Court Rules

Eastern District of Pennsylvania Document Filing Requirements

1025 rules from official source documents

Required elements, certificates, and structural requirements for court documents. This page is scoped to Eastern District of Pennsylvania; use the court rules overview to switch categories without leaving this court.

Applies to
Trial exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Trial exhibits and discovery items must be pre-marked and exchanged at least 3 business days before trial.

All trial exhibits and discovery items to be offered shall be pre-marked and exchanged by counsel at least three (3) business days prior to the date of trial.

Bankruptcy Derek J. BakerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
separate statement of undisputed material facts

Summary judgment motions must include separate statement of undisputed material facts with record citations.

A motion for summary judgment shall include a separate statement of those material facts that the movant contends are not in dispute with supporting citations to the record. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be grounds for summary denial of the motion.

Bankruptcy Patricia M. MayerCRITICAL
Deadline
24 hours
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings and conclusions may be required within 24 hours after TRO hearing.

she may require proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than twenty-four (24) hours after such a hearing.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint appendix
Must include
bates stamping

Joint appendix pages must be consecutively Bates stamped and referenced.

All pages of the joint appendix shall be consecutively 'Bates stamped' and referenced in the motions and briefs by the Bates number assigned each page.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
joint appendix

Only appendix materials will be considered by the judge.

Judge Beetlestone will not consider material not included in the appendix.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply statement of undisputed material facts
Must include
email to chambers
Format
WORD

Reply Statement of Undisputed Material Facts must be emailed to Chambers in Word format.

Counsel for the moving party shall email a copy of the Reply Statement of Undisputed Material Facts to Chambers in Microsoft Word format.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
original signatures

Stipulations must have original signatures, not filed on ECF, effective only after Court approval.

Any stipulations, consent decrees, or other documents requiring Court approval or signature must be submitted in a form containing original signatures (faxed signatures are accepted). Please do not file Stipulations on ECF. Stipulations are not effective until approved by the Court.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint status report
Must include
joint status report

Joint status report of Rule 26(f) meeting required 3 business days before Rule 16 conference.

At least three business days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel must complete and submit to the Court via ECF filing the joint status report of the Rule 26(f) meeting.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Initial disclosure

Initial disclosures must be completed 7 days before Rule 16 conference.

Initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a) shall be completed no later than seven (7) days before the Rule 16 conference.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 16 conference
Must include
lead trial counsel attendance

Lead trial counsel must attend Rule 16 conference; failure to appear may result in monetary sanctions.

Lead trial counsel must attend the Rule 16 conference. If a party fails to appear at a scheduled Rule 16 Conference, absent good cause, monetary sanctions may be applied.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery must commence upon receipt of Rule 16 conference notice.

Judge Beetlestone expects discovery to commence upon receipt of the Notice scheduling the initial Rule 16 conference.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions must include certification of good faith resolution efforts.

All discovery motions must contain the certification required under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f). The Rule requires that counsel who is submitting the dispute to the Court include a certification that a good faith resolution effort has been made by counsel involved in the dispute. Judge Beetlestone expects that such a certification will be substantive, specific, and meaningful.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Temporary restraining order
Must include
hearing notice, notice to respondent, service on respondent

TRO petitioners must notify and serve respondents when practical.

Except in cases where the nature of the emergency precludes it, Judge Beetlestone requires the petitioner to notify the respondent of the nature of the request for a Temporary Restraining Order; to serve the petition and proposed Order upon the respondent, if practical; and to provide the respondent with notice of the date, time and location of the hearing or argument.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Briefs of 20+ pages require table of contents and table of authorities.

Any brief of twenty (20) pages or more shall include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint appendix
Must include
bates stamping, table of contents

Joint appendix must be filed when summary judgment motion is docketed.

The joint appendix shall be filed by the movant no later than the date the initial motion for summary judgment is docketed.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
thumb drive

Thumb drive with admitted exhibits must be provided to court and jury.

At the close of evidence, the parties shall submit to the Court a thumb drive which includes only those exhibits admitted into evidence. The documents on the thumb drive shall be provided to the Jury.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
proposed order

Continuance motions must include a proposed order.

Any such motion must be accompanied by a proposed form of Order which, if approved by the Court, would grant the relief sought by the motion.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions and verdict forms due 3 working days before trial.

Judge Beetlestone requires that at least three (3) working days before the date the case is set for trial, each party shall submit to the Court and serve on each other, two (2) copies of proposed points for charge and a proposed verdict form, and also shall provide those documents to Chambers in digital form in Microsoft Word format.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum 5 days before guilty plea.

Judge Beetlestone requires the government to submit a guilty plea memorandum five (5) days prior to the guilty plea.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Guilty plea memoranda must include offense elements and legal citations.

Such a memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for such elements.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda due 5 days before sentencing hearing.

The sentencing memoranda should be submitted to the Court no later than five (5) days prior to the sentencing hearing.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

AI use must be declared and cited authorities verified.

Parties who use Artificial Intelligence in preparing papers filed with the Court must declare the use of AI, which AI was used and must certify that the signer checked that all cited authorities are proper.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Rule 26(f) report due 5 days before Rule 16 conference.

The Rule 26(f) report must be submitted no later than five (5) days before the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f meeting

Rule 26(f) meeting must occur at least 14 days before Rule 16 conference.

The parties are expected to meet at least fourteen (14) days before the Rule 16 Conference.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Specific Rule 26(f) form must be used from Judge Henry's webpage.

Parties must fill out the Rule 26(f) form available on Judge Henry’s Court webpage (https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/sites/paed/files/documents/procedures/henpolb.pdf).

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Threshold motion

Threshold motions (dismiss, transfer, add parties) due 5 days before Rule 16 conference.

Parties are also expected to submit all possible threshold motions no later than (5) days before the Rule 16 conference, including any motions to dismiss, transfer, or add parties.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion

Discovery motion must certify good faith efforts and request phone conference if desired.

A motion that (1) complies with Local Civil Rule 26.1(f) by certifying that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute, and (2) specifies whether the parties request a telephone conference with Judge Henry to resolve the matter;

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required with discovery motion.

A proposed order;

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
joint filing

Multiple plaintiffs/defendants must file joint motions unless conflicts exist.

Multiple plaintiffs or multiple defendants must file joint motions with their co-parties, unless there are conflicts in their position.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
statement of facts

Statement of facts required with summary judgment motions.

A statement of facts must accompany a moving party's motion for summary judgment.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
existing conflicts, reason for request, amount of time sought +1 more

Continuance motions must include reasons, opposing position, time sought, and scheduling conflicts.

Requests for a continuance must be filed as a motion stating the reasons for the request, the position of the other side, the amount of time sought, and existing conflicts potentially impacting scheduling of a new trial date.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
consent form signed by defendant

Continuance motions require defendant's signed consent form.

Any such motion must be accompanied by a consent form signed by the defendant.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
proposed order, speedy trial act compliance

Continuance orders must comply with Speedy Trial Act and include proposed order.

The proposed form of order must be consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8), and must include a proposed

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service +1 more

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum one week before plea hearing with specific content requirements.

The United States must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least one week prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement and the factual basis for the plea. The change of plea memorandum shall be submitted to chambers by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Catherine_Henry@paed.uscourts.gov.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service +1 more

Government must file trial memorandum one week before jury selection with witness and evidence details.

The government must file a trial memorandum by no later than one week before jury selection setting forth the essential elements of the offenses, the facts which it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness' testimony and any legal issues. The defendant is not required to file a trial memorandum but may do so.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing motion
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service +1 more

Sentencing motions must be filed 7 days before sentencing with 3-day response deadline.

Counsel must file sentencing motions and supporting memoranda at least seven days prior to the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. The memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party. No replies may be filed without leave.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service +1 more

Sentencing memoranda must be filed 7 days before sentencing with 3-day response deadline.

Sentencing memoranda (exclusive of motions), by both the United States and the defense must be filed no later than seven days before the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Pre sentence investigation report
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service +1 more

Pre-sentence reports and sentencing memoranda must be emailed to chambers in Word format.

All Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports and Sentencing Memoranda shall also be promptly delivered to chambers in Microsoft Word Format by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Catherine_Henry@paed.uscourts.gov.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

Parties using AI to prepare court filings must declare which AI was used and certify that cited authorities were verified.

Parties who use Artificial Intelligence in preparing papers filed with the Court must declare the use of AI, which AI was used and must certify that the signer checked that all cited authorities are proper.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Pro hac vice admission motions must specify the attorney's admissions, reasons for participation, and qualifications.

The motion must specify (1) the attorney's admissions, (2) why the party desires that attorney to participate in litigation, and (3) why that attorney is particularly qualified to represent the party.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
proposed order

Discovery dispute motions must include certification of efforts to resolve, request for telephone conference specification, and a proposed order.

A motion that (1) complies with Local Civil Rule 26.1(f) by certifying that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute, and (2) specifies whether the parties request a telephone conference with Judge Henry to resolve the matter; • A proposed order

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

All proposed orders must include language reserving the Court's power to modify the order.

All proposed orders must contain language to this effect: "The Court reserves its inherent power to modify the terms of this Order and permit the disclosure of information in the interest of justice."

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Summary judgment motions must include a statement of facts as a separate document with numbered paragraphs and pinpoint citations.

A statement of facts must accompany a moving party's motion for summary judgment. The parties may jointly file a statement of stipulated material facts. Alternatively, the moving party may file proposed undisputed material facts. Regardless of which option the parties choose, the moving party must file that initial statement of material facts as a separate document with the moving party's Rule 56 motion. Each fact must be in a separately numbered paragraph and accompanied by pinpoint citations that cite not only the relevant exhibit, but the relevant page and line number of that exhibit.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda are due 7 business days before the final pretrial conference and must contain witness lists, motions in limine, deposition notices, objections, stipulations, voir dire questions, and jury instructions.

Pretrial memoranda must be submitted at least (7) business days prior to the final pretrial conference and must include the following: • A list of witnesses and the substance of each witness's testimony. • A list and brief description of any motions in limine. • Notice of any depositions (written or video) that the party intends to use at trial. • Any objections to witnesses and exhibits that the parties have been unable to resolve. Wherever applicable, the objecting party must identify the page of an exhibit and page and line number of a deposition that the party objects to and state the basis of the objection. • A list of any joint stipulations that the parties plan to enter at trial. • Proposed joint questions for voir dire. • Proposed joint jury instructions and verdict forms.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion

Criminal continuance motions must state reasons, other side's position, time sought, and conflicts, and must include a defendant-signed consent form and Speedy Trial Act compliant proposed order.

Requests for a continuance must be filed as a motion stating the reasons for the request, the position of the other side, the amount of time sought, and existing conflicts potentially impacting scheduling of a new trial date. Any such motion must be accompanied by a consent form signed by the defendant. The proposed form of order must be consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8), and must include a proposed

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum one week before change of plea hearing via email.

The United States must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least one week prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement and the factual basis for the plea. The change of plea memorandum shall be submitted to chambers by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Catherine_Henry@paed.uscourts.gov.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memorandum

Government must file trial memorandum one week before jury selection with witness and issue details.

The government must file a trial memorandum by no later than one week before jury selection setting forth the essential elements of the offenses, the facts which it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness' testimony and any legal issues.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing motions due 7 days before sentencing; responses due 3 days before; no replies without leave.

Counsel must file sentencing motions and supporting memoranda at least seven days prior to the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. The memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party. No replies may be filed without leave.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda due 7 days before sentencing; responses due 3 days before.

Sentencing memoranda (exclusive of motions), by both the United States and the defense must be filed no later than seven days before the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date.

Judge Catherine HenryCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery conference
Must include
certificate of conference

E-discovery procedures must be discussed at Rule 16 and Rule 26(f) conferences.

The parties shall be prepared to address e-discovery at the Rule 16 scheduling conference with the Court. At the Rule 26(f) conference, they must discuss the parameters of their anticipated e-discovery. They are required to address procedures to preserve electronically stored information, to avoid inadvertent privilege waivers, and to determine the form in which electronic information will be produced. The cost of producing the information must be discussed.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement discussion
Must include
certificate of conference

Parties must discuss ADR options and comply with Local Rule 53.3.

The parties must familiarize themselves with Local Rule 53.3 before responding. Recite the parties’ discussion about early resolution through ADR, motion or otherwise explain what steps were taken by counsel to advise the client of alternative dispute resolution options. Explain any decision not to seek early resolution and what mediation options the parties may consider and when mediation would be appropriate.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery conference
Must include
certificate of conference

Counsel must certify they have read Judge Kenney's discovery guidelines.

All counsel must certify that they have read Judge Kenney’s guidelines as to discovery and objections.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
certificate of conference

Parties must exchange custodian and system information before Rule 26(f) conference.

Prior to the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall exchange the following information: a. a list of the most likely custodians of relevant electronic materials, including a brief description of each person's title and responsibilities; and, b. a list of each relevant electronic system that has been in place at all relevant times and a general description of each system, including the nature, scope, character, organization, and formats employed in each system.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
certificate of conference

Parties must discuss e-discovery parameters at Rule 26(f) conference and be prepared for Rule 16 conference.

The parties shall discuss the parameters of their anticipated e-discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference and shall be prepared to address e-discovery at the Rule 16 scheduling conference with the court.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
certificate of conference

Each party must designate an e-discovery liaison familiar with systems and technical aspects.

To promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison"). Regardless of whether the e-discovery liaison is an attorney (in-house or outside counsel), a third-party consultant, or an employee of the party, he or she must be: a. familiar with the party's electronic systems and capabilities in order to explain these systems and answer relevant questions; b. knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery, including

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 56 motion

Rule 56 motions must include an index identifying each referenced exhibit and its location in the filing.

Counsel must include with their Rule 56 Motion an index clearly identifying each referenced exhibit and indicating where it can be found in the filing.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorney admission application pro hac vice

Pro hac vice admission requires submission of the specific Attorney Admission Application form.

To be admitted pro hac vice, local counsel of record should submit the “Attorney Admission Application (Pro Hac Vice)” available at https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/attorneys.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26 f report

Rule 26(f) meeting report is required to be filed before the Rule 16 conference.

At least three business days before the pretrial conference, counsel shall file on the docket the required report of the Rule 26(f) meeting.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Rule 12(b)(6), (e), (f) motions must include a certification of meet and confer with opposing counsel.

counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies or matter sought to be stricken.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 56 motion

Rule 56 motions must include a concise, numbered statement of stipulated material facts with citations to the record where possible.

The movant’s initial filing must include a concise statement of stipulated material facts, setting forth in numbered paragraphs the material facts and important background facts that are not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment. Citations to the summary judgment record should be included for each stipulated fact where possible.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 56 filing

Parties relying on facts not in the stipulated facts statement must file a numbered statement of additional facts with citations to the record.

To the extent that any party seeks to rely on facts not included in the concise statement of material facts, it shall set forth those facts in a concise statement of additional facts. Like the statement of stipulated facts, the statement of additional facts shall be organized in numbered paragraphs. The party shall provide citations to the precise page of the summary judgment record that supports each factual assertion in the statement of additional facts.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

Protective and confidentiality orders must include language reserving the court's power to modify terms for the interest of justice.

No protective order or confidentiality order will be approved without language providing that “the Court reserves its inherent power to modify the terms of this agreement and permit the disclosure of information where the interest of justice so requires.”

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

For preliminary injunction hearings where parties cannot stipulate to a full record, submit either a stipulation of disputed/undisputed facts or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In those instances where the parties cannot stipulate to a full record, Judge Kenney requires the submission of either a stipulation of disputed and undisputed facts or the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint report

Daubert Joint Report must include an exhibit list and copies of intended exhibits.

One week prior to the hearing, the parties shall file a Joint Report stating whether any party intends to present testimony from any witness other than the expert at issue. The Joint Report shall also include an exhibit list and copies of any exhibits that the parties intend to use at the hearing.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
proposed verdict forms

Proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and verdict forms must be filed no later than 14 days before trial.

In his scheduling orders, Judge Kenney typically requires that the parties file proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories for the jury no later than fourteen days before the trial date.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
standard instruction citation

Standard jury instructions need only reference the instruction number, volume title, and publication date; use the most recent volume.

Each proposed standard instruction need only reference the Standard Instruction Number as well as the title of the volume and the publication date of the instruction. Counsel should search for and use the most recent volume.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
non standard instruction citation

Non-standard jury instructions must include a citation to specific authority and the reason for the instruction.

If there is a non-standard instruction or a supplement to the standard, this needs to be pointed out with a citation to the specific authority and the reason in this specific case why it is needed.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
modification tracking

Modified model jury instructions must indicate changes; additions underlined, deletions in brackets.

If a model jury instruction is submitted, for instance, from Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, the submitting party shall state whether the proposed jury instruction is unchanged or modified. If a party modifies a model jury instruction, the additions should be underlined, and deletions should be placed in brackets.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact
Must include
proposed conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases must be filed at least 7 days before trial.

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases should be filed at least seven days before the trial date.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict slips
Must include
points for charge

Proposed verdict slips and points for charge on substantive matters covering all claims must be filed with pretrial documents.

Counsel should also file at that time proposed verdict slips and points for charge on substantive matters covering all claims as if the case would be submitted to a jury.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Revised findings of fact
Must include
specific trial evidence reference

Revised or supplemental findings of fact, conclusions of law, and verdict slips must reference trial evidence specifically.

The parties shall submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law and verdict slips with specific reference to trial evidence.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda must not be boilerplate, must include thorough analysis and vital arguments, and may be rejected if untimely or inadequate, resulting in a new sentencing date.

Additionally, counsel are advised that this Court DOES NOT ACCEPT boilerplate memoranda that merely include vague references to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, court opinions, or statutory citations. Given the serious nature of criminal sentencing, in which a defendant may be ordered to serve a significant term of imprisonment or pay substantial financial penalties, the Court expects counsel to advance the strongest positions on behalf of their respective clients. Indeed, the sentencing memoranda must include thorough legal and factual analysis. Counsel shall also incorporate the vital arguments that this Court must consider, and the attorneys must articulate their strongest points and positions in a thoughtful and deliberate manner. Counsel are strongly advised that this Court may REJECT any sentencing memoranda that are deemed untimely or inadequate, and as a result, may also order a new date for sentencing.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Evidentiary proceeding notice

Counsel must advise the Court of the estimated length of any evidentiary proceeding.

Counsel shall advise the Court as to the estimated length of any evidentiary proceeding.

Judge Chad F. KenneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Certification of meet and confer required with motion, including dates, length, and brief description of issues discussed.

Should the parties be unable to resolve the dispute, the filing party shall file a Certification indicating that they have communicated with the non-filing party or parties in an attempt to resolve the dispute and the date(s) of discussion(s), the length of the discussion, as well as a brief (no more than one sentence each) description of the issues which were discussed.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
joint submission

Joint Rule 26(f) report required 5 days before Rule 16 conference.

Five days in advance of the Rule 16 Conference, the parties shall jointly submit a Rule 26(f) report. Judge Weilheimer’s required format is available here. Patent cases have a separate 26(f) format which can be found here.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

Discovery must commence immediately upon Rule 16 scheduling order, not at conference date.

This Court expects discovery to commence immediately upon the issuance of the Order scheduling the Rule 16 Conference—not from the date of the Conference itself. Accordingly, by the time of most Rule 16 Conferences, fact discovery should already be well underway.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption, objective description

Exhibits must be separately numbered attachments with clear objective titles.

All exhibits must be filed as a separately numbered attachment to the main document and must be clearly titled with an objective description of the document so that the nature of the exhibit and its relevance are clearly discernible without the need to open the file (e.g., 6/14/19 Deposition of John Doe).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement of undisputed facts
Must include
certificate of conference

Parties must meet and confer 28 days before summary judgment motion to discuss joint statement of undisputed facts.

At least 28 days in advance of a motion for summary judgment, all parties are required to meet and confer regarding the possibility of entering into a joint statement of undisputed facts (the “Joint Statement”).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement of undisputed facts

Joint Statement must include all undisputed facts relied upon by any party for summary judgment.

The Joint Statement should include all facts upon which any party expects to rely in moving for or opposing summary judgment and about which there is no factual dispute between the parties.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Parties cannot unilaterally file their own Statement of Undisputed Facts.

But no party shall unilaterally file a “Statement of Undisputed Facts" setting forth its interpretation of the record.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Facts not in Joint Statement must be cited to record within party's memorandum.

All references to facts not included in the Joint Statement described above must be contained within the party’s memorandum and cite to the record.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

If no Joint Statement agreement, filing party must certify inability to reach agreement.

If the parties are unable to agree upon a Joint Statement, the filing party is required to include a certification that no agreement could be reached.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended notice of removal

Removing party must file Amended Notice of Removal with State Court Complaint as exhibit.

If a case is brought before this Court by way of a Notice of Removal, the party removing the action, if they have not done so in their original Notice of Removal, is required to file an Amended Notice of Removal, attaching the State Court Complaint as a separate exhibit, named consistent with the naming convention outlined for exhibits to motions, supra.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Answer
Must include
certificate of service

Parties with State Court Answer must docket it without revision within 21 days of removal.

Any party who has already filed an Answer in the underlying State Court Action must docket that Answer without revision within 21 days of removal.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Dispositive motion
Must include
certificate of service

Parties with pending State Court dispositive motions must reformat or withdraw within 21 days of removal.

Any party who has Preliminary Objections or some other dispositive motions pending in the State Court Action at the time of removal must, within 21 days, either: (1) reformat the preliminary objections or dispositive motion to be consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s Local Rules, and this Court’s preference and place the same on the docket; or (2) file an Answer, which will be constituted as a withdrawal of the pending preliminary objections or dispositive motion (though not a waiver of any issue of law).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum

Settlement Conference Memorandum must be submitted 7 days in advance, confidential, not docketed, not shared with opposing counsel.

Seven days in advance of the conference the parties will be required to submit a confidential Settlement Conference Memorandum. This memorandum shall NOT be docketed and should NOT be shared with opposing counsel.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum

Pretrial Conference Memorandum must be submitted 7 days before Pretrial Conference.

Seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference counsel shall submit Pretrial Conference Memorandum, the requirements are attached here.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Three copies of trial exhibits required at commencement of trial.

Three copies of all exhibits expected to be introduced at trial are to be provided at the commencement of trial. (One copy will be used for the witness and retained for the record, one Court copy and one law clerk copy).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial procedure

Only one attorney per party may examine each witness; only that attorney may object during opposing questioning.

Judge Weilheimer will not permit more than one attorney for a party to examine the same witness. The examining attorney is the only one permitted to raise objections during the opposing party’s questioning.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice admission
Must include
local counsel appearance

Local counsel must attend all appearances while pro hac vice motion is pending.

While a motion for leave to appear pro hac vice is pending, local counsel must be present at every appearance before the Court, including those held on the phone or virtually.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice admission
Must include
local rule compliance

Pro hac vice counsel must review and comply with EDPA local rules and Judge's protocols.

Pro hac vice counsel is expected to review and comply with the EDPA local rules as well as Judge Weilheimer’s protocols.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number

Pretrial Conference Memorandum must be docketed at least 7 days before conference

At least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference, each counsel shall docket a Pretrial Conference Memorandum which includes the following:

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum
Must include
exhibit list, witness list

Failure to submit memorandum or list witnesses/exhibits may result in preclusion

Failure to submit a Pretrial Conference Memorandum or failure to list a witness or exhibit on this disclosure, may result in the preclusion of that evidence or testimony.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement memorandum

A confidential Settlement Memorandum must be emailed to chambers at least five days before the Settlement Conference and must not be docketed or shared with opposing counsel.

At least five days prior to the Settlement Conference. a confidential Settlement Memorandum should be sent via email to chambers at chambers weilheimer@paed.uscourts.gov. This document should not be docketed and should not be provided to opposing counsel.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Parties must file a motion for claim construction hearing simultaneously with the Joint Claim Construction Brief, stating briefing is complete and requested argument time.

When the Joint Claim Construction Brief is filed, the parties shall simultaneously file a motion requesting the claim construction hearing, state that the briefing is complete, and state how much total time the parties are requesting that the Court should allow for the argument.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption

All applications to the Court must be made by written motion unless otherwise specified.

Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to the Court shall be by written motion.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

Protective and confidentiality orders will not be approved unless they include language reserving the Court's inherent power to modify the agreement and permit disclosure where the interests of justice require.

No protective order or confidentiality order will be approved without language providing that “the court reserves its inherent power to modify the terms of this agreement and permit the disclosure of information where the interest of justice so requires.”

Judge Gerald A. McHughCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Each exhibit filed on ECF must be a separately numbered attachment to the main document and clearly titled with an objective description of its contents.

Each document filed as an exhibit on ECF must be filed as a separately numbered attachment to the main document and must be clearly titled with an objective description of the document (e.g., 6/14/19 Deposition of John Doe; 10/14/21 Letter from Smith to Jones; 3/15/20-3/23/20 Email Thread between Doe and Roe) so that the nature of the exhibit and its relevance are clearly discernible without the need to open the file.

Judge Gerald A. McHughCRITICAL
Applies to
Filing

All filings must separately include an index identifying each exhibit with the required descriptive information, per Local Rule 5.1.2-5(b).

All filings must also separately include an index providing the above information. See Local Rule 5.1.2-5(b).

Judge Gerald A. McHughCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

For summary judgment motions, parties may not file a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts or Statement of Facts (except a formal stipulation of agreed facts); all factual references must be in the memorandum and cite the record, or the motion may be denied or filing stricken.

When filing a Motion for Summary Judgment, except for a formal stipulation setting forth facts agreed to in their entirety by all parties, no party shall unilaterally file a “Statement of Undisputed Facts” setting forth its interpretation of the record, or any separate “Statement of Facts” apart from its memorandum of law. All references to the facts must be contained within the party’s memorandum and cite to the record. Failure to abide by this instruction may result in the motion being denied or a filing being stricken.

Judge Gerald A. McHughCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed verdict form, unified proposed instructions

Unified proposed jury instructions and verdict form required.

d) Counsel must prepare one unified and agreed upon set of proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and one proposed verdict form or set of special interrogatories to the jury.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
fee

Pro hac vice motions require fee and CM/ECF registration within 7 days of admission

Counsel seeking admission pro hac vice should use the form available on the Courts website at https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/forms/forms-miscellaneous. Judge Pappert will deny pro hac vice motions for which no fee is submitted. Any lawyer admitted pro hac vice must register for the Court's CM/ECF system within seven days of the Order.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Exhibits must be separately numbered attachments with clear objective titles.

Each document filed as an exhibit must be filed as a separately numbered attachment to the main document and must be clearly titled with an objective description of the document (e.g., 6/14/19 Deposition of John Doe; 10/14/21 Letter from Smith to Jones; 3/15/20-3/23/20 Email Thread between Doe and Roe) so that the nature of the exhibit and its relevance are clearly discernible without the need to open the file.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Non-compliance with requirements may result in brief being stricken.

Failure to comply with any of these requirements may result in the brief or memorandum being stricken from the record and not considered by the Court.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
exhibit list

Motions and responses must include an exhibit index.

All motions and responses shall include an index which clearly identifies and describes any exhibits.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment motions must cite specific record references.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment shall include specific references to the parts of the record that support the statements. Failure to cite specifically to the appropriate parts of the record may constitute grounds for denial of the requested relief.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Arbitration case

All discovery must be completed before arbitration hearing.

The parties are expected to complete all discovery prior to the date of the arbitration hearing.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Final pretrial proceedings
Must include
stipulations of counsel

All stipulations of counsel required for final pretrial.

a) All stipulations of counsel.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Final pretrial proceedings
Must include
objections to admissibility

Objections to evidence admissibility required with particularity.

b) A statement of objection to: (1) the admissibility of any exhibit based on authenticity; (2) the admissibility of any evidence expected to be offered for any reason (except objections to relevancy); (3) the adequacy of the qualifications of an expert witness expected to testify and (4) the admissibility of any opinion testimony from lay witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701. Such objection shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial proceedings
Must include
deposition testimony citations

Deposition testimony citations required for trial.

c) Deposition testimony (including videotaped deposition testimony) that the party intends to offer during its case-in-chief. The statement should include citations to the page and line number and the opposing party’s counter-designations.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must be tailored and include accurate citations.

Proposed jury instructions must be tailored and personalized for the case and must include accurate quotes from, and citations to, cases and pattern jury instructions where appropriate.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint exhibit book
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits must be pre-marked, exchanged in advance, and included in a joint exhibit book with exhibit list. Two copies must be provided to Court at final pretrial conference.

Exhibits must be pre-marked and exchanged in advance of trial. In civil cases, the parties will prepare one joint exhibit book with all exhibits that counsel may use at trial. The joint exhibit book must contain an exhibit list briefly describing each exhibit. Counsel should provide two copies of the joint exhibit book to the Court at the final pretrial conference.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
admitted into evidence

Witness may not testify about exhibit content until exhibit is admitted into evidence unless parties agree on admissibility.

Unless the parties have an agreement as to the admissibility of a proposed exhibit, a witness may not testify as to its content until it has been admitted into evidence.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Directed verdict motion
Must include
in writing

Motions for judgment as matter of law (jury) and involuntary dismissal (non-jury) must be in writing; oral argument usually allowed.

Motions for judgment as a matter of law in jury trials and motions for an involuntary dismissal in non-jury trials must be in writing. Oral argument on these motions is ordinarily permitted.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

In non-jury cases, parties must submit proposed findings/conclusions as specified in Scheduling Order, with option to submit revised versions after trial.

In non-jury cases, the parties shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as specified in the Scheduling Order. The parties may submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with specific reference to trial evidence at the conclusion of the case. A schedule for the submission of revised findings of fact and conclusions of law will be discussed at the conclusion of trial.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
oral or videotaped

For unavailable witnesses, Court expects oral or videotaped deposition to be used; unavailability not grounds for trial delay.

If a witness is unavailable at the time of trial, as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(4), the Court expects an oral or videotaped deposition to be used at trial for that witness, whether the witness is a party, a non-party or an expert. The unavailability of such witness will not be a ground to delay the commencement or progress of trial.

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Lay opinion testimony
Must include
notice to opposing parties

Parties must provide opposing parties with notice of expected lay opinion testimony under FRE 701 regarding liability or damages.

Any party expecting to offer lay opinion testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701 regarding issues of liability or damages shall provide the opposing parties

Judge Gerald J. PappertCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint status report
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Rule 26(f) status report must be emailed to chambers 3 business days before Rule 16 conference

At least three business days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel must complete and submit to my Reading chambers, by email, the joint status report of the Rule 26(f) meeting.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
client authority, lead trial counsel attendance

Lead trial counsel must attend Rule 16 conference with authority to discuss all subjects

Lead trial counsel must attend the Rule 16 conference. Counsel taking part in any pre-trial conference must be prepared to speak on every subject, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Arbitration

All discovery must be completed before arbitration hearing.

The parties are expected to complete all discovery prior to the date of the arbitration hearing.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Post arbitration

No discovery or dispositive motions after arbitration hearing.

Ordinarily, neither discovery nor dispositive motions will be allowed after the arbitration hearing.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for TRO and injunction hearings.

Judge Schmehl requires submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for TRO and injunction hearings. The court will set the time for submission of these items at the pre-hearing conference.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
citation to specific authority

Proposed jury instructions without citations will not be considered.

The court will not consider proposed instructions without citation to specific legal authority.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed jury instructions and verdict forms due 10 days before trial.

Judge Schmehl typically requires that the parties submit proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories for the jury no later than ten days before the trial.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to chambers.

