Court Rules

Eastern District of Pennsylvania Pre-Motion Conference Requirements

121 rules from official source documents

Pre-motion conference and letter requirements before filing motions, including sequential steps. This page is scoped to Eastern District of Pennsylvania; use the court rules overview to switch categories without leaving this court.

A motion must be filed before requesting a telephone conference, except for deposition disputes; letter motions are prohibited.

The Court will on occasion hold telephone conferences to resolve scheduling matters or discovery disputes. A motion explaining the dispute and requesting a phone conference should first be filed on the record unless it is a dispute arising during a deposition. Letter Motions will not be accepted.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL

Pre-filing conference with opposing counsel required for Rule 12(b)(6), (e), (f) motions, except in pro se, bankruptcy, or social security appeals; motion must include meet-and-confer certification.

Except in cases where either side is pro se, or in bankruptcy or social security appeals, upon the filing of a complaint, the Court will file an order requiring moving counsel, before filing a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), (e), or (f), to first contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading filing of the motion. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution that eliminates the need for any of the above-mentioned motions, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies or matter sought to be stricken. The Court will deny any motion that fails to conform with these requirements.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL

Parties must meet and confer about material facts no later than 14 days before filing any Rule 56 summary judgment motion.

No later than fourteen days before filing any summary judgment motion pursuant to Rule 56, the parties shall meet and confer about the material facts.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL

Meet and confer required at least 5 days before filing discovery, 12(b), or dispositive motions.

Prior to filing discovery motions, 12(b) motions, or other dispositive motions, counsel contemplating the filing of these motions shall contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the anticipated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged deficiencies or to try to resolve the conflict prior to the filing of the Motion. This communication must occur at least five days prior to the filing of the Motion.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Required
Always

Lead trial counsel must attend Rule 16 conference; substitute with deep case knowledge if lead is on trial.

Lead trial counsel must appear for this conference. If lead counsel is on trial, substitute counsel with deep knowledge of the case may attend.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Reply briefs require leave of court, filed within 5 days with email courtesy copy.

Reply briefs are not permitted without leave of court. Motions for Leave to file a Reply shall be docketed within five days of the docketing of the response with a courtesy copy sent to chambers via email to the e-mail listed above.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Meet and confer required before filing any motion in limine.

In an attempt to resolve any evidentiary issue, counsel shall meet and confer in advance of the filing of any motion in limine.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Parties must conduct substantive verbal communications before filing certain motions, with certification required.

The parties shall conduct substantive verbal communications. Exchanges of letters or e- mails are insufficient. A report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made reasonable efforts is likewise insufficient. If the parties cannot reach a resolution that eliminates the need for any of the above-mentioned motions, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies or matter sought to be stricken.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Motions that fail to meet meet-and-confer requirements will be denied.

The Court will deny any 12(b)(6), (e) or (f) motion or discovery motion that fails to conform with these requirements.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Pre-motion conference required before filing a Motion to Compel discovery, including meet-and-confer and a conference with the Court.

A party may not file a Motion to Compel discovery unless: (1) lead counsel have met and conferred in good faith to try to resolve the dispute, and (2) the party has contacted the Court's law clerk (with opposing counsel) to arrange a conference with the Court to summarize the dispute and the parties' respective positions.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Parties must attempt to resolve expert report disputes promptly; unresolved disputes must be raised via the Discovery Dispute Procedure or the objection is waived.

The parties are expected to promptly try to resolve any such disputes, and, when they cannot reasonably be resolved, use the Court's Discovery Dispute Procedure or the complaint will be waived.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Daubert objections must be filed by motion no later than the dispositive motions deadline.

To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL

Rule 56 motions cannot be filed more than 10 days before the dispositive motions deadline without court leave.

No case dispositive motion under Rule 56 may be filed more than ten days before the above date without leave of the Court.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Required
Always

Preliminary pretrial conference scheduled after answer; joint Rule 26(f) report due 3 business days prior

The Court will schedule a preliminary pretrial conference as described in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and (c) shortly after all defendants have answered the Complaint. At least three business days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel must submit to chambers a joint report of the Rule 26(f) meeting with a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f) meeting should take place as early in the case as possible. The meeting should be a meaningful and substantive discussion to formulate the proposed discovery plan required by the Rule. Parties who do not comply will have no voice at the scheduling conference and may be subject to additional sanctions.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL

Lead counsel must attend Rule 16 conference with authority to settle and discuss all claims/defenses

Lead trial counsel must attend the Rule 16 conference. Counsel taking part in any pre-trial conference must be prepared to speak on every subject, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss all claims and defenses in detail, as well as all topics listed in Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b)-(c) and 26(a), and shall have a thorough understanding of the facts of the case. The Court will issue a Rule 16 Scheduling Order following the conference. The Scheduling Order will reflect counsel's input at the conference and the Court's considered assessment of the time necessary to complete discovery and all pretrial submissions.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL

Motions in limine must be filed 10 days before trial.

