The FTC obtained an injunction against Turbo Solutions Inc. and Alex V. Miller for operating a deceptive credit repair scheme that filed fake identity theft reports without consumers' consent. The scheme charged illegal advance fees and made false promises about removing negative credit items. The court order halts the operation and seeks consumer redress.
The court issued an injunction halting the operations of Turbo Solutions Inc. and Alex V. Miller. The complaint seeks civil penalties and consumer redress.
In-house legal teams should review customer agreements for credit repair services, focusing on clauses governing fee structures to prohibit illegal advance fees, service representations to eliminate false promises about credit removal, consent mechanisms for filing identity theft reports, and compliance warranties ensuring adherence to the Credit Repair Organizations Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule. Changes may include adding explicit terms on fee timing (e.g., prohibiting upfront payments), mandatory consumer consent for report filings, performance metrics or guarantees for credit improvement, and audit provisions to monitor compliance and prevent deceptive practices.
Entity
Turbo Solutions Inc.
Also known as: Turbo Solutions
Industry
Financial ServicesOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/03/ftc-halts-deceptive-credit-repair-operation-filed-fake-identity-theft-complaints
Injunction Alex Miller Turbo Solutions 03.18.2022
/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Injunction%20Alex%20Miller%20Turbo%20Solutions%2003.18.2022.pdf
AlexMillerComplaint
/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/AlexMillerComplaint.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Turbo Solutions Inc."
"Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA)"
"Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR)"
"filed false identity theft reports—usually without customers’ knowledge"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.