Counsel should submit a copy of the proposed jury instructions to chambers via email.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
page references, accurate quoting

Cited cases and model instructions must be accurately quoted with page references.

Cases and model jury instructions that are cited should be accurately quoted and a page reference should be provided.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed findings and conclusions due 7 days before trial, emailed to chambers.

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases should be submitted to chambers via email at least seven days before the trial date.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
oral or videotaped deposition

Unavailable witnesses must have oral or videotaped deposition used at trial.

If a witness is unavailable at the time of trial, as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(3), the court expects an oral or videotaped deposition to be used at trial for that witness, whether the witness is a party, a non-party, or an expert.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Proposed voir dire questions must be submitted in writing 7 days before trial.

Counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions in writing seven days before the trial date.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
e discovery liaison

Each party must designate an e-discovery liaison by a specified date.

No later than , to promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison").

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint status report
Must include
chambers copy

Joint Status Report must be submitted to Chambers by email (preferred) or hard copy.

This form should be submitted to Chambers by email (preferred) or hard copy.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Motions in limine must typically be filed ten days before trial.

Judge Schmehl typically requires motions in limine to be filed ten days before trial.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be submitted for TRO and injunction hearings.

Judge Schmehl requires submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for TRO and injunction hearings.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Motions for JMOL and involuntary dismissal must be in writing.

Motions for judgment as a matter of law in jury trials and motions for an involuntary dismissal in non-jury trials must be in writing.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name

Proposed jury instructions must be submitted no later than ten days before trial via email to chambers.

Judge Schmehl typically requires that the parties submit proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories for the jury no later than ten days before the trial. Counsel should submit a copy of the proposed jury instructions to chambers via email.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
judge name

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases must be emailed to chambers at least seven days before trial.

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases should be submitted to chambers via email at least seven days before the trial date.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
no duplicate exhibits

Do not attach as exhibits documents already on the docket.

Do not attach as exhibits any documents that are already on the docket.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
web page exhibits

Web pages relied upon must be attached as exhibits.

You must attach as exhibits copies of any web pages relied upon.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request
Must include
ecf filing, good cause

Extension requests must be ECF motions/stipulations showing good cause; lack of diligence defeats good cause.

Requests for extensions of time must be made by motion or stipulation filed by ECF (and not sent to the Clerk of Court, e-mailed to chambers, or requested by telephone). Such requests — even if joint or unopposed — must show good cause for proposed extension. Lack of diligence generally defeats good cause.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Rule 12 motions to dismiss require meet-and-confer certification and discovery position statement.

Any Rule 12 motion to dismiss must be accompanied by a certification (preferably filed separately on the docket) that the parties have met and conferred on the substance of the motion, and a statement of each party’s position and reasons for whether or not discovery should proceed while the Rule 12 motion is pending.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redline version

Amended pleadings require a redline version showing changes.

Amended pleadings must always be accompanied by a redline version indicating the amendments that were made.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint rule 26f report

Joint Rule 26(f) report due 7 days before initial Rule 16 conference.

The parties must file a joint Rule 26(f) report no later than 7 days before the initial Rule 16 conference.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26a1 initial disclosures

Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures due 14 days before initial Rule 16 conference.

The parties must exchange Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures no later than 14 days before the initial Rule 16 conference.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
proposed order

Discovery motions must include detailed proposed orders with specific relief.

The motion (and any opposition) must include a detailed and specific proposed order setting forth the precise relief requested; only for the simplest of motions is it sufficient to merely state that the motion is granted.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Local Rule 26.1 certification must be specific and substantive or relief will be barred.

The Local Rule 26.1 certification should be specific and substantive. Failure to do so will usually bar relief.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
statement of facts

Summary judgment motion must include jointly prepared consolidated statement of facts and joint set of exhibits

A summary judgment motion must be accompanied by (a) a single, consolidated statement of facts that the parties will prepare jointly and that will be separately filed on the docket and (b) a joint set of all exhibits cited in the statement of facts.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
statement of facts

Moving party must file consolidated statement of facts and joint exhibits with summary judgment motion

The moving party must file the consolidated statement of facts and the joint set of exhibits with its motion.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed verdict sheets and jury instructions must be filed 7 days before final pretrial conference

At the time ordered, or otherwise no later than 7 days before the final pretrial conference, the parties shall file proposed verdict sheets and proposed jury instructions, together with objections, as follows:

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Plaintiff must serve draft jury instructions and verdict sheet 14 days before filing deadline

Unless otherwise ordered, at least 14 days before the deadline for filing proposed verdict sheets and proposed jury instructions, the plaintiff shall serve on defendant draft jury instructions and a draft verdict sheet, both in Word format. The draft instructions shall include thorough citations to model instructions or other legal authority relied upon.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Defendant must respond to draft jury instructions within 7 days with redline and comments

Defendant shall respond within 7 days by serving on plaintiff a redline version along with explanatory comment bubbles or some equivalent to establish areas of and reasons for disagreement.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Parties must meet and confer, then file single set of jury instructions with alternative language

The parties shall then meet and confer to resolve as many disputes as possible. Finally, by the court’s deadline, the parties shall file a single set of jury instructions and a single verdict sheet, clearly reflecting alternative language using different formatting, brackets, redlining, or the like, and reasons therefore.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Word versions of jury instructions must be emailed to chambers with redlines and comments

In addition to filing the jury instructions and verdict sheet on the docket, the parties shall e-mail to chambers the Word versions (with redlines, comment bubbles, and the like included).

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Final pretrial conference must cover memorandum, motions, objections, jury instructions, exhibits, and trial logistics

The final pretrial conference will be scheduled for a time between the filing of the integrated pretrial memorandum and the beginning of the trial. At the conference, counsel must be prepared to discuss all aspects of the memorandum; any pending motions; any objections that have been raised; the jury instructions and verdict sheet, if they have been filed; how exhibits will be handled and other trial logistics; and any other aspect of trial planning.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Dismissal request
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Dismissal requests for settled cases must be filed on the docket under Local Rule 41.1(b).

A request — filed on the docket — for a dismissal under Local Rule 41.1(b) because the case has settled.

Judge John F. MurphyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be filed as separate documents with descriptive names; single "Exhibits" file will be struck.

When submitting exhibits via ECF, Parties should submit each exhibit as a separate document on the CM/ECF system, rather than as a single file. If the Court receives a filing with a single document marked “Exhibits,” it will strike the filing. In addition, when parties submit exhibits via ECF, they must give each document a name identifying the document. Thus, it is not sufficient to label a file “Exhibit A.” Instead, the name should be “Exhibit A: Contract,” “Exhibit B: Declaration of John Smith,” or some other reference to permit the Court to identify what the exhibit is without having to open the file.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Submit written motion for pro hac vice admission.

To be admitted pro hac vice, associate counsel of record should submit a written motion for admission.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pro hac vice motions without fee will be denied.

The Court will deny pro hac vice motions for which no fee has been submitted and recorded on the docket.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 16 conference
Must include
lead counsel in person

Lead trial counsel must attend Rule 16 conference in person.

Lead trial counsel must attend the Rule 16 conference in person.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Joint status report
Must include
joint status report

Joint status report required 7 days before pretrial conference.

At least seven calendar days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel must submit to chambers a joint status report pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f form
Must include
use court sample form

Parties must use Court's sample Rule 26(f) form.

The parties must use the Court’s sample Rule 26(f) form that will be attached to the order scheduling the Rule 16 conference.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Initial pretrial conference
Must include
address all rule 16 topics, address settlement proposals

Parties must address all Rule 16 topics and settlement proposals at initial pretrial conference.

At the initial pretrial conference, the parties should be prepared to address all topics listed in the Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and (c), the progress of initial disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) and any settlement or mediation proposals.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Lead counsel
Must include
attend rule 16, participate rule 26

Lead counsel must participate in Rule 26 and attend Rule 16 conferences.

Lead counsel shall participate in the Rule 26 conference, attend the Rule 16 conference, and be deemed lead counsel for all future proceedings.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Lead counsel
Must include
attend all court proceedings

Lead counsel must attend all court proceedings.

A designation of 'lead counsel' will mean that counsel will attend all court proceedings.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Final pretrial conference

Final Pretrial Conference within 10 days of trial.

There will be a final Pretrial Conference within ten days of the trial.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
comply with local rule 16 1

Pretrial memorandum must comply with Local Rule 16.1.

Counsel shall comply with Local Rule 16.1 regarding the submission of a pretrial memorandum.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda due 10 days before Pretrial Conference.

Unless otherwise specified in a scheduling order, these memoranda shall be filed no later than then ten days prior to the Pretrial Conference.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
chambers copy

Stipulations and proposed orders must be emailed to chambers, not the Clerk.

Contrary to Local Civil Rule 5.1.2(10), all stipulations and proposed orders must be emailed to chambers rather than sent to the Clerk of Court.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply
Must include
leave of court

Replies and sur-replies require leave of court and must address only new issues.

Replies and sur-replies are not permitted unless leave to file them is granted upon motion of a party. Such briefs should be attached to a motion for leave as an exhibit, must be concise and address only new issues raised by opposing counsel. The Court discourages any replies or sur- replies that repeat or rehash previous arguments.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
statement of undisputed facts

Movant must file statement of undisputed facts with summary judgment motion.

The movant shall file, in support of the motion for summary judgment, a separate “statement of undisputed facts” that set forth, in numbered paragraphs, all material facts the movant contends are undisputed.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
statement of disputed facts

Respondent must file statement of disputed facts opposing summary judgment motion.

The respondent shall file, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, a separate “statement of disputed facts” responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the movant’s statement of undisputed facts.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
statement of additional facts

Respondent must include statement of additional facts with summary judgment opposition.

The respondent shall also set forth, in separate paragraphs under the heading “statement of additional facts,” any additional facts which the respondent contends preclude summary judgment.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
statement of undisputed facts

Undisputed facts deemed admitted unless controverted.

All material facts set forth in the statement of undisputed facts will be deemed admitted unless specifically controverted by the opposing party.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
statement of disputed facts

Facts disputed without evidence are deemed admitted.

If a party disputes a fact without citing supporting evidence, the fact will be deemed admitted.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
statement of undisputed facts

Fact statements must include specific record citations with title, page, and line.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment shall include specific and not general references to the parts of the record which support each of the statements. Each stated fact and each statement that a material fact is disputed shall cite to the source relied upon, including the title, page and line of the document supporting the statement.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
appendix

Movant must file appendix with all cited evidence.

The movant shall file an appendix containing all the evidence to which the movant refers in its motion.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
supplemental appendix

Respondent must file supplemental appendix with additional evidence.

The respondent shall file a supplemental appendix containing any additional evidence to which the respondent refers in its response.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Appendix
Must include
timely filed, appropriately formatted

Evidence not in timely filed, properly formatted appendix will not be considered.

Judge Gallagher will not consider any evidence not included in a timely filed and appropriately formatted appendix.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Dispositive motion
Must include
follow procedures

Non-compliance with appendix procedures results in denial or uncontested consideration.

A movant's failure to follow the foregoing procedures for dispositive motions in all respects will result in a denial of the motion. Respondent's failure to comply with these procedures in all respects will result in the Court's considering the motion uncontested.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
filed on ecf

Discovery dispute letters must be filed on ECF.

Counsel should provide the Court with a brief letter explaining the discovery dispute and requesting a conference. Such letters should be filed on ECF.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motion certificate must detail verbal efforts to resolve dispute.

In a filed discovery motion, the certificate of counsel must provide specific details about the parties’ efforts to resolve the dispute informally. These efforts must include verbal communications, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion

Must provide specific details of informal resolution efforts, not just 'reasonable efforts'.

It is not sufficient to report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made 'reasonable efforts.'

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions lacking required informal resolution details will be denied.

The Court will deny a discovery motion that does not meet these requirements.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
local rule certificate

All discovery motions must include certification under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

All motions must contain the certification required under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must provide sufficient information for opposing party to evaluate privilege claims.

Parties preparing privilege logs must provide information sufficient for the opposing party to determine the basis for the assertion of privilege.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must describe specific withheld emails, not just top-level emails in string.

For claims of privilege covering multiple e-mails, the party asserting privilege must describe the specific e-mails that are being withheld, as opposed to only the e-mail at the top of the e-mail string, and the basis for withholding each e-mail.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda must follow Local Rule 16.1(c) and include specific items.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the pretrial memorandum should be prepared in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1(c) and should also include the following items:

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda must include all stipulations of counsel.

1. All stipulations of counsel.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda must include specific evidentiary objections with particularity.

2. A statement of objection to: (1) the admissibility of any exhibit based on authenticity; (2) the admissibility of any evidence expected to be offered for any reason except relevancy; (3) the adequacy of the qualifications of an expert witness expected to testify; and (4) the admissibility of any opinion testimony from lay witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701. These objections must describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda must identify deposition testimony with citations.

3. An identification of deposition testimony (including videotaped deposition testimony) that the party intends to offer during its case-in-chief. The statement should include citations to the page and line number and the opposing party’s counter-designations.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda must include anticipated legal issues and best authority.

4. A statement of any anticipated important legal issues on which the Court will be required to rule as well as counsel’s single best authority on the issue.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
judge name, case number

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be submitted at least 7 days before trial in non-jury cases.

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases should be submitted at least seven days before the trial date.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire questions
Must include
certificate of service

Voir dire questions must be submitted to deputy clerk at least two days before jury selection.

Counsel must submit voir dire questions to the deputy clerk at least two days before jury selection. Insofar as counsel agree that certain questions should be asked, they may submit a list of those questions jointly. Insofar as counsel do not agree upon any questions, they may submit those questions independently. The Court will then review all the questions submitted and determine which will be asked.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit binder
Must include
joint exhibit binder

Civil cases require joint exhibit binders with all trial exhibits, including contested ones.

In civil cases, after exhibits have been exchanged, the parties must prepare joint exhibit binders containing all the exhibits counsel may use at trial, including those for which admissibility remains contested. Exhibits that are ruled inadmissible will simply not be used but need not be extracted from the binder.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
admissibility agreement

Witnesses cannot testify about exhibit content until it's admitted into evidence.

Unless the parties have an agreement as to the admissibility of a proposed exhibit, a witness may not testify as to its content until it has been admitted into evidence. But the Court strongly encourages counsel to reach agreements before trial as to the admissibility of exhibits.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
oral deposition, videotaped deposition

For unavailable witnesses, the Court expects oral or videotaped depositions to be used at trial.

If a witness is unavailable at the time of trial, as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(3), the Court expects an oral or videotaped deposition to be used at trial for that witness, whether the witness is a party, a non-party or an expert.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Voir dire questions
Must include
proposed voir dire questions

Proposed voir dire questions must be submitted 7 days before trial.

Counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions in writing seven days before the trial date.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Pre trial memorandum
Must include
legal issues, witness identities, facts to be presented +2 more

Government must file pre-trial memorandum 7 days before trial with specific content requirements.

At least seven days prior to the trial date, the Government must file a pre-trial memorandum setting forth the essential elements of the offense(s), the facts that it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness’s testimony, and any legal issues.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions verdict forms
Must include
joint proposed set

Joint proposed jury instructions and verdict forms required.

The Court will generally require the parties to submit a joint proposed set of jury instructions and verdict forms.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions verdict forms
Must include
agreed instructions indicated, contested instructions indicated

Submission must indicate agreed and contested jury instructions and verdict forms.

Counsel’s submission must indicate which instructions and forms have been agreed upon and which remain contested.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions verdict forms
Must include
disputed instruction statements

Disputed jury instructions require concise statements of each party's position and supporting authorities.

Insofar as the parties disagree on any proposed jury instruction, the joint submission should contain a concise statement that identifies each party’s position on the instruction, the reasons supporting the party’s position, and citation to the best authorities supporting each party’s position.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, legal citations +4 more

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum at least 7 days before plea hearing with specific required content.

The Government must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least seven days prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement, and the factual basis for the plea.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Sentencing motions due 14 days before hearing; responses due 7 days before. Sentencing memoranda due 7 days before; responses due 3 days before.

Any sentencing motions shall be submitted at least fourteen days prior to the sentencing hearing, and any responses thereto must be filed at least seven days prior to the sentencing date. All sentencing memoranda, exclusive of motions, must be filed at least seven days prior to the sentencing date, and any responses thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the sentencing date.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Sentencing memoranda (non-motion) due 7 days before sentencing; responses due 3 days before.

All sentencing memoranda, exclusive of motions, must be filed at least seven days prior to the sentencing date, and any responses thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the sentencing date.

Judge John M. GallagherCRITICAL
Applies to
Written submission

Substantive arguments are prohibited in footnotes of written submissions; such arguments will not be considered or preserved for appeal.

The parties shall not include substantive arguments in footnotes. Judge Wolson will not consider substantive arguments made in footnotes, nor will he deem those arguments preserved.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief, sur reply brief

Replies and sur-replies should only be filed when necessary, must be concise, address only new issues raised by opposing counsel, and should not rehash previous arguments.

Counsel should file replies and sur-replies only when necessary. Such briefs must be concise and address only new issues raised by opposing counsel. Judge Wolson discourages any replies or sur-replies that repeat or rehash previous arguments.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Any

Parties are prohibited from making additional submissions except to notify the court of subsequent binding authority.

Parties may not make additional submissions, whether captioned as a brief, a letter, a notice, or anything else, other than to notify Judge Wolson of subsequent binding authority.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
word count

Briefs using the word count limit instead of the page limit must include a certification that the brief contains no more than the applicable word count.

unless counsel includes a certification that the brief contains no more than 8,750 words.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment motions must be accompanied by a joint consolidated statement of facts and joint set of all cited exhibits.

A summary judgment motion must be accompanied by (a) a single, consolidated statement of facts that the parties will prepare jointly and that will be separately filed on the docket and (b) a joint set of all exhibits cited in the statement of facts.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Statement of undisputed material facts

Statement of undisputed material facts must be in numbered, paragraph-by-paragraph format with specific citations to supporting exhibits or testimony.

a statement of undisputed material facts in a numbered, paragraph-by-paragraph recitation that contains specific citations to exhibits or testimony supporting each factual assertion;

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Response to statement of facts

Response to statement of undisputed facts must include each response directly under the original paragraph, citations to evidence creating material dispute or arguing moving party's evidence is insufficient, and any additional facts for summary judgment briefing.

the responding party’s response to each factual assertion, which shall be directly under the original paragraph and must include citation to any evidence that the responding party contends creates a material factual dispute and/or any argument for why the evidence that the moving party has cited does not support the factual assertion or is not admissible; and (b) any additional facts that the responding party intends to submit as part of the summary judgment briefing;

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Parties are prohibited from incorporating by reference arguments from other briefs; repeated arguments must be included in full in the brief, or they will not be considered.

Parties may not incorporate by reference arguments from other briefs in the case, including briefs filed by other parties or briefs filed earlier in the case. If a party needs to repeat an argument that was made earlier in the case, then that party must include the substance of the argument in the brief. If a party purports to incorporate an argument by reference, Judge Wolson will not consider the argument.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Response

Parties are prohibited from responding to a motion for reconsideration unless the Court orders a response.

Parties shall not respond to a motion for reconsideration absent a Court Order.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion

Discovery motions must include attachments of the relevant discovery requests and written responses.

All discovery motions must attach the discovery requests at issue, as well as the written response.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions' certificate of counsel must detail informal resolution efforts, including verbal communications; emails/letters alone are insufficient, and vague 'reasonable efforts' claims are prohibited.

In filing a discovery motion, the certificate of counsel must provide specific details of the parties’ efforts to resolve the dispute informally. These efforts must include verbal communications, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient. It is not sufficient to report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made “reasonable efforts.” Judge Wolson will deny a discovery motion that does not meet these requirements.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

All motions must include the certification required by Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

All motions must contain the certification required under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must provide sufficient information for the opposing party to determine the privilege basis; for multiple withheld emails, each must be described unless the same privilege applies to all, allowing collective description.

Parties preparing privilege logs must provide information sufficient for the opposing party to determine the basis for the assertion of privilege. For claims of privilege covering multiple e-mails, the party asserting privilege must describe the specific e-mails that are being withheld, as opposed to only the e-mail at the top of the e-mail string, and the basis for withholding each e-mail. Where several e-mails are exchanged between individuals, and the same privilege claim applies to all those e-mails, the party asserting privilege may describe the e-mails collectively, rather than one-by-one.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Requests for protective orders or confidentiality agreement approvals must be filed as motions; stipulated proposed orders are not accepted in lieu of a motion.

Any request for a protective order or approval of a confidentiality agreement must be made by motion. Judge Wolson will not accept stipulated proposed orders in lieu of a motion.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda must include all matters required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1, plus the party’s position on trial time limits and proposed limit if applicable.

When a party submits a pretrial memorandum, it must include all matters set forth in Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1, as well as its position on whether Judge Wolson should impose time limits on each side’s trial presentation and, if Judge Wolson does impose a time limit, what that limit should be.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation of dismissal

Parties seeking to have Judge Wolson retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement must either place the settlement agreement on the docket or include all material terms of the agreement in the stipulation of dismissal.

If the parties want Judge Wolson to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement, they must place the agreement on the docket or include all material terms in a stipulation of dismissal.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Briefs exceeding 10 pages must contain a table of contents.

Any briefs longer than ten pages must include a table of contents.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Written submission

Substantive arguments in footnotes are prohibited and will not be considered or preserved.

The parties shall not include substantive arguments in footnotes. Judge Wolson will not consider substantive arguments made in footnotes, nor will it deem those arguments preserved.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Continuance motions must state reasons for request and include a proposed order complying with the Speedy Trial Act.

A party seeking a continuance must submit a motion stating the reasons for the request. Any such motion must be accompanied by a proposed order consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders for continuances must include a finding explaining why ends of justice outweigh speedy trial interests.

The order shall include a proposed finding that explains in reasonable detail why the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Continuance motions for trial dates must include a first trial listing.

Any motion for a continuance of a trial date must be accompanied with a first trial listing.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pre-trial memoranda must include essential elements, facts, witness list, witness testimony, and legal issues.

At least seven days prior to the trial date, the Government must file a pre-trial memorandum setting forth the essential elements of the offense(s), the facts that it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness’s testimony, and any legal issues.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Guilty plea memoranda must include elements of the offense (text cut off).

The memorandum shall include the elements of

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Government sentencing memoranda must include detailed restitution information if the defendant is responsible for restitution.

If a defendant is responsible for restitution, then the Government must submit information in its sentencing memorandum to enable Judge Wolson to determine entitlement, the name and the address of each victim, the amount of loss for each victim, and documentary support for each amount.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

For joint and several restitution liability, the Government must itemize each defendant's restitution responsibility in its sentencing memorandum.

If liability for restitution is joint and several, then the Government shall itemize the restitution amount for which each defendant is responsible.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
certificate of conference

Certificate of concurrence or non-concurrence must be attached to motion to seal.

A certificate of concurrence or non-concurrence must be attached.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order.

A proposed order shall accompany each motion or other request for relief.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of concurrence

All motions must include a Certificate of Concurrence or Non-Concurrence.

All motions shall be accompanied by a Certificate of Concurrence or Non-Concurrence.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation

Stipulations are not effective until approved by the Court

Stipulations are not effective until approved by the Court.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Motion certification required stating good faith efforts to resolve discovery dispute.

If the parties are directed by the Court to file a motion, counsel must certify as part of the motion that all counsel have already made a good faith effort to resolve the issue themselves as required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 26.1.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary injunction
Must include
witness information exchange

Moving party must exchange witness and exhibit information 4 business days before injunction hearing.

The following are to be exchanged by counsel, and filed with the Court in advance of any hearing on a preliminary or permanent injunction: (a) No later than four (4) business days before the hearing, the moving party shall furnish to all opposing parties the names, addresses, and employers of all witnesses, a summary of testimony to be presented by each witness, any affidavits to be filed in connection with the hearing, and copies of all exhibits to be submitted at the hearing.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary injunction
Must include
witness information exchange

Non-moving party must exchange witness and exhibit information 2 business days before injunction hearing.

(b) No later than two (2) business days before the hearing, the non-moving party shall furnish to the moving party the names, addresses, and employers of all witnesses, a summary of testimony to be presented by each witness, any affidavits to be filed in connection with the hearing, and copies of all exhibits to be submitted at the hearing.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Temporarily restraining order

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for TRO and injunction hearings.

The parties are required to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for TRO and injunction hearings.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment motions must include a separate statement of undisputed material facts.

Any motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be accompanied by a separate, short, and concise statement, in numbered paragraphs, of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
record citations

Summary judgment facts must be cited to specific record portions with exhibit, page, and line numbers.

The moving party shall accompany each factual assertion with a citation to the specific portion(s) of the record that support the assertion, including the exhibit, page, and line numbers.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
deposition transcripts

Deposition transcripts must be attached to summary judgment motions when cited.

When a factual assertion cites to a deposition transcript, counsel shall attach a copy of the entire transcript containing the cited testimony to the motion.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment opposition

Opposition to summary judgment must respond to each undisputed fact paragraph.

A party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a separate, short, and concise statement responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the moving party’s statement of undisputed facts and shall either concede the facts as undisputed or state that a genuine dispute exists.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment opposition
Must include
record citations

Opposition to summary judgment must cite specific record portions for disputed facts.

If the opposing party asserts a genuine dispute exists as to any fact, the party shall cite to the specific portion(s) of the record that create the dispute, including the exhibit, page, and line number.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment opposition

Opposition to summary judgment must include additional material facts in enumerated paragraphs.

The opposing party shall also set forth in enumerated paragraphs any additional material facts that the party contends preclude summary judgment.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment opposition
Must include
deposition transcripts

Deposition transcripts must be attached to summary judgment opposition when cited.

When a factual assertion cites to a deposition transcript, counsel shall attach a copy of the entire transcript containing the cited text.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order must be narrowly tailored and identify sealable material in table format.

The proposed order must be narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material and must clearly identify, in table format, each document (or portion thereof) that is sought to be sealed.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Joint jury instructions must quote/cite model instructions and conform to Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions unless compelling reason to deviate.

One (1) copy of joint proposed jury instructions on substantive issues, which shall accurately quote or cite, as applicable, model jury instructions or case citations from which the instructions were derived, and proposed verdict forms (or special interrogatories). The proposed instructions shall conform to the Third Circuit's Model Jury Instructions, if applicable, unless there is a compelling argument for deviation.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Non-agreed jury instructions must be marked to show specific words of disagreement.

Each party shall submit one (1) copy of proposed jury instructions and verdict forms (or special interrogatories) on those issues not agreed upon by the parties in their joint submission, all of which shall be marked to show the specific words on which the parties do not agree.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Briefs must include specific sections in order: Statement of Facts, Questions Involved, Summary of Argument, Argument, Conclusion, Proposed Order

All briefs shall consist of the following matters, separately and distinctly titled and in the following order: (a) Statement of Facts (b) Statement of the Questions Involved (c) Summary of Argument (d) Argument (e) Short conclusion stating the precise relief sought (f) Proposed Order that would grant the precise relief sought

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Briefs must cite record with exhibit, page, and line numbers

When referring to the record, all briefs must specify the relevant exhibit, page, and line numbers.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply briefs must be filed within 7 days of opposition service

Parties shall file a reply brief no later than seven (7) days after the opposition is served.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order formatted for judge's signature

A proposed order shall accompany each motion or other request for relief. The order shall be formatted for the Judge’s signature (for example, do not include the word “proposed” in the text of the order).

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Government must file guilty plea memorandum 7 days before plea hearing

At least seven (7) calendar days prior to the plea hearing, the Government must file a guilty plea memorandum.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea agreement

Guilty plea agreement must be submitted 7 days before plea hearing

A copy of the acknowledgment of rights and guilty plea agreement, if any, must also be submitted to the court at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the plea hearing, and may be emailed to the Criminal Deputy Clerk.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea agreement

Guilty plea agreement must specify plea type

The guilty plea agreement must state whether the plea is a general plea of guilty, a conditional plea, or a plea of nolo contendere.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea agreement

Guilty plea agreement must disclose plea type under Rule 11(c)(1)

The guilty plea agreement also must disclose to the defendant and the Court whether the plea is entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A), (B) or (C).

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea agreement

Guilty plea agreement must advise defendant of punishments and appellate rights

The guilty plea agreement should advise the defendant of the maximum punishments, of any mandatory minimum punishments, and of his appellate rights.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Government's guilty plea memorandum must include offense elements, penalties, plea terms, and factual basis

The Government’s guilty plea memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties and any mandatory minimum punishments for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement, and the factual basis for the plea.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Contraband evidence must be maintained by law enforcement when court is not in session.

In all cases where money, firearms, narcotics, controlled substances or any matter of contraband is introduced into evidence, such evidence shall be maintained for safekeeping by law enforcement during all times when court is not in session, and at the conclusion of the case.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Parties must maintain custody of released exhibits until final disposition of appeals and retrials.

Counsel shall maintain custody of all released exhibits in its possession until the final disposition of all appeals and retrials, if any.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Unclaimed exhibits will be destroyed after 72 hours.

Any exhibits that are not picked up within seventy-two (72) hours thereafter will be destroyed.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
Must include
judge name, case number

Proposed findings of fact must cite specific transcript pages and lines.

If the parties are directed to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, all proposed findings of fact shall cite to specific pages and lines of the transcript where the proposed findings of fact appear.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
party with settlement authority

Parties must attend in-person settlement conferences with full settlement authority.

Judge Leeson requires that a party or party’s representative with knowledge of the case and full and binding settlement authority attend the chambers conference in person.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
settlement conference memorandum

Settlement conference memorandum required one week before conference, max 3 pages.

Judge Leeson requires counsel to submit, for his confidential review, a brief written settlement conference memorandum one week before any scheduled in-person settlement conference or telephone settlement conference, which shall not exceed three (3) pages in length.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
chambers copy
Format
DOCX

Settlement conference memoranda must be emailed to chambers in Word format, not filed with clerk or ECF

Settlement conference memoranda are not to be filed with the Clerk of Court or filed electronically through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing (ECF) System. Instead, each memorandum must be sent to chambers, via e-mail in Microsoft Word format, at: Chambers_of_Judge_Joseph_F_Leeson_Jr@paed.uscourts.gov

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit chart

Each exhibit number in the chart must be hyperlinked to the corresponding exhibit file in the appropriate folder.

Counsel shall ensure that each exhibit number in the exhibit chart is hyperlinked to the corresponding file in the appropriate subfolder.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
On the record agreement

Counsel must agree on the record to the use of the laptop during deliberations and to the accuracy of the exhibits loaded on it as matching the admitted evidence.

The Court will have counsel agree on the record to the following: 1. The use of the laptop during deliberations, and 2. They have reviewed all the exhibits on the laptop and agree they are accurate copies of the exhibits admitted into evidence at trial.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
record citation format

Record citations must include exhibit, page, and line numbers.

When referring to the record in the briefing on any motion, counsel must specify the relevant exhibit, page, and line numbers.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Summary judgment motions require separate statement of undisputed material facts in numbered paragraphs.

Any motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 shall be accompanied by a separate, short, and concise statement, in numbered paragraphs, of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
record citation format

Factual assertions in summary judgment statements must cite specific record portions with exhibit, page, and line numbers.

Each factual assertion shall be accompanied by a citation to the specific portion(s) of the record that support the assertion, including the exhibit, page, and line number. The Court will not consider factual assertions not supported by a citation to the record.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment

Opposition to summary judgment requires separate statement responding to moving party's numbered paragraphs.

