Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementLow Risk

FTC Finalizes Zoom Settlement Over Deceptive Security Practices

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.January 19, 2021Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC finalized a settlement with Zoom Video Communications, Inc. for misleading consumers about its data security practices and compromising user security. The settlement requires Zoom to implement a comprehensive security program, review software updates for security flaws, and undergo biennial third-party assessments.

Remedy

Zoom must implement and maintain a comprehensive security program, review software updates for security flaws before release to ensure they don't hamper third-party security features, obtain biennial independent third-party assessments of its security program, and notify the FTC of any data breaches.

Compliance ProgramAudit RequirementReporting RequirementsConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor and customer agreements, particularly those involving software-as-a-service (SaaS) or platform provisions where data security is a material term. Specific clauses to audit include representations and warranties regarding data security measures, obligations to review and test software updates for vulnerabilities, requirements to maintain a documented security program, and breach notification procedures. Agreements may need amendments to explicitly require compliance with a comprehensive, FTC-approved security program, mandate pre-release security testing for updates to prevent degradation of third-party security features, and incorporate obligations for independent biennial security audits. Teams should also ensure contracts with sub-processors or downstream vendors reflect these heightened security obligations.

Contract Search Terms

data security practicessoftware update reviewsecurity flawsthird-party security assessmentbiennial assessmentcomprehensive security programdata breach notificationmisleading security claims

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

Also known as: Zoom

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Zoom Video Communications, Inc."
Violation Types
"allegations it misled consumers about the level of security it provided for its Zoom meetings and compromised the security of some Mac users."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

The FTC settled with Zoom for deceiving users about its encryption security and unfairly installing software that bypassed browser safeguards. Zoom must implement a comprehensive security program, undergo biennial audits, and is banned from making false security claims. No monetary penalty was imposed.

FTC

12 Unnamed Nudify Tool Providers

The FTC sent warning letters to 12 companies offering 'nudify' tools that generate nonconsensual intimate images, for failing to comply with the TAKE IT DOWN Act (TIDA) by not providing a mechanism for victims to request removal of such content. The letters urge immediate compliance with TIDA, which requires platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate images within 48 hours of a valid request. Noncompliant companies may face future legal action and civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation.

FTC

Covered Platforms

The FTC began enforcing the TAKE IT DOWN Act on May 19, 2026, a law requiring covered platforms to establish a process for victims to request removal of nonconsensual intimate images and delete such content within 48 hours of a valid request. The agency launched a consumer complaint portal, issued compliance guidance for businesses and consumers, and sent reminder letters to major platforms including Meta, TikTok, and X about their obligations under the law. No specific penalties or enforcement actions against individual companies were announced in this release.

FTC

Cliq Inc.

$6.5M

A federal court held Cliq Inc. and its executives Andrew Phillips and John Blaugrund in civil contempt for multiple violations of a 2015 FTC order requiring the payment processor to prevent enabling consumer fraud. The court found the defendants facilitated fraud by processing transactions for high-risk merchants, avoiding fraud monitoring, failing to conduct required underwriting, and ignoring chargeback thresholds. The court imposed $6.5 million in civil contempt sanctions against the defendants.

FTC

Chris Terry, Isis Terry, IM Mastery Academy, IYOVIA, iMarketsLive, IM Academy

$795.8M

The FTC and State of Nevada settled charges with lead defendants of the IM Mastery Academy MLM scheme, including Chris and Isis Terry and their affiliated companies, over false earnings claims used to promote financial training programs and a multi-level marketing venture. The stipulated order imposes a $795.8 million judgment, with defendants surrendering nearly $90 million in assets including luxury real estate, vehicles, jewelry, and a yacht, totaling over $100 million with prior judgments from other involved defendants. The order also bans defendants from selling trading-training services, prohibits false earnings claims, and restricts deceptive practices including negative-option misrepresentations and telemarketing violations.

FTC

B.E.S.T. GDR LLC, d/b/a Premium Home Service

The FTC and State of Illinois, via the Department of Justice, filed a complaint against B.E.S.T. GDR LLC (d/b/a Premium Home Service) and its owner Yosef Bernath for creating thousands of fake home repair business listings with fabricated five-star reviews to deceive consumers. The defendants allegedly routed consumer calls to unqualified representatives, arranged for unlicensed technicians, and violated the FTC Act, Reviews and Testimonials Rule, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and Illinois consumer protection laws. No monetary penalty has been imposed yet as the case is in initial filing stages.