Court Rules

Northern District of California Document Filing Requirements

1442 rules from official source documents

Required elements, certificates, and structural requirements for court documents. This page is scoped to Northern District of California; use the court rules overview to switch categories without leaving this court.

Applies to
Joint proposed final pretrial order

Joint proposed final pretrial order must include specific content: claims/defenses, relief, stipulated facts, factual issues, joint exhibit list, witness list with testimony summaries and time estimates; exhibit list and witness list as appendices.

the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint proposed final pretrial order that contains: (i) a brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided, (ii) a statement of all relief sought, (iii) all stipulated facts, (iv) a list of all factual issues which remain to be tried, (v) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit, a column for when it is offered in evidence, a column for when it is received in evidence, and a column for any limitations on its use, and (vi) each party's separate witness list for its case-in- chief witnesses (including those appearing by deposition) providing, for all such witnesses other than an individual plaintiff and an individual defendant, a short statement of the substance of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will give. If non-cumulative testimony is not spelled out, then the Court will presume the witness is cumulative. For each witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for the direct examination (only). Items (v) and (vi) should be appendices to the proposed order.

charles-r-breyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be filed 7 days before pretrial conference, hyperlinked to evidence, brief, plain English, delivered on thumb drive in Word format with label.

Each party shall file at least 7 days prior to the Pretrial Conference proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on all material issues. The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence. Proposed Findings shall be brief, written in plain English, and free of pejorative language, conclusions and argument. Parties shall deliver to Chambers copies of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on a thumb drive in Word format, with a label including the name of the case, the case number and a description of the submission

charles-r-breyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Admitted exhibits

Admitted exhibits must be accompanied by a Joint Certification of Counsel confirming they are true and correct copies.

These exhibits shall be accompanied by a Joint Certification of Counsel that the exhibits are true and correct copies of the exhibits submitted to the trier of fact in the matter.

charles-r-breyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required with all motions and oppositions.

Counsel shall submit a proposed form of order with all motion and opposition papers.

charles-r-breyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement

Plea agreements under Rule 11(c)(1)(B) must include specific content regarding Sentencing Guidelines and appellate rights waiver.

Plea agreements pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) must include the following: 1. If the agreement includes a Sentencing Guidelines calculation, then it must also state that the parties agree that the adjusted offense level results in a Guidelines range of ___ to ___ months depending on the defendant’s Criminal History Category. 2. If the agreement includes a waiver of appellate rights, it must also reserve the

charles-r-breyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
caption, case number

Joint case management statements must be filed 7 days before initial and all subsequent case management conferences.

Joint case management statements are required and must be filed seven days in advance of the initial case management conference date. Updated joint case management statements are required and must be filed seven days in advance of all other case management conferences.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, case number, proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order with relief sought, rationale, and citations; courtesy copy emailed to ygrpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Each party filing or opposing any motion shall also serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of the decision, including citation of authority that the party requests the Court to adopt, and citations to the record evidence where applicable. The proposed order should be submitted at the same time as the motion or opposition, with a courtesy copy emailed to ygrpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
caption, case number, meet and confer attestation

Discovery relief requests must be in one joint letter brief (max 4 pages, 2 per side) with meet-and-confer attestation.

All other requests for discovery relief must be summarized by the parties in one joint letter brief no longer than four pages (two pages per side). In the joint letter brief, counsel must attest that, prior to filing the request for relief, counsel met and conferred in person or by videoconference, and then concisely summarize all remaining issues that counsel were unable to resolve.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulated protective order
Must include
caption, case number, judicial intervention language

Stipulated protective orders must include language about following Court's Standing Order for designation disputes requiring judicial intervention.

Parties submitting proposed forms of stipulated protective order shall include the following language with respect to resolution of designation disputes: [6.3 Judicial Intervention.] If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the parties shall follow the Court's Standing Order in Civil Cases regarding Discovery and Discovery Motions.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
separate statement

Separate statement required for summary judgment motions, except for pro se plaintiffs.

Any party moving for summary judgment or opposing summary judgment is required to submit a separate statement as set forth herein. Pro se plaintiffs, however, are not required to submit a separate statement.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
general order 71 certification

Pro se employment actions must certify compliance with General Order 71 in summary judgment motion.

A party bringing a motion for summary judgment in a pro se employment action must certify compliance with General Order 71 within the motion for summary judgment.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required for undisputed sealing requests in chart format.

Proposed Order On Undisputed Sealing Requests: Parties shall file and email to the Court's proposed order inbox, a proposed order addressing all undisputed sealing requests. This shall be in chart form with a column identifying the document(s), a column describing the action to be taken (seal, portions to redact, unseal), and a column for the Court's order.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Omnibus proposed order required for sealing disputes in chart format.

Proposed Order: Parties shall file an omnibus proposed order addressing all disputes. The order shall include a chart identifying all documents and portions of documents by consistent identifier (e.g., Bates number) and docket location and a column for the Court's order on each document and portions of documents.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint
Must include
redline comparison

Redline comparison required for amended complaints and motions to amend.

In connection with all amended complaints and motions seeking leave to amend pleadings, parties shall submit a redline comparison with the operative pleading to ygrpo@cand.uscourts.gov upon filing of the amended complaint or motion seeking leave to amend. This requirement does not apply to self-represented parties.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Securities chart
Must include
chart

Securities cases require chart summarizing PSLRA allegations within 14 days.

Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated complaint), the plaintiff shall file a chart summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows: (a) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading; (b) the speaker, date, and medium by which the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or misleading.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff/removing defendant must serve copies of Standing Order and CAND CMC Order to all parties and file certificate of service.

Plaintiff (or in the case of removed actions, any removing defendant) is directed to serve copies of this Standing Order in Civil Cases and the CAND CMC Order at once upon all parties to their action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4 and 5, and to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-6(a).

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement
Must include
signature blocks

Settlement notices must be signed by all parties and comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) for electronic filing.

Any notice of settlement sent to the Court must be signed by all parties to the settlement. Electronically filed notices shall be signed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), including, if applicable, a filer's attestation as provided by Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for class action settlement approval

Class action settlement approval motions must follow NDCA Procedural Guidance.

A motion for Court approval of a class action settlement must provide the information described in the Northern District of California's Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
table of contents

Joint jury instructions must be submitted 7 days before pretrial conference with table of contents.

Counsel shall jointly submit one set of additional proposed jury instructions, ordered in a logical sequence, together with a table of contents, using the Ninth Circuit Manual where possible, or Devitt and Blackmar or CALJIC, not less than seven (7) days prior to the pretrial conference.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must be marked and include arguments/authority.

Any instructions on which counsel cannot agree shall be marked as "disputed," and shall be included within the jointly submitted instructions and accompanying table of contents, in the place where the party proposing the instruction believes it should be given. Argument and authority for and against each disputed instruction shall be included as part of the joint submission, on separate sheets directly following the disputed instruction.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Opening statements

Opening statement visuals must be exchanged by Wednesday before trial, objections filed Thursday, phone conference Friday.

Parties must meet and confer to exchange any visuals, graphics or exhibits to be used in opening statements. Unless otherwise agreed, the exchange must occur no later than the close of business on the Wednesday before trial. Any objections not resolved must be filed in writing by the Thursday before trial. The parties shall be available by telephone on the Friday before trial to discuss the issues raised with the Court.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction hearing
Must include
exhibits

Exhibits must be exchanged and provided to Court 24 hours before hearing

Demonstrative exhibits and visual aids are permissible at the hearing so long as they are based on information contained in the papers already filed. Counsel shall exchange copies of exhibits, as well as provide copies to the Court, no later than twenty-four hours prior to the hearing, and shall bring printed copies to the hearing.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint Case Management Statement must include certification that parties reviewed ESI Guidelines and met/conferred per Rule 26(f) on evidence preservation.

A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information ("ESI Guidelines"), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint Case Management Statement must include Certification of Interested Entities or Persons per Local Rule 3-15 and restate its contents, including funding sources in class actions.

Whether each party has filed the "Certification of Interested Entities or Persons" required by Civil Local Rule 3-15. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. In any proposed class, collective, or representative action, the required disclosure includes any person or entity that is funding the prosecution of any claim or counterclaim.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint Case Management Statement must confirm that all attorneys have reviewed the Guidelines for Professional Conduct.

Whether all attorneys of record for the parties have reviewed the Guidelines for Professional Conduct for the Northern District of California.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Incorporation by reference of prior case arguments is prohibited.

Parties shall never incorporate by reference prior argument submitted in the case.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement

Joint case management statements must follow the format specified in the CAND CMC Order.

The format shall follow the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California re: Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (“CAND CMC Order”) found on the Court’s website at cand.uscourts.gov/ygr.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must include relief sought, rationale statement, citations to authority, and record evidence citations where applicable.

Each party filing or opposing any motion shall also serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of the decision, including citation of authority that the party requests the Court to adopt, and citations to the record evidence where applicable.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulated protective order

Stipulated protective orders must include specified language regarding designation dispute resolution procedures.

Parties submitting proposed forms of stipulated protective order shall include the following language with respect to resolution of designation disputes: [6.3 Judicial Intervention.] If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the parties shall follow the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases regarding Discovery and Discovery Motions. The parties may file a joint letter brief regarding retaining confidentiality within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Failure by a Designating Party to file such discovery dispute letter within the applicable 21- or 14-day period (set forth above) with the Court shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. If, after submitting a joint letter brief, the Court allows that a motion may be filed, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery motions filed after court approval following a joint letter brief must include a declaration affirming meet and confer compliance.

If, after submitting a joint letter brief, the Court allows that a motion may be filed, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to challenge confidentiality designation
Must include
certificate of conference

Motions challenging confidentiality designations must be accompanied by a declaration affirming compliance with meet and confer requirements.

If, after submitting a joint letter brief, the Court allows that a motion may be filed, any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Separate statement

Separate statements must be signed by lead counsel or unrepresented party with attestation about evidence.

Responsive Separate Statement each must be signed by lead counsel (or by the party, if unrepresented by counsel) who has reviewed the document and can attest as follows: "I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports [or disputes] the facts as asserted."

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition transcript

Only relevant, highlighted excerpts of deposition transcripts may be filed, not complete transcripts.

The parties shall not file complete deposition transcripts with the Court. The parties shall instead file only the relevant, highlighted excerpts from those transcripts.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
local rule certificate

Pro se parties bringing summary judgment motions in employment actions must certify compliance with General Order 71.

A party bringing a motion for summary judgment in a pro se employment action must certify compliance with General Order 71 within the motion for summary judgment.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
table of contents

Expert reports must have numbered paragraphs, table of contents, and list/number each opinion with executive summary.

All expert reports shall number each paragraph to facilitate any motion practice challenging the specifics of any opinions and shall include a table of contents. At the beginning of the report, the expert shall list and number each opinion to be proffered in the report and, if applicable, provide an executive opinion of each.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Temporary sealing motion

Temporary Sealing Motion must state reasons for sealing will be addressed in a forthcoming omnibus motion and include a chart with attachment details and confidentiality ownership.

The Temporary Sealing Motion itself shall: 1. State that the reasons for sealing will be addressed in a forthcoming omnibus motion. 2. Include a chart identifying: a. Each attachment by docket number and content (e.g., Dkt. No. 101-3, Exhibit A to Motion for Relief, Sealed). b. Whether the sealed contents contains the filing party’s confidential information or another party’s confidential information.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Daubert motion

Daubert motions must specify the paragraphs or portions of the report the party seeks to exclude; weight and credibility issues are not proper grounds for Daubert motions.

Daubert motions must clearly specify the paragraphs or portions of the report that the party seeks to exclude. Parties are reminded that issues going to the weight and credibility to be given to a report are not proper bases to bring a Daubert motion.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Omnibus sealing stipulation
Must include
proposed order

Omnibus sealing stipulations must include a chart grouping documents by requested sealing action, with specified identifying and basis information, a separate PHI/PII entry, and only one stipulation is required for all Daubert motions or cross-motions; a proposed order must accompany the stipulation.

The omnibus sealing stipulation shall include: A chart listing all documents requested to be sealed. The chart shall identify: each document by a consistent identifier (e.g., Bates number) as well as by the docket entry at which it has been filed under seal; the documents shall be organized, or grouped, by the action requested. For example, undisputed requests to maintain a document under seal or undisputed requests to modify redactions shall be grouped together. If a document is subject to multiple requested actions (e.g., it contains both undisputed redactions and disputed redactions), it should receive entries in each section as appropriate; if the request is undisputed, the basis for sealing; whether a party has previously sought to seal the document or any information in the document; whether it was sealed; and the docket location of the order addressing the request. To the extent that the parties agree to seal PHI or PII, the parties must provide in the chart a statement identifying the types of information that the parties consider PHI or PII (including telephone numbers, addresses, health records) in a separate entry so that the Court may order that information sealed. All Daubert motions shall be treated as one motion for purposes of this section. This means that though there may be numerous Daubert motions, parties shall file one Omnibus Sealing Stipulation and one set of Omnibus Sealing Motions, as described in this section. Similarly, cross-motions shall be treated as one motion.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Declaration sealing

Declarations supporting requests to seal must be filed with the omnibus sealing stipulation within 14 days of briefing conclusion.

Declarations supporting requests to seal.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Unsealed document

Refiled unsealed documents must be attached to a joint stipulation including a chart identifying corresponding docket entries.

Those documents shall be attached to a joint stipulation which includes a chart that identifies the docket entries to which each document corresponds.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint or motion seeking leave to amend

Parties must submit a redline comparison with the operative pleading to ygrpo@cand.uscourts.gov upon filing amended complaints or motions to amend, unless they are self-represented.

In connection with all amended complaints and motions seeking leave to amend pleadings, parties shall submit a redline comparison with the operative pleading to ygrpo@cand.uscourts.gov upon filing of the amended complaint or motion seeking leave to amend. This requirement does not apply to self-represented parties.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Securities complaint

In securities cases, plaintiffs must file a chart summarizing required information under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2) within 14 days of service of the complaint, adhering to specified content and format requirements.

Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated complaint), the plaintiff shall file a chart summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows: (a) the statement or omission; (b) when and where the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or misleading. The chart should clearly identify which statements or omissions are attributable to which defendants and, for each such defendant, the facts alleged which give rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind at the relevant time. The chart must strictly adhere to the allegations in operative complaint and may not include any new or supplemental information or explanation. The chart should be organized in the following format: [Statement No., Speaker(s), Date(s), Medium, False and Misleading Statements, Reasons Statements Were False and Misleading When Made, Facts Giving Rise to a Strong Inference of Scienter]

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement

Notices of settlement must be signed by all parties to the settlement, with electronically filed notices signed per Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) including filer's attestation if applicable.

Any notice of settlement sent to the Court must be signed by all parties to the settlement. Electronically filed notices shall be signed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), including, if applicable, a filer’s attestation as provided by Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
specific language

Motions and oppositions must identify applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3161 exclusions and calculate excludable time.

The party filing any motion or opposition shall show which of the exclusions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 may be applicable to the action sought or opposed, and his or her calculation of the amount of excludable time.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine
Must include
proposed order

Unresolved motions in limine must be filed with a joint chambers copy and a proposed order summarizing each motion and requested relief.

The parties shall jointly submit a chambers copy organized with each motion and the respective opposition. The proponent of a motion shall also submit a comprehensive proposed order summarizing each of his or her own motions and the requested relief.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
proposed order

The government must serve and file a proposed jury verdict form, witness list with summaries, exhibit list, and trial memorandum.

The government shall serve and file: (1) a proposed jury verdict form; (2) a list of all witnesses who may be called, together with a brief summary of the testimony of each; (3) an exhibit list; and (4) a trial memorandum briefly stating the legal bases for the charges and the anticipated evidence, and addressing any evidentiary, procedural or other anticipated legal issues.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
table of contents

Joint proposed jury instructions with table of contents must be submitted at least 7 days before the pretrial conference.

Counsel shall jointly submit one set of additional proposed jury instructions, ordered in a logical sequence, together with a table of contents, using the Ninth Circuit Manual where possible, or Devitt and Blackmar or CALJIC, not less than seven (7) days prior to the pretrial conference.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Opening statement

Opening statement visuals must be exchanged by the Wednesday before trial; objections filed by Thursday; parties available by phone on Friday.

Parties must meet and confer to exchange any visuals, graphics or exhibits to be used in opening statements. Unless otherwise agreed, the exchange must occur no later than the close of business on the Wednesday before trial. Any objections not resolved must be filed in writing by the Thursday before trial. The parties shall be available by telephone on the Friday before trial to discuss the issues raised with the Court.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered.

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered by the Court.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Complaint

Plaintiffs in federal securities fraud cases must attach a chart to their complaint detailing allegedly fraudulent statements or omissions.

Where a plaintiff files a federal securities fraud case, the plaintiff shall attach to its complaint a chart regarding any allegedly fraudulent/misleading statement(s) or omission(s). The following information should be provided on the chart.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for class certification

Motions for class certification must include a 'Manageability of the Class Action Trial' section and a proposed verdict form.