A party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a separate, short, and concise statement responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the moving party’s statement of undisputed facts and either conceding the facts as undisputed or stating a genuine dispute exists.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
record citation format

Opposition must cite specific record portions when asserting genuine disputes in summary judgment.

If the opposing party asserts a genuine dispute exists as to any fact, the party shall cite to the specific portion(s) of the record that create the dispute, including the exhibit, page, and line number.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment

Opposition must include enumerated paragraphs of additional facts precluding summary judgment.

The opposing party shall also set forth in enumerated paragraphs any additional facts which the party contends preclude summary judgment.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment

Uncontroverted facts in moving party's statement are deemed admitted.

All facts set forth in the moving party’s statement of undisputed facts shall be deemed admitted unless controverted by the opposing party.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
entire deposition transcript

Entire deposition transcript must be submitted when using deposition testimony as exhibit.

When submitting deposition testimony as an exhibit, parties are requested to submit the entire deposition transcript.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
permission required for non dispositive

Reply briefs allowed without leave for summary judgment and dispositive motions; permission required for non-dispositive.

Reply briefs may be submitted without leave of Court in support of a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, and with the Court’s permission in support of non-dispositive motions.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply briefs must be filed within 7 days of opposition filing.

Replies shall be submitted no later than seven days after the opposition is filed.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Points for charge
Must include
joint submission

Joint points for charge and verdict slip must be filed on docket and emailed to chambers in Word format.

The parties shall also submit joint requested points for charge and a joint verdict slip with only the disputed points highlighted. Judge Sánchez prefers the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions, where applicable, but will hear argument on reasons for deviations. The joint requested points for charge and joint verdict slip shall be filed on the docket, one instruction per page in sequence, and shall be sent by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Sanchez@paed.uscourts.gov in Microsoft Word format. An email to chambers does not constitute filing.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
proposed order

Continuance requests must be filed as motions with proposed orders.

A request for a continuance must be filed as a motion stating the reasons for the request. Any such motion must be accompanied by a proposed form of order which, if approved by the Court, would grant the relief sought by the motion.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion

Continuance orders must comply with Speedy Trial Act and include detailed findings.

The proposed form of order must be consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), and must include a proposed finding that explains in reasonable detail why the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial continuance motion
Must include
proposed order

Trial continuance requests must be made by motion.

Requests for a continuance of trial must be made by motion, as set forth in Section IV.C. below.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial motion

Pretrial motions must follow Scheduling Order deadlines.

All pretrial motions—including motions in limine and any motions challenging the indictment, seeking suppression of evidence, or raising any dispositive matters—must be filed in accordance with the deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order entered in the case.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Parties must advise Court about testimony plans when filing motions.

Upon the filing of any motion, the parties shall advise the Court whether they intend to present testimony in support of or in opposition to the motion and the expected duration of any such testimony, so that the Court can schedule a motion hearing, if necessary.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 404b notice
Must include
brief summary, purpose identification, logical chain explanation +1 more

Government must file Rule 404(b) notice before final pretrial conference with summary, purpose, logical chain, and proposed jury instruction.

If the Government expects to introduce Rule 404(b) evidence relating to other crimes, wrongs, or acts, it must file a notice of its intention to do so prior to the final pretrial conference. The notice shall include a brief summary of the proposed evidence. It shall also identify the purpose for which the evidence will be offered and explain how the evidence fits into a chain of logical inferences connecting it to a proper purpose, no link of which is an improper propensity inference. See United States v. Davis, 726 F.3d 434, 442 (3d Cir. 2013). The notice shall also include a proposed jury instruction to precede the introduction of such evidence.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea documents
Must include
plea memorandum, filing on docket, guilty plea agreement +1 more

Plea documents must be provided to court 2 days before plea hearing and filed on docket.

Before a defendant offers a guilty plea, the plea memorandum, guilty plea agreement (if applicable), and acknowledgment of rights must be completed and reviewed with the defendant, and must be provided to the Court two days prior to the change of plea hearing, if possible. Plea papers may be transmitted to chambers in hard copy or by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Sanchez@paed.uscourts.gov, with a copy to Nancy_DeLisle@paed.uscourts.gov. Parties must also file plea memoranda on the docket.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea agreement
Must include
plea type specification, no withdrawal right notice, rule 11 c 1 subsection disclosure

Plea agreement must specify plea type and Rule 11(c)(1) subsection, and inform defendant of no withdrawal right under 11(c)(1)(B).

The guilty plea agreement and memorandum must state whether the plea is a general plea of guilty, a conditional plea, or a plea of nolo contendere. The guilty plea agreement also must disclose to the defendant and the Court whether the plea is entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A), (B) or (C), relating to the obligation of the Government regarding other charges under subsection (A), a non-binding sentencing recommendation under subsection (B), or a binding sentencing recommendation under subsection (C). In addition, the plea agreement must inform the defendant and remind the Court, pursuant to Rule 11(c)(3)(B), that the defendant has no right to withdraw the plea if the Court does not follow the recommendation or request if the plea is entered under 11(c)(1)(B).

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Psr objections
Must include
advance submission to probation officer

PSR objections must be sent to probation officer before sentencing; cannot raise for first time in sentencing memorandum.

To avoid delay in sentencing, all objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) must be sent to the probation officer in advance of sentencing. In no event shall counsel raise objections for the first time in a sentencing memorandum.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing motion
Must include
filing deadline, response deadline, email not sufficient

Sentencing motions must be filed 14 days before sentencing; responses 7 days before. Email to chambers not sufficient.

Sentencing motions and supporting memoranda must be filed at least 14 days prior to the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least seven days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. Emailing these materials to chambers does not constitute filing.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
filing deadline, response deadline, simultaneous filing

Sentencing memoranda must be filed simultaneously one week before sentencing; responses 3 days before.

Sentencing memoranda (exclusive of motions) by both the Government and the defense must be filed simultaneously no later than one week before the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request

Extension requests must specify if opposed and whether other deadlines are affected.

Requests for extensions of case management deadlines may be submitted by letter sent via email, facsimile, or hard copy, and must state whether the request is opposed or unopposed and whether the requested extension will affect other existing deadlines.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter

Discovery dispute letter must certify good faith effort to resolve the issue.

The letter must certify that counsel have made a good faith effort to resolve the issue themselves.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint rule 16 conference information report

Parties must email the completed Joint Rule 16 Conference Information Report to chambers at least one day before the conference.

The parties must also complete the Joint Rule 16 Conference Information Report included in these Policies and Procedures here, and must email the completed Report to chambers no later than one day before the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Criminal continuance requests must be by motion stating reasons and accompanied by proposed order.

A request for a continuance must be filed as a motion stating the reasons for the request. Any such motion must be accompanied by a proposed form of order which, if approved by the Court, would grant the relief sought by the motion.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order for continuance must comply with Speedy Trial Act and include detailed finding on ends of justice.

The proposed form of order must be consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), and must include a proposed finding that explains in reasonable detail why the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Guilty plea documents must be provided to the Court two days prior to the change of plea hearing.

Before a defendant offers a guilty plea, the plea memorandum, guilty plea agreement (if applicable), and acknowledgment of rights must be completed and reviewed with the defendant, and must be provided to the Court two days prior to the change of plea hearing, if possible.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing motion

Sentencing motions must be filed 14 days before sentencing; responses 7 days before. Email does not constitute filing.

Sentencing motions and supporting memoranda must be filed at least 14 days prior to the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least seven days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. Emailing these materials to chambers does not constitute filing.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda must be filed simultaneously no later than one week before sentencing; responses 3 days before.

Sentencing memoranda (exclusive of motions) by both the Government and the defense must be filed simultaneously no later than one week before the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Psr objections

PSR objections must be sent to the probation officer in advance; cannot be first raised in a sentencing memorandum.

To avoid delay in sentencing, all objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) must be sent to the probation officer in advance of sentencing. In no event shall counsel raise objections for the first time in a sentencing memorandum.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of intention

Government must file notice of Rule 404(b) evidence before final pretrial conference with summary, purpose, and logical inference chain.

If the Government expects to introduce Rule 404(b) evidence relating to other crimes, wrongs, or acts, it must file a notice of its intention to do so prior to the final pretrial conference. The notice shall include a brief summary of the proposed evidence. It shall also identify the purpose for which the evidence will be offered and explain how the evidence fits into a chain of logical inferences connecting it to a proper purpose, no link of which is an improper propensity inference.

Judge Juan R. SánchezCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery disclosure

Parties must disclose electronic search restrictions within 30 days.

If the parties intend to employ an electronic search to locate relevant electronic documents, the parties shall disclose, within thirty days, any restrictions as to the scope and the method which might affect their ability to conduct a complete electronic search of the electronic documents.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery agreement

Parties must agree on search methodology with e-discovery liaisons.

The parties shall reach agreement as to the method of searching, and the words, terms, and phrases to be searched with the assistance of the respective e-discovery liaisons, who are charged with familiarity with the parties' respective systems.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery plan

Electronic discovery must follow sequenced process with limited accessibility documents last.

Discovery of electronic documents shall proceed in the following sequenced fashion: a. After receiving requests for document production, the parties shall search their documents, other than those identified as limited accessibility electronic documents, and produce responsive electronic documents in accordance with Rule 26(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; b. Electronic searches of documents identified as of limited accessibility shall not be conducted until the initial electronic document search has been completed;

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Limited accessibility request

Limited accessibility document searches require narrow focus and factual basis.

Electronic searches of documents identified as of limited accessibility shall not be conducted until the initial electronic document search has been completed; requests for limited accessibility documents must be narrowly focused with a factual basis supporting the request;

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Inspection request

On-site inspections of electronic media prohibited unless exceptional circumstances.

On-site inspections of electronic media under Rule 34(b) shall not be permitted, absent exceptional circumstances where good cause and specific need have been demonstrated.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Native format request

Native format production requires demonstration of particularized need after initial image file production.

After initial production in image file format is complete, a party must demonstrate particularized need for production of electronic documents in their native format.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Preservation agreement

Parties must negotiate agreement on steps to preserve electronic documents.

The parties shall negotiate an agreement that outlines the steps each party shall take to segregate and preserve the integrity of all relevant electronic documents.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Retention coordinator responsibilities

Retention coordinators must ensure identified custodians' emails are not permanently deleted.

The retention coordinators shall: a. Take steps to ensure that e-mail of identified custodians shall not be permanently deleted in the ordinary course of business and that electronic documents

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Legal citation
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-generated legal citations must be disclosed and verified for accuracy.

If any attorney for a party, or a pro se party, has used generative Artificial Intelligence ("AI")—including but not limited to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or any other program that uses machine learning to create new content—in a citation of any legal authority filed with the Court, and assigned to Judge Kai N. Scott, then they MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that generative AI has been used to assist with the citation of legal authority, disclose what specific generative AI program was used, and CERTIFY that each and every citation of legal authority has been verified as accurate.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
All filings
Must include
ai disclosure

Any attorney or pro se party using AI in preparing a filing must disclose that use and certify that all citations to law or the record have been verified as accurate.

If any attorney for a party, or a pro se party, has used Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the preparation of any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper, filed with the Court, and assigned to Judge Kai N. Scott, MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that AI has been used in any way in the preparation of the filing, and CERTIFY, that each and every citation to the law or the record in the paper, has been verified as accurate.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion

Local counsel must file a pro hac vice motion specifying the attorney's admissions, the reason for their participation, and their qualifications.

Local counsel must file a motion for pro hac vice admission of another attorney. The motion must specify (1) the attorney’s admissions, (2) why the party desires that attorney to participate in litigation, and (3) why that attorney is particularly qualified to represent the party.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
proposed order, certificate of conference

Discovery dispute motions must include a LR 26.1(f) certification, a proposed order, and a brief of up to 5 pages.

If an unresolvable discovery dispute arises, the aggrieved party must file the following: • A motion that (1) complies with Local Civil Rule 26.1(f) by certifying that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute, and (2) specifies whether the parties request a telephone conference with Judge Scott to resolve the matter; • A proposed order; and • A brief of up to five (5) pages that (1) outlines the efforts the parties have made to resolve the dispute and (2) cites any applicable legal authority.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Continuance motions must include a proposed order.

Continuance requests for motions and discovery deadlines, hearings, and trial must be filed in the form of a motion and must include a proposed order. Joint continuance requests must be filed as an unopposed motion.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

A Rule 56 motion must include a separate statement of material facts with each fact in a numbered paragraph and pinpoint citations to exhibit, page, and line.

A statement of facts must accompany a moving party's motion for summary judgment. The parties may jointly file a statement of stipulated material facts. Alternatively, the moving party may file proposed undisputed material facts. Regardless of which option the parties choose, the moving party must file that initial statement of material facts as a separate document with the moving party's Rule 56 motion. Each fact must be in a separately numbered paragraph and accompanied by pinpoint citations that cite not only the relevant exhibit, but the relevant page and line number of that exhibit.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Response

The nonmoving party must respond to each numbered Rule 56 fact by admitting, disputing with citations, or explaining immateriality, and may add additional facts.

Unless the parties file joint stipulated material facts, the nonmoving party must respond to each numbered material fact by either (1) stating that the fact is undisputed, (2) explaining exactly how it is disputed and providing appropriate citations, or (3) explaining why the fact is immaterial to resolution of any claim with appropriate citations. The nonmoving party may also provide additional undisputed material facts; the movant may respond to these facts in kind in a document separate from any reply brief.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Appendix

Parties filing separate appendices must submit documents in full context and cite to the moving party's appendix.

the parties may file separate appendices, with the following restrictions: (1) the moving party must submit documents in their full relevant context rather than excerpts of documents, and (2) the responding party must cite to the moving party's appendix wherever possible and is encouraged to mark exhibits as a continuation of the moving party's appendix pages or exhibit numbers.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must clearly indicate changes through comments, track changes, or both.

Amended pleadings must clearly indicate the additions or corrections made through comments, track changes, or both (the party may file both a clean copy and a copy with track changes).

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda must include specific content including witnesses, expert reports, motions in limine, depositions, objections, stipulations, voir dire questions, and jury instructions.

Pretrial memoranda must be submitted at least (7) business days prior to the final pretrial conference and must include the following: A list of witnesses and the substance of each witness's testimony. All expert witnesses' reports and CVs, if not previously submitted. A list and brief description of any motions in limine. Notice of any depositions (written or video) that the party intends to use at trial. Any objections to witnesses and exhibits that the parties have been unable to resolve. Wherever applicable, the objecting party must identify the page of an exhibit and page and line number of a deposition that the party objects to and state the basis of the objection. A list of any joint stipulations that the parties plan to enter at trial. Proposed joint questions for voir dire. Proposed joint jury instructions and verdict forms.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Joint jury instructions must use the form template from the Judge's website; Voir Dire will not be accepted otherwise.

Counsel are directed to confer with each other and submit joint jury instructions using the form template provided on the Judge's website located at https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/judges-info/district-court-judges/kai-n-scott. Voir Dire will not be accepted if it is not on the form provided.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Continuance motions must include a signed speedy trial waiver form, a proposed order, and a proposed finding on the ends of justice.

Any such motion must be accompanied by a speedy trial waiver consent form (found on Judge Scott's Court website) signed by the defendant(s) and defendant(s) attorney(s), together with proposed form order consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8), and must include a proposed finding explaining in reasonable detail why the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement

Guilty plea documents (memorandum, agreement, acknowledgement of rights, sealed supplemental) must be completed and provided to the judge at least 3 business days before the plea hearing.

Before a defendant offers a guilty plea, counsel for the Government must complete the guilty plea memorandum, guilty plea agreement, acknowledgement of rights, and a sealed supplemental, and counsel for the defendant must review those documents with the defendant. Counsel must also provide copies of those documents to Judge Scott at least three (3) business days prior to the plea hearing.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement

The guilty plea agreement must state the plea type, disclose the Rule 11(c)(1) subsection, and inform the defendant of no right to withdraw under Rule 11(c)(3)(B).

The guilty plea agreement must state whether the plea is a general plea of guilty, a conditional plea, or a plea of nolo contendere. The guilty plea agreement also must disclose to the defendant and Judge Scott whether the plea is entered under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A), (B) or (C), relating to the obligation of the United States regarding other charges under subsection (A), a non-binding sentencing recommendation under subsection (B), or a binding sentencing recommendation under subsection (C). In addition, the plea agreement must inform the defendant and remind Judge Scott, under Rule 11(c)(3)(B), the defendant has no right to withdraw the plea if Judge Scott does not follow the recommendation or request if the plea is entered under Rule 11(c)(1)(B).

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea memorandum

The guilty plea memorandum must include elements, citations, penalties, agreement terms, and factual basis, and be submitted 3 business days before the change of plea hearing.

The United States must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least three (3) business days prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement and the factual basis for the plea.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Presentence report

Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report must be sent to the probation officer in advance of sentencing, not first raised in a sentencing memorandum.

To avoid delay in sentencing, all objections to the Presentence Investigation Report must be sent to the probation officer in advance of sentencing. In no event shall counsel raise objections for the first time in a sentencing memorandum.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
restitution information

Sentencing memoranda must include restitution information: victim names/addresses, loss amounts, and documentary support; joint and several liability must be itemized per defendant.

If a defendant may be responsible for restitution, the United States must submit sufficient information in its sentencing memorandum to enable Judge Scott to determine entitlement, the name and the address of each victim, the amount of loss for each victim, and documentary support for each amount. If liability for restitution is joint and several, the United States shall itemize the restitution amount for which each defendant may be responsible.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint submission

Parties must jointly prepare and submit proposed voir dire, verdict forms, and jury instructions.

The parties shall jointly prepare and submit proposed voir, verdict forms, and jury instructions no later than seven (7) business days before the final pretrial conference.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
legal authority

Proposed jury instructions must include legal authority; model instructions must be submitted with modifications clearly identified in bold and footnotes.

All proposed jury instructions must include appropriate legal authority. When a model jury instruction is used, counsel shall submit a copy of the model instruction along with the proposed instruction. Any modifications to the model instruction must be clearly identified, using bold font and footnotes as appropriate.

Judge Kai N. ScottCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum of law

All memoranda of law must include table of contents and table of authorities

Parties should include, in all memoranda of law, a table of contents, and a table of authorities.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
General

Pro se litigants must disclose attorney assistance in filings.

Pro se litigants who are not being formally represented by lawyers, but have received substantive assistance (i.e. help, guidance, direction or the like with the development of strategy or tactics, drafted pleadings, motions or briefs, etc.) from an attorney for any material filed with the Court shall, in the filed material, identify the attorney, the attorney’s contribution to the filing, and the scope of the attorney’s limited representation.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
General

Failure to disclose attorney assistance constitutes false representation.

Failure to identify any such attorney will amount to a representation by the pro se litigant’s submission for which no substantive assistance from an attorney was received.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint status report

Joint status report due 7 days before Rule 16 conference via email.

A joint status report pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) is due at least seven (7) days prior to the Rule 16 conference and must be submitted to the Court via e-mail.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Temporary restraining order
Must include
certificate of service

TRO/injunction requests require prompt listing and notice to respondent unless emergency precludes it.

Judge Marston will promptly list any request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or a preliminary injunction assigned to her. Except in cases where the nature of the emergency precludes it, Judge Marston requires the petitioner to notify the respondent of the nature of the request for a Temporary Restraining Order and to serve the petition and proposed Order upon the

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
email to chambers

Stipulations and proposed orders must be emailed to Chambers, not the Clerk.

Contrary to Local Civil Rule 5.1.2(10), all stipulations and proposed orders must be e-mailed to Chambers rather than sent to the Clerk of Court.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must include specific language about Court's right to modify.

When submitting a proposed order for the Court’s approval, the order must contain the following language: “The Court retains the right to allow disclosure of any subject covered by this stipulation or to modify this stipulation at any time in the interest of justice.”

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redline

Amended pleadings must include a redline showing changes as an exhibit.

All amended pleadings and motions to amend a pleading must include a redline showing the changes made to the original pleading. This redline should be attached as an exhibit to the amended pleading.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions require certificate detailing verbal efforts to resolve disputes (phone/in-person), not just written communications.

In filing a discovery motion, the certificate of counsel must provide specific details of the parties’ efforts to resolve the dispute informally. These efforts must include verbal communications, whether by phone or in person. Exchanges of letters or e-mails are not sufficient. It is not sufficient to report that opposing counsel was not available or that the parties made “reasonable efforts.” The Court will deny a discovery motion that does not meet these requirements.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

Protective orders and confidentiality agreements must be requested by motion, not stipulated orders.

Any request for a protective order or approval of a confidentiality agreement must be made by motion. The Court will not accept stipulated proposed orders in lieu of a motion. All such motions must satisfy the requirements of In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prod. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672-73 (3d Cir. 2019) and Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsberg, 23 F.3d 772, 786 (3d Cir. 1994).

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memoranda
Must include
witness testimony description

Pretrial memoranda must be filed 7 days before final pretrial conference with detailed witness testimony descriptions.

At least seven (7) days prior to the final pretrial conference date, the parties shall prepare pretrial memoranda and describe in detail the substance of the testimony of each witness. Identifying a witness as giving testimony on liability and/or damages is insufficient.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed verdict form, unified proposed instructions, competing versions if disagreement

Parties must submit unified proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, with competing versions if disagreements exist.

Counsel must prepare one unified and agreed upon set of proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and one proposed verdict form or set of special interrogatories to the jury. If counsel cannot agree on a particular instruction, they must submit their competing versions along with a statement explaining why the Court should give their proposed instruction.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial brief
Must include
legal issues

Trial briefs on legal issues due 7 days before trial.

Each party should submit a trial brief on the legal issues involved in the case seven (7) days prior to the trial date.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Witnesses cannot testify about exhibit content until exhibit is admitted into evidence.

Unless the parties have an agreement as to the admissibility of a proposed exhibit, a witness may not testify as to its content until it has been admitted into evidence.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Directed verdict motion
Must include
in writing

Directed verdict motions must be in writing; oral argument usually permitted.

Motions for judgment as a matter of law in jury trials and motions for an involuntary dismissal in non-jury trials must be in writing. Oral argument in these motions will ordinarily be permitted.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law

Proposed findings and conclusions required in non-jury cases as specified in Scheduling Order.

In non-jury cases, the parties shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as specified in the Scheduling Order. The parties may submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with specific reference to trial evidence at the conclusion

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
oral or videotaped deposition

Unavailability of witnesses requires use of oral or videotaped deposition; not grounds for delay.

If a witness is unavailable at the time of trial, as defined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(4), the Court expects an oral or videotaped deposition to be used at trial for that witness, whether the witness is a party, a non-party or an expert. The unavailability of such witness will not be a ground to delay the commencement or progress of trial.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery liaison designation

Each party must designate an e-discovery liaison by a specified date.

No later than , to promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison").

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery liaison qualifications

E-discovery liaison must be familiar with systems, knowledgeable about technical aspects, prepared for disputes, and responsible for organizing efforts.

Regardless of whether the e-discovery liaison is an attorney (in-house or outside counsel), a third party consultant, or an employee of the party, he or she must be: a. Familiar with the party’s electronic systems and capabilities in order to explain these systems and answer relevant questions; b. Knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery, including electronic document storage, organization, and format issues; c. Prepared to participate in e-discovery dispute resolutions; and, d. Responsible for organizing the party’s e-discovery efforts to insure

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery information exchange

Parties must exchange e-discovery information including custodians, systems, accessibility, liaison, retention policies, and anticipated problems.

Prior to , the parties shall exchange the following information: a. A list of the most likely custodians of relevant electronic materials, including a brief description of each person’s title and responsibilities; b. A list of each relevant electronic system that has been in place at all relevant times and a general description of each system, including the nature, scope, character, organization, and formats employed in each system; c. The parties should also include other pertinent information about their electronic documents and whether those electronic documents are of limited accessibility, that is, those created or used by electronic media no longer in use, maintained in redundant electronic storage media, or for which retrieval involves substantial cost; d. The name of the individual who shall serve as the party’s “e-discovery liaison;” e. A general description of the party’s electronic document retention policies; f. The name of the individual who shall serve as the party’s “e-discovery liaison;” g. A description of any problems reasonably anticipated to arise in connection with e-discovery.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Statement of compliance
Must include
certificate section

Parties must file statement of compliance within 7 days of identifying custodians.

Within seven days of identifying the relevant document custodians, the retention coordinators shall implement the above procedures and each party’s counsel shall file a statement of compliance.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26(f) report

Rule 26(f) reports must use the template provided on Judge Hodge’s website.

The parties must file on ECF (unless leave of Court is requested) and email to Chambers a Rule 26(f) report using the template provided on Judge Hodge’s website at least seven (7) days before the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation

Stipulations requiring Court approval must be submitted by email to Chambers and include basis for relief.

Any stipulations requiring Court approval or the Judge’s signature MUST be submitted by email to Chambers. Counsel MUST provide the basis for any relief sought by stipulation. A stipulation absent any basis for the requested relief will be rejected by the Court.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Motions under Rule 12, 56, 1441, 1404 must include certification of meet and confer with opposing counsel.

If the parties cannot reach a resolution that eliminates the need for any of the above-mentioned motions, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request
Must include
proposed order

All extension requests must include a proposed order.

All requests for extension MUST include a proposed order.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Unopposed extension request

Unopposed extension requests require a stipulation signed by all parties sent via email.

For unopposed extension requests, counsel must submit a stipulation signed by counsel for all parties sent via email with a signature line for Judge Hodge.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Discovery motions must include a form of order (proposed order).

counsel for the aggrieved party shall file with the Court a motion in conformity with Local Civil Rule 26.1(b), with a form of order

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

All motions must include the certification required by Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

All motions must contain the certification required under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

All grounds for relief must be set forth in a single comprehensive motion, not separate motions per count.

All grounds for relief should be set forth in a single, comprehensive motion. A motion to dismiss, for example, should not be divided into separate motions for each count, but rather the singular motion should include all bases for relief.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
certificate of service

Parties must submit proposed jury instructions and verdict forms to the Court and serve them on opposing counsel.

Each party must submit to the Court and serve on opposing counsel proposed points for charge and any proposed jury interrogatories in accordance with the Scheduling Order.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Rule 56 moving parties must include a Statement of Undisputed Material Facts with citations, and provide a Word version to opposing counsel.

The initial filing of the moving party must include a concise Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed and entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law. Each factual assertion shall be accompanied by a citation to the specific portion(s) of the record that support the assertion, including the exhibit, page, and line number. The movant shall provide a Word document of the Statement of Undisputed Material Facts to opposing counsel.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Rule 56 oppositions must include a Statement of Material Facts using the moving party's Word SUMF, with citations.

Opposition to a Motion for Summary Judgment shall include a separate filing of a Statement of Material Facts, responding to the numbered paragraphs in the movant’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts using the Word version of the Statement of Undisputed Material Facts provided by the moving party. The responding party also shall set forth, in separate numbered paragraphs, any additional facts which the respondent contends preclude summary judgment. Where applicable, references to such evidence must include specific citations to exhibit, page, and line number.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulated confidentiality order

Confidentiality or sealing orders must contain specified language about the Court's right to modify.

All such orders must contain the following language (or language substantially similar): "The Court retains the right to allow disclosure of any subject covered by this stipulation or to modify this stipulation at any time in the interest of justice."

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
judge name, case number

Patent non-ANDA cases require phased Markman hearing planning in Rule 26(f) report

In patent non-ANDA cases, the comprehensive joint report of the Rule 26(f) meeting shall include proposed dates for the exchange, in steps, of required information to plan for a Markman hearing as soon as practicable under Fed.R.Civ.P. 1:

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Parties must stipulate undisputed facts to avoid unnecessary discovery

The parties must stipulate as to facts not in dispute. We require stipulations to avoid duplicative and unnecessary discovery, wasted time in depositions asking questions about names, addresses and background or otherwise on dates which are undisputed, employment histories, etc.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Insurance coverage and deductibles must be disclosed in Rule 26(f) report

The parties must also disclose the insurance coverage, including retainer or deductible, consistent with Rule 26(a)(1)(A).

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Rule 26(f) report must confirm compliance with informal disclosure requirements

Confirm each party’s compliance on timing, form and scope of informal disclosures including date of exchange and detailed reason for a deviation from the Court’s scheduling Order.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Rule 26(f) report must describe discovery conducted to date

Discovery begins with the issuance of our Order setting the Initial Pretrial Conference. Describe written discovery issued or taken to date including mandated disclosures under Rule 26(a).

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must disclose need for FRE 502 order.

The parties shall also disclose a need for an Order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must address e-discovery procedures, privilege preservation, production format, and costs in Rule 26(f) report.

The parties are required to address procedures to preserve electronically stored information, to avoid inadvertent privilege waivers, and to determine the form in which electronic information will be produced. The cost of producing the information must be discussed and be addressed in this report.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must indicate agreement on expert witness testimony and deposition needs.

Indicate agreement on anticipated testimony of expert witnesses, including whether depositions of experts will be needed.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Court requires simultaneous expert report exchange, rebuttal reports, and completion with fact discovery.

The parties should expect that the Court requires expert reports to be exchanged simultaneously, witness rebuttal reports required shortly thereafter, and expert discovery to be completed with fact discovery.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

All cases referred to Magistrate Judge or private mediation for early settlement; parties must review Local Rule 53.3.

All cases will be sent to the Magistrate Judge or private mediation for early settlement discussions. The parties must familiarize themselves with Local Rule 53.3 before responding.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must disclose trial conflicts for lead counsel within 4-8 months.

A firm trial date will be scheduled at or shortly after the pre-trial conference. Please advise of trial attachments (not pool listings), pre-paid vacation, medical plans or other irreversible conflicts for lead trial counsel in the following four (4) to eight (8) months.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must state agreement to Magistrate Judge trial referral.

Please provide a statement whether all parties agree to a referral of this case to a Magistrate Judge for trial.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
All documents
Must include
notice of electronic filing

ECF filing required for all counsel.

Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) under Rule 5.1.2 is required of all counsel

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to amend
Must include
proposed amended pleading

Motions to amend pleadings must identify all parties' positions and attach blacklined/highlighted proposed amended pleading.

A motion to amend a pleading shall: identify all parties’ positions on the proposed amendments and attach the proposed amended pleading either blacklined or highlighted solely to show the change in the pleading.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
certificate of service, local rule certificate

Pro hac vice admission requires specific requirements including PA admission, affidavit, and compliance assurances.

The attorney moving for admission of an attorney pro hac vice must: 1. Be admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and in good standing before this Court; 2. Earlier his/her/their appearance in the matter and confirms his/her/their continuing obligations under Section I.K. of our Policies below; 3. Describe the reasons the client requires this lawyer’s special admission, i.e., what does the applicant offer which cannot be provided by the attorney admitted in our Court; 4. Recite the positions of all counsel regarding the motion. 5. Attach the affidavit of the attorney seeking admission pro hac vice swearing as to: a. Year and jurisdiction of each Bar admission as well as the lawyer’s status i.e., active or inactive, in good standing, etc.; b. Whether the attorney has ever been suspended from the practice of law in any jurisdiction or received a public reprimand by the highest disciplinary authority of any Bar in which the attorney has been a member; c. Whether the attorney has read and will comply with the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct, this Court’s Local Rules, and these Policies as amended; and, d. Good faith assurance of fully advising counsel who moved for the pro hac vice admission of the current status of the case for which pro hac vice status has been granted and of all material developments in the case.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
All filings
Must include
signature blocks

Local counsel must sign all filings and be present for certain complex cases; trial dates won't be rescheduled for pro hac vice conflicts.

