Penalty Amount
$8,390,026
Consumer fraud case where the FTC and Florida shut down RivX for deceiving consumers with false trucking investment opportunities. The court entered an $8.39 million judgment and banned the defendants from business opportunities. This protects consumers from business opportunity scams.
The court imposed an $8.39 million monetary judgment against the defendants and permanently banned them from engaging in any business or investment opportunity. Diamond Cargo LLC must pay $15,000 and cooperate with the sale of trucks.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and franchise agreements related to business or investment opportunities, particularly those in the transportation or trucking sectors. Focus on clauses governing earnings representations, disclosure requirements (e.g., Franchise Disclosure Documents), and cancellation/termination rights. Specific attention should be paid to the accuracy of financial projections, mandatory risk disclosures, and any provisions that limit liability for misrepresentations. Contracts may need amendments to include stricter verification processes for earnings claims, enhanced disclosure obligations aligned with the FTC Business Opportunity Rule, and clearer cancellation terms to prevent deceptive practices similar to those alleged against RivX.
Entity
RivX Automation Corp.
Also known as: RivX
Industry
TransportationOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/federal-court-permanently-shuts-down-deceptive-trucking-business-opportunity
rivxcomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/rivxcomplaint.pdf
RivX FinalDefaultJudgment
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/RivX-FinalDefaultJudgment.pdf
DiamondCargo FinalOrder 0
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/DiamondCargo-FinalOrder_0.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"RivX Automation Corp."
"$8,390,025.99"
"FTC Act"
"FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule"
"Consumer Review Fairness Act"
"Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act"
$930K
The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.
$4.0M
The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.
The FTC filed a complaint against Credit Glory LLC and related entities for deceptive credit repair practices, including false promises, impersonating debt collectors, charging illegal upfront fees, and using negative option billing without consent. A federal court temporarily halted the operation.
The FTC issued a policy statement abandoning disparate-impact liability, stating it will no longer bring claims based on this theory. It also modified compliance obligations for several companies based on past decisions.
The FTC, along with Utah and California, filed a complaint against Hims & Hers alleging the telehealth provider shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms without consent, and deceived consumers about billing and cancellation practices. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.