In any motion for class certification, plaintiffs’ counsel must include a section called “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” in which they explain precisely how the Court should handle any potentially individualized issues to ensure that they do not render the trial unmanageable. This section should generally include a discussion of jury instructions, especially in cases that involve subclasses, plaintiffs from multiple states, or law from multiple jurisdictions. In addition, to assist the Court in assessing any manageability concerns, plaintiffs’ counsel must file a proposed verdict form in connection with the motion for class certification.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion or opposition must be accompanied by a proposed order filed simultaneously.

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision. The proposed order should be filed at the same time as the motion or opposition.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must be numbered in order of importance.

Each party shall number its motions in limine in order of importance, the first being the most important.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must follow specified identification and support requirements for stipulated and disputed instructions.

If undisputed, an instruction shall be identified as “Stipulated Instruction No. ____ re ____________________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. Even if stipulated, the instruction shall be supported by citation. If disputed, each version of the instruction shall be inserted together, back to back, in their logical place in the overall sequence. A disputed instruction shall be identified as “Disputed Instruction No. ____ re ____________________ offered by __________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. All disputed versions of the same basic instruction shall bear the same number. If a party does not have a counter-version and simply contends that no such instruction in any version should be given, then that party should so state on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate version. Each party should support its version of a disputed instruction, and/or oppose the version offered by the opposing party, with a brief argument and citation to any relevant authority. The argument and citation should be provided immediately following the disputed instructions. The parties are encouraged to keep disputed instructions to a minimum.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form

Parties must submit a joint proposed verdict form; if unable to agree, each party submits its own.

In a jury trial, the parties shall submit a joint proposed verdict form. If the parties are unable to stipulate to a verdict form, then each party or side shall submit a proposed verdict form.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

In a bench trial, each party must submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In a bench trial, each party or side shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
certificate of conference

The joint letter brief must attest that counsel with full authority met and conferred in person before filing; a telephonic meet and confer is permitted only with good cause.

Must attest that, prior to filing the request for relief, counsel with full and complete authority on discovery matters met and conferred in person. A telephone meet and confer is permitted only where there is good cause (e.g., plaintiff’s counsel is located on the West coast while defense counsel is located...

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery response

A party responding to document requests must state in writing the full extent of production and, promptly after producing, confirm in writing that all materials located after a diligent search have been produced.

In responding to requests for production of documents, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, a party shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which the party will produce materials. In addition, the party shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that the party has produced all such materials so described that have been located after a diligent search of all locations where such materials might plausibly be found.

edward-m-chenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement due 7 calendar days before case management conference unless court orders otherwise.

Parties are required to file a joint case management statement not less than seven calendar days before a scheduled case management conference, unless the Court sets a different deadline.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery letter briefs must be filed in specific ECF category.

The joint letter brief must be filed electronically in the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Cross motion summary judgment

Final brief in cross-motions must be filed 21 days before hearing.

The fourth brief must be filed at least 21 days before the hearing date.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement
Must include
post distribution accounting

Court withholds 10-25% of attorney fees until post-distribution accounting filed.

The Court will typically withhold between 10% and 25% of the attorney’s fees granted at final approval until after the post-distribution accounting has been filed.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement
Must include
proposed order

Class counsel must file proposed order releasing withheld fees with post-distribution accounting.

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees when they file their post-distribution accounting.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Telephonic appearance request
Must include
stipulation and proposed order

Telephonic appearance requests require filing 7 days before scheduled appearance.

parties seeking to appear telephonically must file a stipulation and proposed order, or an administrative motion and proposed order if a stipulation is not possible, at least seven calendar days prior to the scheduled appearance.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted electronically in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement due 7 days before pretrial conference

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties must file and serve a joint pretrial statement no later than seven calendar days before the pretrial conference.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
witness list

Witnesses not disclosed in pretrial statement require court leave

No party will be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Disputed discovery responses
Must include
objections, grounds for objection, position of offering party

Disputed discovery responses must be separately filed with objections

Counsel must separately file a document containing each disputed discovery response or deposition testimony excerpt, and as to each must state the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Exchange all exhibits and lists 21 days before final pretrial conference

At least 21 calendar days before the final pretrial conference, the parties must exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, charts, schedules, diagrams, and other similar documentary materials to be used in their case-in-chief, together with a complete list of all such proposed exhibits.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
certificate of conference

Meet and confer immediately after exhibit exchange to stipulate admissibility

Following the exchange, the parties must immediately meet and confer about the exhibits and any potential objections thereto, and must make a good faith effort to stipulate to exhibits' admissibility.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Parties must use non-overlapping exhibit number ranges with room for additions

The parties must mark their exhibits using non-overlapping ranges of numbers, leaving enough unused numbers that additional exhibits can be marked during trial. For example, the parties might agree that the plaintiff will use numbers 001–199 and the defendant will use numbers 200–399.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Deliver pre-marked exhibits in 3-ring binders to Clerk 7 days before trial

Unless otherwise ordered, at least seven calendar days prior to the commencement of the trial, the parties must deliver one set of all pre-marked exhibits in clearly labeled three-ring binders to the Clerk's office, marked for the attention of the courtroom deputy.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law due 7 days before pretrial conference

At least seven calendar days prior to the pretrial conference, each party must serve and file with the Court proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on all material issues.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings must be brief, plain English, and free of pejorative language

The proposed findings must be brief, written in plain English, and be free of pejorative language, conclusions, or argument.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Conclusions of law must include citations to legal authority

Conclusions of law must be supported by appropriate citation to legal authority.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list

Parties must notify other parties of next day's witnesses by end of each trial day

Unless otherwise ordered, each party must notify all other parties by the close of each trial day of the witnesses that party intends to call on the following trial day.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness examination

Counsel cannot consult witness during cross-examination about prior testimony

Once the cross-examination of a witness has commenced, and until cross-examination of the witness has concluded, counsel offering the witness on direct examination must not: (a) consult or confer with the witness regarding the substance of the witness's testimony already given,

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement required 7 days before case management conference.

Parties are required to file a joint case management statement not less than seven calendar days before a scheduled case management conference, unless the Court sets a different deadline.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Parties must preserve relevant information and suspend document destruction programs.

Parties must take the steps needed to preserve information relevant to the issues in the litigation, including suspending document-destruction programs that, if not suspended, could result in evidence spoliation.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Depositions of fact witnesses must be noticed 30 days before close of fact discovery.

Depositions of fact witnesses must be noticed at least 30 days before the close of fact discovery.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery letter briefs must be filed in specific ECF category.

The joint letter brief must be filed electronically in the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

Fourth brief in cross-motions must be filed 21 days before hearing.

The fourth brief must be filed at least 21 days before the hearing date.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

Post-distribution accounting required within 21 days of settlement distribution.

The Court will require a post-distribution accounting within 21 days after the distribution of settlement funds.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Final approval motion

Court withholds 10-25% of attorney fees until post-distribution accounting filed.

The Court will typically withhold between 10% and 25% of the attorney’s fees granted at final approval until after the post-distribution accounting has been filed.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Telephonic appearance request

Telephonic appearance requests require 7-day advance filing of stipulation or motion.

parties seeking to appear telephonically must file a stipulation and proposed order, or an administrative motion and proposed order if a stipulation is not possible, at least seven calendar days prior to the scheduled appearance.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Telephonic appearance request

Telephonic appearance requests for CMC must wait until case management statement filed.

If a case management statement is required, parties may not file a request to appear telephonically at a case management conference until after the case management statement has been filed.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order
Format
WORD

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must contain 15 specified items covering parties, claims, relief, facts, witnesses, exhibits, legal issues, and trial logistics.

The statement must contain the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the parties, the substance of claims and defenses that remain to be decided, and the operative pleadings. 2. Relief Requested. A detailed statement of all requested relief, including an itemization of all elements of damages claimed. 3. Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties must exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable. 4. Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise list of the issues of fact that are contested and remain to be litigated at trial. 5. Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts. 6. Stipulations. A statement of proposed stipulations or agreements that will expedite the presentation of evidence. 7. Witnesses to be Called. A list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given. No party will be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court. 8. Exhibits, Schedules, and Summaries. A list of all documents or other items to be offered as exhibits at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each that describes: (1) its substance or purpose; (2) the identity of the sponsoring witness; and (3) whether the parties have stipulated to its admissibility and, if they have not, the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 9. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions. 10. Pending Motions or Matters. A statement of any motions or other matters that must be resolved prior to trial. 11. Bifurcation or Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether either party requests bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues and why. 12. Use of Discovery Responses. Citations to all evidence that a party might introduce at trial, other than that to be used solely for impeachment or rebuttal, that was obtained from deposition testimony, interrogatory responses, or responses to requests for admission. Counsel must state any objections to the use of these materials and must certify that they have conferred regarding such objections. Counsel must separately file a document containing each disputed discovery response or deposition testimony excerpt, and as to each must state the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 13. Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours or days needed for the trial. 14. Settlement Discussion. A brief summary of the status of settlement negotiations, without indicating specific dollar amounts, and an indication of whether further negotiations are likely to be productive and what, if anything, would facilitate settlement. 15. Miscellaneous. Any other matters that will facilitate the just, speedy, and efficient resolution of the action.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must include specific language above signature lines.

The joint pretrial statement described above must include the following language directly above the signature lines: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order will supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this case, unless modified by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative motion to seal

Administrative motions to seal must include statements of compliance with this order and Civil Local Rule 79-5.

In addition to the information required by Civil Local Rule 79-5, administrative motions to file materials under seal must contain the following information: 1. A statement that the filing party has reviewed and complied with this order. 2. A statement that the filing party has reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-5, including the requirement to file separate motions if a party seeks to file under seal a document containing “portions that more than one party bears the burden of showing is sealable.” Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(5).

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal

Motion or statement in support of sealing must identify legal standard, explain its applicability, and articulate with evidentiary support why materials satisfy that standard.

The motion or statement in support of sealing must identify the applicable legal standard (i.e., compelling reasons or good cause), explain why that standard applies, and articulate, with evidentiary support where necessary, why the materials to be sealed satisfy that standard.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Revised sealing filing

If a Designating Party seeks less extensive sealing, they must file revised redacted and unredacted versions and a revised proposed order.

If a Designating Party seeks less extensive sealing than a motion filed under Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), that party must file revised redacted and unredacted versions of the documents sought to be sealed, as well as a revised proposed order.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Unredacted version

Unredacted versions of documents partially sealed must highlight the portions for which sealing is sought.

Unredacted versions of all documents sought to be partially filed under seal “must highlight the portions for which sealing is sought.” Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(2).

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must identify legal standard, be narrowly tailored, list in table format each document/portion, and include a column for the Court's ruling.

Proposed orders must identify the appropriate legal standard, be “narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material,” and “list[] in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(3). Tables must include a column for the Court’s ruling as to each document.

jon-s-tigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Appearance list
Must include
notice of appearance

List of counsel must be emailed at least 2 court days before proceeding.

The list shall be emailed at least two (2) court days in advance of the scheduled proceeding.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Daubert motion
Must include
specific paragraphs specified

Daubert motions must specify exact paragraphs to exclude.

Daubert motions must clearly specify the paragraphs or portions of the report that the party seeks to exclude.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
written report

All expert witnesses must provide written reports under Rule 26(a)(2)(B).

All witnesses who will provide expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705, whether retained or non-retained, must be disclosed and must provide written reports in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B).

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report

Expert reports must number paragraphs and include table of contents.

All expert reports shall number each paragraph to facilitate any motion practice challenging the specifics of any opinions and shall include a table of contents.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report

Expert reports must list each opinion to be proffered.

The reports shall list each opinion to be proffered and provide an executive opinion of each.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
relied upon materials produced, relied upon materials identified

Expert reports must identify and produce all relied-upon written materials.

At the time of disclosure of a written report, the disclosing party must identify all written materials upon which the expert relies in that report and produce those materials if they have not done so previously.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert disclosure
Must include
technical expert witnesses identified

Percipient witnesses with expert-level technical expertise must be identified by expert disclosure deadline.

Any percipient witness who may also testify at trial with technical expertise akin to an independent expert shall be identified by name no later than the date of expert disclosures to allow for deposition, if necessary.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
highlighted lines

Parties must highlight specific lines relied upon in summary judgment motions.

Parties shall underline, highlight, or otherwise (e.g., by hyperlink) specific lines of the documents and transcripts upon which they rely in support of or in opposition to a motion.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Amended pleadings require concurrent redlined/highlighted comparison version.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
separate ecf filing, sequential numbering

Exhibits must be separately filed on ECF with sequential numbering.

All exhibits to motions and/or discovery dispute joint statements should be separately filed on ECF. For example, if the motion is Docket No. 30, and the declaration with 10 exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A would be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B would be Docket No. 31-2, and so on.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Any submission
Must include
ai content verification

AI tools not prohibited but counsel must personally verify accuracy.

Use of ChatGPT or other such tools is not prohibited, but counsel must at all times personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any content generated by these tools.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Any submission
Must include
ai verification certification

AI-generated content requires certification of personal verification by lead trial counsel.

Any submission containing AI-generated content must include a certification that lead trial counsel has personally verified the content's accuracy.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
fr cp compliance

Parties must comply with 2015 FRCP amendments, particularly Rule 1 directive and Rule 26(b)(1) proportionality.

Parties should be mindful of the December 1, 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in particular, the directive in Rule 1 that the Rules 'should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,' and the proportionality requirements for discovery under Rule 26(b)(1).

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery statements must be e-filed under specific Civil Events category.

The joint statement or individual statements shall be e-filed (unless the case is exempt from e-filing requirements). Whether joint or individual, the statement must be filed under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.”

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log
Must include
certificate of service

Privilege logs must be produced within 14 days of disclosures or discovery responses.

If a party withholds material as privileged under Federal Rule 26(b)(5) or 45(d)(2)(A), it must produce a privilege log as quickly as possible, but no later than fourteen days after its disclosures or discovery responses are due, unless the parties stipulate to or the Court sets another date.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Privilege logs must include specific required elements.

Privilege logs must contain the following: (a) the subject matter or general nature of the document (without disclosing its contents); (b) the identity and position of its author; (c) the date it was communicated; (d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients of the communication; (e) the document’s present location; and (f) the specific privilege and a brief summary of any supporting facts.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Securities appendix
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Securities cases require 14-day appendix with specific allegations.

Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated complaint), the plaintiff shall file an appendix summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows: (a) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading; (b) the speaker, date, and medium by which the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or misleading.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Class action settlement motions must follow NDCA Procedural Guidance in order.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
certificate of service

Post-distribution accounting required within 21 days, must address class member concerns.

As reflected in the Guidance, the Court will require a post-distribution accounting within 21 days after the final distribution of settlement funds. In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition memorandum
Must include
memorandum of points and authorities

Failure to file opposition memo constitutes consent to motion.

The failure of a party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
plea agreement

Plea agreements must be emailed to chambers by 2:00 PM Monday before change of plea; open pleas require notification by same deadline.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, government counsel shall email a copy of the plea agreement to the Judge Martínez-Olguín’s Courtroom Deputy at amocrd@cand.uscourts.gov by 2:00 p.m. the Monday before the change of plea setting. If there is to be an open plea, counsel for the defendant shall notify the Court by 2:00 pm the Monday before the change of plea setting.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Transcript

Transcript requests must be arranged with Court Reporter Coordinator at least one week before trial.

If transcripts will be requested during or immediately after the trial, arrangements must be made with the Court Reporter Coordinator (Telephone No. 510-637-3534) at least one week prior to the commencement of the trial.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Interpreter request

Interpreter requests must be made at least 30 days before trial if no certified court interpreter is available.

Counsel must notify the Court at least 30 days in advance of trial if any witness requires an interpreter and there is no certified court interpreter available to translate in the necessary language(s).

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
objections to evidence

Objections to evidence must be contained within the objecting party's brief.

Objections to evidence shall comply with the Civil Local Rules, which require that objections be contained within the objecting party’s brief. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a), (c).

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for attorneys fees
Must include
hours chart

Attorney fee motions must include a chart summarizing hours expended on major tasks.

In addition to the motion, memorandum, and evidence, a party moving for attorneys’ fees must provide the Court with a chart, in the format set forth below, summarizing the hours expended on the major tasks in the case.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format on the same day of e-filing.

All proposed orders in e-filing cases shall be submitted in Word format by email to BLFpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day the proposed order is e-filed.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
judge name, case number

Exhibit list and pre-marked exhibits required 7 days before final Pretrial Conference.

At least 7 days before the final Pretrial Conference, each party shall file an exhibit list and serve upon all other parties copies of all pre-marked exhibits.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
certificate of conference

Lead counsel must meet and confer at least 21 days before final Pretrial Conference on settlement, Joint Pretrial Statement, Rule 26(a)(3) materials, and contested issues.

At least 21 days before the final Pretrial Conference, lead counsel who will try the case shall meet and confer with respect to: (1) Settlement of the Case; (2) Preparation of the Joint Pretrial Statement and Order; (3) Preparation and exchange of pretrial materials to be filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3); and (4) Clarification and narrowing of the contested issues for trial.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
certificate of service

Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must be filed at least 14 days before final Pretrial Conference.

At least 14 days before the final Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement and Order containing the following information:

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must include specific binding language above signature lines.

The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order shall recite, directly above the signature lines of the parties, the following: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order shall supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this action, unless modified to prevent manifest injustice.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Pretrial Statement required 7 days before final Pretrial Conference.