The admission of counsel pro hac vice does not relieve associate local counsel and the attorney moving the admission of responsibility for counsel admitted pro hac vice. Judge Kearney requires local counsel sign all filings. While local counsel shall be available by phone and prepared to substantively address fact and legal issues for every case, we also require local counsel to be present in Court (or on the telephone with leave) for a presentation on patent/ANDA, class, collective, qui tam, derivative, multi-party, criminal matters designated as complex or every case designated on the Special Case Management track or transferred to our docket from the Multi District Litigation Panel. We do not reschedule confirmed and attached trial dates based on specially admitted counsel’s conflicts.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
blacklined or highlighted exhibit

Amended pleadings filed as matter of course must include blacklined/highlighted exhibit showing changes.

A party filing an amended pleading as a matter of course under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) must attach as an exhibit a blacklined or highlighted copy of the pleading solely to show the changes in the pleading.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
may be required in non jury cases

Judge Kearney may require proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases.

Judge Kearney may require counsel timely file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Deadline
14 calendar days
Applies to
Post trial motion
Must include
transcript deposit

Post-trial motions require transcript deposit within 14 days unless excused.

A party seeking to challenge trial and pretrial rulings through a timely post-trial motion must strictly comply with Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure 59 and 60 and with Local Rule 7.1(e) requiring ordering and paying a deposit for the trial transcript required by the court reporter within fourteen days of filing any post-trial motion unless Judge Kearney excuses this requirement for good cause.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order, attached memorandum, comprehensive motion

All motions must include a comprehensive motion, proposed order, and memorandum.

All grounds for relief must be set forth in a single, comprehensive motion, accompanied by a proposed order and an attached memorandum.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition motion
Must include
docket number, proposed order, motion reference +1 more

Opposition motions must include proposed order with specific references.

Parties opposing the motion must attach a proposed order referring to the motion, docket filing number, and specific basis for denying the requested relief.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
meaningful description of opposition

Motions without stipulation must describe all parties' positions.

Counsel seeking relief in all matters other than under Rule of Civil Procedure 56 without a stipulation of all parties, including challenging the admissibility of expert or fact evidence, shall comply with the obligations above in II.B. and provide a meaningful fulsome description of the opposition to the requested relief as part of the motion.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
appendix

Judge Kearney will not consider material not included in the required appendix.

Judge Kearney will not consider material not included in the appendix required by this Policy.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Opening statement
Must include
one attorney per side

Only one attorney per side may examine witnesses or address jury during opening/closing.

Only one attorney for each side may examine the same witness or address the jury during the opening statement or summation.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness testimony
Must include
no conferring with sworn witnesses

No conferring with sworn witnesses except for logistics without judge's approval.

Counsel may not confer with a witness once sworn during the balance of their testimony except for logistics as to the courtroom and confirming timing of testimony absent Judge Kearney’s approval upon a showing a good cause.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped testimony
Must include
editing after objections ruled

Counsel must edit videotaped testimony after objections are ruled on before offering at trial.

After Judge Kearney rules on any objections, counsel must edit the testimony before offering the videotaped testimony at trial.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Admitted exhibits
Must include
electronic copy to chambers

Plaintiff's counsel must email electronic copies of admitted exhibits to chambers before verdict.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall, unless excused for good cause, email an electronic copy of all admitted exhibits to our Chambers email address (or provide on a disc) before the jury returns with a verdict.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed instructions, proposed verdict forms

Scheduling order will specify deadline for proposed jury instructions and verdict forms.

The Scheduling Order will note the date on which the parties shall file proposed jury instructions on substantive issues unique to your matter, along with proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories to the jury.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
email to chambers, microsoft word format

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to chambers in Microsoft Word format.

The parties shall also provide by email to Chambers the proposed instructions in Microsoft Word format.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions objections
Must include
one written motion

All objections to jury instructions must be filed in one written motion.

All objections to jury instructions shall be filed in one written motion.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Continuance motions require defendant's signed consent form.

Any such motion must be accompanied by the form of consent to continuance signed by the defendant, as provided by Judge Kearney after receipt of the motion and proposed order which, if approved by Judge Kearney, would grant the relief sought by the motion.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance order

Continuance orders must comply with Speedy Trial Act and include detailed findings.

The proposed form of order must be consistent with the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8), and must include a proposed finding explaining in reasonable detail why the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial motion
Must include
certificate of conference

All pretrial motions must be filed by scheduling order deadline and represent all parties' positions.

All pretrial motions – including motions in limine and any motions challenging the indictment, seeking suppression of evidence, or raising dispositive matters – must be filed in accord with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order and represent the position of all parties on the requested relief.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial motion

Parties must advise Judge Kearney about testimony plans and duration when filing motions.

Upon filing a motion, the parties shall advise Judge Kearney whether they intend to present testimony in support of or in opposition to the motion and the expected duration of any such testimony so Judge Kearney can schedule a hearing, if necessary.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, legal argument +1 more

Guilty plea memorandum must be submitted 2 days before change of plea hearing in Word format by email.

The United States must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least two days prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement and the factual basis for the plea. The change of plea memorandum shall be provided in Microsoft Word Format by email to Chambers_of_Judge_Kearney@paed.uscourts.gov.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing motion
Must include
legal argument

Sentencing motions due 7 days before sentencing; responses due 3 days before; no replies without leave.

Counsel must file sentencing motions and supporting memoranda at least seven days prior to the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. The memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party. No replies may be filed without leave.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
legal argument

Sentencing memoranda due 7 days before sentencing; responses due 3 days before; copy to probation office.

Sentencing memoranda (exclusive of motions), by both the United States and the defense must be filed no later than seven days before the scheduled sentencing date, and any response thereto must be filed at least three days prior to the scheduled sentencing date. Counsel shall serve a copy on the United States Probation Office.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
legal argument, statement of facts

Restitution information must be included in sentencing memorandum with victim details and documentation.

If a defendant may be responsible for restitution, the United States must submit sufficient information in its sentencing memorandum to enable Judge Kearney to determine entitlement, the name and the address of each victim, the amount of loss for each victim, and documentary support for each amount. If liability for restitution is joint and several, the United States shall itemize the restitution amount for which each defendant may be responsible.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
ai disclosure

Parties and counsel may be sanctioned for AI hallucinations or false representations.

Parties and counsel may be subject to sanction should we find false representations including artificial intelligence hallucinations under the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure.

Judge Mark A. KearneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order, attached memorandum

All motions must include a proposed order and attached memorandum.

All grounds for relief must be set forth in a single comprehensive motion, accompanied by a proposed order, and an attached memorandum.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

No separate statements of undisputed facts for summary judgment; all facts must be in memorandum with pinpoint citations.

Except for a formal stipulation setting forth facts agreed to in their entirety by all parties, no party shall file a statement of undisputed material facts or a separate statement of facts setting forth its interpretation of the record. Instead, all references to the facts must be included in the party’s memorandum with pinpoint citations to the record, including the page of any document or line and page number of any deposition to which reference is made.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
TRO motion
Must include
notice of hearing, service on respondent

TRO motions must be served on respondent with notice of hearing date/time.

Judge Costello requires the petitioner to serve any motion for a TRO on the respondent and notify the respondent of the date and time of the hearing or argument.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

One day before trial, submit witness/exhibit lists and two hard copies of each exhibit in tabbed binders; electronic submission optional; paper copies available on request.

One day prior to trial, each party shall submit to Chambers a list of all witnesses expected to be called at trial, a list of all exhibits the parties intend to use at trial, and two hard copies of each exhibit in binders with each exhibit separately tabbed. If the parties intend to present evidence electronically, then the exhibits shall also be submitted electronically (on a memory stick, CD, or DVD) with each exhibit as a separate file. If the volume of exhibits makes it impracticable to provide hard copies of all exhibits, then they may be submitted electronically only. However, the parties must be prepared to provide the Court with paper copies of specific exhibits upon request.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

In non-jury cases, submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law per Final Pretrial Scheduling Order; revised versions allowed after trial.

In non-jury cases, the parties shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as specified in the Court’s Final Pretrial Scheduling Order. The parties may submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with specific reference to trial evidence at the conclusion of the case. A schedule for the submission of revised findings of fact and conclusions of law will be discussed at the conclusion of trial.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial procedure

Unavailability of witness (per FRCP 32(a)(4)) requires use of oral/video deposition; not grounds for delay.

If a witness is unavailable at the time of trial, as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(4), the Court expects an oral or video recorded deposition to be used at trial for that witness, whether the witness is a party, a non-party or an expert. The unavailability of such witness will not be a ground to delay the commencement or progress of trial.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Lay witness testimony

Lay opinion testimony under FRE 701 requires disclosure of supporting information/documents at expert report deadline.

Any party expecting to offer lay opinion testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701 regarding issues of liability or damages shall provide the opposing parties with information or documents supporting the testimony at the time required for submission of expert reports.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum
Must include
factual basis, elements of offense, plea agreement terms +1 more

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum at least 3 days before hearing

The Government must submit a guilty plea memorandum prior to any guilty plea hearing. The memorandum should include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty, the statutory maximum penalties, the terms of the plea agreement (if applicable), and the factual basis for the plea. The guilty plea memorandum should be provided to the Court at least three days before the guilty plea hearing.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
service on probation office

Sentencing memoranda and motions due 7 days before sentencing hearing

Sentencing memoranda and motions should be filed seven days before the sentencing hearing. Counsel should serve a copy of all sentencing motions and sentencing memoranda on the U.S. Probation Office.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloCRITICAL
Applies to
Ecf filing
Must include
text searchable

ECF filings must be text-searchable; exhibits need descriptive file names; reference documents by docket number; don't use existing docketed documents as exhibits.

All ECF filings must be text-searchable, including exhibits. Exhibits must be given file names that identify what the document is. When referencing a document on the docket, parties shall refer to that document by its docket number. Any document that is already on the docket should not be used as an exhibit.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Pro hac vice motions must use the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's official form from the Court's website.

Motions for pro hac vice admission must be made using the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s form; this is available on the Court’s website:

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Disclosure statement
Must include
third party funding

Disclosure statements required to identify third-party litigation funding.

Parties and intervenors must file a disclosure statement that identifies any third party that is funding any portion of the litigation. This requirement is in addition to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1’s requirements.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Certification of pre-motion conference required with Rule 12 motions.

If the parties are unable to reach a resolution that eliminates the need for a Rule 12 motion, counsel for the moving party shall include, along with the motion, a certification that the parties met and conferred regarding the alleged pleading deficiencies or matter sought to be stricken. The Court will deny any motion that fails to conform with these requirements.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
exhibit list, index of exhibits, joint statement of facts

Summary judgment motions require jointly prepared statement of facts and exhibit list.

All summary judgment motions must be accompanied by a statement of facts that the parties will prepare jointly and that must be separately filed on the docket. All parties must attach a joint list of all exhibits referenced in the statement of facts, in addition to an index of the exhibits.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
joint voir dire questions, joint neutral statement of facts

Voir dire limited to 15 questions; joint neutral statement required before final pretrial conference.

Counsel shall discuss and agree upon voir dire questions. If necessary, disputes regarding voir dire questions may be submitted to Judge Perez for resolution. Prior to the final pretrial conference, counsel shall submit a joint neutral statement of the facts and joint questions for voir dire, highlighting only the disputed questions. Voir dire should not be more than 15 questions.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service

Sentencing memoranda due 1 week before sentencing; restitution details required if applicable.

Both the government and the defendant must submit sentencing memorandum no later than one week prior to sentencing. If a defendant is responsible for restitution, the government must include sufficient information in its memorandum to enable the Court to determine entitlement. This includes the name and address of each victim, and the amount of loss for each victim. Documentary support for each amount should also be included.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezCRITICAL
Applies to
Complaint
Must include
certificate of service

Defendants not timely served under Rule 4(m) will be dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff(s) shall serve the Complaint expeditiously in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5. Any Defendant not timely served under Rule 4(m) shall be dismissed from the action without prejudice.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
certificate section

Counsel must certify reasonable effort to resolve discovery disputes before bringing to Judge's attention.

Before bringing a discovery dispute to my attention, Counsel must certify that they have made a reasonable effort to resolve the dispute.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply and sur-reply briefs cannot include declarations or exhibits.

Reply and sur-reply briefs shall not include declarations or exhibits.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Summary judgment motions require a separate statement of material facts in numbered paragraphs.

When moving for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, the moving party shall file a separate, short, and concise statement of material facts, in numbered paragraphs, as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
statement of material facts

Missing statement of material facts may result in denial of summary judgment motion.

Failure to include a statement of material facts may constitute grounds for denial of a motion for summary judgment.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Non-moving party must respond to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement.

The non-moving party shall include a correspondingly numbered paragraph responding to each numbered paragraph in the statement of the moving party.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
record citations

Statements of material facts must include specific record citations.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion shall include specific supporting record cites.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Material facts in moving party's statement are deemed admitted unless controverted.

All material facts set forth in the statement required to be served by the moving party may be deemed admitted unless controverted by the opposing party.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance or extension request
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be included with continuance/extension requests.

Counsel shall include proposed orders when requesting continuances or extensions.

Judge Paul S. DiamondCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Counsel must use the short-form pretrial memorandum under Local Rule 21(c) unless a separate order provides otherwise.

Unless specifically provided for by a separate order, Judge Wells requires counsel to use the short form pretrial memorandum described in Local Rule of Civil Procedure 21(c).

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial submission

Counsel must file and serve a list of all trial exhibits by the date set in the Scheduling Order.

(a) a list of all exhibits to be used at trial;

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial submission

Counsel must file and serve a witness list with a brief summary of each witness’s testimony by the Scheduling Order deadline.

(b) a list of all witnesses to be called at trial, as well as a brief summary of each witness testimony;

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memorandum

Counsel must file and serve memoranda of law addressing all legal and evidentiary issues expected at trial.

(c) memoranda of law on all legal and evidentiary issues expected to arise at trial;

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Counsel must file and serve requests for jury instructions by the date set in the Scheduling Order.

(d) requests for instructions to the jury.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Counsel must submit proposed voir dire questions at the final pretrial conference.

Judge Wells requires counsel to submit proposed voir dire questions at the final pretrial conference.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be pre-marked and exchanged before trial.

All exhibits must be pre-marked and pre-exchanged prior to trial.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Before trial, counsel must provide the Court with an exhibit list and copies of all exhibits.

Counsel shall present to the Court, in a loose-leaf binder, a list and copy of all exhibits before trial.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form

Counsel must jointly submit a proposed verdict form or proposed special interrogatories for the jury.

jointly submit a proposed verdict form or proposed special interrogatories to be submitted to the jury.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

In non-jury cases, counsel must submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law at the final pretrial conference.

Judge Wells requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non- jury cases at the final pretrial conference.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert disclosure
Must include
identity of experts

Expert disclosure required as soon as known, no later than end of discovery period.

Disclosure of the identity of experts who are to testify at trial is required as soon as they are known to the respective parties and no later than the end of the discovery period. In complex cases, Judge Wells may lengthen the time permitted for expert discovery.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
exchange by scheduling order dates

Expert reports must be exchanged by dates in Scheduling Order.

Expert reports should be exchanged on or before the dates set by the Scheduling Order.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
full authority attorney

Attorneys at settlement conferences must have full settlement authority.

Each attorney appearing for a party at a settlement conference must have full authority to

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
short form, stipulation of uncontested facts

Short form pretrial memorandum required under Local Rule 21(c) with stipulation of uncontested facts.

Unless specifically provided for by a separate order, Judge Wells requires counsel to use the short form pretrial memorandum described in Local Rule of Civil Procedure 21(c). A stipulation of uncontested facts, as set forth in Local Rule 21 (d)2(b)(2)(A)-(E) should accompany this memorandum.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial submission
Must include
exhibit list, legal memoranda, jury instructions requests +1 more

Scheduling Order requires filing lists of exhibits, witnesses with summaries, legal memoranda, and jury instructions requests.

The judge also requires counsel to comply with the rules set forth in her Scheduling Order, which at a minimum, requires counsel, on a specific date, to file with the Clerk and serve on opposing counsel: (a) a list of all exhibits to be used at trial; (b) a list of all witnesses to be called at trial, as well as a brief summary of each witness testimony; (c) memoranda of law on all legal and evidentiary issues expected to arise at trial; and (d) requests for instructions to the jury.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury verdict
Must include
unanimous verdict

Jury verdicts must be unanimous unless stipulated otherwise.

All jury verdicts must be unanimous, unless otherwise stipulated by the Court and counsel prior to or during trial.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Non jury case
Must include
proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for non-jury cases at final pretrial conference.

Judge Wells requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases at the final pretrial conference.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
proposed questions

Judge conducts all voir dire in criminal cases; counsel must submit proposed questions in advance.

Judge Wells conducts all voir dire in criminal cases; counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions to the court in advance of trial.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
full day attendance

Counsel must be prepared to attend entire settlement conference day with clients.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be prepared to be present for the entire day (with their client(s)) for as long as needed to make substantial progress towards a mutually agreeable resolution.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Deadline
3 weeks
Applies to
Settlement demand
Must include
costs, damages, attorney fees

Plaintiff must submit settlement demand at least 3 weeks before conference.

Plaintiff(s) must make an updated, precise, and specific written settlement demand, inclusive of all attorney’s fees, costs, and damages, at least three weeks before a scheduled settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Deadline
2 weeks
Applies to
Settlement offer

Defendant must submit settlement offer at least 2 weeks before conference.

Defendant(s) must make an updated, precise, and specific written settlement offer at least two weeks before the conference.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Deadline
2 weeks
Applies to
Settlement summary

Confidential settlement summary (max 5 pages) due 2 weeks before conference.

Counsel for all parties must submit a confidential settlement summary and case synopsis via email (to Chambers_of_Magistrate_Judge_Goldner_Cinquanto@paed.uscourts.gov) two weeks before the conference. The case synopsis should be no more than five-pages in length.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
critical evidence

Counsel must bring critical evidence including policy language, photographs, sketches, diagrams, and charts.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Organize and bring critical evidence (policy language, photographs, sketches, diagrams, charts, etc.) to the conference. Judge Goldner Cinquanto may want to see them.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
principal with settlement authority

Settlement conference requires principals with full settlement authority to be present for entire duration.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto requires a principal for each party with an interest in the case who has full and complete settlement authority (i.e., authority consistent with the most recent demand) to be present (either on the Zoom, or in person, as applicable) for the entire duration of the conference.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
insurer representative with authority

Insurer representatives with settlement authority must attend if insurer approval is required.

If a party requires approval by an insurer to settle, a representative of the insurer with full and complete settlement authority consistent with the most recent demand must be present in addition to the relevant party principal.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Scheduling conference
Must include
rule 26f report

Rule 26(f) report must be emailed to chambers at least 5 days before scheduling conference if not already on docket.

If a Rule 26(f) report is not already on the docket when a case is assigned to Judge Goldner Cinquanto, the parties shall submit a copy of their Rule 26(f) report via email (to Chambers_of_Magistrate_Judge_Goldner_Cinquanto@paed.uscourts.gov) at least five days before the scheduled conference.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute request
Must include
prior efforts description, matters in dispute summary, relevant information attachments

Discovery dispute request must describe prior efforts, summarize matters in dispute, and attach relevant information.

The request shall: (1) describe the parties’ prior efforts to resolve their dispute in detail; (2) summarize the matters in dispute; and (3) attach any information relevant to Judge Goldner Cinquanto’s consideration of the dispute.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
rule 37 certification

Rule 37 requires certification of good faith conferment before filing discovery motions.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 requires parties who file discovery motions to certify "that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action."

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
local rule 26f certification

Local Rule 26.1(f) requires certification that parties are unable to resolve discovery dispute after reasonable effort.

Rule 26.1(f) of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rules of Civil Procedure also requires discovery motions to include "a certification of counsel that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute."

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum

Memoranda over 15 pages require table of contents and table of authorities.

Memoranda over 15 pages in length must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Any filing
Must include
ai disclosure

AI disclosure and certification required for all filings, including identifying AI tool, portions generated, and verifying citations.

Any attorney for a party or any pro se party who uses generative artificial intelligence ("A.I.") to prepare any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper filed with the Court in a matter assigned to Judge Goldner Cinquanto shall: (1) disclose that generative artificial intelligence was used to prepare the filing; (2) identify precisely what portion or portions of the filing was generated by A.I.; (3) identify the A.I. tool that was used; and (4) certify that each and every citation to the law or the record in the filing was verified as accurate in accordance with the obligations set forth in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum

Every factual assertion in memoranda must be supported by pinpoint citations to the record.

Every assertion of fact in a memorandum must be supported by a citation to the record where that fact may be found. Both legal citations and citations to the record must include pinpoint cites.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial documents
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Three pretrial documents must be filed on ECF simultaneously and submitted to chambers in Word format.

The three jointly filed documents must be filed on ECF at the same time as Pretrial Memoranda [or Pretrial Stipulation]. At the time of filing the parties must submit to chambers an electronic version of the three documents, in Word format.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Joint appendix required for summary judgment motions, consecutively numbered, with TOC, filed by movant when motion is docketed.

Joint Appendix: A party who plans to file a motion for summary judgment must meet and confer with all other parties and develop a single, joint appendix of all exhibits that may be referenced in their respective memoranda. All pages of the joint appendix must be consecutively numbered with an appendix page number. Page references in the memoranda must be to the appendix page number, not internal document page numbers. The joint appendix must include a table of contents. The joint appendix must be filed by the movant no later than the date the initial motion for summary judgment is docketed.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed joint voir dire questions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint voir dire questions document with three sections must be filed.

Whether proceeding by Joint Pretrial Stipulation or complying with Local Rule 16.1, the parties jointly must: 1. File one document titled 'Proposed Joint Voir Dire Questions' containing three sections: (1) agreed voir dire questions; (2) additional questions proposed by Plaintiff(s); and (3) additional questions proposed by Defendant(s).

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed joint jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint jury instructions document with three sections must be filed, citing authority for each instruction.

2. File one document titled 'Proposed Joint Jury Instructions,' containing three sections: (1) agreed jury instructions; (2) additional instructions proposed by Plaintiff(s); and (3) additional questions proposed by Defendant(s). Third Circuit standard instructions should be used, if available. Parties must cite the underlying authority for each instruction they propose, even if using the Third Circuit model.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed joint jury verdict form
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint jury verdict form document with agreed and alternative forms must be filed.

3. File one document titled 'Proposed Joint Jury Verdict Form,' containing: (1) an agreed verdict form; and, if necessary, (2) any alternative verdict form Plaintiff(s) propose; and (3) any alternative verdict form Defendant(s) propose.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement demand
Must include
costs, caption, damages +2 more

Plaintiff must submit written settlement demand 3 weeks before conference.

• Plaintiff(s) must make a precise and specific written settlement demand, inclusive of all attorney’s fees, costs, and damages, on or before [three weeks before the conference].

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement offer
Must include
caption, case number

Defendant must submit written settlement offer 2 weeks before conference.

• Defendant(s) must make a precise and specific written settlement offer on or before [two weeks before the conference].

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
client with settlement authority

Principal with full settlement authority must attend entire settlement conference.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto requires a principal for each party with an interest in the case who has full and complete settlement authority (i.e., authority consistent with the most recent demand) to be present (either on the Zoom, or in person, as applicable) for the entire duration of the conference. If a party requires approval by an insurer to settle, a representative of the insurer with full and complete settlement authority consistent with the most recent demand must be present in addition to the relevant party principal.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
chambers copy

Parties must email Word versions of proposed jury instructions and verdict form to chambers.

In addition to filing the proposed jury instructions and verdict form on the Court’s docket, the parties must e-mail Word versions of the documents to Chambers_of_Magistrate_Judge_Goldner_Cinquanto@paed.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
findings of fact, conclusions of law, citations to relevant authority

Findings of fact and conclusions of law due 14 days before trial with 2 exhibit copies

findings of fact and conclusions of law, with citations to relevant authority, on or before [fourteen days prior to date certain]. Counsel shall also provide binders containing two copies of their exhibits, marked for trial.8 All objections to the authenticity of exhibits are waived unless noted in the Pretrial Stipulation.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial stipulation
Must include
exhibit list, witness list, relief sought +5 more

Joint Pretrial Stipulation must include 8 specific elements

The Joint Pretrial Stipulation shall be signed by trial counsel for each party and shall set forth: (1) a realistic, good faith estimate of the total time for trial; (2) the parties’ agreed-upon facts and their disputed facts; (3) their respective claims and defenses; (4) the relief sought; (5) a list of lay and expert witnesses that identifies the subject(s) of their expected testimony and any expected objections to admissibility; (6) a list of exhibits to be used or introduced into evidence and any objections to their authenticity; (7) a summary of applicable law, including, in diversity cases, the basis for choosing the applicable law; and (8) any other disclosures required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3).

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation

Exhibits must be provided in two tabbed loose leaf books (judge and law clerk copies).

Exhibits are to be provided to the Court in the form of two jointly prepared loose leaf exhibit books—one for the judge and one for her law clerk—each book containing tabbed Joint Exhibits, Plaintiffs Exhibits, and Defendant’s Exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request
Must include
letter brief

Extension requests must be made via letter brief.

Judge Straw requires a letter brief requesting an extension.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum

Memoranda over 15 pages require table of contents and table of authorities.

Memoranda over fifteen (15) pages in length must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum
Must include
pinpoint citations

All factual assertions in memoranda must be supported by pinpoint citations to the record.

Every assertion of fact in a memorandum must be supported by a citation to the record where that fact may be found. Both legal citations and citations to the record must include pinpoint cites.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference summary
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Settlement conference requires 5-page summary (1 week before) and updated demand/offer (4 days before).

Judge Straw requires counsel to submit a brief written conference summary one week before the scheduled conference. In addition, the parties must provide the Court with an updated demand and offer four (4) days before the scheduled conference. The summary should not exceed five (5) pages, excluding attachments. If attachments are over 20 pages, a hard copy is to be sent to Judge Straw chambers by the date the summaries are due.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint letter updated positions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Good faith settlement discussions required before summary; updated positions in joint letter before conference.

Judge Straw requires the parties to engage in good faith settlement discussions prior to the submission of the written conference summary. Upon submission of the written conference summary and prior to the conference, the parties are required to update their settlement positions and submit a joint letter setting forth updated positions to Judge Straw.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance required

Settlement conferences are mandatory and not discretionary.

Settlement conferences are scheduled by order of the Court and are not discretionary. Counsel and participants should use all efforts to be available for this conference.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
objections, areas of agreement, joint proposed instructions

Submit joint proposed jury instructions with areas of agreement and objections.

Judge Straw requires counsel to submit joint proposed jury instructions, noting areas of agreement as well as objections.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
jointly prepared

Submit jointly prepared verdict form or special interrogatories by scheduling order deadline.

Counsel will submit a jointly prepared verdict form or proposed special interrogatories in accordance with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law

Submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law at final pretrial conference or scheduling order deadline.

Judge Straw requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases at the final pretrial conference or at such a date as set forth in a scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Counsel availability
Must include
phone number to courtroom deputy

Counsel must provide phone number to courtroom deputy.

Counsel must provide the courtroom deputy with their phone number.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Interrogatories
Must include
copy to jury during deliberations

Provide copy of interrogatories to jury during deliberations.

A copy of the interrogatories shall be given to the jury during their deliberations.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda due one week before scheduled sentencing.

Sentencing memoranda are due to Judge Straw one (1) week before the scheduled sentencing.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawCRITICAL
Applies to
Pro hac vice application

A pro hac vice application must be completed and submitted before the non-admitted attorney's first appearance.

Counsel must complete and submit an Attorney Admission Application (Pro Hac Vice) before the date of the non-admitted attorney’s first appearance. The requisite forms are available on the United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania website.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter brief

Extension requests must be made by letter brief.

Should such circumstances arise, Judge Toplin requires a letter brief requesting an extension.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Any proposed change to a detention or release-conditions order must be submitted by written motion.

Once the Court has ordered that a defendant be detained or has set conditions of release, any proposed changes thereto must be submitted to the Court by written motion.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
authority representatives

Parties and representatives with authority must participate in settlement conferences

Judge Hey requires that parties and representatives with authority participate in settlement conferences.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Required discovery must be completed before settlement conference.

If the parties have agreed that certain discovery should take place prior to the conference, they must complete that discovery before the conference.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Status report
Must include
settlement status

Status report on settlement required by end of discovery if no settlement conference contact.

If the parties have not been in contact with Judge Hey respecting a settlement conference prior to the end of all discovery, they shall provide a status report respecting settlement to Judge Hey by that date.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial Stipulation required instead of pretrial memoranda or Final Pretrial Order

In lieu of pretrial memoranda or a Final Pretrial Order, under Local Rules 16.1(d)(1) and (2), a Pretrial Stipulation shall be submitted, containing the following:

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit book
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Two jointly prepared loose leaf Exhibit Books required, separately numbered

Two copies of each party's exhibits, as marked for trial. (Any objections to authenticity should be noted or will be considered waived. Exhibits shall be provided to the Court in the form of two, jointly prepared, loose leaf Exhibit Books, each separately numbering Joint Exhibits, Plaintiff's Exhibits, and Defendant's Exhibits.)

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire questions jury instructions verdict form
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Voir dire questions, jury instructions, and verdict form must be submitted in hard copy and emailed to law clerk

Proposed voir dire questions, requests for jury instructions, and a proposed jury verdict form. Counsel shall make a good faith effort to agree upon as many of these items as possible. (THESE ITEMS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED IN HARD COPY AND EMAILED TO THE LAW CLERK ASSIGNED TO THE CASE.)

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Electronic equipment statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Statement of electronic equipment required; contact Ed Morrissy for assistance

A statement of the electronic equipment that each side will be bringing for the presentation of its case and any request for additional electronic equipment that counsel will request the court to provide. Judge Hey has a fully electronic courtroom. If you require assistance with the electronics, please contact Ed Morrissy at 267-299-7044.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Plaintiff's counsel must circulate draft Pretrial Stipulation at least one week before due date

IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO CIRCULATE A DRAFT OF THIS PRETRIAL STIPULATION AT LEAST ONE WEEK BEFORE IT IS DUE.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
parties with authority

Parties and representatives with authority must participate in settlement conferences.

Judge Hey requires that parties and representatives with authority participate in settlement conferences.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
discovery completed

Required discovery must be completed before the settlement conference.

If the parties have agreed that certain discovery should take place prior to the conference, they must complete that discovery before the conference.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement status report
Must include
settlement status

Parties must provide a settlement status report by the end of all discovery if no prior contact with Judge Hey.

If the parties have not been in contact with Judge Hey respecting settlement prior to the end of all discovery, they shall provide a status report respecting settlement to Judge Hey by that date.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation

A Pretrial Stipulation must be submitted instead of pretrial memoranda or a Final Pretrial Order.

In lieu of pretrial memoranda or a Final Pretrial Order, under Local Rules 16.1(d)(1) and (2), a Pretrial Stipulation shall be submitted, containing the following:

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be submitted in hard copy and emailed to the law clerk.

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be submitted in hard copy and emailed to the law clerk assigned to the case.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation

A pretrial stipulation signed by all counsel must be filed by the specified date.

A Pretrial Stipulation, signed by all counsel, shall be filed by (date).

