Penalty Amount
$49,500
Consumers Affected
2,432
The FTC settled with genetic testing company 1Health.io for failing to secure sensitive genetic and health data, deceiving consumers about data deletion, and unfairly changing its privacy policy without notice or consent. The settlement includes refunds totaling over $49,500 to 2,432 affected consumers.
The company must provide refunds to affected consumers totaling more than $49,500.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements (if 1Health.io is a service provider), customer/consumer agreements, and data processing addendums. Key clauses to examine include data security obligations (ensuring they specify industry-standard protections for sensitive genetic/health data), data deletion procedures (verifying enforceable deletion guarantees and processes), privacy policy modification terms (checking for requirements around notice and consent before changes), and data inventory maintenance commitments. Potential changes needed: add explicit security requirements with audit rights, mandate verifiable deletion processes with confirmation, require advance notice and affirmative consent for policy updates, and include provisions for regular security assessments and inventory upkeep.
Entity
1Health.io
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/09/ftc-sends-refunds-consumers-deceived-genetic-testing-firm-1healthio-over-data-deletion-security
ftc says genetic testing company 1health failed protect priv
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/06/ftc-says-genetic-testing-company-1health-failed-protect-privacy-security-dna-data-unfairly-changed
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"1Health.io"
"left sensitive genetic and health data unsecured"
"deceived consumers about their ability to get their data deleted"
"without notifying consumers or obtaining their consent"
"genetic and health data"
$75K
The FTC finalized an order against 1Health.io for failing to secure genetic data and unfairly changing its privacy policy. The company must pay $75,000 for consumer refunds, destroy DNA samples, and implement security measures. It deceived consumers about data deletion and shared data without proper consent.
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.