Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

FTC and States Settle Kars-R-Us.com for $3.88M Over Deceptive Charity Fundraising

Kars-R-Us.com, Inc.September 26, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$3,882,091

Consumers Affected

84,000

Summary

The FTC and 19 states settled with Kars-R-Us.com, Inc. and its operators for deceptive charity fundraising claims, where only 0.28% of over $45 million raised was used for breast cancer screenings. Operators face permanent fundraising bans and a $3.88 million monetary judgment.

Remedy

Kars and its operators are permanently banned from fundraising and making misrepresentations, must substantiate all claims, and pay a monetary judgment of $3,882,091, with full amount payable if they misrepresent financial status.

BanInjunctionConsent DecreeMonetary Penalty

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor contracts for clauses related to charitable fundraising representations, ensuring requirements for substantiating claims, prohibitions on misrepresentations, and audit provisions to monitor fund usage. Contracts should include clear terms on how donations are used and penalties for non-compliance, and consider bans on fundraising activities for violators.

Contract Search Terms

charitable fundraisingdeceptive marketingclaim substantiationdonation usage disclosurefundraising service agreementmisrepresentation prohibitionaudit rightsconsumer protection compliancecharity fraudfundraising bans

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Kars-R-Us.com, Inc.

Also known as: Kars-R-Us.com

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Kars-R-Us.com, Inc. (Kars)"
Fine Amount
"a total monetary judgment of $3,882,091"
Violation Types
"Kars claimed that vehicle donations would allow UBCF to “save lives” by providing free and low-cost breast cancer screenings. But, in reality, only $126,815 or 0.28% of the more than $45 million that Kars raised was used to provide breast cancer screenings"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Vanilla Chip LLC

$750K

The FTC finalized an order against Vanilla Chip LLC (doing business as TruHeight) and its principals for deceptively advertising height-enhancing supplements for children and teens without scientific evidence. The company also used fake reviews and incentivized 5-star ratings. The order requires a $750,000 payment and prohibits false health claims and deceptive review practices.

FTC

RentGrow Inc.

$2.3M

The FTC alleged that RentGrow, a tenant screening company, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by failing to use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of its reports, including by reporting duplicate records and failing to disclose data sources. RentGrow agreed to pay a $2.25 million penalty and is prohibited from further FCRA violations and from misrepresenting dispute outcomes.

FTC

Handy Technologies

The FTC and New York Attorney General took action against Handy Technologies for deceptive earnings claims and failure to disclose fees and fines that led to millions of dollars being withheld from workers' wages. The FTC is sending over $2.7 million in refunds to 62,893 affected consumers.

FTC

Hopper Inc.

$35.0M

The FTC alleged that Hopper, a travel booking app, charged consumers hidden and pre-selected fees (Tip and VIP Support) without their consent, misrepresented the benefits of VIP Support and Price Freeze services, and failed to clearly disclose total prices. Hopper agreed to pay $35 million for consumer redress and is prohibited from misrepresenting fees under a proposed order.

FTC

Publishing.com LLC

$1.5M

The FTC finalized a settlement with Publishing.com LLC and its principals for misleading consumers about potential earnings from self-publishing products. The company will pay $1.5 million and is prohibited from making unsubstantiated earnings claims, failing to disclose refund terms, and misrepresenting endorsements and reviews.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing concerns that AI companies may be manipulating AI system outputs contrary to consumer expectations for objectivity and accuracy. The statement explains that such conduct could be considered deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The public comment period runs until July 31, 2026.