Judge Schmehl typically requires motions in limine to be filed ten days before trial.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL

Telephone conference with court required before filing discovery motions.

In the event that a discovery dispute requires court intervention, the party contemplating a motion shall seek a telephone conference with the court before filing any motion. If the telephone conference fails to resolve the discovery dispute, the party seeking relief will be permitted to file an appropriate discovery motion.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Required
Always

Initial Rule 26(f) conference must occur no later than 21 days before initial Rule 16 conference.

The parties must conduct an initial Rule 26(f) conference as soon as possible, and in any event no later than 21 days before the initial Rule 16 conference.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL

Only one Rule 56 summary judgment motion allowed per party without leave, within page/word limits

Summary judgment motions. Absent leave, a party is entitled to file only one single Rule 56 motion (at the time designated in the scheduling order) that addresses whatever issues the party wishes to raise within the page or word limit.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL

Moving party must serve statement of undisputed facts 28 days before motion deadline

At least 28 days before the deadline to file a motion, the moving party must serve on all other parties (but not file) a statement of undisputed material facts in a numbered, paragraph-by-paragraph recitation that contains specific citations to exhibits or testimony supporting each factual assertion;

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL

Responding party must serve response to statement of facts 14 days before motion deadline

At least 14 days before the deadline to file a motion, any responding party must serve on all other parties (but not file) a response to the statement of facts that includes the following: (a) the responding party’s response to each factual assertion, which shall be directly under the original paragraph and must include citation to any evidence that the responding party contends creates a material factual dispute and/or any argument for why the evidence that the moving party has cited does not support the factual assertion or is not admissible; and (b) any additional facts that the responding party intends to submit as part of the summary judgment briefing;

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL

Pre-motion conference required 7 days before filing Rule 12(b)(6) motions.

Before filing a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), counsel shall first contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies. This conference shall take place at least seven days prior to the filing of the motion.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL

Certification of substantive verbal pre-motion conference required with Rule 12(b)(6) motions.

If the parties are unable to reach a resolution that eliminates the need for a 12(b)(6) motion, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the 12(b)(6) motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies. These efforts must include substantive verbal communications, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL

Insufficient pre-motion efforts will result in denial of Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

It is not sufficient to report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made “reasonable efforts.” The Court will deny a 12(b)(6) motion that does not meet these requirements.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL

Parties filing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 motions must hold a substantive verbal discussion with opposing counsel before the due date, submit a pre-motion letter if no agreement is reached, attend a pre-motion conference, and receive a briefing schedule if the dispute is unresolved.

Any Party that intends to file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 must contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies. For cases filed in this Court, that conversation must happen at least one week before the due date. For cases removed to this Court, a defendant that seeks to file a motion to dismiss must contact opposing counsel within three business days of the case being assigned to Judge Wolson. Counsel must have a substantive verbal discussion, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient. If the parties cannot reach agreement, then they must submit to Judge Wolson a letter, via email, that does not exceed five single-spaced pages that sets forth each issue to be raised in the motion and each Party’s substantive position with respect to that issue. The parties must submit the letter to Judge Wolson by the deadline to respond to the Complaint, but in cases removed to this Court, the due date is extended by seven days if the parties are submitting a premotion letter. Judge Wolson will then attempt to resolve the dispute at a premotion conference, likely by phone or videoconference. If Judge Wolson cannot resolve the dispute at that conference, or if Judge Wolson determines that the conference will not facilitate resolution, then Judge Wolson will set a briefing schedule for the motion. This procedure may be filed without premotion letters.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL

A telephone conference with Judge Wolson is required before filing any responsive brief for a discovery motion.

Judge Wolson will schedule a telephone conference with counsel to discuss the motion before the filing of any responsive brief.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL

Prior leave of court is required to file a summary judgment motion in a bench trial; leave requests must be sent via letter to Judge Wolson within seven days after the close of discovery, explaining the grounds for the request.