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement memorandum

Settlement memorandum must include specific content: counsel info, party representative, pending motions, discovery status, claims, damages, last demand/offer, and other relevant matters.

setting out the following in order: 1. The names, telephone numbers, and email addresses of counsel to appear at the conference on behalf of the party; 2. The name of the party or the party’s representative, including insurer if applicable (with title or position) to appear at the conference; 3. The status of any pending motions; 4. The status of discovery; 5. A brief statement of the elements and manner of proof of the party’s claims and/or defenses; 6. A brief statement of the party’s damages and manner of proof of their damages or, as appropriate, its position on damages claimed by any opposing party; 7. The last demand and/or offer: and 8. Any other matters that counsel believe may be relevant to settlement discussions.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyCRITICAL
Applies to
Case synopsis

Case synopsis must attach key expert reports, policy excerpts, photographs, diagrams, charts, and other relevant materials.

The synopsis should attach key summary expert reports, policy language excerpts, photographs, sketches, diagrams, charts, etc., to the conference memos.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
local rule certificate, certificate of conference

Discovery motions must include certifications under FRCP 37 and Local Rule 26.1(f) confirming good faith confer efforts.

Parties are reminded that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 requires parties who file discovery motions to certify “that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1). Rule 26.1(f) of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rules of Civil Procedure also requires discovery motions to include “a certification of counsel that the parties, after reasonable effort, are unable to resolve the dispute.” E.D. Pa. Local R. Civ. P. 26.1(f).

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Synopsis

Settlement conference synopsis must address outstanding lien holders and third parties to invite.

In addition, the synopsis should address whether there are any outstanding lien holders or other third parties who should be invited to participate in the settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Parties must file a formal motion to memorialize a confidentiality agreement, not just a stipulated proposed order.

If parties who form a mutually acceptable confidentiality agreement want a Court order to memorialize their agreement, they must make a formal motion. Judge Arteaga will not accept stipulated proposed orders in lieu of a motion.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Motions for protective orders must explain the good cause for the requested order.

As Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) requires, a motion seeking a protective order must explain why there is good cause for the Court to issue the order.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders for protective orders must state good cause reasons and that private nondisclosure interests outweigh public disclosure interests.

A proposed order attached to the motion must itself also state the reasons good cause exists and state that the private interests in nondisclosure outweigh the public interests in disclosure.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

All factual assertions in memoranda must be supported by pinpoint record citations, and legal citations must also include pinpoint cites.

Every assertion of fact in a memorandum must be supported by a citation to the record where that fact may be found. Both legal citations and citations to the record must include pinpoint cites.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

Protective orders must include language reserving the Court's power to modify the order for justice interests.

Judge Arteaga will not approve any protective order unless it contains language providing that “the Court reserves its inherent power to modify the terms of this agreement and permit the disclosure of information where the interest of justice so requires.”

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Filing
Must include
ai disclosure

Attorneys and pro se parties using generative AI to prepare specified filings must disclose AI use, identify AI-used portions, and certify citation accuracy under Rule 11.

Any attorney for a party or any pro se party who uses generative artificial intelligence (“A.I.”) to prepare any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper filed with the Court in a matter assigned to Judge Arteaga shall: (1) disclose that generative artificial intelligence was used to prepare the filing; (2) identify precisely what portion or portions of the used; and (4) certify that each and every citation to the law or the record in the filing was verified as accurate in accordance with the obligations set forth in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Memoranda exceeding 15 pages must contain a table of contents and table of authorities.

Memoranda over 15 pages in length must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint appendix

Joint appendices must have consecutively numbered appendix pages, TOC, and memoranda must reference appendix page numbers.

All pages of the joint appendix must be consecutively numbered with an appendix page number. Page references in the memoranda must be to the appendix page number, not internal document page numbers. The joint appendix must include a table of contents.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Supplemental joint appendix

Supplemental joint appendices require court permission, must include original appendix, continue page numbering, and have updated TOC.

If unusual circumstances make it necessary for a party to supplement the joint appendix, the party must move for permission to file a supplemental joint appendix. The supplemental joint appendix must contain the original appendix, add the supplemental materials at the end, continue the appendix page numbering, and provide an updated table of contents.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
statement of facts

For summary judgment motions, the moving party must file a separate Statement of Facts with numbered paragraphs citing the joint appendix.

At the same time as its motion for summary judgment, the moving party must also file a separate Statement of Facts (the “Statement”) containing a numbered, paragraph-by-paragraph recitation of the facts that the moving party contends are undisputed, with specific page references to the joint appendix in support of each paragraph. Each paragraph shall deal with one fact.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Response to motion for summary judgment
Must include
counterstatement of facts

For summary judgment responses, the responding party must file a separate Counterstatement of Facts accepting or rejecting each paragraph with appendix citations.

At the same time a response to the motion for summary judgment is filed, the responding party must file a separate Counterstatement of Facts that responds to each paragraph of the Statement by accepting or rejecting the contention in the paragraph. If a contention is rejected, the responding party must supply facts supporting the rejection by specific page reference(s) from the joint appendix.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for leave to file under seal
Must include
specific language

Motions for leave to file under seal must articulate why secrecy interests outweigh public access and identify specific serious injuries from disclosure.

Any motion for leave to file under seal, including any motion for a proposed confidentiality/protective order that would permit a party to file any material under seal, must articulate, clearly and specifically, why the moving party's “interest in secrecy” outweighs the “presumptive right of public access.” Avandia, 924 F.3d at 672. The motion—and the proposed order attached to the motion—must identify “clearly defined and serious injur[ies]” the movant will suffer if the materials are not kept under seal. Id. Judge Arteaga will not grant a motion for leave to file under seal that fails to identify the movant's interests in nondisclosure with specificity.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial stipulation
Must include
caption

Parties should ordinarily file a joint pretrial stipulation instead of complying with Local Rule 16.1.

The parties should ordinarily expect to file a joint pretrial stipulation, in the form attached, in lieu of complying with Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rule 16.1, which otherwise governs pretrial procedure.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed joint voir dire questions

Three joint documents (voir dire questions, jury instructions, verdict form) must be filed on ECF with Pretrial Memoranda and submitted to chambers in Word format.

The three jointly filed documents must be filed on ECF at the same time as Pretrial Memoranda [or Pretrial Stipulation]. At the time of filing the parties must submit to chambers an electronic version of the three documents, in Word format.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits accompanying motions must be docketed in accordance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1.2(5)(b).

Any exhibits should be docketed in compliance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1.2(5)(b).

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial stipulation
Must include
signature blocks

Joint Pretrial Stipulation must be signed by trial counsel, include 8 specified sections, and objections to testimony/exhibits must state grounds and authority.

The Joint Pretrial Stipulation shall be signed by trial counsel for each party and shall set forth: (1) a realistic, good faith estimate of the total time for trial; (2) the parties’ agreed-upon facts and their disputed facts; (3) their respective claims and defenses; (4) the relief sought; (5) a list of lay and expert witnesses that identifies the subject(s) of their expected testimony and any expected objections to admissibility; (6) a list of exhibits to be used or introduced into evidence and any objections to their authenticity; (7) a summary of applicable law, including, in diversity cases, the basis for choosing the applicable law; and (8) any other disclosures required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). Any objections to anticipated testimony or exhibits shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference summary
Must include
caption

Settlement conference summary must be submitted one week before the conference.

Judge Copeland requires counsel to submit a brief written conference summary one week before the scheduled conference.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Memoranda exceeding 15 pages must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Memoranda over fifteen (15) pages in length must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference summary
Must include
certificate of service

Counsel must exchange settlement conference summaries and not file them with the Clerk's Office.

Judge Copeland requires that counsel exchange their summaries. The summaries are not to be filed with the Clerk's Office.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit binders

Counsel must provide the court with two exhibit binders containing a schedule of exhibits and copies of each exhibit.

Counsel should provide Judge Copeland with two (2) exhibit binders that consist of a schedule of exhibits with a brief description of each and copies of each exhibit.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint exhibit list witness lists

Counsel must provide the court reporter with the joint exhibit list and witness lists on the morning of trial.

On the morning of trial, counsel shall provide the ESR/court reporter with a copy of the joint exhibit list and a copy of the witness lists.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Counsel must submit joint proposed jury instructions noting areas of agreement and objections.

Judge Copeland requires counsel to submit joint proposed jury instructions, noting areas of agreement as well as objections.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must include legal authority citations and be submitted by the scheduling order deadline.

The points for charge should be submitted with appropriate citations of legal authority and shall be provided to the Court in accordance with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form

Counsel must submit a joint verdict form or proposed special interrogatories by the scheduling order deadline.

Counsel must submit a jointly prepared verdict form or proposed special interrogatories in accordance with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact conclusions of law

In non-jury cases, counsel must submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law at the final pretrial conference or by the scheduling order date.

Judge Copeland requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases at the final pretrial conference or at such a date as set forth in a scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Summary judgment motions require a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in numbered paragraphs

Any motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 shall include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed and entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Opposition to summary judgment must respond to each numbered paragraph in the Statement of Undisputed Facts

A party opposing summary judgment must respond to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and state whether it agrees or disagrees with each fact the moving party lists.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

All factual statements in motions must include specific record citations with page and line numbers

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion shall include specific references to the parts of the record that support the statements. Each stated fact shall cite the source relied upon, including the page and line of any document or deposition to which reference is made.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
certificate of service

Expert witnesses must be identified and reports provided per Rule 16 scheduling order; failure may bar testimony

The parties will identify expert witnesses and provide expert reports pursuant to the Rule 16 scheduling order entered in the particular case. Failure to do so may bar the use of the expert's testimony at trial.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
certificate of service

Confidential settlement conference memorandum required one week before conference

Judge Sitarski will normally require counsel to submit a confidential settlement conference memorandum one week before the actual conference.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Parties must have representative with settlement authority participate in settlement conference

Judge Sitarski will require that each party or a representative of each party with knowledge of the case and settlement authority participate in the conference.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery plan

All discovery must be completed before arbitration; no additional discovery allowed if trial de novo is requested

Judge Sitarski expects that all discovery will be completed before the arbitration hearing, and will not permit additional discovery in cases where a party requests trial de novo.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for all injunction cases.

Judge Sitarski requires the submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in advance of the hearing in all injunction cases.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
In limine motion
Must include
legal argument

In limine motions must be filed and served before final pretrial conference.

Judge Sitarski requires that in limine motions be filed and served in advance of the final pretrial conference so as to give her an opportunity to consider the merits of each motion.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Two tabbed three-ring binder sets of exhibits required before trial.

Prior to commencement of trial, counsel shall pre-mark and exchange exhibits. Counsel shall provide Judge Sitarski with two sets of exhibits in a tabbed, three-ring binder, together with a schedule of exhibits that briefly describes each exhibit.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness examination
Must include
witness examination limits

Witness examination limited to redirect and recross.

Judge Sitarski will generally restrict counsel from examining witnesses beyond redirect and recross.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped deposition
Must include
edited videotape

Videotaped depositions must be reviewed and edited to present essential evidence.

Judge Sitarski requires counsel to review all videotaped depositions and to have them edited so as to fairly present only the essential evidence of the witness involved.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorney participation
Must include
single attorney per party

Normally only one attorney per party for witness examination and argument.

Judge Sitarski will normally not permit more than one attorney for the party to examine the same witness, and will normally not permit more than one attorney to present argument on behalf of the party on the same point.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint submission, citations of legal authority

Joint proposed jury instructions with citations must be submitted 2 business days before trial.

Judge Sitarski requires counsel to submit joint proposed jury instructions noting areas of agreement as well as objections. The points for charge should be submitted with appropriate citations of legal authority and must be provided to the Court at least two business days prior to the commencement of trial.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
joint submission

Joint verdict form or special interrogatories must be submitted 2 business days before trial.

Counsel will submit a jointly prepared verdict form or proposed special interrogatories at least two business days prior to the start of trial. If counsel are unable to agree, they may submit separate proposed forms of interrogatories.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required in nonjury cases at final pretrial conference.

Judge Sitarski requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in nonjury cases at the final pretrial conference. They shall be submitted electronically, via e-mail to chambers, in Word format.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions and verdict forms must be submitted electronically via email to chambers in Word format.

The proposed jury instructions and verdict forms shall be submitted electronically, via e-mail to chambers, in Word format.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Hearing documents

All relevant documents must be delivered to chambers in advance of all hearings.

Judge Sitarski requires that all relevant documents be delivered to chambers in advance of all hearings and other proceedings.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference form
Must include
judge name, case number

Settlement conference form must be emailed to Chambers by deadline.

Please complete the attached settlement conference form and email it to Chambers at Chambers_sitarski@paed.uscourts.gov on or before XXXXX , 20XX.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference participation
Must include
full settlement authority

Parties with full settlement authority must attend settlement conference.

Parties/client representatives with full and complete settlement authority must be present for the duration of the conference. Full and complete authority means the party must possess authority consistent with the most recent demand.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference participation
Must include
lead trial counsel, counsel familiarity

Lead trial counsel must attend settlement conference and be fully familiar with case.

Lead Trial Counsel for each party must be present at the Conference. Counsel are expected to be fully familiar with the facts of the case, the legal theories supporting their client’s claims or defenses, and the procedural posture of the case.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference protocols
Must include
protocol review, protocol adherence

All participants must review and adhere to Court’s Remote Video Proceedings Protocols.

ALL PARTICIPANTS must review and adhere to the Court’s Protocols for Remote Video Proceedings in The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Counsel are specifically directed to ensure their clients review and adhere to this Protocol.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter

Settlement conference memoranda must be submitted to the Court only, not filed with the Clerk.

These summaries shall be submitted to the Court only and should not be filed with the Clerk's Office.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter

Settlement conference memorandum must be submitted one week before the conference.

Judge Sitarski will normally require counsel to submit a confidential settlement conference memorandum one week before the actual conference.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Sur reply

Surreply briefs not normally permitted; prior court permission required.

Judge Sitarski will not normally permit surreply briefs, and counsel who wish to file a surreply must first seek permission of the Court before such a brief will be accepted.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Rule 56 summary judgment motions must include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in numbered paragraphs.

Any motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 shall include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed and entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Statements of material facts must cite specific record references including page and line numbers.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion shall include specific references to the parts of the record that support the statements. Each stated fact shall cite the source relied upon, including the page and line of any document or deposition to which reference is made.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of appearance

Parties must identify expert witnesses and provide reports per Rule 16 scheduling order; failure may bar testimony.

The parties will identify expert witnesses and provide expert reports pursuant to the Rule 16 scheduling order entered in the particular case. Failure to do so may bar the use of the expert's testimony at trial.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be submitted before injunction hearings.

Judge Sitarski requires the submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in advance of the hearing in all injunction cases.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

In limine motions must be filed and served before the final pretrial conference.

Judge Sitarski requires that in limine motions be filed and served in advance of the final pretrial conference so as to give her an opportunity to consider the merits of each motion.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Videotaped depositions must be edited to present only essential evidence, with objections resolved before trial.

Judge Sitarski requires counsel to review all videotaped depositions and to have them edited so as to fairly present only the essential evidence of the witness involved. Counsel are expected to resolve all matters pertaining to objections before offering the videotape into evidence.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Points for charge must include legal citations and be submitted at least two business days before trial.

The points for charge should be submitted with appropriate citations of legal authority and must be provided to the Court at least two business days prior to the commencement of trial.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form

Jointly prepared verdict form or special interrogatories must be submitted at least two business days before trial start.

Counsel will submit a jointly prepared verdict form or proposed special interrogatories at least two business days prior to the start of trial. If counsel are unable to agree, they may submit separate proposed forms of interrogatories.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be submitted at final pretrial conference in Word format via email for nonjury cases.

Judge Sitarski requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in nonjury cases at the final pretrial conference. They shall be submitted electronically, via e-mail to chambers, in Word format.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
offer demand proposal

Settlement conference memoranda must be submitted one week before conference, max 4 pages, in Word format.

Judge Carlos will normally require counsel to submit a conference memorandum one week before the scheduled conference. It shall include an offer/demand settlement proposal. This memorandum should not exceed four (4) pages and should be submitted in Word format.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
party representative with settlement authority

Parties must attend settlement conference in person with full settlement authority.

Judge Carlos will require that a party or party’s representative with knowledge of the case and full and binding settlement authority attend the conference in person.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
full settlement authority, no telephone authority seeking

Attendees must have full settlement authority and cannot seek additional authority by phone.

Persons present must have full and unlimited settlement authority and may not confer by telephone with anyone to seek additional authority.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Criminal proceeding
Must include
documents to chambers

All relevant documents must be delivered to chambers before court.

Judge Carlos requires that all relevant documents be delivered to chambers in advance of court.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
exhibits, case synopsis, expert reports +1 more

Updated settlement conference memorandum must be emailed to chambers by deadline.

Counsel are further directed to provide AN UPDATED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM to Chambers, by Email on or before __________. FAILURE TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT MEMORANDUM WITHIN THE TIME SET FORTH IN THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
exhibits, case synopsis, expert reports +2 more

Settlement memorandum must include participant info, 4-page synopsis, exhibits, expert reports, and deposition excerpts.

The settlement conference memorandum shall include: 1. Name, title and email of all persons participating in the settlement conference. 2. An updated case synopsis, limited to four pages, which shall be in Microsoft Word format. 3. Critical exhibits in support of the parties' liability and damage claims or defenses. The parties should coordinate with one another as to which party will produce the specific documents if possible. Duplicate submission are discouraged. 4. Affirmative and rebuttal experts reports, if any. 5. Relevant portions of deposition testimony may be submitted. Submission of entire deposition transcripts is strongly discouraged.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Lay witness disclosure
Must include
basis for opinion, identity of witness, substance of opinion

Lay witness opinion testimony must be disclosed with same timing as expert witness disclosures.

Any party expecting to offer opinion testimony from lay witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701 with respect to the issues of liability and damages shall, at the time required for submission of information and/or reports for expert witnesses on liability and damages set forth in the preceding paragraphs, serve opposing parties with concise details and/or documents covering the lay opinions of the Rule 701 witnesses, including the identity of each witness offering the expert opinion, the substance of each opinion, and the basis for each opinion.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memorandum due by specified deadline

Each party shall file a pretrial memorandum no later than . The pretrial

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to motion in limine
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +1 more

Responses to motions in limine due by specified deadline

Responses to properly filed motions in limine, if any, shall be filed no later than .

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions and verdict forms
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Editable Word versions of jury instructions and verdict forms must be emailed to Chambers

The parties shall also email an editable, Word version of the instructions and verdict forms to Chambers at PAED_Carlos_Chambers@paed.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +1 more

Parties must meet and confer on jury instructions and verdict forms

In this regard, counsel shall meet and confer and jointly file proposed instructions and verdict forms that explicitly note areas of agreement, as well as any objections.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Disputed jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +1 more

Disputed jury instructions must include legal authority citations

Where the parties cannot agree on the instruction or verdict form content, please indicate as much, and include appropriate citations of legal authority in support of the proffered instruction.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial participation
Must include
notice of appearance

Only attorneys attending final pretrial conference may participate in trial

Trial counsel must attend the final pretrial conference and only those attorneys attending the conference may participate in the trial.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosCRITICAL
Required
Always
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
offer demand exchange

Counsel must exchange offer/demand before settlement conference.

Judge Reid requires that counsel exchange the offer/demand only in advance of the scheduled conference.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Legal citation
Must include
ai disclosure

AI disclosure required for legal citations with verification certification.

If any attorney for a party, or a pro se party (in both civil and criminal cases), has used generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”)—including but not limited to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or any other program that uses machine learning to create new content—in a citation of any legal authority filed with the Court, and assigned or referred to Judge Scott W. Reid, then they MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that generative AI has been used to assist with the citation of legal authority, disclose what specific generative AI program was used, and CERTIFY that each and every citation of legal authority has been verified as accurate.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Memorandum

Memoranda over 15 pages require table of contents and table of authorities.

Memoranda over fifteen (15) pages in length must include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Sur reply brief
Must include
permission required

Sur-reply briefs require prior Court permission.

Judge Reid will not normally permit sur-reply briefs and counsel desiring to file a sur-reply must first seek permission of the Court before such a brief will be accepted.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Attorney limit
5 pages
Required
Always
Applies to
Settlement conference summary
Must include
offer demand

Settlement conference summary (max 5 pages) required one week before conference.

Judge Reid requires counsel to submit to Chambers a brief confidential written settlement conference summary, including an offer/demand, one week before the scheduled conference. This summary should not exceed five (5) pages, excluding attachments.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped deposition

Videotaped depositions must be reviewed and edited to present only essential evidence; objections resolved before offering video.

Judge Reid requires counsel to review all videotaped depositions and to have them edited such as to fairly present only the essential evidence of the witnesses involved. Counsel are expected to resolve all matters pertaining to objections before offering the video into evidence.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Exhibits must be pre-marked, exchanged, and two copies provided to Judge with schedule; bulky exhibits should include only essential portions.

Prior to commencement of trial, exhibits are to be pre-marked and exchanged by counsel. Counsel should provide Judge Reid with two (2) copies of each exhibit, together with a schedule of exhibits that briefly describes each exhibit. Counsel is encouraged, however, to provide the Court with only the essential and relevant portions of bulky exhibits, together with sufficient material to provide context for the relevant portion of the exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint submission, citations of legal authority

Joint proposed jury instructions with citations required by scheduling order deadline.

Judge Reid requires counsel to submit joint proposed jury instructions, noting areas of agreement as well as objections. The points for charge should be submitted with appropriate citations of legal authority and shall be provided to the Court in accordance with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
joint submission

Joint verdict form required by scheduling order deadline; separate forms allowed if unable to agree.

Counsel will submit a jointly prepared verdict form or proposed special interrogatories in accordance with the deadline set forth in the scheduling order. If counsel are unable to agree, they may submit separate proposed forms of interrogatories.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
findings of fact, conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for non-jury cases at final pretrial conference.

Judge Reid requires counsel to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases at the final pretrial conference or at such a date as set forth in a scheduling order. A supplementation will be permitted at the close of trial or, in an appropriate case, after trial.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
written motion required

Proposed changes to detention/release conditions must be submitted by written motion.

Once the Court has ordered that a defendant be detained or has set conditions of release, any proposed changes thereto must be submitted to the Court by written motion.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict sheets
Must include
proposed order

Proposed verdict sheets and special interrogatories required.

Counsel are required to submit proposed verdict sheets and any special interrogatories.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits must be marked and exchanged before trial.

Judge Brody requires that exhibits be marked and exchanged prior to trial.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery plan
Must include
joint proposed discovery plan

Joint proposed discovery plan must be submitted via ECF 3 days before initial pretrial conference.

As stated in the Notice, counsel must submit a joint proposed discovery plan via ECF to the court no later than 3 days prior to the conference.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Appearance
Must include
ecf appearance, pro hac vice motion

Trial counsel must attend; all participating counsel must enter ECF appearance and file pro hac vice motions with fees before conference.

The Judge expects trial counsel to attend the conference. All counsel wishing to participate in the conference must enter an appearance on ECF prior to the conference. Additionally, all counsel wishing to participate and seeking to be admitted pro hac vice must file a pro hac vice motion and pay the associated fee prior to the conference.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
settlement authority, client telephone availability

Counsel must have settlement authority and client available by phone during conference.

Counsel must arrive at the conference with settlement authority and arrange for the client to be available by telephone for the duration of the conference.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment motions must include statement of undisputed/disputed facts with record citations.

All summary judgment motions and responses must contain a statement of undisputed and disputed facts with citations to the record, including to the specific exhibit, page, and line number.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Disputed exhibits must be submitted before final pretrial conference.

The parties must submit prior to the final pretrial conference any exhibits that are in dispute.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memoranda
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pretrial memoranda required with instructions in trial scheduling order.

Judge Brody requires that parties submit pretrial memoranda. The trial scheduling order provides instructions on the information the parties must include in their memoranda.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memoranda
Must include
legal argument, citation to legal authority

Separate trial memoranda required in non-jury cases addressing legal issues with citations.

In non-jury cases, Judge Brody requires that parties submit separate trial memoranda that address important legal issues and include citation to legal authority.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine
Must include
memoranda

Motions in limine required for anticipated issues with memoranda, addressed at final pretrial conference.

Judge Brody expects all issues that can be anticipated prior to trial to be raised in motions in limine. Motions in limine should be accompanied by memoranda and will usually be addressed at the final pretrial conference.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed order

Proposed jury instructions must be filed on ECF and emailed to law clerk in Word format.

The parties must file their proposed jury instructions on ECF and email a copy of them as an attachment in Microsoft Word format to the law clerk assigned to the case.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped testimony
Must include
transcript

Objections to videotaped testimony and transcript must be submitted before final pretrial conference.

Objections to videotaped testimony should be submitted before the final pretrial conference. A transcript of the testimony should also be provided.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
citations, judge name, case number

After trial in non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law with citations to notes of testimony are required.

In non-jury cases, after trial, Judge Brody requires submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law that include citations to the notes of testimony.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service

Sentencing memoranda required from both government and defendant well in advance of sentencing.

Judge Brody expects the submission of sentencing memoranda by both the government and the defendant well in advance of the sentencing.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to law clerk in Word format.

Each party must email a copy of its proposed jury instructions in Microsoft Word format to the law clerk assigned to the case.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits

Two marked copies of trial exhibits and three copies of exhibit list required before trial.

Prior to trial, each party must submit two marked copies of the trial exhibits and three copies of the exhibit list to chambers.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to law clerk in Microsoft Word format.

Each party must email a copy of its proposed jury instructions in Microsoft Word format to the law clerk assigned to the case.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Two marked copies of trial exhibits and three copies of exhibit list required for chambers.

Prior to trial, each party must submit two marked copies of the trial exhibits and three copies of the exhibit list to chambers.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment

Summary judgment motions and responses must include a statement of facts with citations to the record.

All summary judgment motions and responses must contain a statement of undisputed and disputed facts with citations to the record, including to the specific exhibit, page, and line number.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment motions and responses must include a statement of undisputed and disputed facts with record citations.

All summary judgment motions and responses must contain a statement of undisputed and disputed facts with citations to the record, including to the specific exhibit, page, and line number.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

ECF required for all counseled parties; proposed orders must be attached to motions; no filings to Chambers.

Judge Rufe requires all counseled parties to use Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”). ECF provides greater efficiency and timeliness in the filing of pleadings, automatic e-mail notice of case activity, as well as electronic storage of documents for remote access by the Court, the Bar, and the litigants. Attorneys are urged to register as ECF Users in accordance with Rule 5.1.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, referencing the Procedural Order on Electronic Case Filing. Proposed orders should be attached to corresponding motions or memoranda of law. Transmittal of pleadings, motions, or other filings to Chambers instead of by ECF is not permitted.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement notification
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement requires prompt notification and dismissal request.

Upon reaching a settlement, counsel must notify Judge Rufe’s Chambers promptly and request dismissal of the action pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1 or some other procedure that will effectively terminate the litigation.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
statement of stipulated material facts

Initial summary judgment motion must include numbered Statement of Stipulated Material Facts.

The initial filing by the moving party must include a concise Statement of Stipulated Material Facts, which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the parties agree are not in dispute.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Response must include specific exhibit, page, and line number citations.

Where applicable, references to such evidence must include specific citations to exhibit, page, and line number.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply

Reply must include specific exhibit, page, and line number citations.

The Reply must specify the relevant exhibit, page, and line numbers when referring to the record.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Sur reply

Sur-reply must include specific exhibit, page, and line number citations.

The Sur-reply must specify the relevant exhibit, page, and line numbers when referring to the record.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Discovery motions must include certification under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

All motions must contain the certification required under Local Civil Rule 26.1(f).

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Confidentiality order

Confidentiality orders must include specific language about court's right to modify.

Judge Bartle will approve a confidentiality order if the order includes a detailed statement demonstrating that good cause exists for the protective order. See Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsberg, 23 F.3d 772, 786 (3d Cir. 1994). All such orders must contain the following language or language substantially similar: The court retains the right to allow disclosure of any subject covered by this stipulation or to modify this stipulation at any time in the interest of justice.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Expert witness
Must include
written report

Failure to identify expert witnesses or provide reports will bar testimony at trial.

Parties should identify expert witnesses and provide the experts' written reports pursuant to the scheduling order entered in the particular case. Failure to do so will bar the use of the expert's testimony at trial.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Trial procedure
Must include
witness examination limit

Only one attorney per party may examine each witness.

Judge Bartle will not permit more than one attorney for a party to examine the same witness.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped deposition
Must include
editing required, counsel review required, objection resolution required

Counsel must review and edit videotaped depositions before offering as evidence.

Judge Bartle requires counsel to view all videotaped depositions for the purpose of editing the videotape and resolving material objections before offering the videotape as evidence.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required in non-jury cases.

Judge Bartle requires the submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury cases.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions and interrogatories due 7 working days before trial.

Judge Bartle requires that at least seven (7) working days before the date the case is set for trial, each party shall submit to the court and serve on each other, two (2) copies of proposed points for charge and any proposed jury interrogatories. Each point for charge and proposed jury interrogatory shall be numbered and on a separate sheet of paper identifying the name of the requesting party.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, legal argument

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum 2 days before plea with offense elements and citations.

Judge Bartle requires the government to submit a guilty plea memorandum two days prior to the guilty plea. Such a memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for such elements.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation

Stipulations must be sent to Judge's chambers for review, not to Clerk.

Stipulations should be sent to Judge Bartle's chambers for review and not to the Clerk. Judge Bartle requires that all stipulations be submitted to him for review and the Clerk mails copies to counsel.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIICRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Provide 1 copy of each exhibit and 3 copies of exhibit schedule at final pretrial conference; 2 copies of each exhibit at trial.

At the final pretrial conference, the parties shall provide the Court with one copy of each exhibit and three copies of a schedule of exhibits which shall briefly describe each exhibit. At the trial, the parties shall provide the Court with two copies of each exhibit.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Lay witness opinion
Must include
supporting information

Lay opinion testimony under FRE 701 requires disclosure of supporting information/documents at expert report deadline.

Any party expecting to offer lay opinion testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701 regarding issues of liability or damages shall provide the opposing parties with information or documents supporting the testimony at the time required for submission of expert reports.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
timing of offer

Exhibits must be offered during testimony, during case-in-chief, or at close of case-in-chief; advance review required for agreed/disputed exhibits.

Exhibits are to be placed in evidence during testimony, at a convenient time during a party’s case-in-chief, or at the close of each party’s case-in-chief. If the latter, counsel should review the exhibits in advance so that agreed upon exhibits can be admitted quickly and disputed exhibits ruled upon at a time that will not impose on the jury.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
publication timing

Exhibits may be published after witness examination or before breaks; permission needed before witness takes stand.

Exhibits may be published to the jury at the end of the party’s examination of the witness or prior to a break. If the exhibit is necessary to explain the testimony, Judge Slomsky may permit it to be published during the testimony. Ordinarily, permission should be sought prior to the witness taking the stand.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for judgment as matter of law
Must include
oral argument permitted

Motions for judgment as a matter of law may be oral or written; oral argument permitted if requested.

Motions for judgment as a matter of law and motions for judgment on partial findings may be oral or written. Oral argument will be permitted if counsel request it.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
substantive issues only

Counsel must meet to discuss and submit agreed jury instructions covering only substantive issues, not basic instructions.

Counsel must meet and discuss proposed jury instructions and verdict forms for the purpose of submitting agreed upon jury instructions and verdict forms. The proposed instructions should cover only the substantive issues regarding the elements of each cause of action and each defense. Basic instructions, such as the burden of proof, credibility and procedure, should not be submitted.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
no waiver of objections

Submitting proposed jury instructions does not waive objections; objections discussed at charging conference.