At least 7 days before the final Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement addressing all items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury materials
Must include
judge name, case number

Jury materials must be filed 7 days before final Pretrial Conference in hard copy and word processing format via email.

At least 7 days before the final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall file and serve the following materials. All jury materials must be submitted in hard copy and in word processing format via e-mail to BLFpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
judge name, case number

Witness list with testimony summaries required 7 days before final Pretrial Conference.

At least 7 days before the final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall file a witness list that includes a brief summary of the testimony of each witness.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each side is limited to 5 motions in limine total.

Each side is limited to 5 motions in limine.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement and order

Parties must file a Joint Pretrial Statement and Order at least 14 days before the final Pretrial Conference, containing specified information including parties, claims, relief, jurisdiction, facts, legal issues, trial estimate, settlement status, and binding effect language.

At least 14 days before the final Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement and Order containing the following information:

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial order

The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must include a witness appendix listing all witnesses, substance of testimony, length estimate, and for experts, theories, conclusions, CV, and report.

The following information shall be provided as an appendix to the Joint Pretrial Statement and Order. For each party, a list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial, including those appearing by deposition. For each witness, there should be a short statement of the substance of his or her testimony and an estimate regarding the length of testimony (including direct and cross-examination). If the witness is an expert witness, please state the expert's theories and conclusions and the bases therefor. Attach the expert's curriculum vitae and report (if any).

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial order

The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must include a joint exhibit list in tabular form with specific columns; parties must meet and confer in person before filing.

The following information shall be provided as an appendix to the Joint Pretrial Statement and Order. A joint list of exhibits, discovery responses, and deposition excerpts to be offered at trial, in tabular form with (a) a column identifying the exhibit number consistent with the pre-marking requirement below; (b) a column briefly describing the exhibit; (c) a column describing the purpose for which the exhibit is offered and identifying its sponsoring witness; (d) a column stating any objections to the exhibit; and (e) a column responding to the objections. The Court will not rule on these objections before trial and any remaining objections must be asserted at trial. Before this list is filed with the Court, counsel shall meet and confer, in person, to consider exhibit numbers, eliminate duplicate exhibits and confusion over exhibits, and make a good faith effort to stipulate to admissibility. If stipulation is not possible, the parties shall make every effort to stipulate to authenticity and foundation absent a legitimate (not tactical) objection.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanCRITICAL
Applies to
Continuance request
Must include
number of previous extensions

Continuance requests must specify previous extension history in the caption.

The caption of any request for a continuance or extension shall indicate how many previous extensions have been requested (e.g., “First Request for Extension”). The request must state whether the Court has granted those extensions and whether the Court has stated that no further extensions will be granted.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
compliance with local rule, compliance with standing order

Joint case management statement required 14 days before any case management conference.

Parties must prepare a joint case management statement fourteen (14) days prior to the date of any case management or status conference. The joint case management statement shall comply with the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement” and Civil Local Rule 16-9.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Initial case management statement must include full litigation schedule with amendment and ADR deadlines.

In their joint case management statement for the initial case management conference, the parties must propose a full litigation schedule, including a proposed last day to amend pleadings as well as a deadline to complete ADR, regardless of whether they have received a ruling on any motion to dismiss.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Conference request
Must include
identified issues, explanation of basis, detail of meet and confer efforts

Conference requests must identify issues, explain basis, and detail meet-and-confer efforts.

If any party believes a conference is needed, the party shall identify the issue(s) that require the Court’s attention, explain the basis for the request, and detail the efforts that the parties have made to address or resolve the issue.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order complying with applicable local rules.

Each motion shall be accompanied by a proposed order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-2(c). Each proposed order shall comply with any applicable Civil Local Rule. See, e.g., Civil L.R. 6-3 (proposed orders to change time), 7-11 (proposed orders for administrative relief), 16-9 (proposed case management orders), 65-1 (proposed temporary restraining orders), 72-2 (proposed orders for relief from a non-dispositive Magistrate Judge order), 79-5 (proposed orders to seal documents).

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must be filed as PDF on ECF; Word copy required for sealing, patent claim construction, or TRO/injunction motions.

All proposed orders should be filed in PDF form on ECF. In addition, the moving party should submit a Microsoft Word chambers copy only if the proposed order relates to: (1) a sealing motion; (2) a claim construction proceeding in a patent case; or (3) a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. The Word version chambers copy should be sent to eklpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
certificate section

All citations and factual statements must be completely accurate; misrepresentations may result in sanctions.

All case citations and factual statements must be completely accurate. A citation to a case, statute, or other authority is counsel's representation to the Court that the authority stands for the proposition asserted and is good law. A quotation of a case or other authority is counsel's representation that the quoted language is complete and present in the authority cited. Counsel must ensure that the use of ellipses or elisions in quotes does not mislead the Court or misrepresent the substance of the holding or other authority. Counsel's representations of facts are subject to the same requirements of completeness and accuracy. Misrepresentations of law or fact, however subtle, may result in sanctions and a referral to the District's Standing Committee on Professional Conduct.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-generated content submissions require certification of accuracy by lead trial counsel.

Any submission containing AI-generated content must include a certification that lead trial counsel has personally verified the content’s accuracy.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

Non-compliance with AI disclosure certification may result in sanctions.

Failure to include this certification or comply with this verification requirement will be grounds for sanctions.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Fourth summary judgment brief must be filed at least 28 days before hearing.

The fourth brief must be filed at least 28 days before the hearing date.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Separate statement
Must include
signature, attestation

Separate statements must be signed with attestation that evidence fairly and accurately supports or disputes facts.

Each separate statement must be signed by counsel or unrepresented party who has reviewed the document and attests as follows: I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports or disputes the facts as asserted.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Separate statement

Separate statements must not include argument or circumvent page limits.

The separate statements shall not include argument in support of the summary judgment motion and shall not be used to circumvent the page limits that apply to summary judgment briefing.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Separate statement

Separate statements should only include facts cited in the summary judgment briefs.

Parties should include only those facts that are actually cited in the briefs. Facts that are not cited in the summary judgment briefs will not be considered.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Objections to evidence must be contained within the brief, not filed separately.

Objections to evidence shall be contained within the objecting party’s brief and shall not be filed as a separate pleading.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
follow magistrate procedures

Discovery will be referred to magistrate judge; parties must follow magistrate judge's procedures.

Discovery in almost all cases will be referred to a magistrate judge. The parties must follow the magistrate judge’s procedures.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute
Must include
meet and confer in person or videoconference

Discovery disputes require in-person or videoconference meet and confer; letters/emails/calls insufficient.

Upon the development of an impasse with respect to discovery, the parties must first meet and confer; that is, counsel for each party shall meet and confer in person or via videoconference to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange of letters, emails, or telephone calls does not satisfy the meet and confer requirement.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
identify deviations, indicate model order basis, provide redlined comparison

Protective order filings must indicate if based on model orders and identify deviations with redlined comparison.

When filing a proposed protective order, at the very beginning of their stipulation or motion, parties must indicate whether they have based their proposed order on one of the Northern District’s model orders. If they have, they must identify any deviations from the model order by submitting as an exhibit a redlined or highlighted comparison of their proposed order and the model order.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Class settlement motions must comply with Northern District's Procedural Guidance.

In connection with motions for approval of class settlements, the parties shall comply with the requirements set forth in the Northern District’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/. In addition, the following shall apply.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval documents
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Preliminary approval documents must be sent in Word format to specific email.

The proposed notices, claims forms, and other documents associated with preliminary approval should be sent in Microsoft Word format to eklpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Motion must discuss appropriateness of electronic notice methods.

The motion must discuss whether notice by email and/or social media, use of online claims and opt-out forms, and a website for the settlement are appropriate, and if not, explain why not.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Money settlement motions must discuss redistribution of unclaimed funds.

In a proposed settlement involving the distribution of money to a class, the motion must discuss whether unclaimed funds should be redistributed to class members who claimed their share, and if not, explain why not.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Claim-based settlements require motion to explain why claims are necessary.

If the settlement requires class members to file claims, as opposed to simply receiving checks, the motion must address why that is appropriate.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Fee motion must be filed at least 35 days before objection deadline.

In proposing a schedule for final approval of a class settlement, the parties must ensure that the motion for attorneys’ fees is filed at least 35 days before the deadline for objecting to the settlement.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Final approval order must list all settlement administration dates.

The proposed order granting final approval should list all dates relating to the administration of the settlement, including the dates for when the checks distributing the judgment separately from their proposed order granting final approval.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
local rule certificate

Post-Distribution Accounting required within 21 days of fund distribution.

Within 21 days after the settlement funds have been fully distributed to class members (but before distribution to cy pres recipients), class counsel will be required to file a Post-Distribution Accounting, as described in the Northern District’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

Post-Distribution Accounting must discuss class member concerns and issues.

In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the Post-Distribution Accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Final approval order must specify fee withholding percentage.

The proposed order granting final approval should specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

Post-Distribution Accounting must include proposed order releasing remaining fees.

With the Post-Distribution Accounting, class counsel should submit a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea application
Must include
judge name, case number

Defendant counsel must notify court and complete guilty plea form 3 court days before open plea.

If there is to be an open plea, counsel for the defendant shall notify the Court no later than noon three (3) court days before the plea is to be entered. Counsel shall review and complete the Application to Enter Guilty Plea & Order form (https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/criminal-forms/), presenting the government with a copy of the completed application.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
Sealing motion
Must include
proposed order

Sealing motions require proposed order in Word format listing sealable material.

The motion must be accompanied by a proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material, and lists in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed, pursuant to Criminal Local Rule 56-1(c). Proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word format to eklpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Eumi K. LeeCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Local Rules, and General Orders except as superseded by this standing order.

1. Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing orders.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff/removing defendant must serve standing order on all parties and file certificate of service.

2. Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) shall promptly serve copies of this standing order upon all parties to the action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5. Following service, the responsible party shall file a certificate of service with the Clerk of this Court.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
joint filing

Joint case management statement required 7 days before conference; separate allowed for pro se cases.

12. The parties must file a joint case management statement addressing those items required by the Standing Order for all Judges of the Northern District of California. Parties shall file their joint statement not less than seven calendar days prior to the case management conference. In cases involving pro se litigants, the parties may file separate case management statements.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation and proposed order
Must include
adr process

Stipulation and Proposed Order for ADR must be filed 7 days before case management conference.

13. Consistent with Local Rule 16-8(c) and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Local Rule 3-5(b), at least seven calendar days prior to the case management conference, the parties shall also file the Stipulation and Proposed Order form, which identifies the ADR process that the parties have selected and a proposed deadline by which the parties will conduct the ADR

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format on same day as e-filing.

Proposed orders shall be submitted in Word format by email to HSGpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day the proposed order is e-filed.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management status report
Must include
joint report

Joint case management status report required after claim construction ruling.

Upon issuance of the claim construction ruling, the Court will also set a date for the filing of a further joint case management status report.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Government must email plea agreement to HSGcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by 2:00 p.m. Friday before plea.

6. If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, counsel for the government shall email a copy of the plea agreement to the Court (with all counsel cc'd) to HSGcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by 2:00 p.m. the Friday before the plea is to be entered. If there is to open plea is to be entered.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow federal criminal rules, local rules, and general orders except where superseded by this standing order.

1. Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Criminal Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing orders.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Patent Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this standing order.

Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Patent Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing orders.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint claim construction statement must be truly joint with disputed terms designated and side-by-side constructions.

The initial joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must be truly joint. Disputed terms, phrases, and clauses must be designated as disputed. All other terms will be presumed to be undisputed. For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on the identity of the term. With regard to disputed terms, phrases, or clauses, the joint statement will list each disputed term, phrase, or clause (listed by claim); each party's proposed construction; and support for each party's proposed construction side by side. A model claim construction statement is attached to this Order.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
exhibits

Joint claim construction statement must include copies of all disputed patents and complete prosecution history available upon request.

Parties must attach to the joint claim construction statement copies of all patents in dispute. Parties must also make a complete prosecution history for each patent available to the Court upon request.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Court will generally construe no more than 10 terms; parties must meet and confer to narrow terms if more than 10 are at issue.

The Court will generally construe no more than 10 terms. If multiple terms present identical issues, they may be grouped together or a representative term may be chosen, and each group or representative term may be considered a single term for purposes of the ten-term limit. If more than ten terms are at issue, the parties must meet and confer before the preparation of the joint claim construction statement to narrow the number of terms that are to be construed by the Court and shall jointly propose the ten terms requiring construction.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Government must email mandatory remand statute status to HSGcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by Monday before hearing.

Prior to change of plea and sentencing hearings for out-of-custody Defendants, the government shall indicate whether the offense of conviction is subject to the mandatory remand statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3143. The government shall email the Court (with all counsel cc'd) to HSGcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by no later than the Monday before the hearing.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Motions must follow Criminal Local Rule 47-1, consult scheduling notes for available dates, comply with Rule 47-2.

7. Motions must be noticed for a hearing in accordance with Criminal Local Rule 47- 1. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date in advance. However, before selecting a hearing date, counsel must consult Judge Gilliam's scheduling notes to determine which dates are available. Motions may be reset as the Court's calendar requires. All motions shall comply with Criminal Local Rule 47-2. Please refer to this Court's Criminal Pretrial and Trial Standing Order for information regarding motions in limine.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
witness list

Parties may not call undisclosed witnesses at trial without court leave for good cause.

No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case in chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement unless the Court grants leave for good cause.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must include specific language above signature lines.

The joint pretrial statement and proposed order shall include the following language directly above the signature lines: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order shall supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this case, unless modified by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
joint filing

Parties must file joint proposed jury instructions using Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions, with modifications clearly marked using strikethrough and underline.

The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions. The parties should use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions where possible. Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified to the Court. Any language a party proposes to be removed from a model instruction must be designated with a strikethrough and language proposed to be added to a model instruction must be underlined.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list

Form exhibit and witness lists must be filed at least three days before trial.

At least three days prior to the first day of trial, the parties shall file form exhibit and witness lists.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Submit a flash drive with exhibits to the Clerk's office 7 days before trial.

Submit a flash drive to the Clerk’s office containing the exhibits identified in Section (h) of the parties’ joint pretrial statement and proposed order (and not already excluded by the Court in limine)

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit and witness lists
Must include
exhibit list

File form exhibit and witness lists 3 days before trial.

File form exhibit and witness lists

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.CRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Redlined or highlighted version required with amended pleadings

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
certificate of conference

Joint statement (max 5 single-spaced pages) required for discovery disputes.

Instead of a noticed motion, the parties shall prepare a joint statement of not more than five single-spaced pages (12-point font or greater) stating the nature and status of the dispute and attesting to their good faith meet and confer efforts. Each side thus has approximately 2.5 pages of the submission. Issue-by-issue, the joint statement shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each party’s position with appropriate legal authority, and provide each party’s final proposed compromise before addressing the next issue. It is preferable that the parties file a separate statement for each dispute. When necessary, the parties may submit supporting declarations and documentation of up to 12 pages.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery statement
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery statements must be e-filed under specific Civil Events category.

The joint statement or individual statements shall be e-filed (unless the case is exempt from e-filing requirements). Whether joint or individual, the statement must be filed under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.”

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for class action settlement approval
Must include
local rule certificate

Class action settlement approval motions must address guidelines in specified order.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for- classaction-settlements/, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
post distribution accounting

Post-distribution accounting required within 21 days, including discussion of class member concerns.

As reflected in the Guidance, the Court will require a post-distribution accounting within 21 days after the final distribution of settlement funds. In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
certificate of conference

Joint claim construction statement must designate disputed terms and be truly joint.

The initial joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must be truly joint. Disputed terms, phrases, and clauses must be designated as disputed. All other terms will be presumed to be undisputed.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint statement must list disputed terms by claim with each party's proposed construction and support.

For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on the identity of the term. With regard to disputed terms, phrases, or clauses, the joint statement will list each disputed term, phrase, or clause (listed by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
exhibits

Joint statement must include copies of all patents in dispute and complete prosecution history available upon request.

Parties must attach to the joint claim construction statement copies of all patents in dispute. Parties must also make a complete prosecution history for each patent available to the Court upon request.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

New constructions cannot be proposed for first time in reply briefs or filings without opportunity for response.

While the Court encourages the parties to negotiate mutually agreeable constructions, the parties may not propose new constructions for the first time in reply briefs or other filings that do not afford the opposing party an opportunity to respond.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction brief
Must include
local rule certificate

Request required to propose different construction in brief than in joint statement, with explanation of basis.

If for some exceptional reason a party needs to propose a different construction in its brief than that found in the joint claim construction statement, that party must submit a short request for consideration to the Court that clearly sets forth the new construction and explains the basis for the change.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
exhibits

Amended final joint claim construction statement required with reply briefs if positions have changed.

At the time of filing the reply briefs, the parties shall file an amended, final joint claim construction statement if there has been any change in the parties’ claim construction positions, including in the amended statement only the remaining disputed terms, phrases, and clauses.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Technology synopsis
Must include
judge name, case number

Technology synopsis (max 12 pages) due 7 court days before tutorial, neutral overview only.

