Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeLow Risk

FTC Orders Illuminate Education Data Security Program After 10M Student Breach

Illuminate Education, Inc.December 1, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Consumers Affected

10,100,000

Summary

The FTC proposed a consent order against Illuminate Education, Inc. for failing to secure student data, leading to a breach affecting over 10 million students. The company allegedly had security failures and delayed breach notifications. The order requires a data security program, data deletion, and a retention schedule.

Remedy

The proposed consent order prohibits misrepresentations about data security and breach notifications, requires deletion of unnecessary data, implementation of an information security program, adherence to a public data retention schedule, and reporting of data breaches to the FTC if reported elsewhere.

InjunctionData DeletionCompliance ProgramReporting RequirementsConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements where the company acts as a data processor or service provider for educational institutions, including student information system (SIS) contracts, cloud services agreements, and data processing addendums (DPAs). Specific clauses to scrutinize are data security obligations (e.g., requiring industry-standard safeguards like encryption and access controls), breach notification timelines and procedures (ensuring prompt reporting to the company and affected schools), data retention and deletion policies (mandating secure disposal of unnecessary student data), and representations/warranties regarding compliance with student privacy laws (like FERPA). Changes may be needed to mandate a comprehensive, written information security program, require regular security audits by independent third parties, impose stricter data minimization practices, and clarify liability and indemnification for data breaches involving children's sensitive information, including medical diagnoses.

Contract Search Terms

data security programbreach notification clausedata retention schedulestudent data protectioncloud security standardsencryption requirementsaccess controlsdata minimizationthird-party auditorincident response plan

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Illuminate Education, Inc.

Also known as: Illuminate Education

Industry

Education

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Illuminate Education, Inc. (Illuminate)"
Violation Types
"failed to deploy reasonable security measures"
Violation Types
"waited nearly two years to notify some school districts"
Violation Types
"personal data of more than 10 million students"
Violation Types
"children’s medical diagnoses"
Violation Types
"health-related information"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

Illuminate Education, Inc.

$5.1M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with California and New York Attorneys General, settled with Illuminate Education, Inc. for failing to protect student data in a breach that exposed personal information of millions of students. The settlement, the first under Connecticut's Student Data Privacy Law, requires Illuminate to pay $5.1 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

NY

Illuminate Education, Inc.

$5.1M

New York, California, and Connecticut attorneys general reached a $5.1 million settlement with educational technology company Illuminate Education, Inc. for failing to protect student data, resulting in a 2022 breach exposing millions of students’ personal information. The investigation found Illuminate failed to implement basic security measures including data encryption, suspicious activity monitoring, and proper decommissioning of inactive user accounts, and did not delete student data when required by contracts. Illuminate must pay the penalty and implement enhanced data security measures including a comprehensive information security program, encryption of student data, and annual notice to schools about data collection and deletion options.

CA

Illuminate Education, Inc.

$5.1M

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by Connecticut and New York Attorneys General, secured a $5.1 million multistate settlement with edtech company Illuminate Education, Inc. over a 2021 data breach that exposed sensitive personal and medical information of millions of students, including over 434,000 California students. The investigation found Illuminate failed to implement basic security measures, including failing to terminate former employee credentials, lacking suspicious activity monitoring, and unsecured backup databases, as well as making false statements in its privacy policy. Illuminate must pay $3.25 million to California, implement enhanced security practices, and notify the CA DOJ of future student data breaches.

FTC

CMG Media Corporation

$930K

The FTC finalized orders requiring CMG Media Corporation (doing business as Cox Media Group), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC to pay a total of $930,000 for falsely claiming they offered an AI-powered service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. The orders also prohibit the companies from making misrepresentations about their advertising services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.

FTC

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC announced it is seeking public comment on a proposed enforcement policy statement regarding personalized pricing, which is the use of personal data to set prices based on what a company believes an individual consumer is willing to spend. The statement warns that undisclosed collection or use of personal data for personalized pricing could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.

FTC

Chase Nissan LLC

$4.0M

The FTC and Connecticut secured a $4 million settlement with Chase Nissan LLC (doing business as Manchester City Nissan) over allegations the dealership charged consumers unauthorized fees, including double-charging for 'certified pre-owned' vehicles and inserting charges like total loss protection into financing agreements without consent. The settlement requires $4 million in consumer redress, prohibits misrepresentations about vehicle certification and warranties, mandates prominent disclosure of the maximum total vehicle price, and requires express informed consent for all charges.