Submitting a proposed point does not constitute a waiver of objection. Counsel are instructed to work on proposed instructions regardless of counsel’s position with respect to a point’s applicability. If the Court sustains an objection to a particular instruction, it will not be submitted to the jury. Objections to jointly submitted points will be discussed and ruled upon at the charging conference.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
agreed findings conclusions, additional proposed findings conclusions

In non-jury trials, submit agreed findings/conclusions plus each party's additional proposed findings/conclusions.

In a non-jury trial, counsel shall submit findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which they agree. In addition, each party shall submit any additional proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for the consideration of the Court.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Counsel must agree on exhibits to send to jury; if not, request ruling immediately after jury retires.

After the jury has retired to deliberate, counsel shall review the exhibits to determine which exhibits will go out with the jury. If counsel cannot agree, they should request a ruling immediately after the jury retires to the deliberations room.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial hearing
Must include
proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law

Suppression/Starks/Daubert hearings held 2 weeks before trial; government must file proposed findings.

Suppression, Starks and Daubert hearings are typically held at least two weeks prior to trial. The government is required to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the commencement of the hearing. The parties may request leave to supplement proposed findings of fact after the hearing.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance request
Must include
speedy trial act form, defendant written consent

Defendant's written consent required for continuances using Speedy Trial Act form.

In all criminal cases, before a continuance will be granted, Defense Counsel must obtain Defendant’s written consent to a continuance. Such consent shall be given by using the Court’s Speedy Trial Act Acknowledgment of Rights form. This form must be signed by Defendant and docketed before any continuance shall issue.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
numbering required, proposed points for charge, proposed jury interrogatories

Proposed jury instructions and interrogatories due 7 days before trial, numbered.

Each party must submit to the Court and serve on opposing counsel proposed points for charge and any proposed jury interrogatories no later than seven days prior to the trial date. Each point for charge and proposed jury interrogatory shall be numbered.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
authority citations, model instruction changes indicated

Proposed instructions must include authority; model instructions must indicate changes.

Each point for charge and proposed jury interrogatory shall be numbered proposed instruction must be submitted with authority. If a model jury instruction is used, the party submitting it shall state whether the proposed instruction is unchanged or modified. If a party modifies a model instruction, additions shall be underlined and deletions shall be placed in brackets.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memorandum
Must include
legal issues, intended facts, witness identities +2 more

Government must file trial memorandum 1 week before trial with specific content.

At least one week prior to the trial date, the government must file a trial memorandum setting forth the essential elements of the offenses, the facts which it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness’ testimony and any legal issues. The defendant is not required to file a trial memorandum but may do so.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
certificate of service

Rule 26(f) meeting must occur within 14 days of Rule 16 conference scheduling order.

The Rule 26(f) meeting shall take place as soon as possible and, in any event, no later than fourteen (14) days after the date of the Order scheduling the Rule 16 conference.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 26f report
Must include
certificate of service

Non-compliance with Rule 26(f) meeting and plan submission results in no voice at scheduling conference and potential sanctions.

Outstanding motions will not excuse the requirements of holding the meeting and submitting the plan. Compliance is mandatory. Parties who do not comply will have no voice at the scheduling conference and may be subject to additional sanctions.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Rule 16 conference
Must include
certificate of service

Lead trial counsel (not associate) must attend Rule 16 conference with authority to discuss settlement.

Lead trial counsel, not an associate, must attend the Rule 16 conference. Counsel shall have a thorough comprehension of the facts and shall be prepared to discuss all claims and defenses in detail, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Threshold motion
Must include
certificate of service

Threshold motions must be filed before Rule 16 conference; counsel must discuss merits at conference.

Motions to dismiss, amend, transfer, add parties and other threshold motions should be filed before the Rule 16 conference. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss the merits of any outstanding motions at the conference.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Wells required; parties with settlement authority must attend unless excused.

Counsel are required to attend a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells as set forth in the Scheduling Order. Counsel must adhere to Magistrate Judge Well’s requirements regarding the conduct of the conference. The parties and/or persons with full authority to settle must accompany counsel to the mediation before Judge Wells unless excused in advance by Judge Wells.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Initial disclosure
Must include
certificate of service

Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a) must be exchanged within 14 days of Rule 16 scheduling order.

The information required to be disclosed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) is required to be exchanged no later than fourteen (14) days after the date of the Order scheduling the Rule 16 conference. Compliance with the Rules is mandatory.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery plan
Must include
certificate of service

Discovery must commence immediately upon Rule 16 conference notice; pending motions don't excuse discovery.

The parties are required to commence discovery immediately upon receipt of notice of the Rule 16 conference. Pending motions do not excuse counsel from proceeding with discovery.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute
Must include
certificate of service

Discovery disputes require court assistance after reasonable attempts; certification must detail resolution efforts.

When timely discovery is not forthcoming after a reasonable attempt has been made to obtain it, the immediate assistance of the court should be sought after compliance with Local Rule 26.1(f). The certification must state in detail what efforts were made to resolve the dispute.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Summary judgment motions require a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in numbered paragraphs.

Any motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 shall include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed and entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law. Only those facts which bear on dispositive material issues shall be included in the Statement of Undisputed Facts.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment

Opposition to summary judgment requires a separate statement responding to numbered paragraphs in the Statement of Undisputed Facts.

The papers opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include a separate statement of material facts, responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the Statement of Undisputed Facts, which the respondent contends present genuine issues to be tried. The responding party also shall set forth, in separate numbered paragraphs, any additional facts which the respondent contends preclude summary judgment. All material facts set forth in the statement required to be served by the moving party shall be admitted unless controverted by the opposing party.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

All statements of material facts in summary judgment motions must include specific record citations with page and line numbers.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a citation to the specific page or pages of the record on which each fact is supported. Each stated fact shall cite the source relied upon, including the page and line of any document or deposition to which reference is made.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda must detail the substance of each witness's testimony, not just identify their role.

The filing of a Pretrial Memorandum as described in Local Rule 16(1)(c) will be required. In the pretrial memoranda, counsel must detail the substance of the testimony of each witness. Identifying a witness as giving testimony on liability and/or damages is insufficient.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be provided in a single three-ring binder with specific copy requirements for court and trial.

The parties shall provide the Court with one copy of each exhibit and three copies of a schedule of exhibits which shall briefly describe each exhibit. At the trial, the parties shall provide the Court with two copies of each exhibit. Exhibits shall be arranged and tabbed in a single three ring binder containing all exhibits numbered consecutively.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Parties must notify others of deposition use in pretrial memorandum and file written objections with page/line citations before pretrial conference.

Any party intending to use depositions, written or video, at trial must notify all other parties in the pretrial memorandum. Objections to deposition testimony shall be made prior to the pretrial conference in writing, setting forth the page and line numbers of the challenged testimony and a clear statement for the basis of the objection. The objecting party must provide the Court with a copy of the deposition transcript with the challenged testimony highlighted.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery information

Parties must exchange e-discovery information before Rule 26(f) conference.

Prior to the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall exchange the following information:

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery discussion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Parties must discuss e-discovery parameters at Rule 26(f) conference and be prepared to address at Rule 16 conference.

The parties shall discuss the parameters of their anticipated e-discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference and shall be prepared to address e-discovery at the Rule 16 scheduling conference with the court.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery liaison
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Each party must designate a single e-discovery liaison for all e-discovery requests and responses.

To promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison").

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
E discovery liaison qualifications
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

E-discovery liaison must be familiar with party's electronic systems and knowledgeable about technical aspects of e-discovery.

Regardless of whether the e-discovery liaison is an attorney (in-house or outside counsel), a third party consultant, or an employee of the party, he or she must be: familiar with the party's electronic systems and capabilities in order to explain these systems and answer relevant questions; knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery, including

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Conference attendance

Lead trial counsel must attend Rule 16 conference with full case knowledge and settlement authority.

Lead trial counsel, not an associate, must attend the Rule 16 conference. Counsel shall have a thorough comprehension of the facts and shall be prepared to discuss all claims and defenses in detail, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
statement of facts

Summary judgment motions must include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in numbered paragraphs.

Any motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 shall include a separate Statement of Undisputed Facts which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, the material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed and entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition
Must include
statement of facts

Opposition to summary judgment must include a separate response to the Statement of Undisputed Facts.

The papers opposing a motion for summary judgment shall include a separate statement of material facts, responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the Statement of Undisputed Facts, which the respondent contends present genuine issues to be tried.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Statements of material facts in summary judgment motions must cite sources including page and line numbers.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment shall cite the source that supports each of the statements. Each stated fact shall cite the source relied upon, including the page and line of any document or deposition to which reference is made.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial order

Objections to deposition testimony must be made in writing before the pretrial conference with page/line citations.

Objections to deposition testimony shall be made prior to the pretrial conference in writing, setting forth the page and line numbers of the challenged testimony and a clear statement for the basis of the objection.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Government must submit guilty plea memorandum 2 days before plea hearing with elements, penalties, plea terms, and factual basis.

The government must submit a guilty plea memorandum at least two days prior to the change of plea hearing. The memorandum shall include the elements of each offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty and legal citations for the elements, the maximum statutory penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement and the factual basis for the plea.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda due one week before sentencing with legal authority; copies served on opposing party, Chambers, and Probation Office upon filing.

Judge Slomsky requires the submission of sentencing memoranda by both the government and the defendant no later than one week before sentencing. The memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party. One copy of each sentencing memorandum, motion and response shall be served on the opposing party, the Court (Chambers, Room 4000) and the United States Probation Office when the original is filed.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

Government must include restitution entitlement information in sentencing memorandum when defendant owes restitution.

If a defendant is responsible for restitution, the government must submit sufficient information in its sentencing memorandum to enable the Court to determine entitlement

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Government must file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law before pretrial hearings begin.

The government is required to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the commencement of the hearing.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Parties must submit numbered jury instructions and interrogatories 7 days before trial, with citations and formatting for modifications.

Each party must submit to the Court and serve on opposing counsel proposed points for charge and any proposed jury interrogatories no later than seven days prior to the trial date. Each point for charge and proposed jury interrogatory shall be numbered proposed instruction must be submitted with authority. If a model jury instruction is used, the party submitting it shall state whether the proposed instruction is unchanged or modified. If a party modifies a model instruction, additions shall be underlined and deletions shall be placed in brackets.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial memorandum

Government must file trial memorandum one week before trial with elements, facts, witnesses, and legal issues.

At least one week prior to the trial date, the government must file a trial memorandum setting forth the essential elements of the offenses, the facts which it intends to present, the identity of each witness it intends to call, a statement of the substance of each witness' testimony and any legal issues.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
scheduling information report

Scheduling Information Report required 3 business days before pretrial conference.

At least three business days before the pretrial conference, counsel must submit to chambers a completed Scheduling Information Report. This form will be attached to the conference notice.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
discovery plan

Discovery plan from Rule 26(f) conference required 3 business days before pretrial conference.

No later than three business days prior to the scheduled pretrial conference, counsel must also submit the discovery plan adopted at the Rule 26(f) conference in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
concise statement of stipulated facts

Rule 56 motions require Concise Statement of Stipulated Material Facts in numbered paragraphs.

The moving party’s initial filing must include a Concise Statement of Stipulated Material Facts, which sets forth (in numbered paragraphs) material facts and important background facts that the parties agree are not in dispute for purposes of Summary Judgment.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert disclosure
Must include
expert report, curriculum vitae

Expert witness disclosure required per FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) by scheduling order dates.

Counsel are required to identify expert witnesses and provide curriculum vitae and, as to all experts, voluntarily exchange the information referred to in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) by expert report, deposition, or answer to expert interrogatory in accordance with the dates outlined in the Court’s scheduling orders.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed voir dire questions
Must include
electronic version

Proposed voir dire questions require electronic version in Word format emailed to chambers.

Parties should file proposed voir dire questions by the deadline set forth in the Rule 16 Scheduling Order for the submission of proposed jury instructions. Judge Padova also requires that the parties submit an electronic version in Microsoft Word format emailed to: chambers_of_judge_john_r_padova@paed.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit schedule
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Three copies of exhibit schedule required at trial start; two copies of each exhibit at first use.

Judge Padova requires that exhibits be pre-marked and pre-exchanged. At the commencement of trial, the parties shall provide the Court with three copies of a schedule of exhibits that shall briefly describe each exhibit. At the trial, the parties shall provide the Court with two copies of each exhibit at the time of its first use at trial.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Offer exhibits at close of first witness's testimony unless objected to.

Judge Padova prefers that counsel offer exhibits into evidence at the close of testimony by the first witness testifying about the exhibit unless the exhibit is objected to, in which event it should not be testified to unless it is received into evidence.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Rule 50 motions must be in writing; oral argument only if Court requests.

Judge Padova prefers that Rule 50 motions be in writing. Oral argument, if necessary, will be requested by the Court.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint jury instructions required for agreed issues; individual submissions for disputed issues.

Judge Padova expects counsel to work together in submitting joint proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories to the jury. In addition, Judge Padova requires that counsel submit individual proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and proposed verdict forms or special interrogatories to the jury on those issues that counsel cannot agree upon in their joint submissions.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda must be submitted at least one week before the scheduled sentencing date.

SENTENCING MEMORANDA SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST ONE WEEK BEFORE THE SCHEDULED SENTENCING DATE.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order, speedy trial act language

Motions for trial continuance must include a proposed order with Speedy Trial Act findings.

Motions requesting a trial continuance should be accompanied by a proposed order in Speedy Trial Act language, containing findings of fact and conclusions that would justify a continuance under the Speedy Trial Act.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
local rule certificate

Pretrial Memorandum required under Local Rule 16.1(c)

The filing of a Pretrial Memorandum as described in Local Rule 16.1(c) will be required.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
cm ecf filing, judge signature block

Stipulations must be filed on CM/ECF with judge signature block

Stipulations should be filed on CM/ECF and should contain a signature block for the judge to sign it as an Order, if approved.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
statement of uncontested facts

Summary judgment motions require Statement of Undisputed Facts

The party filing a Motion for Summary Judgment shall include, preferably as a separate document, or, if short, within the Memorandum of Law, a “Statement of Undisputed Facts,” which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed, with record references.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
statement of disputed facts

Opposition to summary judgment requires Statement of Disputed Facts

The responding party shall include, preferably as a separate document, or within the Memorandum of Law, a “Statement of Disputed or Undisputed Facts” responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in the moving party’s statement, either admitting that the

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
response to additional facts

Moving party must respond to responding party's additional material facts in numbered paragraphs.

For Summary Judgment Motions, the moving party shall also respond to the responding party’s statement of additional material facts, following the numbered paragraphs.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Statement of material facts
Must include
specific record references

Summary judgment statements must include specific record references with document titles, deponent names, page numbers, or affidavit paragraphs.

Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a Motion for Summary Judgment shall include specific and not general references to the parts of the record that support each statement, such as the title or numbered reference to a document, or the name of a deponent and the page(s) of the deponent’s deposition, or the identity of an affidavit or declaration and the specific paragraph relied upon.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
tabbed, exhibit index

Exhibits must be listed in an index and tabbed with corresponding numbers/letters.

Exhibits should be listed in an index and tabbed with corresponding numbers/letters.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum
Must include
certificate of service, certificate of conference

Objections to exhibits, expert testimony, or lay witness opinion testimony must be set forth in Pretrial Memorandum or by Motion with particularity.

Any party having an objection to: (a) the admissibility of any exhibit based on authenticity; (b) the adequacy of the qualifications and/or admissibility of testimony of an expert witness expected to testify; or (c) the admissibility of any opinion testimony from lay witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701, shall set forth separately each such objection in its Pretrial Memorandum or by Motion. Each objection shall describe with particularity the ground for the objection. These issues should be addressed at the Final Pretrial Conference.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

AI disclosure and citation verification required for all filings.

If any attorney for a party, or a pro se party, has used Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the preparation of any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper, filed with the Court, and assigned to Judge Michael M. Baylson, MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that AI has been used in any way in the preparation of the filing, and CERTIFY, that each and every citation to the law or the record in the paper, has been verified as accurate.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
ai disclosure

AI disclosure and citation verification required for all filings.

If any attorney for a party, or a pro se party, has used Artificial Intelligence ("AI") in the preparation of any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper, filed with the Court, and assigned to Judge Michael M. Baylson, MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that AI has been used in any way in the preparation of the filing, and CERTIFY, that each and every citation to the law or the record in the paper, has been verified as accurate.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Videotaped testimony

Objections and transcripts for videotaped testimony must be submitted in advance; equipment must be set up early and not obstruct views.

Judge Surrick requires that a list of all objections to videotaped trial testimony and a copy of the transcript be submitted to the Court well in advance of the offering of such evidence. The videotape should then be edited to eliminate pauses and speed-ups to the maximum extent such final editing is possible. Videotape playback equipment should be brought into the courtroom at the beginning of the morning or afternoon session at which the videotape will be played. It should not block the view of counsel or the jury when not in use.

Senior Judge R. Barclay SurrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be pre-marked, pre-exchanged, and accompanied by exhibit list; bench copy required on first day of trial.

Judge Surrick requires that exhibits be pre-marked and pre-exchanged. A bench copy of trial exhibits should be provided to the Court on the first day of trial. The trial exhibits should be accompanied by an exhibit list which describes each exhibit.

Senior Judge R. Barclay SurrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial objection
Must include
local rule certificate

Objections must cite rule number or be one word only.

Speaking objections are not permitted. Objections shall be made by reciting the appropriate rule number or a one word basis.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Rebuttal

Rebuttal cannot rehash closing argument.

Rebuttal must not be a rehashing of closing argument.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit admission

Exhibits admitted at close of case-in-chief, not during testimony.

Exhibits are admitted into evidence at the close of each party=s case-in-chief and not during testimony or after the exhibit is identified. Counsel should review the exhibits in advance so that agreed upon exhibits can be admitted quickly and disputed exhibits ruled upon at the conclusion of the party=s case.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Counsel must meet to discuss and submit agreed-upon jury instructions and verdict forms.

Counsel must meet and discuss proposed jury instructions for the purpose of submitting agreed-upon jury instructions and verdict forms.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Counsel must cooperate in preparing joint jury instructions or face sanctions.

Counsel are expected to cooperate in the preparation of the joint proposed instructions. Failure to cooperate in the process will result in the imposition of sanctions.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

If counsel cannot agree on jury instructions, alternative instructions with authority must be submitted.

If counsel cannot agree, proposed alternative instructions must be submitted with authority for each instruction.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

In non-jury trials, parties must file stipulation of uncontested facts and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In a non-jury trial, the parties shall file a stipulation of uncontested facts. Each party shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

After jury retires, counsel must review exhibits to determine which go to jury; if they cannot agree, request ruling immediately.

After the jury has retired to deliberate, counsel shall review the exhibits to determine which exhibits will go out with the jury. If counsel cannot agree, they should request a ruling immediately after the jury retires to the deliberations room.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed order

Government must file proposed findings and conclusions before suppression/Starks/Daubert hearings.

The government is required to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the commencement of the hearing.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
legal authority

Each proposed jury instruction must include legal authority.

Each proposed instruction must be submitted with authority.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
model instruction status

Must indicate if model jury instruction is unchanged or modified.

If a model jury instruction is used, the party submitting it shall state whether the proposed instruction is unchanged or modified.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

Parties must exchange e-discovery information before Rule 26(f) conference

Prior to the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall exchange the following information:

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

Parties must discuss e-discovery parameters at Rule 26(f) conference and be prepared for Rule 16 scheduling conference

The parties shall discuss the parameters of their anticipated e-discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference and shall be prepared to address e-discovery at the Rule 16 scheduling conference with the court.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

Each party must designate a single e-discovery liaison for all e-discovery requests and responses

To promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison").

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

E-discovery liaison must be familiar with party's electronic systems and knowledgeable about technical aspects of e-discovery

Regardless of whether the e-discovery liaison is an attorney (in-house or outside counsel), a third party consultant, or an employee of the party, he or she must be: familiar with the party's electronic systems and capabilities in order to explain these systems and answer relevant questions; knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery,

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery disclosure

Parties must disclose restrictions on electronic search scope and methods.

If the parties intend to employ an electronic search to locate relevant electronic documents, the parties shall disclose any restrictions as to scope and method which might affect their ability to conduct a complete electronic search of the electronic documents.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery agreement

Parties must agree on search methods and terms with e-discovery liaisons.

The parties shall reach agreement as to the method of searching, and the words, terms, and phrases to be searched with the assistance of the respective e-discovery liaisons, who are charged with familiarity with the parties' respective systems.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery timeline

Electronic discovery proceeds in sequence: initial search and production, then limited accessibility documents.

Discovery of electronic documents shall proceed in the following sequenced fashion: after receiving requests for document production, the parties shall search their documents, other than those identified as limited accessibility electronic documents, and produce responsive electronic documents in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2);

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery timeline

Limited accessibility documents searched only after initial search complete.

electronic searches of documents identified as of limited accessibility shall not be conducted until the initial electronic document search has been completed;

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery inspection

On-site inspections of electronic media prohibited unless exceptional circumstances shown.

documents must be narrowly focused with a factual basis supporting the request; and, on-site inspections of electronic media under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b) shall not be permitted, absent exceptional circumstances where good cause and specific need have been demonstrated.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Document production format

If parties cannot agree on format, electronic documents produced as PDF/TIFF image files.

If, during the course of the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties cannot agree to the format for document production, electronic documents shall be produced to the requesting party as image files (e.g., PDF or TIFF).

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Document production integrity

Producing party must preserve document integrity, formatting, metadata, and revision history.

When the image file is produced, the producing party must preserve the integrity of the electronic document's contents, i.e., the original formatting of the document, its metadata and, where applicable, its revision history.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Native format production

Native format production requires demonstration of particularized need after initial image file production.

After initial production in image file format is complete, a party must demonstrate particularized need for production of electronic documents in their native format.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Preservation agreement

Parties must negotiate preservation agreement within 30 days of discovery.

Within the first thirty (30) days of discovery, the parties shall negotiate an agreement that outlines the steps each party shall take to segregate and preserve the integrity of all relevant electronic documents.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Retention coordinator duties

Retention coordinators must prevent deletion/alteration of custodian emails and documents.

The retention coordinators shall: take steps to ensure that e-mail of identified custodians shall not be permanently deleted in the ordinary course of business and that electronic documents maintained by the individual custodians shall not be altered;

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Retention coordinator duties

Retention coordinators must provide notice of spam/virus filtering criteria.

provide notice as to the criteria used for spam and/or virus filtering

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions must comply with Local Rule 26.1(f) and include a certification detailing the efforts made to resolve the dispute.

The motion must comply with Local Rule 26.1(f). The certification must state in detail what efforts were made to resolve the dispute.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memoranda must detail the substance of each witness's testimony; identifying a witness by liability/damages category is insufficient.

In the pretrial memoranda, counsel must detail the substance of the testimony of each witness. Identifying a witness as giving testimony on liability and/or damages is insufficient.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Parties intending to use depositions at trial must notify all other parties in the pretrial memorandum.

Any party intending to use depositions, written or video, at trial must notify all other parties in the pretrial memorandum.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Objections to deposition testimony

Objections to deposition testimony must be made in writing before the pretrial conference, identifying page/line numbers and the basis of the objection.

Objections to deposition testimony shall be made prior to the pretrial conference in writing, setting forth the page and line numbers of the challenged testimony and a clear statement for the basis of the objection.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
certificate of conference

Parties must attempt resolution before filing discovery dispute letters.

If the parties cannot resolve the problem through the reasonable efforts required by Local Civil Rule 26.1(f), they may file on the docket submit brief letters explaining the dispute and requested relief.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneWARNING
Applies to
Witness management

Witnesses must be ready to resume immediately after recess.

If a witness was on the stand at a recess or adjournment, the witness should be on the stand ready to proceed when court resumes.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneWARNING
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Flawed/incomplete submissions will be returned for revision.

Flawed or incomplete submissions will be returned to counsel for revision and resubmission.

Judge Catherine HenryWARNING
Applies to
Rule 26f meeting

Bad faith in Rule 26(f) process results in no voice at Rule 16 conference.

A party that fails to participate in good faith in the Rule 26(f) meeting, report, or revision requests will have no voice at the initial Rule 16 conference.

Judge Catherine HenryWARNING
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include a summary of changes and be filed as both clean and redlined copies.

Amended pleadings must include a brief descriptive summary of all changes and clearly indicate the additions or corrections made by the filing of both a clean copy and a redlined copy.

Judge Catherine HenryWARNING
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
certificate of conference

If pleadings don't permit discussion, parties must agree on exchange date or seek court resolution.

To the extent that the state of the pleadings does not permit a meaningful discussion of the above issues by the time of the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall either agree on a date by which this information will be mutually exchanged or submit the issue for resolution by the court at the Rule 16 scheduling conference.

Judge Chad F. KenneyWARNING
Applies to
Letter
Must include
notice of intent to amend

Letter to court required when intending to file amended pleading after meet and confer.

If meeting and conferring results in the intention to file an amended pleading, the party who intends to file an amended pleading should let the Court know of that intention by way of a letter placed on the docket, which will serve to ensure the Court not enter default against the party who otherwise would have an obligation to respond to the initial pleading.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Court may impose sanctions or require revised Joint Statement if parties agree on facts but failed to submit one.

If the Court later concludes from briefing that the parties do agree on enough material facts to justify submission of a Joint Statement, the Court may sua sponte schedule a hearing and/or request briefing from the parties to determine whether sanctions are appropriate for failure to comply with these protocols, and/or may reject the filings and require both parties to submit a revised Joint Statement.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum

Witnesses or exhibits not disclosed in Pretrial Conference Memorandum may be precluded at trial.

Note: The Court may preclude at trial any witness or exhibit not disclosed in the Pretrial Conference Memorandum.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Pro hac vice admission
Must include
local rule compliance

Unfamiliarity with rules may result in order requiring local counsel attendance or discontinuation of pro hac vice admission.

If pro hac vice counsel shows an unfamiliarity with the Local Rules of Civil Procedure or this Court’s protocols, this Court may issue an order requiring local counsel to appear at all future appearances or may discontinue the pro hac vice admission.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum
Must include
settlement negotiations

Settlement negotiations not required for bench trials

Settlement negotiation should not be provided if a matter is scheduled as a bench trial.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Settlement memorandum

The Settlement Memorandum must include a case summary with strengths/weaknesses, critical documents, recent offer/demand, settlement authority scope, and any other helpful information.

The Settlement Memorandum should include the following: 1. A brief summary of the case which includes the strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of the submitting party; 2. Copies of critical documents relevant to settlement (e.g. expert reports, photographs of the scene); 3. The most recent offer and demand and any insight as to why previous attempts to settle were unsuccessful; 4. The scope of settlement authority of the submitting party; and 5. Any other information that would benefit the Court in helping to effectuate a settlement.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Testimony at claim construction hearing is prohibited without prior court approval.

Absent prior approval of the Court, the parties shall not present testimony at the argument.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Joint or unopposed motions must be identified as such in the pleading title so they receive expedited consideration.

Joint or unopposed motions should be clearly identified as such in the title of the pleading, so that they can be given expedited consideration.

Judge Gerald A. McHughWARNING
Applies to
Pleading

Motions and pleadings referencing other docket documents should identify them by ECF number.

In all motions and pleadings, references to other documents on the docket, e.g. “Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint,” should identify those documents by their ECF number to facilitate retrieval.

Judge Gerald A. McHughWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Briefs over 10 pages must include TOC and TOA.

Any brief longer than ten pages shall include a table of contents and table of authorities.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Motion to exceed page limit
Must include
reasons for exception

Motion to exceed page limit must be filed before principal filing deadline with reasons.

If a party believes that it will need more than 25 pages to explain its position to the Court, the party should file a motion to exceed the page limit, setting forth the reasons why the party believes it should be granted an exception to this rule. The motion to exceed the page limit should be filed prior to the memorandum deadline and allow the Court sufficient time to consider and rule on the motion.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Motion to exceed page limit

Pending motion to exceed page limits does not extend principal filing deadline.

A pending motion to exceed page limits does not relieve a party of its responsibility to comply with the filing deadline for the principal filing.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Post arbitration

No discovery or dispositive motions after arbitration hearing.

Ordinarily, neither discovery nor dispositive motions will be allowed after the arbitration hearing is held.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Trial exhibits

Trial exhibits should not include pleadings, discovery responses, or transcripts.

Absent a specific reason to introduce them into evidence, and consistent with subpart c) below, trial exhibits shall NOT include pleadings, written discovery responses or deposition transcripts.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Trial preparation

Parties must be ready to start trial on scheduled date.

Once the trial date is scheduled, counsel, parties and witnesses should be ready to start trial on the scheduled date.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs should only be submitted if specifically requested by the Court.

Parties should not submit a trial brief unless requested to do so by the Court.

Judge Gerald J. PappertWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial conference preparation
Must include
e discovery plan

Parties must discuss e-discovery parameters at Rule 26(f) and be prepared to address at Rule 16 conference

The parties shall discuss the parameters of their anticipated e-discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference and shall be prepared to address e-discovery at the Rule 16 conference with the court.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlWARNING
Applies to
Lay opinion testimony
Must include
supporting documents

Lay opinion testimony under FRE 701 requires supporting documents at expert report deadline.

Any party expecting to offer lay opinion testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 701 regarding issues of liability or damages shall provide the opposing parties with information or documents supporting the testimony at the time required for submission of expert reports.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Modifications to model jury instructions must show additions underlined and deletions in brackets.

If a party modifies a model jury instruction, the additions should be underlined and deletions should be placed in brackets.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlWARNING
Applies to
All
Must include
docket number references

Reference docketed documents by docket number, use ECF header page numbers if no page numbers.

When referencing a document already on the docket, do so by docket number so that it may easily be retrieved (e.g., DI 12). If the docket entry lacks its own page numbering, use the ECF header page numbers.

Judge John F. MurphyWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Unpublished decisions from Westlaw or Lexis should not be submitted to court.

Parties should not submit to the Court unpublished decisions that are available on Westlaw or Lexis.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
client authority

Counsel must have client authority to discuss all subjects at pretrial conferences.

Counsel taking part in any pre-trial conference must be prepared to speak on every subject, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Rule 26f meeting

Pending motions do not excuse Rule 26(f) or Rule 16 obligations.

Pending motions do not stay the parties’ obligations to meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) or to attend a conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Discovery stay request
Must include
in person request

Discovery stay requests must be made in person at Rule 16 conference.

If a party wishes to stay discovery during the pendency of a motion, it should present its request in person at the Rule 16 conference.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Discovery stay

Discovery stays granted only in extraordinary circumstances.

However, the Court will grant a stay of discovery only in extraordinary circumstances.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
All

Citations to docket documents must include ECF numbers.

In all written submissions to the Court, citations to documents on the docket, e.g., “Amended Complaint,” should identify those documents by ECF number.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Motion for reconsideration
Must include
follow page limits

Reconsideration motions should be filed sparingly and follow page limits.

Motions for reconsideration should be filed sparingly. Any motion for reconsideration of a discovery order must itself comply with the page limits in Section II.C.1., below.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference

Settlement conference referral does not stay discovery or trial dates.

A case may be referred to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, but counsel should not expect the Court to stay discovery or trial dates merely because the parties are awaiting their appointment with the magistrate judge and wish to avoid incurring further costs.

Judge John M. GallagherWARNING
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must be formatted for Judge's signature without the word 'proposed'.

The order shall be formatted for the Judge’s signature (for example, do not include the word “proposed” in the text of the order).

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Joint summary

Joint summary for voir dire must be brief (few sentences) and neutral in tone.