If a tutorial is scheduled, each party should file a written technology synopsis that provides, in plain and accessible language, background information about the technology and science to be discussed at the tutorial. The synopsis is due at least 7 court days before the tutorial, and should not exceed 12 pages. Do not include a rewrite of any portion of the patent or claim construction statements, or argument on any legal issue such as invalidity, infringement, patentability and so on. The synopsis should be a neutral overview of the technology related to the tutorial.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must contain nine specified sections and be signed by all lead trial counsel.

The parties will file a joint pretrial statement, signed and vetted by all lead trial counsel, that contains the following information: i. Substance of the Action: A brief description of the substance of the claims and defenses which remain to be decided. ii. Relief Requested: A statement of all relief sought, itemizing all elements of damages claimed. iii. Undisputed Facts: A statement of all relevant undisputed facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits. iv. Disputed Factual Issues: A statement of all relevant disputed facts that remain to be decided. v. Disputed Legal Issues: Without extended legal argument, a brief statement of disputed points of law concerning liability and relief. vi. Stipulations: A statement of stipulations requested or proposed. vii. Bifurcation: A statement of whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues is feasible and desired. viii. Settlement: A statement summarizing the status of settlement negotiations and indicating whether further negotiations are likely to be productive. ix. Estimate of trial length: An estimate of the total length of the trial.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial brief must specify each cause of action and defense and include applicable legal standard.

Each party will serve and file a trial brief, not to exceed 10 pages, specifying each cause of action and defense remaining to be tried along with a statement of the applicable legal standard.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine must address a single specific evidentiary issue.

each addressing a single specific evidentiary issue

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine cannot be used for summary judgment or Daubert challenges without prior court approval.

Motions in limine may not be used to request summary judgment or raise Daubert challenges unless the Court has specifically granted prior approval.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list

Parties must file a joint witness list by the pretrial filings due date, including substance of testimony and time estimate.

The parties must file by the pretrial filings due date a joint list of all witnesses who are likely to be called at trial (other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal purposes), including a brief statement describing the substance of the testimony to be given by each witness and an estimate of minutes or hours the witness’s testimony is expected to take (direct and cross).

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list

Parties must jointly file two exhibit charts by the pretrial filings due date: one for agreed exhibits and one for disputed exhibits, with specific content requirements.

The parties must jointly file by the pretrial filings due date two separate charts of proposed documentary exhibits, with one chart summarizing those exhibits that the parties agree are admissible and another chart summarizing those exhibits for which admissibility is disputed. The chart of disputed exhibits must identify the objecting party and include succinct summaries of the objection and the response, with authority that supports the parties’ respective positions. Both charts must also include the following information as to all exhibits: (1) exhibit number; (2) name or brief description of the exhibit; and (3) the exhibit’s purpose and sponsoring witness.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list

Before closing arguments, counsel must jointly provide a revised list of all exhibits in evidence with exhibit number and brief description.

Before the closing arguments, counsel must confer with the Courtroom Deputy to make sure the exhibits in evidence are in good order. Counsel must jointly provide a revised list of all exhibits actually in evidence (and no others), stating the exhibit number and a brief, non-argumentative description (e.g., letter from A.B. Case to D.E. Frank, dated August 17, 1999). This joint list will go into the jury room to help the jury sort through exhibits in evidence.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Discovery dispute letters must attach the disputed discovery request and response, and no other documents.

The letter to the Court must attach an excerpt of the disputed discovery request and the corresponding, served response. No other documents shall be attached or provided pending further order by the Court.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement must be filed 7 days before conference.

The parties must file a joint case management statement addressing the standardized items required by the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California: Contents of Joint Case Management Statements. The joint statement must be filed at least seven calendar days prior to the case management conference.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference

Lead counsel must attend with authority to stipulate and admit.

For parties with counsel, each party must be represented at the case management conference by lead counsel prepared to address all pertinent matters and with authority to enter stipulations and make admissions.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery

Formal discovery cannot begin until after Rule 26(f) conference.

Pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(d)(1), formal discovery should not be served or initiated by any party until after the parties have conferred as required by FRCP 26(f), except by stipulation or court order, or as provided for in FRCP 26(d)(2) or other rules.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Joint statements of undisputed facts not required but helpful on summary judgment motions; separate statements not permitted

On summary judgment motions, joint statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Separate statements of “undisputed facts” may not be filed. See Civil L.R. 56-2.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
All submissions
Must include
hearing date and time

All submissions must include hearing/conference date and time on cover sheet

All submissions filed with the Court must include the date and time of the hearing or conference on the cover sheet.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
All submissions

Parties must inform Court of potentially related actions in this District or other federal/state courts

The parties are reminded that they must inform the Court of any potentially related actions pending in this District or any other federal or state court in accordance with Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 3-13.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
plea agreement

Plea agreement or open plea notification required by 10:00 AM day before plea.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, counsel for the government shall deliver a copy of the plea agreement to chambers on the 19th Floor in San Francisco by 10:00 a.m. the day before the plea is to be entered. If the plea is not pursuant to a plea agreement or if the specifics of the agreement are not yet finalized, counsel for the defendant shall notify the Courtroom Deputy of the entry of an open plea, and shall deliver a copy of the application for entry of plea to chambers by 10:00 a.m. the day before the plea is to be entered.

Judge James DonatoCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted electronically in Word format to specific email address.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
local rule certificate

Pretrial statement must address all items in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

The parties must file a pretrial statement that addresses all items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement

Pretrial statement must include joint jury instructions using Ninth Circuit Model, with deviations clearly marked and supported.

The parties must attach to their pretrial statement a joint set of jury instructions ordered in logical sequence and accompanied by a table of contents. The parties must use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions whenever possible. Proposed deviations from the model instructions, no matter how minor, must be clearly identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
word format

Email Word versions of jury instructions, voir dire, and verdict form to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov on filing day.

The parties must e-mail Word versions of the proposed jury instructions, voir dire, and verdict form to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day they file them.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
compliance required

Exhibits not provided as required may be excluded at court's discretion.

All exhibits that have not been provided as required are subject to exclusion in the reasonable exercise of the Court’s discretion.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exchange all trial exhibits 21 days before final pretrial conference.

At least 21 calendar days before the final pretrial conference, the parties must exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, charts, schedules, diagrams, and other similar documentary materials to be used in their case-in-chief, together with a complete list of all such proposed exhibits.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
delivery to chambers

Deliver pre-marked exhibits in three-ring binders to courtroom deputy 7 days before trial.

At least seven calendar days prior to the beginning of trial, the parties must deliver one set of all pre-marked exhibits in clearly labeled three-ring binders to the courtroom deputy.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
daily notification

Notify other parties of next day's witnesses by close of each trial day.

Unless otherwise ordered, each party must notify all other parties by the close of each trial day of the witnesses that party intends to call on the following trial day.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must contain 15 specified sections including substance of action, relief requested, undisputed facts, exhibits list, disputed legal issues, and others.

The statement must contain the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the parties, the substance of claims and defenses that remain to be decided, and the operative pleadings. 2. Relief Requested. A detailed statement of all requested relief, including an itemization of all elements of damages claimed. 3. Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties must exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable. 4. Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise list of the issues of fact that are contested and remain to be litigated at trial. 5. Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts. 6. Stipulations. A statement of proposed stipulations or agreements that will expedite the presentation of evidence. 7. Witnesses. A list of all witnesses to be called in the case-in-chief, excluding those solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given. No party will be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court. 8. Exhibits, Schedules, and Summaries. A list of all documents or other items to be offered as exhibits at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each that describes: (1) its substance or purpose; (2) the identity of the sponsoring witness; and (3) whether the parties have stipulated to its admissibility and, if they have not, the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 9. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions. 10. Pending Motions or Matters. A statement of any motions or other matters that must be resolved prior to trial. 11. Bifurcation or Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether either party requests bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues and why. 12. Use of Discovery Responses. Citations to all evidence that a party might introduce at trial, other than that to be used solely for impeachment or rebuttal, that was obtained from deposition testimony, interrogatory responses, or responses to requests for admission. Counsel must state any objections to the use of these materials and must certify that they have conferred regarding such objections. Counsel must separately file a document containing each disputed discovery response or deposition testimony excerpt, and as to each must state the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 13. Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours or days needed for the trial. 14. Settlement Discussion. A brief summary of the status of settlement negotiations, without indicating specific dollar amounts, and an indication of whether further negotiations are likely to be productive and what, if anything, would facilitate settlement. 15. Miscellaneous. Any other matters that will facilitate the just, speedy, and efficient resolution of the action.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statements must include specified language directly above the signature lines.

The joint pretrial statement described above must include the following language directly above the signature lines: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order will supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this case, unless modified by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings must be brief, plain English, no pejorative language/conclusions/argument; conclusions of law require legal authority citations.

The proposed findings must be brief, written in plain English, and be free of pejorative language, conclusions, or argument. Conclusions of law must be supported by appropriate citation to legal authority.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative motion to seal

Administrative motions to file materials under seal must include two compliance statements regarding this order and Civil Local Rule 79-5.

In addition to the information required by Civil Local Rule 79-5, administrative motions to file materials under seal must contain the following information: 1. A statement that the filing party has reviewed and complied with this order. 2. A statement that the filing party has reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-5, including the requirement to file separate motions if a party seeks to file under seal a document containing “portions that more than one party bears the burden of showing is sealable.” Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(5).

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion or statement in support of sealing

Motions or statements in support of sealing must identify and apply the legal standard, provide evidentiary support, and avoid insufficient justifications like mere stipulation references or conclusory competitive harm claims.

The motion or statement in support of sealing must identify the applicable legal standard (i.e., compelling reasons or good cause), explain why that standard applies, and articulate, with evidentiary support where necessary, why the materials to be sealed satisfy that standard. See Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1)–(2). “Reference to a stipulation or protective order that allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a document, or portions thereof, are sealable.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c). Conclusory references to “competitive harm” without explanation are also almost always insufficient justification for sealing.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed sealing orders must identify the legal standard, be narrowly tailored, list sealed materials in a table with a court ruling column, and have electronic copies sent in Word to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Proposed orders must identify the appropriate legal standard, be “narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material,” and “list[] in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(3). Tables must include a column for the Court’s ruling as to each document. Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties are prohibited from incorporating prior case management statements by reference.

Parties must not incorporate prior case management statements by reference.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed protective order or esi discovery order
Must include
local rule certificate

Proposed protective orders or ESI discovery orders must be accompanied by a qualifying declaration, or they will be denied without prejudice.

Parties must file one of the following with any proposed protective order or order re: discovery of ESI: (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable. Proposed orders that are not accompanied by one of the required declarations will be denied without prejudice.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Request for telephonic appearance
Must include
proposed order

Requests for telephonic appearance must be accompanied by a stipulation (or administrative motion if no stipulation) and proposed order.

parties seeking to appear telephonically must file a stipulation and proposed order, or an administrative motion and proposed order if a stipulation is not possible, at least seven calendar days prior to the scheduled appearance.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Post-distribution accounting

Post-distribution accounting for class action settlements must include specified information about settlement administration issues and resolutions.

In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Post-distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing remaining attorney’s fees when submitting the post-distribution accounting.

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees when they file their post-distribution accounting.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for class action settlement approval

Motions for preliminary or final approval of class action settlements must address the Northern District’s class action settlement guidance in the order presented on the website.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/rules-forms-fees/northern-district-guidelines/procedural-guidance-class-action-settlements, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Word format to the specified email address.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to jstpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must contain 15 enumerated items covering substance, relief, facts, witnesses, exhibits, legal issues, and other trial-related matters.

The statement must contain the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the parties, the substance of claims and defenses that remain to be decided, and the operative pleadings. 2. Relief Requested. A detailed statement of all requested relief, including an itemization of all elements of damages claimed. 3. Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties must exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable. 4. Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise list of the issues of fact that are contested and remain to be litigated at trial. 5. Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts. 6. Stipulations. A statement of proposed stipulations or agreements that will expedite the presentation of evidence. 7. Witnesses to be Called. A list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given. No party will be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court. 8. Exhibits, Schedules, and Summaries. A list of all documents or other items to be offered as exhibits at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, and a brief statement following each that describes: (1) its substance or purpose; (2) the identity of the sponsoring witness; and (3) whether the parties have stipulated to its admissibility and, if they have not, the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 9. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions. 10. Pending Motions or Matters. A statement of any motions or other matters that must be resolved prior to trial. 11. Bifurcation or Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether either party requests bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues and why. 12. Use of Discovery Responses. Citations to all evidence that a party might introduce at trial, other than that to be used solely for impeachment or rebuttal, that was obtained from deposition testimony, interrogatory responses, or responses to requests for admission. Counsel must state any objections to the use of these materials and must certify that they have conferred regarding such objections. Counsel must separately file a document containing each disputed discovery response or deposition testimony excerpt, and as to each must state the objection to its admission, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party. 13. Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours or days needed for the trial. 14. Settlement Discussion. A brief summary of the status of settlement negotiations, without indicating specific dollar amounts, and an indication of whether further negotiations are likely to be productive and what, if anything, would facilitate settlement. 15. Miscellaneous. Any other matters that will facilitate the just, speedy, and efficient resolution of the action.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must include specific language above signature lines.

The joint pretrial statement described above must include the following language directly above the signature lines: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order will supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this case, unless modified by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must use model instructions when possible; deviations must be identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

The parties must submit a set of agreed-upon case-specific instructions using the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions or California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) whenever possible. Proposed deviations from the model instructions, no matter how minor, must be clearly identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

Judge Jon S. TigarCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must follow ESI guidelines and meet/confer on ADR and ESI topics before initial case management conference.

Parties must review in detail the Northern District’s electronically stored information (“ESI”) guidelines and checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences, which are available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines. The Court discourages deviation from the ESI guidelines absent good cause. Failure to meet and confer regarding the required topics prior to the initial case management conference, including alternative dispute resolution and ESI, may, in the reasonable exercise of the Court’s discretion, result in sanctions or disciplinary action.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Protective orders must use model orders or include required declarations explaining deviations.

Parties who seek a protective order or order re: discovery of ESI must, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated orders available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-orders or https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines. Parties must file one of the following with any proposed protective order or order re: discovery of ESI: (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable. Proposed orders that are not accompanied by one of the required declarations will be denied without prejudice.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative motion

Administrative motions and declarations must be submitted in Word format by email on the same day of filing.

Each administrative motion filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c) and declaration filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3) shall be submitted in Word format by email to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day of filing.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Cross motion
Must include
stipulation, proposed order

Stipulation and proposed order setting briefing schedule required before first brief.

Before the first brief is filed, the parties must submit a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing schedule for the cross-motions.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorneys fees motion
Must include
hours chart

Chart summarizing hours expended required with attorneys' fees motion.

In addition to the motion, memorandum, and evidence, a party moving for attorneys’ fees must provide the Court with a chart, in the format set forth below, summarizing the hours expended on the major tasks in the case.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorneys fees motion

Attorneys' fees hours chart must be submitted in Word format by email.

Electronic copies of the chart must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement motion
Must include
procedural guidance

Class action settlement motions must follow Northern District of California's Procedural Guidance in order.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action final approval motion
Must include
justification, withholding percentage

Final approval motion must specify appropriate withholding percentage and justification.

The final approval motion should specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold and why.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
disputed terms chart

Joint claim construction statement must include chart with disputed terms and proposed constructions.

The joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must include a chart, in the format set forth below, listing each disputed term, phrase, or clause (by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint claim construction chart must be submitted in Word format by email.

Electronic copies of the chart included in the joint claim construction statement must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings require concurrent redlined/highlighted comparison version.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Hearing materials
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Materials used at hearings must be filed electronically within 7 days.

Any materials used during a hearing or case management conference shall be electronically filed within seven days of the hearing or case management conference.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative request
Must include
proposed order

Parties must file an administrative request and proposed order at least one week before a hearing to appear via Zoom.

Parties wishing to appear via Zoom shall file and serve an administrative request to appear via Zoom and a proposed order at least one week prior to the scheduled hearing date.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must file a joint case management statement at least 18 calendar days before a scheduled CMC.

Parties are required to file a joint case management statement not less than eighteen (18) calendar days before a scheduled case management conference, unless the Court sets a different deadline.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statement must comply with the Standing Order and Civil Local Rule 16-9, and must not incorporate prior statements by reference.

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties’ statement must comply with the terms of the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California: Contents of Joint Case Management Statement and Civil Local Rule 16-9. Parties must not incorporate prior case management statements by reference.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statement must propose a full litigation schedule and ADR deadline.

In their joint case management statement for the initial case management conference, the parties must propose a full litigation schedule, including a deadline to complete ADR, regardless of whether they have received a ruling on any motion to dismiss.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed protective order

Proposed protective orders or ESI orders must use model orders where practicable and must be accompanied by a declaration (identity, modification with redline, or explanation of impracticability).

Parties who seek a protective order or order re: discovery of ESI must, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated orders available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-orders or https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines. Parties must file one of the following with any proposed protective order or order re: discovery of ESI: (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable. Proposed orders that are not accompanied by one of the required declarations will be denied without prejudice.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation and proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Parties must submit a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing schedule before the first cross-motion brief is filed.

Before the first brief is filed, the parties must submit a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing schedule for the cross-motions.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Sumf
Must include
certificate

Each SUMF must be signed with an attestation that the evidence cited fairly and accurately supports or disputes the facts.

