Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium RiskMultistate

FTC Returns Nearly $3 Million to Consumers Deceived by Mortgage Relief Scheme

Golden Home ServicesJune 9, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$3,000,000

Consumers Affected

1,821

Summary

The FTC is returning nearly $3 million to consumers deceived by the Golden Home Services mortgage relief scheme, which falsely promised to reduce homeowners' mortgage payments and prevent foreclosures. A federal court banned the companies and their operators from telemarketing and debt relief businesses and required them to pay millions. The refunds are being mailed to 1,821 affected homeowners.

Remedy

The court banned the companies and operators from telemarketing and debt relief businesses, required them to pay millions of dollars, and the FTC is returning nearly $3 million to 1,821 affected homeowners via mailed checks.

Monetary PenaltyBanConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with mortgage relief or debt relief service providers, focusing on clauses related to truthful advertising, compliance with FTC rules on telemarketing and debt relief, and indemnification for deceptive practices. Customer agreements should be checked for clear disclosures about services and fees, and any clauses that could be interpreted as false promises. Employee contracts should include training requirements on regulatory compliance and prohibitions against misleading marketing.

Contract Search Terms

mortgage reliefdebt relieftelemarketing banconsumer refundsforeclosure preventionfalse promisesfinancial services agreementcompliance program

Laws Cited

FTC Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Golden Home Services

Industry

Financial Services

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Golden Home Services"
Fine Amount
"nearly $3 million"
Violation Types
"falsely promised to reduce homeowners’ mortgage payments and prevent foreclosures"
Remedy Types
"banned these companies and their operators from the telemarketing and debt relief businesses"
Consumers Affected
"1,821 affected homeowners"
Co Enforcers
"California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.