Judge Wolson does not permit summary judgment motions in bench trials without prior leave of court. A party that seeks leave to file a summary judgment motion in a bench trial must send Judge Wolson a letter no more than seven days after the close of discovery explaining the grounds on which the party seeks leave to move.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL

Hearing required for Government continuance requests where defendant does not sign waiver.

For a Government continuance request, where the defendant will not sign a waiver, Judge Wolson will hold a hearing.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL

Continuance requests may not be submitted by letter.

Judge Wolson does not permit continuance requests by letter.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL

Discovery disputes must be addressed by counsel before requesting court intervention, with certification of good faith efforts.

If the parties are unable to resolve a discovery dispute on their own, counsel are to initially send correspondence to the Court briefly describing the dispute and the parties’ respective positions and must certify that all counsel have already made a good faith effort to resolve the issue themselves as required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 26.1, which must describe in detail the efforts the parties made to resolve the dispute on their own.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Required
Always

Final pretrial conference held at least 30 days after discovery closes and during week before trial.

Judge Sánchez regularly lists a final pretrial conference date in the Scheduling Order. Generally, the final pretrial conference will be held no less than 30 days after the close of discovery and during the week preceding the trial date or trial pool to which a case is assigned.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Pending summary judgment motions must be argued at final pretrial conference.

If a motion for summary judgment is pending when the final pretrial conference takes place, counsel must be prepared to argue the motion at the conference.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Motions in limine must meet Scheduling Order deadline; late filings require good cause.

Motions in limine with respect to legal matters that the parties reasonably expect to arise during trial must be presented in accordance with the deadline established in the Scheduling Order. Motions in limine filed after the deadline will be considered only upon a showing of good cause.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Required
Always

Deposition designation disputes resolved at final pretrial conference; specific exchange deadlines apply.

Judge Sánchez expects to decide disputes regarding deposition designations and preserved objections within depositions at the final pretrial conference. To facilitate the timely resolution of such disputes, the parties must exchange deposition designations at least one week prior to the final pretrial conference, and counter-designations must be exchanged at least three days prior to the conference. The parties must submit any objections to designations and counter-designations to the Court in writing no later than one day before the final pretrial conference, along with a copy of the deposition transcript(s). Objections should be raised by letter referencing the page number(s) and ground(s) for objection; a formal motion is not required.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Discovery motions should not be filed until after a telephone conference with chambers.

Motions to compel or other discovery motions should not be filed until a telephone conference has been held.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Pre-motion certification required for Rule 12 motions that opposing counsel was given opportunity to cure.

Curable Defects: Before any motion based on a curable defect under Rule 12 is filed, counsel must certify that opposing counsel has been given an opportunity to cure the defect.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

TRO requests trigger immediate conference scheduling with all counsel required to attend.

Motions for Injunctive Relief: When a temporary restraining order is requested, Judge Sánchez will immediately schedule a conference to hear the motion. Unless the urgency of the circumstances preclude notice to opposing counsel, Judge Sánchez requires that all counsel be present.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Upon filing any pretrial motion in criminal cases, parties must advise Court of intent to present testimony and expected duration.

Upon the filing of any motion, the parties shall advise the Court whether they intend to present testimony in support of or in opposition to the motion and the expected duration of any such testimony, so that the Court can schedule a motion hearing, if necessary.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL

Judge Scott holds a prompt conference for TRO and preliminary injunction requests after service, unless extraordinary imminent harm requires a hearing.

Judge Scott attempts to hold a prompt conference with counsel seeking and defending requests for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions following an affidavit of service, unless there is risk of extraordinary imminent harm a hearing will be held.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Required
Always

Counsel must attend a scheduling conference within 50 days of the defendant's initial appearance or arraignment.

Once a defendant has an initial appearance and/or arraignment on an indictment, counsel for the Government and Defendant(s) are required to attend a scheduling conference within fifty (50) days of the initial appearance/arraignment.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL

Preliminary pretrial conference scheduled after all defendants appear; lead counsel must attend in person.

The Court will schedule a preliminary pretrial conference as described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 once each defendant has appeared in the case. The Court expects lead trial counsel to attend the conference in person. If lead counsel is unable to attend for a compelling reason, the

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL

7-day pre-motion conference required before filing Rule 12(b)(6) motions.

Before filing a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), counsel shall first contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies. This conference shall take place at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the motion.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL

Certification of pre-motion conference required with Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

If the parties are unable to reach a resolution that eliminates the need for a 12(b)(6) motion, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the 12(b)(6) motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL

Merely reporting unavailability or reasonable efforts is insufficient; motion will be denied.

