Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow Risk

FTC Sues Genesis Tech Enterprise for Unlawful Subscription Schemes

Genesis Tech enterpriseJune 17, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC sued the Genesis Tech enterprise and its owners for operating deceptive internet-based subscription schemes. The defendants allegedly misled consumers about subscription terms, billed without authorization, and made cancellation difficult. The court granted a temporary halt to the operations pending trial.

Remedy

A federal court temporarily halted the enterprise's deceptive subscription schemes pending trial. No monetary penalty or other remedies have been imposed yet.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements for subscription-based services, particularly clauses related to auto-renewal, cancellation mechanisms, and disclosure of material terms. Ensure contracts require clear and conspicuous disclosure of subscription terms, explicit consumer consent before billing, and simple cancellation processes. Also review payment processing agreements to ensure compliance with ROSCA and FTC Act requirements regarding negative option marketing.

Contract Search Terms

subscription cancellationauto-renewal disclosurenegative optionconsent to chargemoney-back guaranteerecurring billingmaterial terms disclosurecancellation mechanism

Laws Cited

FTC ActRestore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Genesis Tech enterprise

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Genesis Tech enterprise"
Violation Types
"Failure to disclose material terms"
Violation Types
"Charges without authorization"
Violation Types
"Failure to provide simple cancellation mechanisms"
Laws Cited
"FTC Act"
Laws Cited
"Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA)"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman

The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Accelerated Debt Settlement Inc.; ADS Resolve LLC; Financial Solutions Group LLC; Unified Capital Services LLC; Mediwerks; Resolution Specialists LLC; and Futura Capital

$106.8M

A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.