One (1) copy of a joint summary of the case for the Court to read at the beginning of voir dire to advise the venire of the nature of the case and the issues to be tried. This summary should be very brief (not to exceed a few sentences) and neutral in tone and content.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Joint summary

Joint summary for trial must describe claims, counterclaims, defenses, and elements of each claim.

One (1) copy of joint summary of the case and of applicable law for the Court to read to the jury panel at the beginning of trial to describe the claims, any counterclaims or defenses, and the elements of each claim.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit binder

Exhibit binders must include table of contents.

Each binder shall include a table of contents listing all exhibits.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit binder

Tangible exhibits require placeholder in binder.

In the event there is a tangible exhibit, such as a firearm or controlled substance, counsel shall include a place holder in the binder identifying the exhibit.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit

Parties must take immediate possession of tangible property, enlargements, or large/bulky items.

Counsel for any party that offered into evidence tangible property, enlargements, or other large or bulky items shall take immediate possession.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit

Unclaimed exhibits remain in court's possession until final disposition or appeal period expires.

Any exhibits that are not picked up by counsel or the parties will remain in the court’s possession until the final disposition of all appeals and retrials, if any, or the appeal period expires.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonWARNING
Applies to
Jencks act statements
Must include
disclosure before trial

Jencks Act and Rule 26.2 statements should be disclosed before trial to avoid delays.

Judge Sánchez strongly encourages the disclosure of Jencks Act and Rule 26.2 statements prior to trial so that any dispute may be resolved at the final pretrial conference without delaying the trial. If disclosure is withheld until after direct examination, the statements will be presumed to be relevant, and the opposing party will be afforded a recess to prepare for cross-examination.

Judge Juan R. SánchezWARNING
Applies to
Transcript dispute resolution
Must include
joint resolution before conference

Disputes over transcript accuracy must be resolved before final pretrial conference.

If tapes are used in a case, counsel shall jointly resolve any dispute regarding the accuracy of transcripts prior to the final pretrial conference. Any unresolved dispute must be raised at the conference.

Judge Juan R. SánchezWARNING
Applies to
Retention coordinator deposition

Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of retention coordinator may be appropriate to avoid spoliation accusations.

In order to avoid later accusations of spoliation, a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of each party's retention coordinator may be appropriate.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Briefs exceeding 25 pages must include a table of contents.

Any briefing exceeding twenty (25) pages must include a table of contents.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Parties must meet in person or by video conference for the Rule 26(f) conference; email is insufficient.

Parties are required to meet and confer to complete a Rule 26(f) report jointly. Parties may meet in person or through video conference; email correspondence is insufficient.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Parties must use the Rule 26(f) form from Judge Scott's webpage; the form is a minimum requirement.

Parties must fill out the Rule 26(f) form available on Judge Scott’s Court webpage (https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/judges-info/district-court-judges/kai-n-scott). The parties may attach any supplemental information desired to this form; the form is a minimum requirement.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Rule 16 conference

A client or representative with settlement authority must be available by telephone for the entire Rule 16 conference.

authority to negotiate a case’s settlement, then the client or a representative who can authorize settlement must be available by telephone for the entirety of the Rule 16 conference.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Brief

An oversize brief is permitted if it exceeds the page limit only due to embedded pictures or charts, and the party must certify that this is the reason.

If a filing exceeds these page limits due only to the size of pictures or charts embedded within the filing, then the party may file the oversize brief and must certify that that is why the brief is oversize.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Supplemental brief

Supplemental briefing must clearly reference the misstated point of law.

The supplemental briefing does not need to repeat the entire argument but must clearly reference the misstated point of law.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum

The sentencing memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party.

The memorandum must set forth any legal authority relied upon by the party.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Reply

No replies to sentencing motions may be filed without leave of court.

No replies may be filed without leave.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
legal authority

Alternative jury instructions must be submitted within the same document, with supporting legal authority.

If the parties are unable to agree on a particular jury instruction, each party may submit an alternative proposed instruction and shall provide the relevant legal authority supporting the proposed language. However, the Judge wants the alternative versions submitted within the same document.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Objection

Objections must be made by reciting the rule number or a brief phrase, and attorneys cannot argue the basis unless the Court requests argument.

Objections must be made by reciting the appropriate rule number or a word or brief phrase; attorneys cannot argue the basis for objections unless the Court requests argument.

Judge Kai N. ScottWARNING
Applies to
Pleading

Affirmative defenses must have good faith basis; prophylactic defenses prohibited.

Parties are reminded that Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 only permits parties to assert affirmative defenses for which they have a good faith basis. Parties may not assert affirmative defenses prophylactically.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonWARNING
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law may be required within 24 hours after TRO/preliminary injunction hearing.

Judge Marston may require proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than twenty-four (24) hours after such a hearing.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply and sur-reply briefs should not repeat case facts

Reply and sur-reply submissions should not contain a repeat recitation of the facts of the case.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonWARNING
Applies to
Discovery

Court may apportion e-discovery costs upon showing of good cause.

However, the court will apportion the costs of electronic discovery upon a showing of good cause.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeWARNING
Applies to
All documents
Must include
ai disclosure

Website references and AI use have specific requirements.

Requirements for website references and artificial intelligence use

Judge Mark A. KearneyWARNING
Applies to
General
Must include
exhibit list

Website references must include screenshot exhibits.

Filings referencing a website shall attach a screenshot of the cited website reference as an exhibit.

Judge Mark A. KearneyWARNING
Applies to
General
Must include
ai disclosure

AI hallucinations may result in sanctions under professional conduct rules.

Parties and counsel may be subject to sanction should we find false representations including artificial intelligence hallucinations under the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure.

Judge Mark A. KearneyWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
appendix

Movant non-compliance may result in denial without prejudice; respondent non-compliance may result in motion being considered uncontested.

Failure of the movant to follow this procedure in all respects may result in the denial of the motion without prejudice to be renewed at trial. Respondent’s failure to comply in all respects may result in the Court’s considering the motion as uncontested.

Judge Mark A. KearneyWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Filings with website references must attach screenshot as exhibit.

Filings referencing a website shall attach a screenshot of the cited website reference as an exhibit.

Judge Mark A. KearneyWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
client authority

Counsel must have client authority and be prepared to discuss all claims, defenses, and topics at pretrial conferences.

Counsel taking part in any pretrial conference must be prepared to speak on every subject, including settlement, and have authority from their clients to do so. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss all claims and defenses in detail, as well as all topics listed in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b)–(c) and 26(a) and shall have a thorough understanding of the facts of the case.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute
Must include
meet and confer

Discovery disputes must be resolved through meet-and-confer before seeking court intervention; sanctions may be imposed.

The vast majority of discovery disputes should be settled by the parties through civility and common sense. Judge Costello expects the parties to have met and conferred in good faith by telephone, by video conference, or in person before submitting a dispute. If the Court's intervention is required to resolve a discovery dispute, the Court may impose sanctions in favor of the prevailing party.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit

Exhibits must be separately numbered attachments with clear objective titles.

Each document filed as an exhibit must be filed as a separately numbered attachment to the main document and must be clearly titled with an objective description of the document so that the nature of the exhibit and its relevance are clearly discernible without the need to open the file.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloWARNING
Applies to
Discovery objection
Must include
specific objection grounds, partial objection specification, statement of withheld materials

Rule 34 objections must be specific and state grounds; general objections may result in sanctions.

In objecting to a discovery request served under Rule 34, the Parties shall “state with specificity the grounds for objecting to the request, including the reasons.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(B). “An objection must state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection. An objection to part of a request must specify the part and permit inspection of the rest.” Id. 34(b)(2)(C). General objections will rarely be appropriate and may be punished by the imposition of sanctions.

Judge Paul S. DiamondWARNING
Applies to
Discovery production

Late production of evidence or witnesses is viewed unfavorably.

I look unfavorably on attempts to ambush opposing Counsel with the production of evidence or witnesses past the applicable cutoff date in the Case

Judge Paul S. DiamondWARNING
Applies to
Supplemental brief

Parties must obtain permission before filing supplemental briefs.

The parties must seek permission to file supplemental briefs.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

A stipulation of uncontested facts under Local Rule 21(d)2(b)(2)(A)-(E) should accompany the pretrial memorandum.

A stipulation of uncontested facts, as set forth in Local Rule 21 (d)2(b)(2)(A)-(E) should accompany this memorandum.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs should only be submitted if the Court requests them.

Counsel should not submit trial briefs unless requested to do so by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Voir dire questions

In criminal cases, counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions to the court before trial.

Judge Wells conducts all voir dire in criminal cases; counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions to the court in advance of trial.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
review prior to hearing

Court prefers to review all proposed orders before hearings.

The Court prefers having the opportunity to review all proposed orders prior to any hearing.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
stipulation of exhibits

Counsel must stipulate exhibits for jury room; judge decides if no consensus.

Judge Wells will ask counsel to stipulate what evidence will go out to the jury. Should counsel be unable to reach a consensus, Judge Wells will determine the issue.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Conflict of interest
Must include
avoid multiple defendants

Single attorney representing multiple defendants disfavored except for initial appearance.

Judge Wells looks upon a single attorney representing multiple defendants in one case with disfavor, with the possible exception of the initial appearance.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsWARNING
Applies to
Settlement summary

Attachments to settlement summary limited to 30 pages with labeled dividers.

The synopsis should attach key summary expert reports, policy language excerpts, photographs, sketches, diagrams, charts, etc., to the conference memos. Judge Goldner Cinquanto will review them. Please attach only those excerpts which are most relevant to the claims at issue. Relevant portions must be delineated. Attachments should be no more than 30 pages and should be separated with labeled divider pages.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Any filing
Must include
ai disclosure

Non-compliance with AI policy may result in bar referral, monetary sanctions, or other sanctions.

Failure to comply with this policy may result in consequences such as referral to the appropriate state bar, monetary sanctions, or any other sanction the Court deems appropriate.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
consent statement

All requests must state if made with other party's consent.

Any requests shall state whether it is made with the other party’s consent. Responses to all motions are due within the period prescribed by Local Rule 7.1(c).

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
exhibit objections

Exhibit authenticity objections waived unless noted in Pretrial Stipulation

All objections to the authenticity of exhibits are waived unless noted in the Pretrial Stipulation.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
objection particularity

Objections must describe ground and authority with particularity

Any objections to anticipated testimony or exhibits shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
objections to testimony

Objections to anticipated testimony must describe with particularity the ground and authority.

Any objections to anticipated testimony shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
objections to exhibits

Objections to exhibits must describe with particularity the ground and authority.

Any objections to exhibits shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation

Video equipment requests must be made at least two weeks before trial via email.

Parties who intend to use video equipment to present the testimony of a witness should either supply that equipment or request, at least two weeks before trial, that the Court reserve equipment for them by email to Chambers_of_Magistrate_Judge_Goldner_Cinquanto@paed.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation

Voir dire questions, jury instructions, and verdict form must follow format in Practices and Procedures.

[Counsel shall comply with the format prescribed in my Practices and Procedures].

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
non jury exclusion

Judge Straw does not conduct settlement conferences in non-jury matters.

Judge Straw will not take part in settlement discussions in a non-jury matter. A settlement conference may, however, be arranged with another magistrate judge.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Judge Toplin requires the short form pretrial memorandum described in Local Rule 16.1(c) unless a separate order provides otherwise.

Unless specifically provided for by a separate order, Judge Toplin will require the use of the short form pretrial memorandum described in Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinWARNING
Applies to
Settlement report

Plaintiff must file a written report on settlement efforts by a specified date.

By (date), plaintiff will report in writing on counsels' serious settlement efforts.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyWARNING
Applies to
Settlement memorandum

Settlement memorandum is confidential, not to be shared with opposing counsel or filed of record.

The document is not to be shared with opposing counsel nor filed of record. This is for Judge Hey’s eyes only.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyWARNING
Applies to
Filing

Failure to comply with AI disclosure policy may result in bar referral, sanctions, or other court-ordered consequences.

Failure to comply with this policy may result in consequences such as referral to the appropriate state bar, monetary sanctions, or any other sanction the Court deems appropriate.

Magistrate Judge José R. ArteagaWARNING
Applies to
Record reading
Must include
pleadings read, stipulations read, depositions discouraged

Stipulations and pleadings read into record; depositions discouraged.

Judge Sitarski will request that counsel read stipulations and pleadings into the record. Judge Sitarski discourages reading depositions into the record, she prefers that a witness respond to the questions of counsel in open court.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiWARNING
Applies to
General practice

Counsel must be prompt, professional, courteous, and discuss disputes before bringing them to court.

Judge Sitarski expects counsel to be prompt in all appearances, to be professional and courteous to each other, both in the presence of the Court and otherwise, and to have discussions with each other about any matter in dispute before it is brought to the attention of the Court.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference notification
Must include
settlement possibility notification

Parties must notify Court if settlement is not a real possibility.

Please notify the Court if settlement is not a real possibility.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiWARNING
Applies to
Reply

Reply briefs permitted but must be concise and limited to matters raised in opposition; no new issues allowed.

Judge Sitarski will permit reply briefs, but expects such briefs to be concise, and to be limited to replying to matters raised in the opposition brief. Reply briefs should not be used to raise new issues.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed voir dire questions must be exchanged before the final pretrial conference.

Counsel should exchange proposed voir dire questions prior to the final pretrial conference.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiWARNING
Applies to
Criminal proceeding
Must include
dual representation prohibited

Dual representation of defendants by single attorney generally not favored.

Judge Carlos does not favor the dual representation of defendants by a single attorney at any criminal proceeding, apart, perhaps, from the initial appearance.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosWARNING
Applies to
Daubert motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Daubert motions must be filed separately, not as motions in limine

The Court will not entertain Daubert motions that are styled as “motions in limine.” All such motions should be filed by the deadline set forth in paragraph 8 above.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions must be tailored to case facts

While the undersigned prefers use of the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions where appropriate, it is insufficient to simply list the header without tailoring the content of the instruction to the facts and circumstances that are unique to this matter.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosWARNING
Applies to
Sidebar conference

Sidebar conferences are discouraged; evidentiary issues should be raised before trial or during recesses.

Judge Reid discourages the use of sidebar conferences. Counsel are encouraged to raise particular evidentiary issues before trial or during recesses or adjournments.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidWARNING
Applies to
Attorney examination argument

Normally only one attorney per party may examine a witness or present argument on the same point.

Judge Reid will not normally permit more than one attorney for the party to examine the same witness or more than one attorney to present argument on behalf of the party on the same point.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidWARNING
Applies to
Witness examination

Witness examination generally restricted to re-direct and re-cross.

Judge Reid will generally restrict counsel from examining witnesses beyond re-direct and re-cross.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidWARNING
Applies to
Representation
Must include
dual representation discouraged, exception for initial appearance

Dual representation of defendants by single attorney not favored except for initial appearance.

Judge Reid does not favor the dual representation of defendants by a single attorney at any criminal proceeding, apart, perhaps, from the initial appearance.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidWARNING
Applies to
Proposed discovery plan

Disagreements in the Proposed Discovery Plan must be highlighted in bold.

Disagreements concerning the timetable of discovery or other discovery-related matters must be highlighted in bold-face type.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyWARNING
Applies to
Scheduling request

Scheduling requests must include reasons, agreement/disagreement of counsel, and five alternative dates.

Requests to schedule or reschedule a conference or hearing before Judge Brody may be made by letter, fax, or email to the law clerk assigned to the case, stating the reasons and noting the agreement or disagreement of all counsel. Counsel must also provide the court with five alternative dates that are acceptable to all parties.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

Pretrial memorandum must include statement of facts, damages list, witness list, exhibit schedule, objections, trial estimate, and special comments.

The pretrial memorandum of each party must include the following: • A brief statement of the facts of the case. • A list of items of monetary damages claimed. • A list showing the names of all witnesses the party submitting the memorandum intends to call at trial. Liability and damages witnesses must be designated separately. • A schedule of all exhibits to be offered at trial by the party. • Objections to any proposed witnesses. • Objections to any proposed exhibits (including objections to genuineness and authenticity). • Objections to any proposed videotaped testimony. • Objections to any proposed depositions to be read at trial. • An estimate of the number of days required for trial. • Special comments, if any, regarding legal issues, stipulations, amendments of pleadings, or other appropriate matters.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyWARNING
Applies to
Trial memorandum

Trial memorandum must address important legal issues with citations to legal authority.

The separate trial memorandum of each party must address important legal issues and include citation to legal authority.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyWARNING
Applies to
General proceedings
Must include
civility, punctuality, professional conduct

Counsel must be punctual and civil to all parties, witnesses, and court personnel.

Judge Bartle expects counsel to be punctual for all conferences, hearings, and trials. He also expects counsel at all times to be civil to one another as well as to all parties, witnesses, and court personnel.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIWARNING
Applies to
Courtroom proceedings
Must include
stand when addressing court, may sit when examining witnesses, permission required to approach witnesses

Counsel must stand when addressing court but may sit when examining witnesses.

In all courtroom proceedings, Judge Bartle expects counsel to stand when addressing the Court. However, counsel may remain seated when examining witnesses. Counsel also may approach the witnesses with permission of the Court.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
juror notetaking prohibited

Judge Slomsky generally prohibits jury notetaking but may permit it in appropriate cases.

As a general rule, Judge Slomsky does not allow the jury to take notes. In an appropriate case, he may permit notetaking.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyWARNING
Applies to
E discovery information
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

If pleadings don't permit e-discovery discussion, parties must agree on exchange date or seek court resolution.

To the extent that the state of the pleadings does not permit a meaningful discussion of the above issues by the time of the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall either agree on a date by which this information will be mutually exchanged or submit the issue for resolution by the court at the Rule 16 scheduling conference.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyWARNING
Applies to
Letter

Permitted correspondence must state that counsel agrees or disagrees with the request.

Correspondence regarding the following is permitted, provided the letter states that counsel agrees or disagrees with the request:

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Threshold motions should be filed before the Rule 16 conference, with counsel prepared to discuss merits.

Motions to dismiss, amend, transfer, add parties and other threshold motions should be filed before the Rule 16 conference. Counsel shall be prepared to discuss the merits of any outstanding motions at the conference.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyWARNING
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
sentencing memorandum

Sentencing memoranda from both parties must follow Sentencing Guidelines framework.

Judge Padova expects the submission of sentencing memoranda by both the Government and defendants, but notes that they must be within the framework provided by the Sentencing Guidelines in order to be useful.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaWARNING
Applies to
Scheduling order
Must include
sanctions warning

Violations of Scheduling Orders subject to sanctions under Rule 16(f)

Unexcused violations of Scheduling Orders are subject to sanctions under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f), upon Motion or the initiative of the Court.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonWARNING
Applies to
Surreply
Must include
new arguments only, leave of court required

Surreplies require leave of court and only for new arguments

Surreply briefs are not accepted without leave of the Court and should only be requested if the moving party has asserted new arguments or citations in its reply brief.

Senior Judge Michael M. BaylsonWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
certificate of service

Reply/surreply briefs only for new controlling authority

Reply and surreply briefs should be filed only when absolutely necessary and only in circumstances where the parties wish to draw Judge Surrick=s attention to controlling authority not previously cited by the parties.

Senior Judge R. Barclay SurrickWARNING
Applies to
In limine motion

In limine motions must be filed early enough for advance consideration.

In limine motions should be presented in sufficient time so that they can be considered in advance of trial. Routine in limine motions will ordinarily be disposed of on the first day of trial or during the course of the trial.

Senior Judge R. Barclay SurrickWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions should only cover substantive issues, not basic instructions.

Proposed instructions should cover only the substantive issues regarding the elements of each cause of action and each defense. Basic instructions, such as the burden of proof, credibility and procedure, should not be submitted.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageWARNING
Applies to
Discovery

If pleadings don't permit e-discovery discussion, parties must agree on exchange date or seek court resolution

To the extent that the state of the pleadings does not permit a meaningful discussion of the above issues by the time of the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties shall either agree on a date by which this information will be mutually exchanged or submit the issue for resolution by the court at the Rule 16 scheduling conference.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply briefs may address only issues raised in the opposition brief and must not repeat arguments.

Reply briefs, addressing only issues raised in the brief in opposition and not repeating arguments in the brief, may be filed within seven days of service of the opponent’s brief in opposition and shall be limited to ten pages.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageWARNING
Applies to
Sur reply

No further briefs, including sur-replies, may be filed after the reply brief.

No further briefs may be filed.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit schedule

The schedule of exhibits must describe each exhibit.

The parties shall provide the Court with one copy of each exhibit to which there is an objection and two copies of a schedule of exhibits which shall describe each exhibit.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Pro hac vice admissions require a written motion before first appearance.

V. Pro Hac Vice Admissions: To be admitted appearing before Judge Beetlestone pro hac vice, associate counsel of record should submit a written motion for admission prior to the day of the first appearance of out-of-state counsel. The admission of out-of-state counsel pro hac vice does not relieve associate counsel of responsibility for the matter before the Court.

Chief Judge Wendy BeetlestoneINFO
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Rule 26(f) form is minimum requirement; supplemental information may be attached.

The parties may attach any supplemental information desired to this form; the form is a minimum requirement.

Judge Catherine HenryINFO
Applies to
Rule 26f report

Key documents (e.g., disputed contracts) encouraged for Rule 16 conference.

Parties are encouraged to attach any key documents for the Court’s review ahead of the Rule 16 conference (e.g., a disputed contract).

Judge Catherine HenryINFO
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
joint appendix

Joint appendix encouraged with summary judgment briefings.

Parties are encouraged to submit a joint appendix with the moving party's briefings.

Judge Catherine HenryINFO
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
local rule certificate

Default e-discovery standards apply if parties cannot agree before Rule 16 conference.

In the event the parties cannot reach an agreement on how to conduct electronic discovery ("e-discovery") before the Rule 16 scheduling conference, the following default standards shall apply until such time, if ever, the parties conduct e-discovery on a consensual basis.

Judge Chad F. KenneyINFO
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
substantive issues only

Only substantive jury instructions are required; procedural matter instructions are not necessary.

Jury instructions need only be submitted with respect to substantive issues in the case. Proposed instructions on procedural matters such as the burden of proof, unanimity, and credibility are not necessary.

Judge Chad F. KenneyINFO
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
model instructions favored

Model jury instructions are favored; Pennsylvania Standard for diversity cases, Third Circuit Model for federal question cases.

Model Jury Instructions are favored. In Pennsylvania law, the Pennsylvania Standard instructions are favored for diversity cases. In federal question cases, the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions are favored.

Judge Chad F. KenneyINFO
Applies to
Amended complaint
Must include
certificate of conference

Amended complaint filed after meet and confer is deemed filed with leave of court under Rule 15(a)(2).

If during the meet and confer described herein, a party is alerted to a deficiency in their complaint by opposing counsel, the filing party is permitted to submit an amended complaint which rectifies all, or some, of the issues addressed at the meeting. The party filing the amended complaint should attach to the amended complaint a certification that such amendment was the result of compliance with this protocol. If such certification is attached, the amended complaint will be deemed filed with leave of Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), and therefore not exhaust the party’s amendment as of right under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Brief

Parties may argue additional undisputed facts in briefing beyond those in Joint Statement.

Agreeing upon the submission of a Joint Statement will not preclude a party from arguing in briefing that there are other undisputed facts besides those on which the parties were able to agree.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Joint statement of undisputed facts

Joint Statement should include relevant exhibits.

The Joint Statement should include exhibits, where relevant.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Joint statement of undisputed facts

Including facts in Joint Statement does not constitute concession of relevance or materiality.

Inclusion of a given fact in a Joint Statement will not be considered a concession by any party that a given fact is relevant or material.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Brief

When Joint Statement exists, factual citations should reference it where possible.

Where the parties agree upon a Joint Statement, all factual citations should be made to the Joint Statement, to the extent they can be.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Opposition to summary judgment
Must include
certificate of service

Court typically sets deadline for summary judgment opposition in Scheduling Order.

The Court will typically set a deadline by which a party opposing summary judgment must file its opposition in its Scheduling Order.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Amended notice of removal

Amended Notice of Removal does not affect case deadlines running from removal.

The filing of an Amended Notice of Removal will have no impact on any case deadlines which run from the removal of the case.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Trial procedure

Jurors may take notes during evidence presentation but not during arguments or jury instructions.

Judge Weilheimer permits note taking by jurors during the presentation of evidence. Jurors are not permitted to take notes during argument or the Court’s instruction on the law.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice admission
Must include
local rule certificate

Pro hac vice counsel may use Eastern District's standard admission form.

Counsel applying for admission before the Court pro hac vice may use the Eastern District’s standard form.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice admission

Local counsel attendance not required after pro hac vice admission, except as specified.

After motion for leave to appear pro hac vice is granted, local counsel need not be present at every appearance, except as outlined infra.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Sample certification language for meet-and-confer requirement.

The undersigned counsel certifies that on insert date the parties did meet and confer in an attempt to resolve list motion or topic that was addressed . As this matter was unable to be resolved through substantive verbal communications the attached Motion is being filed.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Pretrial conference memorandum
Must include
unavailable dates

Specific circumstances qualify as witness/counsel unavailability

The Court will consider a witness or counsel to be unavailable due to a court attachment, a prepaid vacation/business trip, a scheduled medical procedure or a significant life event such as a child's wedding or graduation.

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Brief

Live technology tutorials are permitted at the claim construction hearing; electronic tutorials must be submitted by the Joint Claim Construction Brief deadline; live tutorials must focus on underlying technology, not infringement or validity.

The Court is open to the presentation of live technology tutorials when they may be of benefit. The parties may also submit tutorials in electronic form by the deadline for submission of the Joint Claim Construction Brief. If a party intends to present a live tutorial, it should be directed to the underlying technology (rather than argument related to infringement or validity).

Judge Gail A. WeilheimerINFO
Applies to
Scheduling order
Must include
settlement conference referral

Settlement conferences referred to Magistrate Judge.

The Court’s Scheduling Order will refer cases to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Scheduling order

Court does not participate in settlement negotiations for non-jury cases.

The Court will not participate in settlement negotiations in non-jury cases.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
competing instruction versions

Competing jury instruction versions required if parties disagree.

If counsel cannot agree on a particular instruction, they must submit their competing versions along with a statement explaining why the Court should give their proposed instruction.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
local counsel responsibility

Pro hac vice admission does not relieve local counsel of responsibility

The admission of counsel pro hac vice does not relieve associate local counsel and that attorney moving the admission of responsibility for counsel admitted pro hac vice.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Preliminary injunction motion
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings and conclusions may be required for injunctions.

He may also require the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the hearing.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Arbitration certification
Must include
arbitration designation

Arbitration certification evaluated for non-arbitration track cases.

Judge Pappert will evaluate, as necessary, counsel’s Arbitration Certification in non-arbitration track matters and will designate the case for arbitration pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 53.2 as appropriate.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Arbitration track case

No Rule 16 conference or scheduling order in arbitration track cases.

Judge Pappert will not hold a Rule 16 conference or issue a Scheduling Order in arbitration track cases, unless there is a de novo appeal from an arbitration award.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Trial de novo
Must include
scheduling order

Scheduling order issued for trial de novo from arbitration award.

Upon demand for trial de novo from an arbitration award, the Court will issue a Scheduling Order setting the date for trial at the earliest date available to the Court.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Pattern instructions should use Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions.

If pattern instructions are to be given, those instructions should be taken from the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions wherever possible.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Supreme Court or Third Circuit cases should be cited when applicable.

United States Supreme Court or Third Circuit Court of Appeals cases should be cited whenever applicable.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Rule 16 conference
Must include
trial date determined

Trial date set at initial Rule 16 conference.

A date for trial will be determined at the initial Rule 16 conference.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Trial scheduling

Out-of-town parties scheduled same as all other cases.

Judge Pappert schedules the trial of cases involving out-of-town counsel, parties, or witnesses in the same manner as all other cases.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Witness scheduling
Must include
counsel responsibility

Counsel responsible for scheduling witnesses.

Counsel are responsible for scheduling their witnesses.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jurors are permitted to take notes during trial.

Judge Pappert permits jurors to take notes.

Judge Gerald J. PappertINFO
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
specific reference to trial evidence

Revised findings/conclusions may be submitted after trial with trial evidence references.

The parties may submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with specific reference to trial evidence at the conclusion of the case.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Trial bifurcation

Trial may be bifurcated when damages witnesses greatly exceed liability witnesses.

In cases where the number of witnesses for damages greatly exceeds the number of witnesses for liability, Judge Schmehl may bifurcate the trial of the case.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Stipulations
Must include
exhibits, undisputed facts, jury instructions +1 more

Counsel encouraged to stipulate to undisputed facts, exhibits, jury instructions, and special interrogatories before trial.

Judge Schmehl strongly encourages counsel to stipulate to as many matters as possible before trial, including undisputed facts, exhibits, jury instructions, and special interrogatories.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Jury deliberations
Must include
exhibit selection discussion

Court and counsel discuss which exhibits go to jury after jury begins deliberations.

After the jury has been instructed and taken to the jury room to begin deliberations, the court and counsel will discuss which exhibits should go out with the jury for their consideration during deliberations.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Jury deliberations
Must include
testimony readback procedure

Deputy Clerk may read back testimony or replay tapes at jury's request.

At the jury’s request, the court may permit the Deputy Clerk to read portions of testimony back to the jury or to replay the audio or video-taped testimony.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Jury verdict
Must include
interrogatories, verdict taken by deputy

Court submits interrogatories to jury; Courtroom Deputy takes verdict in presence of court, counsel, and parties.

Ordinarily, the court will submit interrogatories to the jury. The Courtroom Deputy will take the verdict in the presence of the court, counsel, and the parties.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Jury polling
Must include
polling available upon request

Court will poll jury if requested by counsel.

If requested by counsel, the court will poll the jury.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Juror interviews
Must include
interviews allowed, jury not required to participate

Judge allows counsel to interview jurors but instructs jury they are not required to talk to attorneys.

Judge Schmehl will allow counsel to interview jurors but will instruct the jury that they are not required to talk to the attorneys.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Oral argument
Must include
available upon request

Oral argument generally permitted on substantive motions in criminal cases upon request.

The court will generally permit oral argument on a substantive motion in a criminal case upon request.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
E discovery
Must include
e discovery liaison qualifications

E-discovery liaison must be familiar with systems, knowledgeable about e-discovery, prepared for disputes, and organize efforts.

No later than , to promote communication and cooperation between the parties, each party shall designate a single individual through whom all e-discovery requests and responses are made ("the e-discovery liaison"). Regardless of whether the e-discovery liaison is an attorney (in-house or outside counsel), a third party consultant, or an employee of the party, he or she must be: a. Familiar with the party's electronic systems and capabilities in order to explain these systems and answer relevant questions; b. Knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery, including electronic document storage, organization, and format issues; c. Prepared to participate in e-discovery dispute resolutions; and, d. Responsible for organizing the party's e-discovery efforts to insure

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs are required only when a new or unique point of law is involved.

Parties should submit a trial brief only if a new or unique point of law is involved.

Judge Jeffrey L. SchmehlINFO
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
file on ecf

Proposed orders should be filed on ECF; complex orders should also be emailed to chambers in Word format.

