Court Rules

Privacy Enforcement Tracker

1,285 enforcement actions from 14 federal and state jurisdictions. Every event traced back to its official government source.

1,285

Total Actions

14

Jurisdictions

$35.3B+

Total Fines Tracked

Access this data programmatically:MCP Server API Docs
ORSettlement

Grocery Delivery E-Service USA, Inc., doing business as HelloFresh(HelloFresh)

Consumer protection and advertising enforcement action. Oregon Attorney General secured a settlement with meal-kit company HelloFresh for misleading consumers with deceptive 'free meal,' 'free shipping,' and 'free gift' offers that required hundreds of dollars in purchases to obtain. The company must pay $106,000 and implement comprehensive advertising reforms.

MediumDark PatternsNotice Failure

$106K

CPPASettlement

American Honda Motor Co.(Honda)

The California Privacy Protection Agency settled with American Honda Motor Co. for CCPA violations, including making it difficult for consumers to opt-out of data sharing, using dark patterns in its privacy tool, hindering authorized agent requests, and sharing data with ad tech companies without proper contracts. Honda must pay a $632,500 fine, implement new processes for privacy requests, certify compliance, train employees, and ensure appropriate data sharing contracts.

MediumOpt-Out FailureDark PatternsConsent Failure

$633K

FTCConsent DecreeMultistate

CRI Genetics, LLC(CRI Genetics)

CRI Genetics, LLC was charged by the FTC and California Attorney General for deceptive marketing of DNA testing services, including false accuracy claims, fake reviews, and using dark patterns in billing. The company agreed to a settlement, paying a $700,000 civil penalty, and is prohibited from deceptive practices, must obtain consent for data sharing, and allow data deletion for consumers who requested it.

MediumDark PatternsBiometric Data

$700K

CTEnforcement Action

Vision Solar, LLC(Vision Solar)

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong filed a lawsuit against Vision Solar, LLC for engaging in predatory high-pressure sales tactics, misrepresenting financing and tax credits, and performing unpermitted work that left homeowners with nonfunctioning systems and unaffordable loans. The action seeks restitution for consumers, civil penalties, and injunctive relief to stop the company's unfair and deceptive practices.

MediumConsent FailureDark Patterns

Explore Enforcement Data