Each separate SUMFs must be signed by counsel or unrepresented party who has reviewed the document and attests as follows: I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports or disputes the facts as asserted.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for preliminary or final approval

Motions for preliminary or final approval of class action settlements must address the court's Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements in order.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

The post-distribution accounting must discuss concerns from class members and issues in settlement administration.

the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remainder of fees with the post-distribution accounting.

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees when they file their post-distribution accounting.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

The joint claim construction statement must include a chart with disputed terms, proposed constructions, and support side by side.

The joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must include a chart, in the format set forth below, listing each disputed term, phrase, or clause (by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Amended pleadings must be filed with a redlined or highlighted version showing changes.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Pretrial Statement must be filed 14 days before pretrial conference

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties must file and serve a Joint Pretrial Statement no later than 14 calendar days before the pretrial conference.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
witness list

Witnesses not disclosed in pretrial statement require court leave

No party will be permitted, without leave of court, to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
trial time hours

Parties must account for all trial time except voir dire

The parties must provide the total number of hours requested for the trial. Except for voir dire, ALL time should be accounted for, including but not limited to opening statements, direct and cross-examination, objections, sidebars, argument outside the presence of the jury, and closing arguments.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
time division

Trial time equally divided between plaintiffs and defendants unless stipulated otherwise

Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, or by Court order, the total number of hours will be equally divided between plaintiffs and defendants, regardless of the number of parties.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
certificate of conference

Lead trial counsel must meet and confer at least 21 days before final pretrial conference

At least 21 calendar days before the final pretrial conference, lead trial counsel must meet and confer with respect to:

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must be filed 14 days before pretrial conference

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties must file and serve a joint pretrial statement no later than 14 calendar days before the pretrial conference.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
notice of motion

Criminal motions must be noticed for hearing per Local Rule 47-1.

All criminal motions must be noticed for a hearing in accordance with Criminal Local Rule 47-1.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
trial time in hours

Parties must account for all trial time (except voir dire) in hours

The parties must provide the total number of hours needed for the trial. Except for voir dire, ALL time should be accounted for, including but not limited to opening statements, closing arguments, cross-examination, sidebars, objections, and argument outside the presence of the jury.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Trial hours equally divided between plaintiffs and defendants unless stipulated otherwise

Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, or by Court order, the total number of hours will be equally divided between plaintiffs and defendants, regardless of the number of parties.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Parties must track and report daily time usage to court

The parties will be required to keep track of their time each day, account for all available hours the jury is available (irrespective of whether the parties elect to use all of those hours), and report the stipulated division of time to the Court each day.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must include binding language above signature lines.

The joint pretrial statement described above must include the following language directly above the signature lines: The parties have made the foregoing admissions and set forth the remaining issues of fact and law to be litigated at trial. This Joint Pretrial Statement supplements the parties' pleadings and, along with the Court's orders, governs the course of trial of this case.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
attendance

Lead counsel or self-represented party must attend pretrial conference in person.

Pretrial conferences are held in person. Lead counsel who will try the case, or the party if self-represented, must attend the pretrial conference and be prepared to address all aspects of trial; this includes the substance of all documents, arguments, and issues set forth in this standing order.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exchange

Parties must exchange exhibits 21 days before final pretrial conference.

At least 21 calendar days before the final pretrial conference, the parties must exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, charts, schedules, together with a complete list of all such proposed exhibits. Voluminous exhibits must be reduced by elimination of irrelevant portions or through summaries.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury materials
Must include
list of participants, proposed jury instructions, proposed jury verdict form +1 more

Jury materials (participants list, voir dire, instructions, verdict form) due 14 days before pretrial conference with two courtesy copies and Word versions emailed.

no later than 14 calendar days before the pretrial conference, the parties must jointly file and serve the following documents, described further below, with two courtesy copies delivered to the Court, and Word versions emailed to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov: (a) list of participants; (b) agreed upon voir dire questions; (c) proposed jury instructions; and (d) a proposed jury verdict form.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire questions
Must include
agreed questions, disputed questions, court preferred questions

Parties must submit agreed and disputed voir dire questions to Court.

The parties must provide for the Court’s consideration: a list of any agreed upon voir dire questions; a separate list of requested voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree; and, a list of questions, if any, the parties would prefer the Court ask the jurors.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness exhibit list
Must include
exhibit list, witness list

Parties must notify others of next day's witnesses and exhibits by end of each trial day.

Unless otherwise ordered, by the close of each trial day each party must notify all other parties of all witnesses that party intends to call on the following trial day and shall provide a list of all exhibits that will be used on direct and cross-examination (other than for impeachment of an adverse witness).

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
outstanding objections

Exhibit list must include outstanding objections if not stipulated.

If the parties have not stipulated to the admission of the exhibits that will be used for those witnesses, the exhibit list must include the outstanding objections.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Counsel must place clearly marked exhibit copies on witness stand before each witness.

Immediately before each new witness takes the stand, counsel calling the witness, or conducting cross-examination, shall place on the witness stand a clearly marked copy of each exhibit that counsel expects to reference during direct examination or cross-examination respectively.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Objection

Objections must be brief and standing; no speaking objections allowed.

Counsel shall stand when making objections and briefly state the basis of the objection. Counsel shall not make speaking objections. Counsel shall not expand on the basis for the objection, or respond to the objection of another party, unless requested by the Court.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Parties must retain exhibits throughout appellate process and arrange record filing.

At the conclusion of the trial, each party must retain its exhibits throughout the appellate process. It is each party’s responsibility to arrange with the Office of the Clerk of Court to file the record on appeal.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
leave of court

Maximum 2 motions per party per hearing without leave of court.

No party will be given reservations for more than two motions without leave of Court, nor will the Court hear more than two motions per party at a particular hearing without leave of Court or a Court order.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule compliance

Motions must comply with Criminal Local Rule 47-2.

All motions shall comply with Criminal Local Rule 47-2.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
court order

Reply briefs to motions in limine require court order showing good cause.

The Court will not consider reply briefs absent prior order on a showing of good cause.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Amended pleadings must include redlined or highlighted comparison to prior version.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Electronic copies of proposed orders must be sent in Word format to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
joint filing, comprehensive coverage

Joint pretrial statement required addressing all items in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

The parties must file a joint pretrial statement that addresses all items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint filing, logical sequence, table of contents

Joint jury instructions with table of contents required with pretrial statement.

The parties must attach to their pretrial statement a joint set of jury instructions ordered in logical sequence and accompanied by a table of contents.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
authority support, model instructions, deviation identification

Must use Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions; deviations must be red-lined and supported by authority.

The parties must use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions whenever possible. Proposed deviations from the model instructions, no matter how minor, must be clearly identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
disputed marking, argument and authority

Disputed jury instructions must be marked “disputed” with concise argument and authority.

Any instruction to which the parties disagree must be marked as “disputed” and must be followed by concise argument and authority in support of and against the use of the instruction.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
joint filing, agreed questions, disputed questions

Joint list of agreed and disputed voir dire questions required with pretrial statement.

The parties must attach to their pretrial statement a joint list of agreed-upon voir dire questions and a list of any voir dire questions on which they could not agree.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form
Must include
filing, lodging, service +1 more

US counsel must file, serve, and lodge verdict form on same day as pretrial statement.

Counsel for the United States must file and serve a verdict form on the same day as the pretrial conference statement is due. Copies of the verdict form must also be lodged with the pretrial conference statement.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial filing
Must include
email submission, same day deadline

Word versions of jury instructions, voir dire, and verdict form must be emailed to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov same day as filing.

The parties must e-mail Word versions of the proposed jury instructions, voir dire, and verdict form to nwpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day they file them.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
complete list

Exhibits must be exchanged at least 21 days before final pretrial conference with complete list.

At least 21 calendar days before the final pretrial conference, the parties must exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, charts, schedules, diagrams, and other similar documentary materials to be used in their case-in-chief, together with a complete list of all such proposed exhibits.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
meet and confer, good faith effort, stipulation attempt

Parties must meet and confer immediately after exhibit exchange to stipulate admissibility.

Following the exchange, the parties must immediately meet and confer about the exhibits, including any objections to their use, and must make a good faith effort to stipulate to exhibits’ admissibility.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be delivered in three-ring binders to courtroom deputy 7 days before trial.

Unless otherwise ordered, at least seven calendar days prior to the beginning of trial, the parties must deliver one set of all pre-marked exhibits in clearly labeled three-ring binders to the courtroom deputy.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits not provided as required may be excluded at court's discretion.

All exhibits that have not been provided as required are subject to exclusion in the reasonable exercise of the Court’s discretion.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness disclosure

Failure to notify witnesses may result in exclusion at court's discretion.

Failure to comply with this order may, in the discretion of the Court, be grounds for exclusion of any witness who was not properly disclosed.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative request
Must include
proposed order

Parties requesting to appear via Zoom must file and serve an administrative request with a proposed order at least one week before the hearing.

Parties wishing to appear via Zoom shall file and serve an administrative request to appear via Zoom and a proposed order at least one week prior to the scheduled hearing date.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statements must comply with the referenced standing order and Civil Local Rule 16-9 unless the Court orders otherwise.

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties’ statement must comply with the terms of the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California: Contents of Joint Case Management Statement and Civil Local Rule 16-9.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statements are prohibited from incorporating prior case management statements by reference.

Parties must not incorporate prior case management statements by reference.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Initial joint case management statements must include a full litigation schedule with a deadline to complete ADR, regardless of any pending motion to dismiss rulings.

In their joint case management statement for the initial case management conference, the parties must propose a full litigation schedule, including a deadline to complete ADR, regardless of whether they have received a ruling on any motion to dismiss.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must explain any proposed deadlines that deviate from the default timeline provided in the standing order.

Parties must explain proposals that deviate from the timeline set forth below.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

The “Other References” section of the joint case management statement must indicate whether all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

In the section of the joint case management statement addressing “Other References,” the parties must indicate whether all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed protective order

Parties seeking a protective order must use the model stipulated protective order from the court’s website where practicable.

Parties who seek a protective order or order re: discovery of ESI must, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated orders available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-orders or https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed protective order

Proposed protective orders must be accompanied by a declaration meeting one of three specified criteria.

Parties must file one of the following with any proposed protective order or order re: discovery of ESI: (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed protective order

Proposed protective orders not accompanied by the required declaration will be denied without prejudice.

Proposed orders that are not accompanied by one of the required declarations will be denied without prejudice.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Sumf

Each Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUMF) must be signed by counsel or the unrepresented party who reviewed it, and include the required attestation confirming the evidence fairly supports or disputes the asserted facts.

Attestation: Each separate SUMFs must be signed by counsel or unrepresented party who has reviewed the document and attests as follows: I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports or disputes the facts as asserted.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Sumf

SUMFs are prohibited from containing summary judgment argument or circumventing applicable briefing page limits, must only include facts cited in the summary judgment briefs, and uncited facts will not be considered by the Court.

Additional Guidance: The separate SUMFs shall not include argument in support of the summary judgment motion and shall not be used to circumvent the page limits that apply to summary judgment briefing. Parties must include only those facts that are actually cited in the briefs. Facts that are not cited in the summary judgment briefs will not be considered.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Objections to evidence

Objections to evidence must be included in the objecting party’s brief and are prohibited from being filed as a separate pleading.

Objections to Evidence: Objections to evidence shall be contained within the objecting party’s brief and shall not be filed as a separate pleading.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorney fees motion

Motions for attorney’s fees must include a chart summarizing hours expended per task and attorney (with adjustable categories) in the specified format, and the total hours in the chart must match the hours stated in the fees motion.

In addition to the motion, memorandum, and evidence, a party moving for attorney’s fees must provide the Court with a chart, in the format set forth below, summarizing the hours expended on the major tasks in the case. While the Court has suggested several categories of tasks, the moving party may add or modify categories as necessary. The Court is primarily interested in the number of hours spent per task and per attorney, along with the effective billing rate associated with those hours. The total number of hours reflected in this chart must be identical to the number of hours set forth in the fees motion.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement motion

Motions for preliminary or final approval of class action settlements must address the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements in the order the guidelines are presented on the court’s website.

Any motion for preliminary or final approval of a class action settlement must address the respective guidelines in the Northern District of California’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/, in the order the guidelines are presented on the website.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

Post-distribution accounting for class action settlements must include, in addition to the Guidance requirements, discussions of class member concerns, settlement administration issues since final approval, and resolutions to those concerns/issues.

In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement motion

Motions for final approval of class action settlements must specify the percentage of attorney’s fees class counsel proposes to withhold (typically 10-25%) and the reasoning for that proposed percentage.

The final approval motion must specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold and why.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remaining attorney’s fees when submitting the post-distribution accounting for a class action settlement.

Class counsel must file a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees when they file their post-distribution accounting.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint claim construction statements required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must include a side-by-side chart listing each disputed claim term/phrase/clause, each party’s proposed construction, and supporting evidence for each construction.

The joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must include a chart, in the format set forth below, listing each disputed term, phrase, or clause (by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint

In PSLRA cases, lead plaintiff must format securities fraud allegations in a chart with specific numbered headings when filing an amended complaint.

If and when a lead plaintiff files an amended complaint, lead plaintiff must set out in chart form its securities fraud allegations under the following headings on a numbered, statement-by-statement basis: (1) the speaker(s), date(s), and medium; (2) the false and misleading statements; (3) the reasons why the statements were false and misleading when made; and (4) the facts giving rise to a strong inference of scienter.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
proposed order

Motions to seal must include a proposed order listing sealable material in table format.

The motion must be accompanied by a proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material, and lists in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed, pursuant to Criminal Local Rule 56-1(c).

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must be accompanied by a redlined or highlighted version comparing to prior pleading.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must address all items in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

The parties must file a joint pretrial statement that addresses all items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement

Pretrial statement must include joint jury instructions in logical sequence with table of contents.

The parties must attach to their pretrial statement a joint set of jury instructions ordered in logical sequence and accompanied by a table of contents.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions must be used when possible; deviations must be red-lined with authority; disputed instructions must be marked and supported.

The parties must use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions whenever possible. Proposed deviations from the model instructions, no matter how minor, must be clearly identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority. The Court discourages the unnecessary submission of special instructions or modification of model instructions. Special instructions, if any, must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative. Any instruction to which the parties disagree must be marked as "disputed" and must be followed by concise argument and authority in support of and against the use of the instruction.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement

Pretrial statement must include joint list of agreed voir dire questions and list of disagreed questions.

The parties also must attach to their pretrial statement a joint list of agreed-upon voir dire questions and a list of any voir dire questions on which they could not agree.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict form

Verdict form must be filed and served same day as pretrial conference statement; copies must be lodged with statement.

Counsel for the United States must file and serve a verdict form on the same day as the pretrial conference statement is due. Copies of the verdict form must also be lodged with the pretrial conference statement.

Judge Noël WiseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Case Management Statements are due 7 days before the conference.

Joint Case Management Statements are due 7 days before the conference.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to exclude expert testimony
Must include
dispositive motion deadline

Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony must be filed by dispositive motions deadline.

Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony must be filed by the dispositive motions deadline.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
accurate facts, accurate citations

Citations and factual assertions must be completely accurate.

Citations and factual assertions must be completely accurate. Misrepresentations of law or fact, however subtle, may result in sanctions.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
consolidated reply

Moving party must file single consolidated reply brief when multiple opposition briefs are filed.

If multiple parties file separate opposition briefs to a motion, the moving party must file a single consolidated reply brief complying with the default page limits.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined document

Attach redlined document showing changes to amended pleadings.

Attach as an exhibit to any amended or proposed amended pleading a redlined document showing the changes made to the previously filed pleading.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
evidence objections in briefs

Object to evidence within briefs, not separate pleadings.

Object to evidence within briefs. Do not file separate pleadings.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders required for administrative motions, ex parte applications, and motions seeking specific relief.

Proposed Orders. File proposed orders on ECF as PDFs and email Word versions to pcppo@cand.uscourts.gov. Proposed orders are only necessary for administrative motions, ex parte applications, and motions seeking specific relief.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Demonstratives

Demonstratives must be sent to opposing counsel and CRD via email 48 hours in advance.

Send any demonstratives to opposing counsel and Judge Pitts's CRD (via email) 48 hours in advance.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement motion

Class action settlement motions must follow specific guidelines and include an appendix.

Parties submitting motions for preliminary or final approval of class action settlements must follow these guidelines: https://cand.uscourts.gov/forms/procedural-guidance-for-class-action-settlements/. Parties should include an appendix with their brief that responds to the specific requirements outlined in the guidelines.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders required only for administrative motions, ex parte applications, and motions seeking specific relief or factual findings.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss. File proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, and motions that ask for specific relief (e.g., a motion for a preliminary injunction or an application for a temporary restraining order) or factual findings (e.g., a motion to approve a class settlement or for attorneys’ fees).

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
specific relief sought

Proposed orders for injunctive relief must be filed on ECF (PDF) and emailed (Word) to specific address.

Proposed orders submitted in connection with motions for injunctive relief should state the specific relief sought. Proposed orders must be both filed on ECF in PDF form and emailed in Word form to pcppo@cand.uscourts.gov. Orders submitted only by email are not deemed filed and may not be seen by the Judge.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint trial availability statement
Must include
joint availability, trial duration estimate

Parties must file joint trial availability statement one week before trial setting conference.

