposed order requires payment of $300,000 (with a total penalty of $10.7 million partially suspended) and permanently prohibits the company and its owners from engaging in such circumvention tactics.

FTC

Dennise Merdjanian

$45.9M

The FTC permanently banned Dennise Merdjanian from the debt relief industry and telemarketing after she and Superior Servicing LLC allegedly ran a student loan forgiveness scam that took more than $45.9 million from consumers. The proposed stipulated order imposes a partially suspended monetary judgment and resolves the FTC's litigation against the remaining defendants.

FTC

Alexander Mashinsky, Shlomi Daniel Leon, and Hanoch Goldstein

$16.5M

The FTC charged the founders of Celsius Network with deceiving consumers by falsely promising that cryptocurrency deposits were safe and always available. The founders agreed to pay $16.5 million and are banned from marketing or selling products that can be used to deposit or withdraw assets, among other restrictions.

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized a settlement with Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals over allegations that they deceptively advertised height-enhancing supplements for children and teenagers without competent and reliable scientific evidence. The FTC also alleged that TruHeight used fake social media bot profiles and relied on reviews written by employees, vendors, or consumers who received free products or discounts for 5-star reviews. Under the final order, TruHeight must pay $750,000 and is barred from making unsupported health claims or misrepresenting reviews.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the FCRA by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its consumer reports, failing to disclose sources of data, and mishandling consumer disputes. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further violations.