It is not sufficient to report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made “reasonable efforts.” The Court will deny a 12(b)(6) motion that does not meet these requirements.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL

Counsel may request telephone/video conference for simple discovery disputes; must attempt to resolve with opposing counsel first and submit letter via email.

Counsel may request a telephone or video conference with Judge Hodge to resolve straightforward discovery disputes and other issues, but complicated matters should be resolved by formal motion and briefing. Counsel must make a substantive effort to address all discovery disputes with opposing counsel before requesting Judge Hodge’s assistance and submit a certification to that end along with any discovery motions. Counsel should submit a letter by email to Chambers summarizing the reason for the requested telephone conference. An email request without a letter attached will not be considered.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL

Counsel must meet and confer with opposing counsel at least 7 days before filing Rule 12, 56, removal, or transfer motions; verbal communication required, pro se/bankruptcy/Social Security appeals exempt.

1. Meet and Confer Certification with Motions: 1 Counsel contemplating filing any motion, including a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, 28 U.S.C. §1441, or 28 U.S.C. §1404, shall contact opposing counsel prior to filing to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies or strike certain matter to see if the filing of the contemplated motion is then necessary. This conference shall take place at least seven (7) days before the filing of the motion. The parties shall conduct substantive verbal communications. Exchanges of letters or emails are insufficient. A report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made reasonable but unsuccessful efforts to meet and confer is likewise insufficient. If the parties cannot reach a resolution that eliminates the need for any of the above-mentioned motions, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the 1 This directive shall not apply to cases in which either side is pro se, or to bankruptcy or Social Security appeals.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Required
Always

Non-compliance with Rule 26(f) meeting results in no input at initial pretrial conference.

Pending motions will not excuse the requirements of holding the meeting and submitting the plan. Parties who do not comply will have no input at the initial pretrial conference.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Rule 26(f) meeting must be completed promptly and is substantive.

Judge Kearney relies on counsel's good faith compliance in all respects with Rule 26(f). Parties should complete the Rule 26(f) meeting as soon as possible. This meeting is a meaningful and substantive discussion to address prompt settlement positions, formulate the proposed discovery plan, and discuss the parties' factual and legal positions.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Joint Rule 26(f) report required at least one day before initial pretrial conference.

Unless waived for good cause, our scheduling Order will begin discovery and require the parties to file a comprehensive joint report of the Rule 26(f) meeting at least one day before the initial pretrial conference fully compliant with the 'Report of Rule 26(f) Meeting' form provided on the District's web page: www.paed.uscourts.gov/judges-info/district-court-judges/mark-kearney.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL

Patent non-ANDA cases require specific Markman hearing planning in Rule 26(f) report.

In patent non-ANDA cases, the comprehensive joint report of the Rule 26(f) meeting shall include proposed dates for the exchange, in steps, of required information to plan for a Markman hearing as soon as practicable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 1:

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Initial pretrial conference must address multiple substantive topics.

The initial pretrial conference is a substantive discussion addressing, at a minimum: items listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Local Rule 16.1(b); completion of self-executing disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a); a review of the required stipulated facts; disclosure of insurance coverage and deductibles; requests for a Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) Order; status of pending discovery; the preservation, production and cost allocation of electronically stored information; status of settlement demands and offers and proposed timing of mediation; and, specific facts regarding liability, damages and relief sought.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Attending counsel at initial pretrial conference is designated as lead trial counsel unless excused.

Absent compelling grounds provided in writing before the conference, counsel attending the initial pretrial conference shall be designated as lead trial counsel. If lead counsel is excused in advance of the conference, the attorney appearing must have access to lead counsel's calendar during the proceeding.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Lead trial counsel must have full settlement authority at initial pretrial conference.

Lead trial counsel shall be prepared to discuss settlement at the initial pretrial conference, including having full authority from clients on settlement. Counsel may not claim lack of authority to discuss settlement with opposing counsel and Judge Kearney unless the client or carrier representative with full authority is present at the initial pretrial conference.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL

Meaningful conference required before threshold motions, except for pro se parties.

Parties seeking to move to dismiss, strike, remand, transfer, substitute parties, and other threshold issues shall: 1. Confirm the movant meaningfully conferred in good faith with the represented party (does not apply to pro se parties) subject to the anticipated motion including specifically identifying the communications and shared resolution to resolve the issue particularly on motions to dismiss based on the perceived inadequacy of the pleading or venue issues which can often be readily resolved by an amended pleading or stipulated transfer or remand;

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL

Meaningful conference requires sharing arguments and caselaw citations.