Joint Trial Availability Statement. At least one week before the trial setting conference, the parties shall file a joint statement specifying their joint availability for trial and an estimate of the total number of hours or days needed for trial.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary statement
Must include
joint statement

One-paragraph preliminary statement required for jury voir dire.

Preliminary statement: A one-paragraph joint statement of the case to be read at voir dire.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury questions
Must include
agreed upon questions

Up to nine proposed jury questions required for online questionnaire.

Proposed jury questions: A list of up to nine agreed-upon questions to be asked in the online questionnaire that will be sent to prospective jurors before jury selection.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement

Plea agreements must be emailed to Courtroom Deputy by 2:00 p.m. Monday before plea; open pleas require notification by same deadline.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, government counsel shall email a copy of the plea agreement to Judge Pitts’s Courtroom Deputy Nicole Coleman at pcpcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by 2:00 p.m. the Monday before the plea is to be entered. If there is to be an open plea, counsel for the defendant shall notify the Court by 2:00 p.m. the Monday before the plea is to be entered.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Joint pretrial conference statement required 7 days before pretrial conference, addressing 15 issues, with attached jury instructions, voir dire, exhibits, and stipulations.

Counsel shall comply with Local Rule 17.1-1(b) and file a joint pretrial conference statement not less than seven days prior to the pretrial conference addressing all fifteen issues identified therein. Counsel shall meet and confer in advance on proposed jury instructions, voir dire questions, exhibits, and stipulations, all of which must be attached to their joint pretrial conference statement. Counsel should be prepared to discuss with the Court any anticipated evidentiary objections and any means for shortening and simplifying the trial. Counsel should submit an agreed upon set of additional requested voir dire questions to be posed by the Court. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree shall be submitted separately.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement
Must include
joint set

Joint jury instructions with table of contents required with pretrial conference statement

The parties must attach to their pretrial conference statement a joint set of jury instructions ordered in logical sequence and accompanied by a table of contents.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Special instructions

Special instructions must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative

Special instructions, if any, must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
disputed instructions marked

Disputed instructions must be marked 'disputed' with concise argument and authority

Any instruction on which the parties disagree should be marked as 'disputed' and in the place where the proposing party believes the instruction should be given. Disputed instructions must be followed by concise argument and authority in support of and against the use of the instruction.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed voir dire questions
Must include
agreed upon questions

Agreed-upon voir dire questions requiring yes/no answers.

Proposed voir dire questions: A list of agreed upon-questions to be posed by the Court after initial voir dire. The parties should formulate these questions such that they require only "yes"/"no" answers enabling jurors to raise their hands in response.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
List of involved individuals
Must include
list of all involved

List of all involved individuals required for jury selection.

List of involved individuals: A list of all people involved in this case (including counsel, parties, and potential witnesses) to be shared during jury selection.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
joint instructions

Joint proposed jury instructions following Ninth Circuit Model Instructions.

Proposed jury instructions: A joint set of proposed jury instructions. Proposed instructions should follow the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions to the extent possible, and any deviations must be indicated.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict form
Must include
proposed verdict form

Proposed verdict form required (joint if possible, separate if not).

Proposed verdict form: A single agreed upon proposed verdict form if possible, or separate proposed verdict forms if the parties cannot reach agreement.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint filing of trial exhibits
Must include
expert reports, deposition transcripts, single set of all exhibits

Single joint filing required for all trial exhibits and expert reports.

Joint Filing of Trial Exhibits. The parties shall prepare a single set of all trial exhibits, expert reports of testifying experts, and deposition transcripts of testifying witnesses that will be the official record and, if applicable, used on appeal.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
meet and confer in person

Parties must meet and confer in person before submitting trial exhibits.

Before submitting trial exhibits, the parties shall meet and confer in person to consider exhibit numbers, eliminate duplicates, and minimize confusion, and make a good faith effort to stipulate to admissibility.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
stipulate to authenticity and foundation

Parties must make good faith effort to stipulate to authenticity and foundation.

At minimum, absent a legitimate objection, the parties shall make every effort to stipulate to authenticity and foundation.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Digital exhibit copies required on USB drives 5 days before trial.

At least five days prior to the commencement of trial, the parties shall deliver to the Courtroom Deputy two USB drives that each contain one set of exhibits, with each exhibit as a separate file.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Audio video exhibits
Must include
transcript

Transcripts required for audio/video exhibits on day offered.

The parties must provide agreed-upon transcripts of any audio or video exhibits used at trial by the day offered.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Special equipment motion
Must include
joint motion

Joint motion required for special equipment in courthouse.

If the parties plan to bring special equipment into the courthouse (e.g., printers, monitors, other large objects or unusual technology), the parties must submit a joint administrative motion seeking permission to bring in said special equipment.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition objections
Must include
spreadsheet

Spreadsheet required for deposition objections via email.

The parties shall also email pcppo@cand.uscourts.gov and pcpchambers@cand.uscourts.gov an editable spreadsheet identifying the deposition page and line number(s) for each objection.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Special equipment
Must include
court order

Special equipment requires court order for courthouse entry.

The Court security officers will not permit entrance of special equipment without a court order.

Judge P. Casey PittsCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
proposed order

Joint Pretrial Statement must contain 13 specified items including substance, relief, undisputed facts, disputed facts, witnesses, exhibits, legal issues, etc., and must include a proposed order.

the parties shall file and serve a Joint Pretrial Statement and Proposed Order containing the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the parties, the substance of claims and defenses that remain to be decided, and the operative pleadings that raise the issues; 2. Relief Prayed. A detailed statement of all relief claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed; 3. Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties shall exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable; 4. Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise list of the issues of fact that are contested and remain to be litigated at trial; 5. Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts; 6. Stipulations. A statement of proposed stipulations or agreements that will expedite the presentation of evidence; 7. Witnesses to be Called. A list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, together with a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given. No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case in chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court for good cause; 8. Exhibits, Schedules and Summaries. A list of all documents and other items to be offered as exhibits at the trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, with a brief statement following each, describing its substance or purpose and the identity of the sponsoring witness; 9. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions; 10. Pending Motions or Matters. A statement of any motions or matters that must be resolved prior to trial; 11. Bifurcation, Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues is feasible and desired; 12. Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours or days needed for the trial; and, 13. Miscellaneous. Any other matters that will facilitate the just, speedy and efficient determination of the action.

Judge Richard SeeborgCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must include specific language above signature lines.

The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order described above shall recite, directly above the signature lines of each party, the following: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be litigated, this order shall supplement the pleadings and govern the course of trial of this cause, unless modified to prevent manifest injustice.

Judge Richard SeeborgCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must be jointly submitted in hard copy and via email, using Ninth Circuit model instructions, with objections placed after disputed instructions.

the parties shall meet and confer and submit jointly an agreed set of instructions, using the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit where appropriate. In the event the parties are unable to agree to the language of a particular instruction, the objecting party shall submit a written objection or an alternative proposed instruction placed in sequence immediately following the disputed instruction. The joint set of jury instructions shall be submitted in hard copy as well as in word processing format via email to RSpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Richard SeeborgCRITICAL
Applies to
Emergency application
Must include
certificate of conference

Emergency relief requires showing reasonable effort to notify opposing party.

If the party seeking emergency relief does not show that it made every reasonable effort to notify the opposing party, at the earliest possible time, of its intent to seek emergency relief, the relief will not be granted.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Moving party must confer with opposing counsel before noticing motion.

Counsel for the moving party shall confer with opposing counsel about a mutually convenient hearing date before noticing any motion.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Redlined or highlighted version required with amended pleadings.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
attorney with full authority

Attorney at case management conference must have full decision-making authority.

The attorney appearing at a case management conference need not be lead counsel but must have full authority to make decisions about any issue that may come up during the conference.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
full litigation schedule, proposed last day to amend pleadings

Case management statement must include full litigation schedule when motion to dismiss is pending.

If the Court sets an initial case management conference while a motion to dismiss remains pending, the case management statement shall propose a full litigation schedule, including a proposed last day to amend pleadings.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
discovery cutoff includes all harmonized

Discovery cutoff includes all discovery and related hearings.

The discovery cut-off is the date by which all discovery must be completed, including hearings on discovery motions and any resulting additional discovery ordered at those hearings.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint discovery letter
Must include
excerpt of specific discovery request or response

Joint discovery letter limited to specific discovery request/response excerpts.

No exhibits may be submitted with the letter other than an excerpt of the specific discovery request or response that is the subject of the letter.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
indication of model order usage

Protective order filings must indicate if based on model order.

When filing a proposed protective order, at the very beginning of their stipulation or motion, parties must indicate whether they have based their proposed order on one of the Northern District’s model protective orders.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
redline comparison of deviations

Deviations from model protective order must be shown via redline comparison.

If they have, they must identify any deviations from the model order by submitting as an exhibit a redline comparison of their proposed order and the model order.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
notice of electronic filing

All exhibits to motions must be separately filed on ECF with sequential numbering.

All exhibits to motions should be separately filed on ECF. For example, if the motion is Docket No. 30, and the declaration with 10 exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A would be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B would be Docket No. 31-2, and so on.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
local rule certificate

Proposed orders for sealing must identify legal standard and explain compliance.

In addition to complying with Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(3), the proposed order must identify the applicable legal standard and contain a brief explanation of how that standard and the requirements under Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(1) are met.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
local rule certificate

Complicated sealing motions require filing the Motion to Seal Summary Table.

If counsel has a complicated sealing motion, counsel shall file the Motion to Seal Summary Table linked on the Standing Orders page of Judge Lin's website.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Exhibits must be cited with declaration, exhibit letter/number, and page/line numbers.

When citing exhibits (including deposition testimony), briefs should identify the declaration to which the exhibit is attached, the letter or number of the exhibit, and the relevant page and, if available, line number (for example: "Smith Decl., Ex. 1, at 22:1-5").

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Joint or separate statements of undisputed facts prohibited for summary judgment motions

The parties shall not file joint or separate statements of undisputed facts in connection with summary judgment motions.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
written report, expert disclosure, fr cp 26 a 2 b compliance

Expert witnesses must be disclosed and provide written reports under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B)

All witnesses who will provide expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705, whether retained or non-retained, must be disclosed and must provide written reports in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report

Expert reports must number paragraphs and include table of contents

All expert reports shall number each paragraph to facilitate any motion practice challenging the specifics of any opinions and shall include a table of contents.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report

Expert reports must list and number opinions at beginning, with executive summary if applicable

At the beginning of the report, the expert shall list and number each opinion to be proffered in the report and, if applicable, provide an executive opinion of each.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness disclosure
Must include
percipient witness expert technical knowledge

Percipient witnesses with expert-level technical expertise must be identified by expert disclosure deadline

Any percipient witness who may also testify at trial with technical expertise akin to an independent expert shall be identified by name no later than the date of expert disclosures to allow for deposition, if necessary.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert disclosure
Must include
written materials relied upon by expert

Expert disclosure must include all written materials relied upon by the expert

At the time of disclosure of a written report, the disclosing party must identify all written materials upon which the expert relies in that report and produce those materials if they have not done so previously.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action release

Release language must specify claims based only on identical factual predicate

Release language should make clear that the class members are releasing claims based only on the identical factual predicate. Each proposed notice should make that clear as well. Hesse v. Sprint Corp., 598 F.3d 581, 590 (9th Cir. 2010).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action notice

Notice must specify written objection requirement may be excused for good cause; requires only substantial compliance

If a proposed notice to class members (or prospective class members) requires a written objection as a prerequisite to appearing in court to object to the settlement, the notice must specify that this requirement may be excused upon a showing of good cause. The Court will require only substantial compliance with the requirements for submitting an objection, and this should be made clear in any notice to class members.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement
Must include
payment disclosure, settlement administrator declaration

Settlement administrator must submit declaration detailing all payments received

The proposed settlement administrator must submit a declaration that (a) states whether they will receive any payments in connection with their administration of the settlement other than the fee described in the preliminary approval papers, including any payments from third-party vendors, (b) if so, describes those payments, (c) regardless whether they are receiving such payments in this case, states whether they have received such payments in the past in connection with other class action settlements, and (d) if so, describes the nature of those payments in the past and whether their practice has changed in accepting those payments.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction statement
Must include
order terms by priority

Court will construe only first ten terms if more than ten submitted without leave.

If more than ten terms are submitted for construction without leave of court, the Court will construe only the first ten terms listed in the joint claim construction statement.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Pslra chart
Must include
case number, certificate of service

Securities plaintiffs must file PSLRA chart within 14 days of complaint service.

Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated complaint), the plaintiff shall file a chart summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows: (a) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading; (b) the speaker, date, and medium by which the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or misleading.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Pslra chart
Must include
adhere to operative complaint

PSLRA chart must strictly adhere to operative complaint allegations.

The chart must strictly adhere to the allegations in operative complaint and may not include any new or supplemental information or explanation.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Guilty plea application
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Open plea requires completing Application to Enter Guilty Plea & Order form and providing to government for review before court submission.

If the defendant is entering an open plea, the defendant and defense counsel shall complete the Application to Enter Guilty Plea & Order form on the Criminal Forms portion of the Court’s website, and present the government with a copy of the completed application for review prior to providing the application to the Court at or before the change of plea hearing.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
chambers copy

Plea agreement must be emailed to chambers 2 court days before plea entry by noon.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, counsel for the defendant shall email a copy of the plea agreement to rflcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon two court days before the plea is to be entered. Normally, that would be Tuesday at noon.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
relevant authority indicated

Must indicate relevant authority and use Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions with changes highlighted

The parties should indicate the relevant authority for a proposed instruction. The parties should almost always use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions and, if a modification is proposed, should clearly identify any changes to the model instructions via highlighting or redline.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire and jury instructions due 21 days before pretrial conference

File proposed supplemental juror questionnaire and proposed jury instructions 21 Days Before Pretrial Conference

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Arrangement for transcript
Must include
arrangement confirmed

Daily transcript or real-time reporting must be arranged 14 days before trial

Arrange for daily transcript or real-time reporting 14 Days Before Trial

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order for exhibit equipment
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order for exhibit equipment/technology must be filed 14 days before trial

File proposed order for bringing exhibit presentation equipment and technology into the building 14 Days Before Trial

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint list of terms
Must include
joint submission

Joint list of terms must be provided to court reporter 5 days before trial

Provide court reporter with joint list of terms 5 Days Before Trial

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury computer preparation
Must include
exhibit list, admitted exhibits

Jury computer with admitted exhibits must be prepared morning of closing argument

Prepare jury computer with admitted exhibits and exhibit list Morning of Closing Argument

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Supplemental juror questionnaire
Must include
judge name, case number

Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire questions must be filed on docket and emailed to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov without argument.

The parties shall file these questions on the docket and submit a Microsoft Word compatible version to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov. However, no argument may be included in this submission.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Parties must file joint proposed jury instructions in proposed order.

The parties shall file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Agreed instructions must be labeled "Stipulated Instruction No. ____ Re ___________".

Instructions upon which the parties agree shall be identified as "Stipulated Instruction No. ____ Re ___________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Disputed instructions must be labeled "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________".

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Disputed instruction language must be labeled "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________".

If the parties dispute whether a particular instruction should be given at all, the proponent of the instruction shall provide proposed language, identified as "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Disputes requiring resolution before opening statements must be raised when filing jury instructions and at pretrial conference.

If either party believes that a dispute about jury instructions must be resolved before opening statements, it must be raised when the proposed jury instructions are filed and at the pretrial conference.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
judge name, case number, certificate of service

Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due 14 days before PTC with specific content requirements

The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement that contains the following:

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must follow specific identification format

Each motion should be clearly identified as “___________'s Motion in Limine No. __ Re: ____________.”

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Involved individuals list
Must include
judge name, case number

Involved individuals list must be sent to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov in Word format.

The parties shall jointly file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of people involved in the case.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict form
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint or separate proposed verdict forms required.

The parties shall file either a joint proposed verdict form, or, if they disagree, separate proposed verdict forms.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint exhibit list must include 6 specific columns in tabular format.

The parties shall file a joint exhibit list in tabular form with the following columns: (1) exhibit number; (2) name or brief description of the exhibit; (3) the exhibit’s purpose and sponsoring witness; (4) a brief description of any objections to the admissibility of the exhibit or, alternatively, a statement that the parties have stipulated to the exhibit’s admissibility; (5) a brief response to any objections; and (6) a blank column for the Court’s use.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Exhibits must be uploaded to Box.com 5 days before trial, each as separate sequentially-named file.

No later than 5 days before trial, the parties shall send exhibits to Judge Lin’s chambers’ Box.com storage. Each exhibit should be uploaded as a separate file, with each file named so that the exhibits appear sequentially when sorted by file name.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
caption

Parties must announce exhibit numbers when used, even if already admitted.

The parties must clearly announce the number of any exhibit used during the proceedings, even if it has already been admitted.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Audio video exhibits
Must include
transcript

Agreed-upon transcripts required for audio/video exhibits; failure precludes admission.

The parties must provide agreed-upon written transcripts of the content of any audio or video exhibit to be used at trial. Failure to provide an agreed-upon transcript by the day an exhibit is offered will preclude the exhibit’s admission.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit notebooks
Must include
permission

Exhibit notebooks for jury require prior court permission.