Proposed orders should be filed on ECF along with the relevant request for relief, except that complex proposed orders, such as scheduling orders in patent cases or lengthy discovery orders, should also be e-mailed to chambers in Word version to facilitate editing.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Motion

Joint exhibits must follow section 2 requirements; for voluminous exhibits, use single numbered appendix with TOC

The joint set of exhibits must be filed in conformity with section 2 of these policies and procedures. For motions with voluminous exhibits, we encourage using a single consecutively numbered appendix with a table of contents rather than individual, separately filed exhibits.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Parties should follow Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions with legal authority for variations

Whenever possible, the parties shall adhere to the Third Circuit’s Model Jury Instructions. Variation should be explained with reference to specific legal authority, such as other model jury instructions, caselaw, instructions from other trials, or otherwise.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Each jury instruction must be numbered and start on a new page

Each proposed instruction should be numbered consecutively and should start on a new page to facilitate reference, editing, and reordering.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Parties must propose complete set of preliminary, final, standard, and case-specific instructions

The parties should deliberate over and propose a complete, ready-to-read set of instructions: both preliminary and final instructions; and both standard and case-specific instructions.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Instructions should be customized, terse, and neutral for jury understanding

Counsel should customize the instructions to the parties or events of the case in a terse and neutral manner so that they may be more easily understood by the jury.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Counsel must notify chambers about court reporter preference well before pretrial conference

If counsel want a court reporter for trial rather than an audio recording, they must raise that with chambers well before the pretrial conference.

Judge John F. MurphyINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Pro hac vice admission does not relieve counsel of responsibility.

The admission of out-of-the-jurisdiction counsel pro hac vice does not relieve associate counsel of responsibility for the matter before the Court.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Rule 26f meeting

Rule 26(f) meeting should occur early in the case.

The Rule 26(f) meeting should take place as early in the case as possible.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Discovery

Discovery should begin immediately without waiting for Rule 16 conference.

The parties should begin discovery as soon as permitted under the applicable rules without waiting for the Rule 16 conference and regardless of whether a motion is pending.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Rule 16 scheduling order

Rule 16 Scheduling Order issued after conference.

The Court will issue a Rule 16 Scheduling Order following the conference.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Final pretrial conference
Must include
address scheduling issues, address factual legal issues, address exhibit admissibility

Final Pretrial Conference addresses factual/legal issues and exhibit admissibility.

During this conference, the Court will address factual and legal issues, the admissibility of exhibits and scheduling issues.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Final pretrial order

Final pretrial order or scheduling order issued after final Pretrial Conference.

At the conclusion of the conference, the Court will issue a final pretrial order or a final scheduling order in a complex case.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Discovery schedule

Discovery period typically 120 days from Rule 16 conference; trial 120 days after discovery completion.

The Court usually allows up to 120 days from the date of the Rule 16 conference to complete discovery. A case will ordinarily be listed for trial 120 days after the completion of discovery.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Privilege log

Multiple emails with same privilege claim may be described collectively in privilege log.

Where several e-mails are exchanged, and the same privilege claim applies to all of those e-mails, the party asserting privilege may describe the e-mails collectively, rather than one-by-one.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Settlement discussion

Settlement discussions may occur at Rule 16 status conferences.

Settlement may be discussed at the initial Rule 16 status conference and at any subsequent conference.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Settlement negotiation

Court will not participate in settlement negotiations for non-jury cases.

The Court will not participate in settlement negotiations in non-jury cases.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Settlement

Case dismissal will not be stayed pending settlement payment.

Should the parties reach a settlement, case dismissal will not be stayed pending the payment of settlement funds.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Parties may submit revised findings of fact and conclusions of law after trial with specific reference to trial evidence.

The parties may submit revised or supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with specific reference to trial evidence at the conclusion of the case.

Judge John M. GallagherINFO
Applies to
Written submission

Citations to docket documents in written submissions should include the document's ECF number.

In all written submissions to Judge Wolson, citations to documents on the docket, e.g., “Indictment,” should identify those documents by ECF number.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonINFO
Applies to
Post hearing brief

Post-hearing briefs or proposed findings may be required after suppression hearings, with schedule set by judge.

Following a hearing on a motion to suppress, Judge Wolson might request the submission of post-hearing briefs or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Judge Wolson will establish a schedule of these submissions after the suppression hearing.

Judge Joshua D. WolsonINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
oral argument request

Oral argument must be requested by letter or in motion/responsive pleading.

A party desiring oral argument should request it by letter or in the body of the motion or responsive pleading.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Stipulation

Stipulations and consent decrees may use electronic signatures

Stipulations, consent decrees, or other documents requiring Court approval or signature may be in a form using electronic signature.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Stipulation

Approved stipulations are forwarded to Clerk for filing and dissemination

If approved, Judge Leeson forwards the Stipulation and Order to the Clerk for filing and dissemination to the parties.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Summary judgment statement must include only material facts in dispute.

The moving party shall include only those facts that are material to the issues in dispute in the enumerated statement of facts.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Summary judgment opposition
Must include
controvert facts

Undisputed facts in summary judgment are deemed admitted unless controverted.

All facts set forth in the moving party’s statement of undisputed facts shall be deemed admitted unless controverted.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Pretrial conference

Pretrial conference held approximately one week before trial date

If it appears that the case will procced to trial, the Court will hold a pretrial conference approximately one week prior to the trial date.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Exhibit

Exhibits may be released to offering party at close of trial with court approval.

upon approval of the Court, exhibits may be released at the close of trial to the custody of the party who offered them.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum

Settlement conference memorandum must include case caption and trial type.

Each memorandum shall include the following information: (1) The caption of the case. (2) Whether the case will be tried to a jury or through a nonjury trial.

Judge Jr. Joseph F. LeesonINFO
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
signature blocks

Stipulations and consent decrees must be signed by all counsel; electronic signatures permitted per Local Rule 7.4(b).

Any stipulations, consent decrees, or other documents requiring Court approval or signature must be signed by all counsel. Electronic signatures are permitted in accordance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.4(b).

Judge Juan R. SánchezINFO
Applies to
Cross examination

Recross-examination permitted only when new evidence is opened on redirect.

Judge Sánchez generally permits recross-examination only “[w]here new evidence is opened up on redirect examination.” United States v. Riggi, 951 F.2d 1368, 1375 (3d Cir. 1991) (explaining “the privilege of recross-examination as to matters not covered on redirect examination lies within the trial court’s discretion” (citation omitted)).

Judge Juan R. SánchezINFO
Applies to
Rule 16 conference

Rule 16 pretrial conferences are held in person at Chambers.

Judge Scott holds Rule 16 Pretrial Conferences in person at Chambers.

Judge Kai N. ScottINFO
Applies to
Rule 16 conference

Parties must be ready to discuss six topics at the Rule 16 conference.

Parties must attend the Rule 16 conference ready to discuss (1) discovery progress, (2) all claims, defenses, and relief sought, (3) filed and anticipated motions, (4) key factual disputes, (5) the likelihood of settlement, and (6) the case schedule.

Judge Kai N. ScottINFO
Applies to
Rule 16 conference

A scheduling order will issue after the Rule 16 conference; participants must be ready to set the schedule and non-attendees must submit their schedule to co-counsel.

A scheduling order will be issued after the conclusion of the Rule 16 conference. Thus, all Rule 16 conference participants must come to the conference ready to set the case’s schedule, and any counsel that does not attend the Rule 16 conference must submit their schedule to co-counsel.

Judge Kai N. ScottINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Joint submission of jury instructions does not waive objections; counsel may separately submit objections or contingency instructions.

The submission of a joint proposed jury instruction does not constitute a waiver of any objection to that instruction. Rather, the joint submission indicates only that the parties agree to the language to be used if the instruction is ultimately given. Counsel should therefore err on the side of submitting proposed instructions on a contingency basis rather than waiting until trial to request additional instructions. Counsel may separately submit objections to proposed instructions or advise the Court of the circumstances under which a particular instruction should or should not be given.

Judge Kai N. ScottINFO
Applies to
Discovery

Discovery may begin immediately without waiting for Rule 16 conference.

The parties should begin discovery as soon as permitted under the applicable rules, without waiting for the Rule 16 conference and regardless of whether a motion is pending.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonINFO
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Voir dire questions due 10 days before trial.

Counsel may submit a set of voir dire questions in writing ten (10) days before the trial date.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
note taking permitted

Jurors are permitted to take notes.

Judge Marston permits jurors to take notes.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonINFO
Applies to
Trial proceeding

Judge Marston permits reading stipulations, pleadings, or discovery into the record when appropriate.

Judge Marston will allow the reading of stipulations, pleadings or discovery into the record when appropriate.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonINFO
Applies to
Jury instruction
Must include
written copy to jury

Court may provide jury with written instructions in appropriate cases.

The Court may give the jury a copy of the written instructions in appropriate cases.

Judge Karen Spencer MarstonINFO
Applies to
Discovery

Each party bears its own discovery costs.

Generally, the costs of discovery shall be borne by each party.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeINFO
Applies to
Appendix

Appendices must include a table of contents; joint appendices are encouraged for Rule 56 motions.

Parties are encouraged to submit a joint appendix of all exhibits with the moving party’s briefings. If that is not practical, then the parties may file separate appendices, and the responding party must cite to the moving party’s appendix wherever possible. Appendices, whether joint or separate, must include a table of contents.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeINFO
Applies to
Motion

Parties requesting oral argument must do so via letter, motion body, or responsive pleading.

A party desiring oral argument should request it by letter or in the body of the motion or responsive pleading.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeINFO
Applies to
Guilty plea memorandum

Guilty plea memorandum should include offense elements, statutory maximum penalties, plea agreement terms, and factual basis for the plea.

The guilty plea memorandum should include: the elements of each offense to which the defendant will plead guilty and legal citations for the elements, the statutory maximum penalties for each offense, the terms of any plea agreement, and the factual basis for the plea.

Judge Kelley Brisbon HodgeINFO
Applies to
Trial procedure

Speaking objections discouraged; state "objection" and cite rule; sidebars permitted only sparingly.

Judge Costello discourages speaking objections. Instead, counsel lodging an objection should state “objection” and cite the relevant rule. Judge Costello will permit sidebars only sparingly.

Judge Mary Kay CostelloINFO
Applies to
Statement of facts
Must include
not filed with court

Statement of facts process should not be filed on docket but shared with parties.

This process of serving and responding should not be filed with the Court on the docket but must be realized with all other parties.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezINFO
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
jury exhibits agreement

Counsel must agree on exhibits for jury; request ruling if unable to agree.

Counsel will determine which exhibits will be given to the jury after it retires to deliberate. If counsel cannot agree, they should request a ruling immediately after the jury retires to the deliberation room.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezINFO
Applies to
Objection

Speaking objections discouraged; sidebars permitted sparingly.

Speaking objections are discouraged and should include only the word “objection” and the relevant rule number. Sidebars will be permitted only sparingly.

Judge Mia Roberts PerezINFO
Applies to
Magistrate judge consent form
Must include
caption, case number

Magistrate judge consent form available at specified URL.

The consent form is available on the Court's website at http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/handbook/forms/app_q1.pdf.

Judge Paul S. DiamondINFO
Applies to
Proposed order

The Court prefers to review all proposed orders before any hearing.

The Court prefers having the opportunity to review all proposed orders prior to any hearing.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Confidentiality agreement

Confidentiality agreements encouraged but stipulated orders rarely approved.

Judge Wells encourages counsel to develop confidentiality agreements, when appropriate. However, she rarely will entertain stipulated confidentiality orders submitted for court approval.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Expert deposition
Must include
fr cp compliance

Expert depositions permitted under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Judge Wells permits depositions of expert witnesses in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Arbitration
Must include
accelerated discovery

Arbitration cases have accelerated discovery process.

Judge Wells has no special practices or procedures for arbitration cases, except for an accelerated discovery process.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Jury polling
Must include
upon request

Judge will poll jury upon request of counsel.

Judge Wells will, upon request of counsel direct her Deputy Clerk to poll the jury.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Sentencing memoranda
Must include
permitted

Sentencing memoranda permitted.

Judge Wells permits submission of sentencing memoranda.

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore WellsINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
patience

Counsel must be patient as settlement is a process that takes time.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be patient. Settlement is a process. It takes time.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
flexibility

Counsel must be flexible and avoid bottom lines or top numbers.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be flexible. Avoid bottom lines or top numbers.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
creativity

Counsel must be creative in settlement discussions.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be creative.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
expectation management

Counsel must manage their own expectations.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Manage their own expectations.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
settlement impediments

Counsel must be prepared to discuss legal, financial, or emotional impediments to settlement.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be prepared to discuss any impediments to settlement, whether legal, financial, or emotional.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement summary

Judge may require hard copies of lengthy materials.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto may require parties to provide hard copies of lengthy materials.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
case analysis

Counsel must be prepared to discuss both strengths and weaknesses of their case.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be prepared to discuss the weaknesses, as well as the strengths, of their case.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
agreement disagreement analysis

Counsel must be prepared to discuss factual and legal points of agreement and disagreement.

Judge Goldner Cinquanto expects counsel to: Be prepared to discuss factual and legal points of agreement and disagreement.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
proportionality

Discovery must be proportional to the needs of the case.

Discovery must be proportional to the needs of the case.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Motion

Motion practice governed by EDPA Local Rule 7.1 with exceptions noted in this document and other applicable rules.

Motion practice is governed by Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 except as described elsewhere in these Practices and Procedures, the Local Rules and applicable Standing Orders, or, as relevant, the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), or the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Supplemental joint appendix

Supplemental joint appendix must include original appendix, add materials at end, continue page numbering, and update TOC.

If unusual circumstances make it necessary for a party to supplement the joint appendix, the party must move for permission to file a supplemental joint appendix. The supplemental joint appendix must contain the original appendix, add the supplemental materials at the end, continue the appendix page numbering, and provide an updated table of contents.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Pretrial stipulation
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial stipulation is preferred over Local Rule 16.1 for pretrial procedure.

The parties should ordinarily expect to file a joint pretrial stipulation, in the form attached, in lieu of complying with Eastern District of Pennsylvania Local Rule 16.1, which otherwise governs pretrial procedure.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Joint pretrial stipulation
Must include
unusual legal issues, citations to relevant authority

Unusual legal issues for JMOL or dispositive motions must be cited in Pretrial Stipulation

The Joint Pretrial Stipulation should also alert the Court of any unusual legal issues which would serve as the basis for a motion for a judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 or any other dispositive motions with citations to relevant legal authority.

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Local rules

Local Rules and Court Policies available at Eastern District of Pennsylvania website

of Civil Procedure for this District and this Court’s Policies and Procedures. Both are available through the website for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/).

Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner CinquantoINFO
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Supplementation of proposed findings permitted at close of trial or after trial.

A supplementation will be permitted at the close of trial or, in an appropriate case, after trial.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

No specific practice on submitting jury instructions to jury.

Judge Straw has no particular practice or policy on submitting a copy of instructions to the jury.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
In limine motion
Must include
proposed order

In limine motions accepted before final pretrial conference per scheduling order.

Judge Straw will accept in limine motions in advance of the final pretrial conference and in accordance with his scheduling order so as to give him an opportunity to consider the merits of the motion.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Exhibits

Provide only essential portions of bulky exhibits with context.

Counsel is encouraged, however, to provide the Court with only the essential and relevant portions of bulky exhibits, together with sufficient material to provide context for the relevant portion of the exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Exhibits

Reach agreement in advance on exhibit admission.

Judge Straw expects counsel to reach agreement in advance as to the admission of exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Use Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions when possible.

Judge Straw prefers use of the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions whenever possible.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Verdict form

Judge encourages agreement on less than unanimous verdict.

Judge Straw will encourage counsel to agree upon a less than unanimous verdict.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Exhibits

Judge considers exhibit submission to jury on case-by-case basis.

Judge Straw will consider what exhibits should be sent out to the jury during their deliberations on a case-by-case basis.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Read back requests

Judge seeks counsel input on read-back requests, decides case-by-case.

Judge Straw will seek the input of counsel and will then make a determination on a case-by-case basis when requests are made to read back testimony or replay tapes.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Counsel availability

Counsel not required to stay in courthouse but must be available by phone.

Judge Straw will not require counsel to remain in the courthouse during deliberations but will require counsel to be available on short telephone notice.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Verdict

No usual practice for taking verdict.

Judge Straw has no usual practice with respect to taking a verdict.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Interrogatories

Judge submits written interrogatories to jury in appropriate cases.

Judge Straw will submit written interrogatories to the jury in the appropriate case.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Jury polling

Judge permits jury polling if requested.

Judge Straw will, if requested, permit the jury to be polled.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Juror interviews

Permit juror interviews after verdict recorded, jury discharged, and told no obligation to speak.

Judge Straw will permit counsel to interview jurors, but only after the verdict has been recorded, the jury has been discharged and they have been told in clear terms that they have no obligation to speak with counsel.

Magistrate Judge Craig M. StrawINFO
Applies to
Pretrial memorandum

In certain cases, Judge Toplin may require counsel to stipulate uncontested facts as set out in Local Rule 16.1(d)(2)(b)(2)(A-E).

In certain cases, Judge Toplin may require that counsel stipulate uncontested facts as generally set out in Local Rule 16.1(d)(2)(b)(2)(A-E).

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth L ToplinINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference

Settlement conferences conducted remotely via Zoom unless counsel requests otherwise

Unless counsel request otherwise, settlement conferences are being conducted remotely by video, utilizing Zoom.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyINFO
Applies to
Pretrial services report
Must include
defense counsel review, government counsel review

Both government and defense counsel may review Pretrial Services Report.

Judge Hey permits counsel for the government and defense counsel to review the Pretrial Services Report.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyINFO
Applies to
Probation report
Must include
defendant review, defense counsel review

Defendant/defense counsel may review Probation Department's sentencing recommendation if no waiver.

Where there is no waiver of the presentence report, Judge Hey permits the defendant or defense counsel to review the Probation Department's written recommendation as to sentence.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. HeyINFO
Applies to
Jury polling request

The court will permit jury polling upon request.

Judge Copeland will, if requested, permit the jury to be polled.

Magistrate Judge Katayoun M. CopelandINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Oral pro hac vice motions permitted on first appearance day

Judge Sitarski will permit oral motions for pro hac vice admissions on the day that the attorney to be admitted first appears. On or before the date of the non-admitted attorney’s first appearance, counsel must prepare an appropriate order to memorialize the pro hac vice admission.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Oral argument scheduled at court's discretion, may be requested

Judge Sitarski will schedule oral argument on motions if it appears likely to be helpful to the Court’s resolution of the matter. Counsel may request oral argument if counsel considers argument appropriate, but the Court will determine whether oral arguments will be heard.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Discovery plan

Standard discovery period is 90-120 days, but may be adjusted based on counsel's input

Judge Sitarski normally permits from 90 to 120 days for the completion of discovery; however, she will consider the informed view of counsel as to the time that will be required for discovery in a particular case.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Confidentiality agreement

Confidentiality agreements permitted subject to Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg requirements

Judge Sitarski will permit confidentiality agreements, subject to the requirements of Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 786 (3d Cir. 1994).

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference memorandum
Must include
exhibits

Attorneys may submit up to five critical documents with settlement conference memorandum

Judge Sitarski permits each attorney to submit copies of up to five documents that he/she considers critical to resolution of the case.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Trial brief
Must include
legal argument

Trial briefs encouraged when necessary or helpful.

Judge Sitarski encourages the submission of trial briefs when they are necessary or likely to be helpful to the Court.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Witness order
Must include
witness order flexibility

Witnesses may be examined out of sequence in appropriate circumstances.

Judge Sitarski will permit witnesses to be taken out of turn in appropriate circumstances.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
essential portions only

Only essential portions of lengthy exhibits should be provided to court.

Counsel are encouraged to provide the Court with only the essential and relevant portions of lengthy exhibits, together with sufficient material to provide context for the relevant portion of the exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Opening closing statements
Must include
reasonable length

Reasonable latitude for opening/closing statements length.

Judge Sitarski will discuss with counsel the length of time necessary and appropriate for opening and closing statements, but will give counsel reasonable latitude.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference submission
Must include
confidentiality

Settlement conference submissions are confidential and for Court only.

These submissions are confidential and shall be submitted to the Court only.

Magistrate Judge Lynne A. SitarskiINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
post conference follow up

Judge may continue settlement discussions after conference if matter unresolved.

Judge Carlos will, if appropriate, continue to work with counsel after the settlement conference if the matter is not resolved at the conference.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosINFO
Applies to
Verdict
Must include
jury discharged, verdict recorded, clear notice to jurors

Juror interviews permitted only after verdict, discharge, and clear notice of no obligation.

Judge Carlos will permit counsel to interview jurors, but only after the verdict has been recorded, the jury has been discharged, and they have been told in clear terms that they have no obligation to speak with counsel.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosINFO
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
from both counsel

Sentencing memoranda permitted from both counsel when pretrial sentencing report is used.

Judge Carlos permits the submission of sentencing memoranda by both counsel.

Magistrate Judge Pamela A. CarlosINFO
Applies to
Pro hac vice order
Must include
proposed order

Oral pro hac vice motions allowed on first appearance day.

Judge Reid will permit oral motions for pro hac vice admissions on the day that the attorney to be admitted first appears. On or before the date of the non-admitted attorney’s first appearance, counsel must prepare an appropriate Order to memorialize the pro hac vice admission.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
General

Counsel must follow FRCP 1 mandate for just, speedy, inexpensive proceedings.

Counsel are expected to be mindful of the mandate of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 that the procedural rules “should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.”

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs are encouraged when necessary or helpful.

Judge Reid encourages the submission of trial briefs when they are necessary or likely to be helpful to the Court.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Voir dire

Counsel are usually permitted to conduct all voir dire.

Judge Reid usually permits counsel to conduct all voir dire.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
In limine motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

In limine motions accepted in advance of final pretrial conference per scheduling order.

Judge Reid will accept in limine motions in advance of the final pretrial conference and in accordance with his scheduling order so as to give him an opportunity to consider the merits of the motion.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Witness examination

Witnesses may be examined out of sequence in appropriate circumstances.

Judge Reid will permit witnesses to be taken out of turn in appropriate circumstances.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Exhibit admission

Counsel expected to agree in advance on exhibit admission; no specific procedure for formal offer timing.

Judge Reid expects counsel to reach agreement in advance as to the admission of exhibits. Judge Reid has no particular procedure as to when an exhibit may be formally offered into evidence.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
less than unanimous verdict option

Judge encourages agreement on less than unanimous verdict.

Judge Reid will encourage counsel to agree upon a less than unanimous verdict.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

No specific practice on submitting written jury instructions to jury.

Judge Reid has no particular practice or policy on submitting a copy of instructions to the jury.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibit selection for jury room determined case by case.

Judge Reid will consider what exhibits should be sent out to the jury during their deliberations on a case by case basis.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Jury procedure

Read back/replay requests handled case by case.

Judge Reid will make a determination on a case by case basis when requests are made to read back testimony or replay tapes.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
written interrogatories to jury

No usual verdict practice; written interrogatories provided to jury during deliberations when appropriate.

Judge Reid has no usual practice with respect to taking a verdict. Judge Reid will submit written interrogatories to the jury in the appropriate case. A copy of the interrogatories shall be given to the jury during their deliberations.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Jury procedure

Jury polling permitted if requested.

Judge Reid will, if requested, permit the jury to be polled.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Jury procedure
Must include
juror interviews, clear notice required, jury discharged first +1 more

Juror interviews permitted after verdict recording and discharge with clear notice of no obligation.

Judge Reid will permit counsel to interview jurors, but only after the verdict has been recorded, the jury has been discharged and they have been told in clear terms that they have no obligation to speak with counsel.

Magistrate Judge Scott W. ReidINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Note-taking by jurors permitted on case-by-case basis considering counsel or juror requests.

Judge Brody decides whether note-taking will be permitted on a case by case basis, taking into consideration requests from counsel or from the jurors.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Opening statements

No time limits on opening statements or summations; lectern use not required.

Generally, Judge Brody will not impose time limits on opening statements or summations and does not require use of the lectern.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Closing argument

Objections during closing argument should be deferred until counsel finishes.

Judge Brody expects counsel to refrain from objecting during closing argument if the objection can wait until counsel has finished.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Trial procedure

Side bar conferences permitted for unanticipated trial matters.

Judge Brody permits side bar conferences during trial to address matters that were unanticipated prior to trial.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Witness scheduling

Judge will accommodate counsel on witness scheduling.

Judge Brody makes every effort to accommodate counsel regarding the scheduling of witnesses.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Witness examination

Further examination of witness permitted after redirect/recross upon request.

Upon request, Judge Brody may permit further examination of a witness after redirect or recross has been completed.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Trial procedure

No policy on reading stipulations/pleadings/discovery into record; counsel preference considered.

Judge Brody has no overall practice or policy on reading stipulations, pleadings, or discovery materials into the record and will consider the preference of counsel.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Exhibit

Exhibits may be moved into evidence at close of case unless otherwise necessary.

Unless otherwise necessary, counsel may wait until the close of his or her case to move for the admission of exhibits.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Directed verdict

Directed verdict motions may be oral or written; oral argument usually conducted.

Counsel may move for a directed verdict either orally or in writing. Judge Brody usually conducts oral argument on such a motion.

Senior Judge Anita B. BrodyINFO
Applies to
Civil case

Civil litigants must consider ADR processes, except for social security appeals, pro se prisoner civil rights actions, and habeas corpus petitions.

Litigants in all civil actions, exempting only social security appeals, pro se prisoner civil rights actions, and petitions for habeas corpus, shall be required to consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process (the “ADR process”) at an appropriate stage in the litigation.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

ADR processes may include mediation, settlement conferences, and other processes designated by the assigned judge.

ADR processes may include mediation and settlement conferences and such other ADR processes as the judge to whom the case is assigned (the “assigned judge”) may designate.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

All ADR processes are confidential unless waived by all participants or ordered by the assigned judge for good cause.

All ADR processes subject to this Rule shall be confidential, and disclosure by any person of confidential dispute resolution communications is prohibited unless confidentiality has been waived by all participants in the ADR process, or disclosure is ordered by the assigned judge for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

Assigned judge retains authority to conduct settlement conferences, order ADR participation, and approve/disapprove ADR processes.

Nothing in the Rule shall be construed to limit the assigned judge from (a) conducting settlement conferences or referring a matter to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, or (b) ordering the litigants to participate in an ADR process, or (c) approving or disapproving of an ADR process selected by the litigants.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

ADR Committee administers the court's ADR program and recruits, screens, and trains attorney neutrals.

The Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Committee of the court shall administer, oversee, and evaluate the court’s ADR program in accordance with the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998. The Clerk of Court, or such other person as may be designated from time to time by the Chief Judge, shall serve as the ADR coordinator. Under the direction of the ADR committee, the coordinator shall administer a program for recruitment, screening and training of attorneys to serve as neutrals.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

Court may adopt guidelines and policies for ADR program administration, maintained on file with the Clerk.

The Rule is intended to be flexible so as to permit the court to adopt, from time to time, guidelines and policies for the administration of the ADR program. The procedures promulgated by the court for the implementation of the ADR program shall be maintained on file in the office of the Clerk.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

Local Civil Rule 53.2 (arbitration) remains in effect; Local Civil Rule 53.2.1 (compulsory mediation) is repealed.

Nothing in the Rule shall be construed to amend or modify the provisions of Local Civil Rule 53.2 (compulsory and voluntary arbitration with right of trial de novo). Local Civil Rule 53.2.1 (compulsory mediation) is repealed by separate order.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Civil case

Rule implements ADR Act of 1998, demonstrates commitment to non-binding ADR, and exempts certain civil actions from ADR.

The Rule is intended to implement the provisions of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998 and to demonstrate the long-standing commitment of the court and its bar to non-binding alternative dispute resolution, without, however, limiting the authority and discretion of the assigned judge. Certain civil actions are exempted from the Rule as cases not appropriate for ADR process pursuant to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998.

Senior Judge Cynthia M. RufeINFO
Applies to
Settlement negotiation

Settlement negotiations are rarely referred to another district court judge.

Judge Bartle rarely refers settlement negotiations to another district court judge.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIINFO
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
admitted exhibits to jury room

Admitted exhibits (except weapons/drugs) go to jury room.

Judge Bartle's general rule is that (except for weapons and drugs) if an exhibit is admitted into evidence, it goes into the jury room.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIINFO
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
judge name, case number, legal argument

Sentencing memoranda encouraged from both government and defendant.

Judge Bartle encourages the submission of sentencing memoranda by both the government and the defendant.

Senior Judge Harvey Bartle IIIINFO
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
case complexity

Pretrial conferences held only in complex cases or those with multiple attorneys.

Pretrial conferences in criminal cases are held only in complex cases or those involving several attorneys.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyINFO
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
judge conducts voir dire

Judge conducts voir dire; counsel may submit proposed questions.

Judge Slomsky conducts voir dire in criminal cases. Counsel may submit proposed voir dire questions.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyINFO
Applies to
Motion

Pro hac vice admission requires submitting the Attorney Admissions Application (Pro Hac Vice) form.

Counsel moving for the pro hac vice admission of an attorney may file a motion with the Court by submitting the Attorney Admissions Application (Pro Hac Vice) form.

Senior Judge Joel H. SlomskyINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
response

Motions considered ripe when response is filed.

Judge Padova considers motions “ripe” when a response has been filed.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Written jury instructions generally not given but may be provided in appropriate cases.

Judge Padova generally does not give the jury written instructions, but may do so in appropriate cases.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

All trial exhibits generally permitted in jury room unless well-founded objection.

Upon request, Judge Padova generally permits all trial exhibits to go out to the jury unless a well-founded objection is asserted.

Senior Judge John R. PadovaINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Submitting a proposed instruction does not waive objection to it.

Submitting a proposed point does not constitute a waiver of objection. Counsel are instructed to work on proposed instructions regardless of counsel=s position with respect to a point=s applicability.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Applies to
Supplemental proposed findings
Must include
leave required

Parties may request to supplement proposed findings after hearing.

The parties may request leave to supplement proposed findings of fact after the hearing.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Applies to
Trial memorandum
Must include
optional for defendant

Defendant may file trial memorandum but not required.

The defendant is not required to file a trial memorandum but may do so.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Applies to
Discovery plan

Parties may limit electronic search scope to minimize expense.

To minimize the expense, the parties may consider limiting the scope of the electronic search (e.g., time frames, fields, document types).

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Applies to
Spoliation prevention

Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of retention coordinator may be appropriate to avoid spoliation claims.

In order to avoid later accusations of spoliation, a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition of each party's retention coordinator may be appropriate.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Applies to
Motion

A party desiring oral argument may request it in the body of the motion or responsive pleading.

Oral argument is not routinely scheduled. A party desiring oral argument may request it in the body of the motion or responsive pleading.

Senior Judge Timothy J. SavageINFO
Common questions about Eastern District of Pennsylvania document filing requirements

What must be included with motion to seal filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule requires certificate of conference. Certificate of concurrence or non-concurrence must be attached to motion to seal.

What must be included with pretrial memorandum filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. Counsel must use the short-form pretrial memorandum under Local Rule 21(c) unless a separate order provides otherwise.

View ruleSource: page 4, section Proposed Final Pretrial Memoranda

What must be included with pretrial submission filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule requires exhibit list. Counsel must file and serve a list of all trial exhibits by the date set in the Scheduling Order.

View ruleSource: page 4, section Proposed Final Pretrial Memoranda

What must be included with trial memorandum filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule requires legal argument. Counsel must file and serve memoranda of law addressing all legal and evidentiary issues expected at trial.

View ruleSource: page 4, section Proposed Final Pretrial Memoranda

What must be included with jury instructions filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. Counsel must file and serve requests for jury instructions by the date set in the Scheduling Order.

View ruleSource: page 4, section Proposed Final Pretrial Memoranda

What must be included with voir dire questions filings in Eastern District of Pennsylvania?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. Counsel must submit proposed voir dire questions at the final pretrial conference.

View ruleSource: page 5, section Voir Dire