We interpret 'meaningfully conferred' to include sharing the movant's arguments in summary fashion as well as citations to caselaw addressing each point expected to be included in moving papers;

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL

Threshold motions must be addressed at initial pretrial conference even if not fully briefed.

Be prepared to address the merits of a pending or anticipated threshold motions at the initial pretrial conference, even if not fully briefed at that time;

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL

Rule 16 conference scheduled after all defendants answer; joint Rule 26(f) report with discovery plan due 3 business days before conference.

The Court will schedule a preliminary pretrial conference as described in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 shortly after all defendants have answered the Complaint. At least three business days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel must submit to Chambers a joint report of the Rule 26(f) meeting with a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f) meeting should take place as early in the case as possible.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL

Reply and sur-reply briefs must be filed within 7 days of the brief they respond to, without seeking leave.

Reply briefs and sur-reply briefs may be filed without seeking leave and must be filed no later than seven days after the filing to which the brief responds.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL

Pre-motion conference required 7 days before filing Rule 12(b)(6), (e), or (f) motions, except in pro se, bankruptcy, or social security cases.

Except in cases involving a pro se litigant, or in bankruptcy or social security appeals, counsel contemplating filing a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (e), or (f), shall first contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies or strike certain matter. This conference shall take place at least seven days before the filing of the motion.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL

Threshold motions must be filed before Rule 16 conference.

All motions to dismiss, transfer, or add parties and other threshold motions should be filed before the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL

Pre-motion conference required 7 days before Rule 12 motions (except pro se, bankruptcy, social security cases).

Except in cases where either side is pro se, or in bankruptcy or social security appeals, any party intending to file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 must contact opposing counsel to discuss the substance of the contemplated motion and to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged pleading deficiencies or strike certain matter. This conference shall take place at least seven days prior to the filing of the motion.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL

Moving party must serve statement of undisputed facts 28 days before summary judgment deadline.

At least 28 days before the deadline to file a motion, the moving party must serve all other parties a statement of undisputed facts in a numbered, paragraph-by-paragraph statement that contains specific citations to the record that support each factual assertion.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL

Responding party must serve response to undisputed facts 14 days before summary judgment deadline.

At least 14 days before the deadline to file a motion, a responding party must serve on all other parties, a response to the moving party’s statement of facts that responds to each factual assertion. All responses should be directly under the original paragraph of the moving party’s motion and must include citations to any evidence that the responding party believes is necessary to show that the moving party has not cited evidence that supports a factual assertion.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL

Discovery disputes must be presented by letter after meet-and-confer, without formal motions unless directed.

After counsel have met and conferred, they may present discovery disputes to the court via letters emailed to chambers and copied to the other side without filing formal motions unless otherwise directed by the court.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL

Good faith telephone/video conference required before judicial intervention for discovery disputes.

Judge Arteaga will not entertain a request for judicial intervention if parties or their counsel have exchanged emails or other correspondence but have not made a good faith effort to speak to each other by telephone or video conference regarding a discovery dispute.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Parties must email chambers to request telephone conference before filing discovery motion, including prior efforts, dispute summary, and relevant attachments.

If a party still requires Court intervention in a discovery dispute after making good faith efforts to communicate with an opposing party, the requesting party shall email Chambers_of_Magistrate_Judge_Arteaga@paed.uscourts.gov to request a telephone conference before filing any discovery motion on the docket. The request shall: (1) describe the parties’ prior efforts to resolve their dispute in detail; (2) summarize the matters in dispute; and (3) attach any information relevant to Judge Arteaga’s consideration of the dispute.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Parties filing summary judgment motions must meet and confer to develop a single joint appendix of exhibits.

A party who plans to file a motion for summary judgment must meet and confer with all other parties and develop a single, joint appendix of all exhibits that may be referenced in their respective memoranda.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Parties must request a pre-filing conference with the Court before filing any discovery motion requiring intervention.

If Court intervention is required, the parties shall request a conference before filing any discovery motion.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Dispositive motions and Rule 702 expert exclusion motions must be filed by [+4 weeks], responses by [+2 weeks], replies by [+1 week].

Any and all dispositive motions and motions to exclude expert witness evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 shall be filed on or before [+4 weeks]. Responses to any such motions shall be filed by [+2 weeks] and replies, if any, shall be filed on or before [+1 week].

