Penalty Amount
$16,500,000
The FTC finalized an order against Avast for selling consumers' web browsing data for advertising after promising privacy protection. Avast must pay $16.5 million, is banned from selling such data, must delete collected data, obtain consent, notify consumers, and implement a privacy program.
Avast must pay $16.5 million, is prohibited from selling or licensing web browsing data for advertising, must delete all transferred browsing data, obtain affirmative consent before selling data from non-Avast products, notify affected consumers, and implement a comprehensive privacy program.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements (especially those involving data sharing or licensing), customer-facing agreements (privacy policies, terms of service), and any data processing agreements. Focus on clauses governing data sharing, licensing, or sale; consent mechanisms; data retention and deletion obligations; and representations regarding privacy protections. Changes may be needed to explicitly prohibit the sale or licensing of browsing data for advertising, mandate clear and affirmative consumer consent before any such sharing, require deletion of previously collected browsing data, and incorporate obligations to implement a comprehensive privacy program consistent with the FTC order.
Entity
Avast Limited
Also known as: Avast
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/06/ftc-finalizes-order-avast-banning-it-selling-or-licensing-web-browsing-data-advertising-requiring-it
202 3033 avast final consent package
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/202_3033_-_avast_final_consent_package.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Avast Limited"
"$16.5 million"
"sold it without adequate notice and without consumer consent"
$750K
The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.
$2.3M
The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.
The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.
$35.0M
The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.
$1.5M
The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.
The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.