Exhibit notebooks for the jury will not be permitted without prior permission from the Court.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
filing deadline

Exhibits must be filed on docket within 10 days of verdict; parties retain copies through appeal.

Upon the conclusion of the trial, and unless otherwise ordered by the Court, exhibits offered during trial shall be filed on the docket within ten days of a trial verdict pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(g). Each party shall retain a full set of exhibits through the appellate process.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition designations
Must include
certificate of service

Parties must jointly file deposition designations 7 days before trial and email chart to court.

Unless otherwise ordered, no later than 7 days before trial begins, the parties shall jointly file all designations of deposition testimony or other discovery it wishes to offer, as well as any counter-designations or objections to the deposition testimony or discovery offered by any other party. In the same filing, the parties shall attach all excerpts of deposition testimony referenced in their designations and/or counter-designations, including the portions to which there are no objections. In addition to being filed, the designations chart must be emailed to the Court (rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov) in Word format, with a blank column in the table added for the Court's ruling.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Pronunciation guide
Must include
certificate of service

Provide court reporter with name/term list 5 days before trial.

No later than five days before the start of trial, the parties must provide the Court Reporter a jointly-created list of names and places as well as any uncommon terms or acronyms that are likely to come up during the trial.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Batson objection

Batson objections must be made by asking to retain juror and approach without stating reason.

Any objection to another party’s use of a peremptory challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), or its progeny, should be made by asking to retain the juror and then asking to approach, without mentioning the reason for the request.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Objection

Speaking objections are forbidden; only state legal grounds unless Court requests elaboration.

Speaking objections are strictly forbidden. In making objections, the parties should state only the legal grounds for the objection and should withhold all further comment or argument unless elaboration is requested by the Court.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Prior statement
Must include
hard copies

Hard copies of prior statements/transcripts required for Court and opposing party at sidebar.

If you wish to question a witness about a prior inconsistent or consistent statement, you must have hard copies of the prior statement for the Court and the opposing party to review at sidebar. If you plan to play an audio or video recording, you must have hard copies of the transcript, if one exists. If you do not, the Court cannot determine whether the statement is inconsistent or consistent, and you will not be allowed to read or play the statement.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness exhibit list
Must include
exhibit list, witness list

Parties must exchange witness and exhibit lists for next two court days at end of each trial day.

At the close of each trial day, the parties shall exchange a list of witnesses for the next two full court days and the exhibits that will be used during direct examination (other than

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
written in plain english, free of pejorative language, factual findings with citations

Revised proposed findings due 7 days after trial, emailed to court in Word format with record citations.

The parties will be required to submit revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law 7 days after the trial. All factual findings must be supported by citations to all pertinent portions of the record; therefore, arranging for daily transcripts is strongly recommended. If the citation is to witness testimony and a rough or final transcript is not yet available, the citation can simply be to the date of the testimony. Proposed findings shall be brief, written in plain English, and free of pejorative language. In addition to being filed, the proposed findings must be emailed to the Court (rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov) in Word format.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury questionnaire objection
Must include
objections to standard questionnaire

Objections to standard jury questionnaire due 21 days before pretrial conference

No later than 21 days before the pretrial conference, the parties should submit objections to any aspect of the standard questionnaire.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
joint filing

Joint pretrial statement due 14 days before pretrial conference

No later than 14 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must file a joint pretrial statement that addresses the items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine
Must include
filing deadline

Motions in limine due 14 days before pretrial conference; oppositions due 7 days before

Any motions in limine must be filed no later than 14 days before the pretrial conference. Oppositions must be filed at least 7 days before the pretrial conference. No reply papers will be considered.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
word format, joint filing, email submission

Joint proposed jury instructions due 7 days before pretrial conference

The parties should file joint proposed jury instructions, and send a copy in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, no later than 7 days before the pretrial conference.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
stipulated instruction labeling

Agreed instructions must be labeled "Stipulated Jury Instruction No. __ Re _____"

Instructions on which the parties agree must be identified as "Stipulated Jury Instruction No. __ Re _____," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
disputed instruction labeling

Disputed instructions must be labeled "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________"

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
one page explanation for disputed instructions

One-page explanation required for each disputed instruction

Following each set of proposed versions of a disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the Court should give that party's proposed instruction.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Objection to unconscious bias video
Must include
objection statement

Objection to unconscious bias video must be filed (max 1 page double-spaced)

If a party objects to prospective jurors' viewing this video, the party must file a short statement (not to exceed one page double-spaced) explaining its objection.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed case description
Must include
word format, joint filing, email submission

Joint proposed case description due 7 days before pretrial conference

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties should jointly file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a proposed description of the case.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed verdict forms
Must include
word format, joint filing, email submission

Joint verdict forms due 7 days before pretrial conference

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must jointly file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, either an agreed-upon proposed verdict form or competing proposed verdict forms.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
word format, email submission, individual filing

Exhibit lists due 7 days before pretrial conference

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, each party must file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of exhibits.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
word format, joint filing, email submission

Witness lists due 7 days before pretrial conference

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, lists of potential witnesses reasonably anticipated to be called at trial.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Involved individual list
Must include
word format, joint filing, email submission

Involved individual lists due 7 days before pretrial conference

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must jointly file, and send in Word format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of people involved in the case.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
daily consultation

Counsel must consult daily about exhibits in evidence and promptly raise disagreements to Judge.

Counsel must consult with each other and with the Courtroom Deputy at the end of each trial day about which exhibits are in evidence and any limitations thereon. If there are any disagreements, counsel should promptly bring them to Judge Lin’s attention.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
announce number when used

Counsel must announce exhibit numbers when used, even if already admitted.

Counsel must clearly announce the number of any exhibit used during the proceedings, even if it has already been admitted.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
final conference with deputy

Counsel must confer with Courtroom Deputy at close of evidence to verify exhibit order.

At the close of evidence, before closing arguments, counsel must confer with the Courtroom Deputy to make sure the exhibits in evidence are in good order.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
jury notebooks permission required

Jury exhibit notebooks require prior permission from Judge Lin.

Exhibit notebooks for the jury will not be permitted without prior permission from Judge Lin.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Deadline
5 days before trial
Applies to
Transcript preparation
Must include
joint list of names places terms

Parties must provide Court Reporter a joint list of names/terms/acronyms 5 days before trial.

No later than 5 days prior to the start of trial, the parties must provide the Court Reporter a jointly created list of names, places, and any uncommon terms or acronyms that are likely to come up during the trial.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial equipment
Must include
party provided equipment

Parties must provide their own computer graphics, poster blow-ups, or models for trial.

During trial, counsel may wish to use computer graphics, poster blow-ups, or models. The parties must provide such equipment.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial safety
Must include
tape extension cords for safety

Parties must tape extension cords to carpet for safety.

The parties shall tape extension cords to the carpet for safety.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury selection research
Must include
no social media notifications to jurors

Viewing social media profiles that trigger notifications to prospective jurors constitutes prohibited contact.

Contact includes actions taken by a party, attorney, investigator, etc., that trigger a notification to a prospective juror that their social media profile has been viewed by someone, even if that notification does not specify who viewed the profile, is inadvertent, or is provided automatically by the social media site (e.g., a LinkedIn notification that prospective juror’s profile was viewed by an “anonymous person,” or certain social media sites that automatically provide a list of accounts that have viewed the prospective juror’s posts or content).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury selection research
Must include
no social media requests to jurors

No follow/friend requests may be sent to prospective jurors on any social media site.

No “follow requests,” “friend requests,” or the like may be sent to any prospective juror on any social media site, regardless of whether a profile is public or private.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury selection research
Must include
no in person surveillance

No in-person surveillance of prospective jurors is permitted.

No in-person surveillance, no matter how...

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Redlined or highlighted version required when filing amended pleadings.

If a party files an amended pleading, they shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
attorney authority

Attorney at case management conference must have full decision-making authority.

The attorney appearing at a case management conference need not be lead counsel but must have full authority to make decisions about any issue that may come up during the conference.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
all productions made by cut off, all discovery completed by cut off, all discovery motions resolved by cut off

Judge Lin's discovery cut-off requires all discovery, motions, and productions completed by that date.

Judge Lin sets discovery cut-off dates that are different than the default set by Civil Local Rule 37-3. The discovery cut-off set by Judge Lin is the date by which all discovery must be completed. This means that all hearings on discovery motions must occur, all orders resolving those motions must be issued, and all productions must be made by the cut-off date. Accordingly, all discovery requests shall be served and all discovery motions filed sufficiently in

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders are not required for substantive motions but are required for administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and factual findings.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or preliminary injunction motions. The parties should submit proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and rulings that call upon the court to make factual findings (such as a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys' fees).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must be sent in Microsoft Word compatible format to specified email address.

Proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word compatible format to rflpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint discovery letter
Must include
proposed order

Both parties must submit proposed orders with joint discovery dispute letters.

Both sides must submit proposed orders as well.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed protective orders should use model orders, must state if model was used, and submit redline comparison of deviations as exhibit.

Parties requesting a protective order are encouraged to base any proposed order on the model protective orders on the Northern District’s website. When filing a proposed protective order, at the very beginning of their stipulation or motion, parties must indicate whether they have based their proposed order on one of the Northern District’s model protective orders. If they have, they must identify any deviations from the model order by submitting as an exhibit a redline comparison of their proposed order and the model order.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders are required for administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and factual finding motions (class settlement, attorney fees).

The parties should submit proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and rulings that call upon the court to make factual findings (such as a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys’ fees).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders for motions to seal must identify the legal standard and explain compliance with Local Rule 79-5(c)(1).

In addition to complying with Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(3), the proposed order must identify the applicable legal standard and contain a brief explanation of how that standard and the requirements under Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(1) are met.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report

Expert reports must include a table of contents.

All expert reports shall number each paragraph to facilitate any motion practice challenging the specifics of any opinions and shall include a table of contents. At the beginning of the report, the expert shall list and number each opinion to be proffered in the report and, if applicable, provide an executive opinion of each.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Release

Release language must clarify that class members release only claims based on the identical factual predicate.

Release language should make clear that the class members are releasing claims based only on the identical factual predicate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed notice

Proposed notices must clarify that class members release only claims based on the identical factual predicate.

Each proposed notice should make that clear as well.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval motion

Preliminary approval motions seeking injunctions must explain why the injunction is necessary.

If the parties seek an injunction, the motion for preliminary approval must explain why.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed notice

Proposed notices requiring written objections for court appearances must state the requirement may be excused with good cause.

If a proposed notice to class members (or prospective class members) requires a written objection as a prerequisite to appearing in court to object to the settlement, the notice must specify that this requirement may be excused upon a showing of good cause.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed notice

Proposed notices must state that only substantial compliance with objection requirements is required.

The Court will require only substantial compliance with the requirements for submitting an objection, and this should be made clear in any notice to class members.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement administrator declaration
Must include
ai disclosure

Settlement administrator declarations must disclose AI use and safeguards for accuracy and bias.

whether artificial intelligence will be used to administer the settlement by the administrator, its subcontractors, or its vendors and, if so, what safeguards will ensure accuracy and lack of bias

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement administrator declaration

Settlement administrator declarations must include all specified compensation, data sharing, AI, fraud prevention, and historical performance details.

The proposed settlement administrator must submit a declaration in support of the motion for preliminary approval that describes (a) any money or thing of value the administrator will receive in connection with administering the settlement beyond the fee described in the preliminary approval papers, including interest or float on settlement deposits, payments from depository banks, and any revenue-sharing, ownership percentage, or markups on settlement services from payment, claims processing, social media, or other vendors; (b) any amounts that class members or claimants could be charged by the administrator, its vendors, or its subcontractors in connection with the settlement, including interchange fees, dormancy fees, or retention of residual balances; (c) whether data about visitors to the settlement website or other settlement class data will be shared with third parties not involved in administering the settlement, including via trackers or pixels; (d) whether artificial intelligence will be used to administer the settlement by the administrator, its subcontractors, or its vendors and, if so, what safeguards will ensure accuracy and lack of bias; (e) a detailed fraud prevention plan, of which portions may be submitted under seal if necessary and which shall include a discussion of the availability of real-time fraud reporting, assessments to detect if an unusual number of payments are being sent to linked accounts, and measures taken to avoid unnecessary hurdles for valid claimants; and (f) any situations in which the administrator resigned or was terminated or suspended from its settlement administration duties before they were fully completed, and a description of why. To the extent available, the settlement administrator shall also include, for its five most recent class settlements, the total dollars spent on settlement administration (including class notice costs) per valid claim submitted.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice plan

Notice plans must address non-English speaking class members and need for translated notices.

The notice plan should address whether a significant portion of the class does not speak English and if so, whether class notice in other language(s) should be provided.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval motion

Preliminary approval motions must discuss appropriateness of email, social media, online forms, and settlement websites for notice.

The motion must discuss whether notice by email and/or social media, use of online claims and opt-out forms, and a website for the settlement are appropriate, and if not, explain why not.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Email notice

Email notices must include a plan to update addresses and retry bounced emails.

Any email notice shall include a plan for updating email addresses and making a second attempt at notice if the emails bounce back.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Social media notice plan

Social media notice plans must detail how widespread viewing by class members will be achieved.

Any social media or online publication notice plan shall explain in detail how widespread viewing of the notice by likely class members will be accomplished.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval motion

Monetary settlement motions must discuss redistributing unclaimed funds to participating class members.

In a proposed settlement involving the distribution of money to a class, the motion must discuss whether unclaimed funds should be redistributed to class members who claimed their share, and if not, explain why not.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval motion

Settlement motions requiring claims must explain why claims are appropriate instead of automatic checks.

If the settlement requires class members to file claims, as opposed to simply receiving checks, the motion must address why that is appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary approval motion

Preliminary approval motions must include class counsel’s conflict disclosures, escrow assessments, and administration suitability conclusions.

(b) a description of any potential conflict of interest, or potential appearance of conflict of interest, for counsel or their litigation funder(s) in the selection of the administrator, including any financial relationship and any large gifts over $500; (c) class counsel’s assessment of whether settlement funds held in escrow will receive market-rate interest and be held in appropriately risk-free instruments, and the basis for that assessment; and (d) the basis for counsel’s conclusion that the proposed administration arrangements serve the best interests of the settlement class.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for attorneys fees

Attorneys’ fees motions must be filed at least 35 days before the final approval deadline.

In proposing a schedule for final approval of a class settlement, the parties must ensure that the motion for attorneys’ fees is filed at least 35 days before the deadline for

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders granting final approval must list all settlement administration dates, including check mailing dates to class members.

The proposed order granting final approval should list all dates relating to the administration of the settlement, including the dates for when the checks distributing the settlement fund payments will be mailed to class members.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Final approval motion

Final approval motions must include settlement administrator updates on notice issues, claimant confusion, fraud, and social media/online notice metrics if applicable.

The final approval motion shall include an update from the settlement administrator on any notice problems, repeated issues of confusion among claimants, or fraud issues. If the notice plan included social media or online publication notice, the settlement administrator shall also provide information about the number of impressions, settlement website views, claim forms begun, and claim forms completed.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Attorneys fees motion

Attorneys’ fees motions must include detailed fee summaries, task breakdowns, blended hourly rates, and work justifications.

To permit an accurate lodestar cross-check, the attorneys’ fees motion should be supported with detailed summaries, including a breakdown of fees by task (e.g., prefiling investigation, preparing complaint, motion to dismiss, document review, depositions, mediation, etc.), the blended hourly rate for each task, and a detailed justification for the work done (e.g., nature of unusually complex work with expert, number of depositions or documents reviewed, etc.).

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

Post-Distribution Accounting must include class member concerns, settlement administration issues, and cost calculations per valid claim.

In addition to the information contained in the Guidance, the post-distribution accounting must discuss any significant or recurring concerns communicated by class members to the settlement administrator or counsel since final approval, any fraud or other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved. The Post-Distribution Accounting shall also include the administrator’s calculation of the total dollars spent on settlement administration (including class notice costs) per valid claim submitted.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders granting final approval must include fee withholding provision unless approval motion explains burden.

The proposed order granting final approval should incorporate that provision, unless the parties’ approval motion explains why that provision would be particularly burdensome under the circumstances.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact

Rule 52 parties must file joint undisputed and separate disputed findings of fact and conclusions of law seven days before hearing.

No later than seven days before the Rule 52 hearing, the parties must also file joint proposed undisputed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and separately file disputed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Securities allegations chart

Plaintiff must file a securities allegations chart within 14 days of complaint service, containing specific required content and no new information.

Within 14 days of service of the complaint (or consolidated complaint), the plaintiff shall file a chart summarizing the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2), specifically identifying the allegations in the operative complaint as follows: (a) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading; (b) the speaker, date, and medium by which the statement was made; (c) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made; and (d) the facts alleged to show that defendant(s) knew the statement false and/or misleading. The chart should clearly identify which statements or omissions are attributable to which defendants and, for each such defendant, the facts alleged which give rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind at the relevant time. The chart must strictly adhere to the allegations in operative complaint and may not include any new or supplemental information or explanation.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
Securities allegations chart

New securities chart filed with amended complaint may not include misstatements not in prior chart without court leave or Rule 15 stipulation.