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Motions in limine must be filed 14 days prior to Pretrial Stipulation, responses due [+1 week].

All other motions in limine shall be filed on or before [fourteen days prior to Pretrial Stipulation]. Responses shall be filed on or before [+1 week].

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL

Sur-reply briefs require prior court permission via letter brief.

Judge Copeland will not normally permit sur-reply briefs and counsel desiring to file a sur-reply must first seek permission of the Court by letter brief, before such a brief will be accepted.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL

Opposition to summary judgment due in 21 days; reply/surreply due in 10 days; no leave required.

A party is granted 21 days to file a response in opposition to a motion for summary judgment and 10 days to file any reply or surreply. Motions for leave to file a reply and surreply are not necessary for a Rule 56 motion because replies and surreplies are automatically allowed.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Required
Always

Rule 26(f) conference required at least 14 days before Rule 16 scheduling conference; mandatory compliance.

Judge Rufe relies on good-faith compliance in all respects with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The Rule 26(f) meeting shall take place as soon as possible and, in any event, at least 14 days before the Rule 16 scheduling conference. Outstanding motions will not excuse the parties from timely holding the meeting and submitting a Rule 26 plan. Compliance is mandatory. The meeting should not be viewed as perfunctory, but rather as a meaningful and substantive discussion to formulate the discovery plan required by the Rule. Parties who do not comply will have no voice at the scheduling conference and may be subject to additional sanctions.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL

Status conference required after defense counsel appears in civil cases; covers multiple pretrial matters.

After the entry of appearance by defense counsel in civil actions, Judge Bartle schedules a status conference in chambers. At this status conference, counsel are expected to be prepared to discuss jurisdictional defects; possibility of amicable settlements; alternative dispute resolution; time limitations for joining additional parties and amending pleadings, if necessary; scheduling for discovery deadlines, filing of motions, filing of pretrial memoranda, and future pretrial conferences; scheduling a date for trial; and any other appropriate matter. Judge Bartle enters a scheduling order following this conference.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL

Meet and confer about material facts required 14 days before Rule 56 motions (except pro se prisoner cases).

Except in matters in which a pro se prisoner is a party, the parties shall meet and confer about the material facts no later than fourteen days prior to the filing of any summary judgment motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL

Discovery disputes require motion to compel after failed resolution attempts.

When a discovery default occurs, Judge Padova encourages counsel to file a motion to compel, which he will usually grant upon presentation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.1(g). When a discovery dispute occurs, and counsel have been unable to resolve it themselves or with Judge Padova’s assistance by telephone, he requires a motion to compel.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL

Reply/surreply briefs require leave of court, filed within 14 days with proposed brief attached.

Reply and Surreply Briefs... Reply and surreply briefs may only be filed with leave of the Court. A motion for leave to file a reply or surreply brief must be filed within fourteen days of the previous filing, and counsel shall attach as an exhibit the proposed reply or surreply brief.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL

Motions in limine must be filed by Scheduling Order deadline.

Motions in limine must be filed by the deadline set in the Scheduling Order. Rulings upon such motions are usually made before or at the final pretrial conference.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL

Motion to compel may be filed if telephone conference doesn't resolve discovery dispute.

If a discovery dispute is not resolved following a telephone conference and a motion to compel becomes necessary, the motion and any

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneWARNING

Threshold motions must be filed at least 7 days before Rule 16 conference.

Threshold motions (e.g., motions to transfer or substitute parties) should be filed at least seven (7) days before the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Catherine HenryWARNING

Failure to meet and confer may result in motion denial or sanctions.

Failure to communicate by the filing party may result in the motion being denied. Failure to respond within a reasonable timeframe to attempts to communicate from the filing party may result in sanctions for the non-responding party.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING

Motions for leave to reply must specify issues and not include proposed reply.

Motions for Leave should highlight the specific issues raised in the response brief to which a reply is requested. Counsel should not prepare and attach their proposed reply to their Motion.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING

Summary judgment rarely granted in non-jury cases.

Judge Pappert will rarely, if ever, grant summary judgment in a non-jury case.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING

Reply briefs encouraged, may be filed without leave, must be filed within 7 days of opposition brief

Reply briefs are encouraged where thought to be helpful; may be filed without leave; and must be filed no later than 7 days after the opposition brief.

Judge John F. MurphyWARNING

Pre-motion conference must include substantive verbal communication, not just emails/letters.

These efforts must include substantive verbal communications, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonWARNING

Pretrial conferences not generally conducted in criminal cases but available upon request.

