Court Rules

Privacy Enforcement Tracker

1,285 enforcement actions from 14 federal and state jurisdictions. Every event traced back to its official government source.

1,285

Total Actions

14

Jurisdictions

$35.3B+

Total Fines Tracked

Access this data programmatically:MCP Server API Docs
NJEnforcement ActionMultistate

Michael D. Lansky, LLC(Avid Telecom)

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin joined a multistate lawsuit against Avid Telecom for allegedly initiating and facilitating billions of illegal robocalls, including to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule. The company is accused of transmitting scam calls and ignoring warnings from the Industry Traceback Group.

LowOpt-Out FailureConsent Failure
CTEnforcement ActionMultistate

Michael D. Lansky, LLC(Avid Telecom)

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong filed a lawsuit against Michael D. Lansky, LLC (Avid Telecom) for allegedly initiating billions of illegal robocalls, including to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry. The company is accused of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule. This action is part of a multistate task force with nearly every state attorney general.

LowConsent FailureOpt-Out Failure
CTNew Law

Robocall Scammers

Attorney General William Tong and bipartisan legislators announced a bill to modernize Connecticut's anti-robocall laws, which haven't been updated since 2015. The bill would expand coverage to text messages, ban gateway VoIP providers, enforce calls to Connecticut area codes, set calling hour restrictions, strengthen telemarketer disclosures, and clarify Do Not Call List protections.

LowOpt-Out Failure
FTCInvestigation

AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership (Verizon Wireless), Charter Communications Operating LLC, Comcast Cable Communications (Xfinity), T-Mobile US Inc., Google Fiber Inc.(AT&T, Verizon, Charter, Comcast, T-Mobile, Google Fiber)

The FTC released a staff report based on Section 6(b) orders to six major ISPs, finding they collect extensive personal data, including internet traffic and location data, and share it with third parties. The ISPs often obscure data use disclosures in fine print and make it difficult for consumers to opt out, while combining data to profile sensitive characteristics. The report highlights the need for stricter privacy restrictions.

LowOpt-Out FailureNotice FailureUnauthorized Data Sharing

Explore Enforcement Data