The FTC settled with data brokers X-Mode Social and Outlogic for selling precise location data without informed consent and failing to protect sensitive information. The proposed order bans the sale of sensitive location data, requires deletion of collected data, and mandates a comprehensive privacy program. This is the FTC's first action against a data broker for sensitive location data practices.
The proposed order bans X-Mode/Outlogic from selling or sharing sensitive location data, requires deletion of previously collected location data, mandates a comprehensive privacy program, implements supplier assessments, and provides consumers with ways to withdraw consent and delete their data.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and data processing agreements where location data is collected, shared, or sold. Focus on clauses defining data scope (especially 'sensitive location data' covering medical clinics, places of worship, shelters), consent mechanisms for geolocation tracking, third-party data sharing/sale permissions, data security obligations, and data retention/deletion policies. Changes may be needed to prohibit the sale of sensitive location data, require explicit opt-in consent for precise location collection, impose stricter security safeguards on third-party data use, and align retention/deletion practices with the order's mandate to delete collected data.
Entity
X-Mode Social and Outlogic, LLC
Also known as: X-Mode Social
Industry
Data BrokerOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/01/ftc-order-prohibits-data-broker-x-mode-social-outlogic-selling-sensitive-location-data
X Mode Complaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/X-Mode-Complaint.pdf
X Mode D&O
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/X-Mode-D%26O.pdf
statement chair lina m khan matter x mode social inc outlogi
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/public-statements/statement-chair-lina-m-khan-matter-x-mode-social-inc-outlogic-llc
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"X-Mode Social and Outlogic"
"FTC Act"
"selling raw location data, failing to obtain informed consumer consent"
The FTC filed a complaint alleging that GovAssist LLC, Entry LLC, and Scott Zuckerman used deceptive paid search ads, misleading service and pricing claims, and fake reviews to deceive consumers seeking passport services. The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the case will be decided by the court, and no penalty or remedy is reported as imposed.
The FTC issued its annual report to Congress describing fraud trends affecting older adults and the agency’s enforcement, education, and outreach efforts. The report is not a specific privacy enforcement action and announces no penalty or remedy.
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
$106.8M
A federal court entered a $106.8 million default judgment against corporate defendants in an alleged debt-relief scheme that impersonated banks and government entities and targeted seniors and veterans. The judgment permanently bans the defendants from the debt-relief industry and imposes additional prohibitions, including on impersonation, telemarketing, and misrepresentations.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.