Judge Wells does not generally conduct pretrial conferences in criminal cases, but will do so, upon request of counsel.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING

Sur-reply briefs require prior permission by letter brief.

Judge Straw will not normally permit sur-reply briefs and counsel desiring to file a sur-reply must first seek permission of the Court by letter brief, before such a brief will be accepted.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawWARNING
Required
Always

Counsel must make good faith efforts to resolve disputes before seeking Court involvement.

Judge Toplin requires that counsel make all good faith efforts to resolve any disputed matter between themselves before seeking involvement of the Court.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinWARNING

Reply briefs must be filed within 7 days of opposition brief unless Court sets different schedule.

A reply brief, addressing arguments raised in the brief in opposition to the motion, may be filed and served by the moving party within seven (7) days after service of the brief in opposition to the motion unless the Court sets a different schedule.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIWARNING

Prompt conference held for TRO/preliminary injunction requests.

Judge Henry attempts to hold a prompt conference with counsel seeking and defending requests for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions following an affidavit of service.

Judge Catherine HenryINFO

Prompt conference held with counsel for TRO and preliminary injunction motions after affidavit of service.

Judge Henry attempts to hold a prompt conference with counsel seeking and defending requests for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions following an affidavit of service.

Judge Catherine HenryINFO
Required
Always

Rule 16 conference held after all defendants answer; counsel may request if not scheduled.

A Rule 16 Pretrial Conference will be held as soon as possible after all defendants have docketed an Answer to the Complaint. If the Court has not scheduled a Rule 16 conference within a reasonable time after the filing of the Answer, counsel should contact Chambers to request a conference.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Required
Always

Pretrial conference scheduled at Rule 16 if no dispositive motions, or after ruling on dispositive motions.

A Pretrial Conference will be scheduled either at the time of the Rule 16 Conference if dispositive motions are not anticipated or if necessary after a ruling on dispositive motions. At the Pretrial Conference a date certain trial date and associated deadlines will be provided.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO

Ruling on reply leave without response; if granted, scope and due date specified.

A ruling will be made on the Motion for Leave without a response from opposing counsel. If the Court grants leave to file a reply, the order will clearly specify the scope of the reply and the due date.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO

Oral argument scheduled at Court's discretion; may decide on papers even if requested.

Oral argument will be scheduled by Chambers when it is beneficial to the Court. Parties may request oral argument, but the Court will frequently decide a motion on the papers even where such a request is made.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO

A final pretrial conference will be held after dispositive motions are ruled upon.

As needed, after ruling on dispositive motions, the Court will hold a final pretrial conference in Court with counsel.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO

Pre-hearing conference may be held for injunctions.

He may hold a pre-hearing conference to discuss discovery, narrow the issues in contention and allocate time for the hearing.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO

Timing for motions in limine will be set at Rule 16 conference and confirmed in Scheduling Order.

The time for filing motions in limine will be determined at the Rule 16 conference and will be confirmed in the Scheduling Order.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO

Moving party may respond to responding party's statements directly under relevant paragraphs

The moving party may then respond to any statements or arguments in the responding party’s submission, directly under the relevant paragraph.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Required
Always

Rule 16 conference scheduled after all defendants appear.

The Court will schedule a preliminary pretrial conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 once each defendant has appeared in the case.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Required
Always

Motions in limine filing deadline set at Rule 16 conference and confirmed in scheduling order.

The time for filing motions in limine will be determined at the Rule 16 conference and will be confirmed in the scheduling order.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO

Suppression, Starks, and Daubert hearings are typically scheduled at least 14 days before trial.

Judge Wolson typically holds suppression, Starks, and Daubert hearings at least 14 days prior to trial.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonINFO

Counsel expected to resolve objections before motions in limine deadlines.

Judge Kearney expects counsel attempted to resolve objections to exhibits and testimony before the motions in limine deadlines, leaving only those objections the parties could not resolve.

Judge Mark A. KearneyINFO

Motions in limine filed after exchange of pretrial memoranda, with reply before pretrial conference.

To the extent there are unresolved evidentiary issues, counsel should anticipate the Scheduling Order will require motions in limine be filed after the contemporaneous exchange of pretrial memoranda, with a reply due before the pretrial conference.

Judge Mark A. KearneyINFO

Summary judgment rarely granted in non-jury cases.

Judge Costello will rarely grant summary judgment in a non-jury case.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloINFO

Rule 16 conference scheduled after answer or during preliminary motions.

