Consumer fraud investigation where the FTC is seeking information from 20 universities about whether sports agents are complying with the Sports Agent Responsibility and Trust Act (SPARTA), which requires disclosures to student athletes and notification to schools. The inquiry aims to ensure student athletes are protected from deceptive practices by agents.
In-house legal teams should review agreements involving sports agents, including contracts between agents and student athletes, and any university-agent memoranda or addendums. Key clauses to examine are the mandatory disclosure statement (with SPARTA-specific language), the 72-hour notification requirement to the athlete's school after contract execution, and prohibitions against inducements such as false promises or providing value. Contracts may need amendments to insert SPARTA-compliant disclosure wording, add explicit notification timelines and methods, remove any terms that could constitute inducements, and potentially include compliance certifications or audit rights to ensure ongoing adherence.
Entity
Sports agents
Also known as: Sports Agents
Industry
OtherOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/ftc-seeking-information-20-universities-sports-agents-compliance-law-aimed-protecting-student
model letter sent universities regarding sports agent respon
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/staff-letters/model-letter-sent-universities-regarding-sports-agent-responsibility-trust-act-sparta
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"sports agents who work with student athletes"
"Sports Agent Responsibility and Trust Act (SPARTA)"
"whether sports agents are providing disclosures required under the law"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.