Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh Risk

FTC Penalizes GoodRx $1.5M for Sharing Health Data for Ads

GoodRx Holdings Inc.February 1, 2023Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$1,500,000

Consumers Affected

55,000,000

Summary

The FTC settled with GoodRx for sharing consumers' sensitive prescription and health information with Facebook, Google, and other third parties for advertising without consent, and for failing to report these unauthorized disclosures as required by the Health Breach Notification Rule. GoodRx will pay a $1.5 million civil penalty and is permanently barred from sharing user health data for advertising.

Remedy

GoodRx must pay a $1.5 million penalty. It is permanently prohibited from sharing user health information with third parties for advertising. For any other sharing, it must obtain users' affirmative express consent. The company must direct third parties to delete the shared health data, inform consumers about the breaches, implement a comprehensive privacy program, limit data retention, and publicly post its data retention schedule.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeData DeletionCompliance ProgramCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving the handling of consumer health data, including vendor contracts with advertising platforms (e.g., Facebook, Google), customer terms of service, and data processing agreements. Specific clauses to scrutinize are those governing data sharing, consent mechanisms for advertising, breach notification procedures, and restrictions on the use of sensitive health information. Changes may be required to explicitly prohibit sharing user health data for advertising without prior opt-in consent, mandate prompt breach reporting under the Health Breach Notification Rule, and ensure all third-party data transfers comply with health privacy regulations.

Contract Search Terms

health data advertising consentunauthorized disclosure clausebreach reporting requirementHealth Breach Notification Rule compliancethird-party data sharingsensitive health information protectionprescription data use restrictionconsumer health datadata processing addendumadvertising use restriction

Laws Cited

FTC ActHealth Breach Notification Rule

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

GoodRx Holdings Inc.

Also known as: GoodRx

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"GoodRx Holdings Inc."
Fine Amount
"pay a $1.5 million civil penalty"
Violation Types
"sharing sensitive personal health information—including its users’ prescription medications and personal health conditions—with third party advertising companies and advertising platforms like Facebook, Google, and Criteo"
Violation Types
"failed to notify consumers, the FTC, and the media about the company’s unauthorized disclosure of individually identifiable health information"
Violation Types
"prohibits the company from using manipulative designs, known as dark patterns, to obtain users’ consent"
Laws Cited
"violating the Health Breach Notification Rule"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.