Judge Perez will schedule a Rule 16 conference once an answer is filed, or in some instances, while a motion to dismiss or another preliminary motion is pending.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezINFO

Moving party may respond to responding party's submissions under each paragraph.

The moving party may then respond to any statement or arguments in the responding party’s submission, directly under the paragraph in question.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezINFO
Required
Always

Oral argument is generally not required for motions.

I generally will not require oral argument on motions.

Judge Paul S. DiamondINFO
Required
Never

Pretrial conferences in criminal cases are generally not held, but may be conducted if counsel requests one.

Judge Wells does not generally conduct pretrial conferences in criminal cases, but will do so, upon request of counsel.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO

Parties must confer on discovery confidentiality before seeking court intervention per FRCP 26(c).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) requires parties to confer and attempt to reach an agreement regarding the confidentiality of discovery materials before seeking Court intervention.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaINFO

Motion practice is governed by Local Rule 7.1 subject to these procedures, local rules, standing orders, and supplemental rules for Social Security and Section 2254 cases.

Motion practice is governed by Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 except as described elsewhere in these Practices and Procedures, the Local Rules and applicable Standing Orders, or, as relevant, the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) or the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaINFO

Conference on proposed jury instructions is usually conducted.

Judge Sitarski usually conducts a conference on proposed jury instructions.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO

Replies automatically allowed for all motions; surreplies allowed for Rule 56 motions, discouraged for others.

Although sometimes unnecessary, replies are automatically allowed for all motions, and a party need not seek leave to file a reply. For a Rule 56 motion, a surreply is automatically allowed. For all other motions, surreply briefs are discouraged and a party must move for leave to file a surreply.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO

Oral argument held at judge's discretion or upon counsel's request.

Judge Brody will hold oral argument if she believes it will assist her in deciding the motion. Judge Brody will also consider requests from counsel to hold oral argument on a particular motion.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO

Summary judgment motions typically use alternative method schedule.

In most cases, summary judgment motions filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 will use the form and schedule outlined in Attachment B to the Sample Scheduling Order (the Appendix hereto), which is known as the “alternative method.” When there are cross-motions for summary judgment or in certain other cases, however, Judge Rufe will permit the parties to file their Rule 56 Motions under the traditional method.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO

Initial pretrial conference scheduled within 30 days of all defendants filing answers.

Judge Padova regularly schedules an initial pretrial conference within 30 days of all defendants filing answers to the complaint.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO

Rule 26(f) meeting must occur at least 14 days before scheduling conference.

The Rule 26(f) meeting shall take place as soon as possible and, in any event, at least fourteen days before the scheduling conference.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO

Counsel must have client authority to speak on settlement at all pretrial conferences.

Judge Padova further requires that counsel taking part in all pretrial conferences be prepared to speak on the subjects to be covered, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO

Counsel must be prepared to argue pending motions at pretrial conferences.

Counsel must be prepared to present argument at the conference on any pending motions.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO
Required
Always

Final pretrial conference typically held during week before trial.

Judge Padova typically holds a final pretrial conference sometime during the week before trial is scheduled.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO

Parties may agree to a different briefing schedule.

The parties may stipulate to a briefing schedule.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonINFO
Common questions about Eastern District of Pennsylvania pre-motion conference requirements

Does Eastern District of Pennsylvania require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Eastern District of Pennsylvania rules set a pre-motion procedure for motions in limine. Motions in limine must be filed 10 days before trial.

View ruleSource: page 10, section I. Trial Procedure

Does Eastern District of Pennsylvania require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Yes. A pre-motion letter is required for covered motions. Details: response due in 3 days. Preliminary pretrial conference scheduled after answer; joint Rule 26(f) report due 3 business days prior

Does Eastern District of Pennsylvania require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Eastern District of Pennsylvania rules set a pre-motion procedure for covered motions. Lead counsel must attend Rule 16 conference with authority to settle and discuss all claims/defenses

Does Eastern District of Pennsylvania require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

The rule does not state that a pre-motion letter is required, but it sets the applicable pre-motion procedure. Patent non-ANDA cases require specific Markman hearing planning in Rule 26(f) report.

View ruleSource: page 9, section C. Additional disclosures in patent non-ANDA cases

Does Eastern District of Pennsylvania require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Eastern District of Pennsylvania rules set a pre-motion procedure for no covered filings. Pretrial conferences in criminal cases are generally not held, but may be conducted if counsel requests one.

View ruleSource: page 8, section Pretrial Conferences and Motions