The FTC settled with Zoom for deceiving users about its encryption security and unfairly installing software that bypassed browser safeguards. Zoom must implement a comprehensive security program, undergo biennial audits, and is banned from making false security claims. No monetary penalty was imposed.
Zoom must establish and implement a comprehensive information security program with annual risk assessments, vulnerability management, multi-factor authentication, and data deletion controls. It is prohibited from making misrepresentations about privacy and security. The company must undergo biennial third-party security audits and notify the FTC of any data breaches.
In-house legal teams should review vendor, customer, and data processing agreements for clauses related to security representations, encryption standards, and software installation. Specifically, examine any warranties or descriptions of security features (e.g., 'end-to-end encryption'), terms governing the installation of additional software or plugins, and provisions requiring compliance with specific security programs or audits. Given the FTC's findings, agreements may need amendments to ensure all security claims are accurate and non-misleading, incorporate requirements for a comprehensive security program akin to Zoom's mandated program, and include explicit user consent mechanisms for any software that interacts with or bypasses browser safeguards. Additionally, audit rights and reporting obligations should be strengthened to align with the biennial audit requirement.
Entity
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Also known as: Zoom
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/11/ftc-requires-zoom-enhance-its-security-practices-part-settlement
1923167zoomacco2
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1923167zoomacco2.pdf
1923167zoomcomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1923167zoomcomplaint.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Zoom Video Communications, Inc."
"FTC Act"
"misled users by touting that it offered “end-to-end, 256-bit encryption”"
"secretly installed software, called a ZoomOpener web server"
The FTC finalized a settlement with Zoom Video Communications, Inc. for misleading consumers about its data security practices and compromising user security. The settlement requires Zoom to implement a comprehensive security program, review software updates for security flaws, and undergo biennial third-party assessments.
$750K
The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.
$2.3M
The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.
The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.
$35.0M
The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.
$1.5M
The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.