If a motion to dismiss is granted with leave to amend, a new chart must be filed with the amended complaint. That new chart may not include alleged misstatements that were not included in the prior chart, absent leave of Court or stipulation by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.

Judge Rita F. LinCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Local Rules, and General Orders, with non-compliance subject to sanctions.

1. Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court’s standing orders. Any failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may be deemed sufficient grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order service
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff/removing defendant must serve standing orders and file certificate of service.

2. Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) shall promptly serve copies of this standing order and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California upon all parties to the action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5. Following service, the responsible party shall file a certificate of service with the Clerk of this Court.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
joint filing, no incorporation by reference

Joint case management statement required; no incorporation by reference.

12. Unless otherwise ordered, the parties must file a joint case management statement addressing those items required by the Standing Order for all Judges of the Northern District of California. Parties must not incorporate prior case management statements by reference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Adr stipulation
Must include
adr deadline proposed, adr process identified

Parties must file ADR Stipulation and Proposed Order form at least 7 days before case management conference.

Consistent with Civil Local Rule 16-8(c) and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Local Rule 3-5(b), at least seven calendar days prior to the case management conference, the parties shall also file the Stipulation and Proposed Order form, which identifies the ADR process that the parties have selected and a proposed deadline by which the parties will conduct the ADR session. The court form is available at: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/3389/ADR_Stip_fillable.pdf.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
due 4 weeks before pretrial conference

Joint Pretrial Statements are due 4 weeks before Pretrial Conference.

Joint Pretrial Statements (including objections, motions in limine, and jury instructions) are due four weeks before Pretrial Conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
last day dispositive motions 8 weeks before pretrial

Last day to hear dispositive motions is at least 8 weeks before pretrial conference.

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions is at least eight weeks before pretrial conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Daubert motion
Must include
filed and heard by dispositive motion deadline

Daubert motions must be filed and heard by dispositive motion deadline.

Daubert motions must be filed and heard by the dispositive motion hearing deadline.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
8 weeks between motions and pretrial

At least 8 weeks must separate dispositive/Daubert motions deadline from final pretrial conference.

The parties must allow at least eight weeks between the proposed dispositive and Daubert motions’ hearing deadline and the proposed final pretrial conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to modify schedule
Must include
joint statement max 3 pages, particularized good cause required

Parties must file joint 3-page statement with particularized good cause to move scheduled dates.

Once the Court has entered a case schedule, the parties may not move the dates except by Court order. If the parties seek to move one of these dates, the parties must file a joint statement of no more than three pages proving particularized good cause for the requested change.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
attorney full authority required

Attorney at case management conference must have full authority to make decisions.

The attorney appearing at a case management conference must have full authority to make decisions about any issue that may come up during the conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint
Must include
exhibit list

Amended complaints must include red-line document showing changes.

All amended complaints shall attach as an exhibit a red-line document showing the changes made to the previously filed complaint.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Motions for summary judgment must comply with Civil Local Rule 7.

Motions for summary judgment must comply with Civil Local Rule 7 in all respects.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Word format by email to TLTPO@cand.courts.gov on the same day as e-filing.

Proposed orders shall be submitted in Word format by email to the Courtroom Deputy at TLTPO@cand.courts.gov on the same day the proposed order is e-filed.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Patent Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this standing order.

Parties and counsel shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Patent Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court’s standing orders.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion brief

Parties must include specific content in motion briefs for patent Section 101 hearings.

To assist the Court in preparing for oral arguments on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgement on the pleadings in a patent case in which a party seeks a ruling that one or more claims of the patent(s)-in-suit is ineligible due to subject matter, each party should include the following in its motion brief:

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint claim construction statement must be truly joint with disputed terms designated and side-by-side constructions.

The initial joint claim construction statement required by Patent Local Rule 4-3 must be truly joint. Disputed terms, phrases, and clauses must be designated as disputed. All other terms will be presumed to be undisputed. For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on the identity of the term. With regards to disputed terms, phrases, or clauses, the joint statement will list each disputed term, phrase, or clause (listed by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side. A model claim construction statement is attached to this Order.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
case number

Patents in dispute must be cited or attached; prosecution history must be available upon request.

In the joint claim construction statement, parties must either cite to the docket where copies of all patents in dispute can be found or attach copies of all patents in dispute. Parties must also make a complete prosecution history for each patent available to the Court upon request.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Court will construe no more than 10 terms; parties must meet and confer to narrow terms if more than 10 are at issue.

The Court will generally construe no more than 10 terms. If multiple terms present identical issues, they may be grouped together or a representative term may be chosen, and each group or representative term may be considered a single term for purposes of the ten-term limit. If more than ten terms are at issue, the parties must meet and confer before the preparation of the joint claim construction statement to narrow the number of terms that are to be construed by the Court and shall jointly propose the ten terms requiring construction.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pre-recorded tutorial
Must include
word count

Pre-recorded tutorial (max 45 min per side) must be submitted 30 days before hearing via portable media; nonargumentative.

At least 30 days before the claim construction hearing, the parties shall, separately or jointly, submit a pre-recorded tutorial of no more than 45 minutes per side that presents a short summary and explanation of the technology at issue (see Patent Local Rule 4-5(a)), via portable media (e.g., flash drive or DVD). Nonargumentative demonstrations and visual aids are encouraged, and the Court generally prefers that someone other than counsel make the presentation. No argument will be permitted.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Demonstrative exhibit
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Demonstrative exhibits must be provided 2 days before claim construction hearing.

All demonstrative exhibits, PowerPoints, and visual aids must be provided to the Court at least 2 days before the hearing.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management status report
Must include
joint filing

Joint case management status report required after claim construction ruling.

Upon issuance of the claim construction ruling, the Court will also set a date for the filing of a further joint case management status report.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management status report

Joint status report must address 7 specific topics after claim construction.

In that report, the parties must address the following topics: a. whether either party wishes the Court to certify the claim construction ruling for immediate appeal to the Federal Circuit; b. the filing of dispositive motions, and the timing of those motions; c. if willful infringement has been asserted, whether the allegedly-infringing party wishes to rely on the advice of counsel defense—if so, the parties should be prepared to address proposals for resolving any attorney-client privilege issues that arise, and whether the parties believe bifurcation of the trial into liability and damages phases would be appropriate; d. anticipated post-claim construction discovery; e. proposed deadlines and court dates for the remainder of the case schedule; f. any other pretrial matters; and g. the progress of settlement discussions, if any.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
stipulation

In-person required for sentencing, change of plea, and evidentiary hearings; Zoom only with good cause and stipulation filed 2 days prior.

Sentencing, change of plea, and any evidentiary hearings shall be in person. Zoom appearances will only be permitted for good cause on a case-by-case bases. If a Zoom appearance is requested, the lawyers and defendant must file a stipulation two days before the scheduled hearing.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
judge name, case number

Plea agreement must be delivered to Clerk's Office by 2:00 p.m. Friday before plea; open plea requires defendant counsel notification by same deadline.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, counsel for the government shall deliver a copy of the plea agreement to the Clerk’s Office in San Francisco by 2:00 p.m. the Friday before the plea is to be entered and email a courtesy copy to TLTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov. If there is to be an open plea, counsel for the defendant shall notify the Court by 2:00 p.m. the Friday before the open plea is to be entered.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Certificate of service
Must include
certificate of service

Responsible party must file a certificate of service after serving the standing order.

Following service, the responsible party shall file a certificate of service with the Clerk of this Court.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation and proposed order

Stipulation and Proposed Order form must identify selected ADR process and proposed ADR deadline.

Consistent with Civil Local Rule 16-8(c) and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Local Rule 3-5(b), at least seven calendar days prior to the case management conference, the parties shall also file the Stipulation and Proposed Order form, which identifies the ADR process that the parties have selected and a proposed deadline by which the parties will conduct the ADR session.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter

Discovery dispute letters must be joint, state dispute nature/status, and be filed after good faith resolution efforts.

If the parties cannot resolve their discovery dispute after a good faith effort, they shall prepare and file a joint letter of no longer than five pages stating the nature and status of their dispute.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this standing order.

The parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing orders.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request
Must include
proposed order

Extension requests must include a proposed order and chart of current/proposed deadlines.

When the parties request an extension of time, the parties must submit a proposed order listing all future deadlines and the proposed extensions. The parties must also submit, alongside any stipulation or administrative motion to change deadlines, a chart that includes the currently scheduled deadlines and the parties’ proposed deadlines.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement

CMC statements must include full litigation schedule with proposed amendment deadline.

In their case management statement for the initial case management conference, the parties must propose a full litigation schedule, including a proposed last day to amend pleadings, regardless of whether they have received a ruling on any motion to dismiss.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
joint letter, proposed order

Discovery disputes require joint letter (max 5 pages) with proposed orders, no exhibits except disputed requests/responses.

Discovery disputes should be brought to the Court's attention as early as possible. If the parties cannot resolve their discovery dispute after a good faith effort, they shall prepare and file a joint letter of no longer than 5 pages stating the nature and status of their dispute. Both sides must submit proposed orders as well. No exhibits may be submitted with the letter other than any discovery request or response that is the subject of the dispute.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders must be in Microsoft Word format and emailed to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

All proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Final briefs must be filed at least 14 days before motion hearing.

The final brief for any motion should be filed at least 14 days prior to the hearing on the motion.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Evidentiary hearing
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits during evidentiary hearings must follow Court’s Standing Order for Civil Trials.

When using exhibits during evidentiary hearings, the parties must prepare and present exhibits in accordance with the Court’s Standing Order for Civil Trials.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Class certification motions must include "Manageability of the Class Action Trial" section.

In any motion for class certification, plaintiffs’ counsel must include a section called “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” in which they explain precisely how the Court should handle any potentially individualized issues to ensure that they don’t render the trial unmanageable.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed verdict form required for class certification motions with subclasses.

In cases that involve subclasses, plaintiffs’ counsel must file a proposed verdict form in connection with the motion for class certification.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice
Must include
plain english

Notices must be in plain English or motion will be rejected.

If the proposed notices are not carefully written and in plain English, the Court will reject the motion for preliminary approval. Unnecessary acronyms should be avoided.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice

Written objection requirement must allow good cause exceptions.

If a proposed notice to class members (or prospective class members) requires a written objection as a prerequisite to appearing in court to object to the settlement, the notice must specify that this requirement may be excused upon a showing of good cause.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for attorneys fees

Attorneys' fees motion must be filed 14 days before objection deadline.

In proposing a schedule for final approval of a class settlement, the parties must ensure that the motion for attorneys’ fees is filed at least 14 days before the deadline for objecting to the settlement.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
dates relating to settlement administration

Final approval order must list all settlement administration dates.

The proposed order granting final approval should list all dates relating to the administration of the settlement, including the dates for when the checks distributing the settlement fund payments will be mailed to class members.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for preliminary approval

Motion must address whether claims filing is required vs automatic checks.

The parties should consider whether theirs is the type of settlement that requires class members to file claims, as opposed to simply receiving checks. The motion for preliminary approval should address this issue.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
contact information

FLSA defendants must produce contact info at Rule 26(f) conference; continuances rarely granted.

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the contact information for potential collective members in FLSA cases must be produced by the defendant at the Rule 26(f) conference. The court will almost never grant requests to continue the initial case management conference in FLSA cases—even if there is a pending motion to dismiss—unless the parties have reached a tolling agreement.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
contact information

Rule 23 wage and hour class actions require early production of class member contact info.

Likewise, in a Rule 23 wage and hour class action brought under California law, absent extraordinary circumstances, the contact information for potential class members must be produced early in the case. At the initial case management conference, the parties should expect to set an early deadline for the production of this information. Typically, the only circumstance in which this production may be delayed is when the schedule calls for cross-motions for summary judgment regarding liability as to the named plaintiffs to be adjudicated prior to class certification, as discussed in the “Class Actions” section of this standing order.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
chambers copy

Plea agreement must be emailed to Bhavna Sharma by noon the business day before plea entry.

If a plea is being entered pursuant to a plea agreement, counsel for the defendant shall email a copy of the plea agreement to Bhavna Sharma at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon the business day before the plea is to be entered.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Format
WORD

Each party must file exhibit list in Word format 7 days before pretrial conference.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, each party must file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of exhibits.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Parties must follow Court's instructions for trial exhibit preparation.

When using exhibits during evidentiary hearings, the parties must abide by the Court’s instructions regarding preparation of exhibits for trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury questionnaire

File proposed jury questions 21 days before pretrial conference; max 9 questions plus scheduling conflict question.

In advance of the trial, the Jury Office will send prospective jurors an online questionnaire. The questionnaire includes standard questions that are asked in every case, as well as a maximum of ten supplemental questions specific to a given case. One of those questions will ask about scheduling conflicts, so the parties can propose as many as nine other questions. At least 21 days before the pretrial conference, the parties shall file the proposed questions on the docket and submit a Word version to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The parties may agree on proposed questions or submit competing lists. However, no argument may be included in this submission. The Court will decide the final set of questions after giving the parties a chance to object.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Format
WORD

Parties must file witness lists in Word format 7 days before pretrial conference.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, lists of potential witnesses to be called at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury questionnaire objections

File objections to standard questionnaire 21 days before pretrial conference.

Also no later than 21 days before the pretrial conference, the parties should submit objections to any aspect of the standard questionnaire.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
joint filing

Joint pretrial statement due 14 days before pretrial conference.

No later than 14 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must file a joint pretrial statement that addresses the items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint filing

Joint proposed jury instructions due 7 days before pretrial conference; send Word copy to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

The parties should file joint proposed jury instructions, and send a copy in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, no later than 7 days before the pretrial conference.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Case description
Must include
joint filing

Joint proposed case description due 7 days before pretrial conference; send Word copy to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties should jointly file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a proposed description of the case.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict form
Must include
joint filing
Format
WORD

Parties must jointly file proposed verdict forms in Word format 7 days before pretrial conference.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must jointly file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, either an agreed-upon proposed verdict form or competing proposed verdict forms.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Involved individual list
Must include
joint filing
Format
WORD

Parties must jointly file involved individual list in Word format 7 days before pretrial conference.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must jointly file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of people involved in the case.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
judge s copy, official copy
Format
PDF

Each side must deposit trial exhibits (binders and thumb drive) 5 days before trial.

No later than 5 days before trial, each side shall deposit one binder or set of binders (judge’s copy) and one thumb drive (official copy) with the Courtroom Deputy.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Exhibits must be marked as "Trial Exhibit No. _____" not as "Government's Exhibit" or "Defendant's Exhibit."

To avoid any party claiming "ownership" of an exhibit, all exhibits shall be marked and referred to as "Trial Exhibit No. _____," not as "Government's Exhibit" or "Defendant's Exhibit."

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Exhibit tags: fill in exhibit and case numbers, leave "Date Entered" and "By" blank.

Counsel should fill in the exhibit and case numbers, but leave the other spaces ("Date Entered" and "By") blank.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Counsel must announce exhibit numbers when used, even if already admitted.

Counsel must clearly announce the number of any exhibit used during the proceedings, even if it has already been admitted.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Exhibit notebooks for jury require prior permission from Judge Chhabria.

Exhibit notebooks for the jury will not be permitted without prior permission from Judge Chhabria.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Court order
Must include
equipment order

Court order required for equipment; request from Bhavna Sharma within 10 days.

The United States Marshal requires a court order to allow equipment into the courthouse. To request such an order, the parties should contact Bhavna Sharma no later than 10 days before trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Each party must retain exhibits through appeal and arrange with Clerk to file record on appeal.

Each party shall retain a full set of exhibits after trial through the appellate process. It is each party's responsibility to make arrangements with the Clerk of the Court to file the record on appeal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
interpreter request

Interpreter requests must be made to Bhavna Sharma at least 30 days before trial.

If any witness will require an interpreter at trial, counsel shall notify Bhavna Sharma at least 30 days before the commencement of trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
equipment provision

Parties must provide their own equipment and share when possible.

The parties must provide such equipment. Counsel should share equipment to the maximum extent possible.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Equipment setup
Must include
setup testing

Electronic equipment setup/testing must be arranged with Bhavna Sharma within 10 days.

For electronic equipment, the parties should arrange with Bhavna Sharma no later than 10 days before trial a date to set up and test the equipment in advance of trial and be prepared to maintain the equipment during trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury selection
Must include
excusal request timing

Parties must submit excusal requests 1-2 days before excusal hearing.

One to two days before the excusal hearing, the

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
daily notification

Counsel must notify opposing side of witnesses for next two trial days each evening.

Each evening, counsel must notify the other side of the witnesses who will be called the following two trial days.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Transcript arrangement
Must include
arrangement confirmed

Daily transcript or real-time reporting must be arranged

Arrangement of daily transcript or real-time reporting

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit equipment order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required for exhibit presentation equipment

Filing of proposed order for bringing exhibit presentation equipment and technology into the building

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition designations
Must include
joint filing

Joint filing required for deposition testimony designations

Joint filing of all designations of deposition testimony

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
thumb drive, original set

Original trial exhibits and thumb drive must be delivered

Deliver original trial exhibit set and thumb drive of exhibits

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Supplemental juror questionnaire
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Supplemental juror questionnaire questions must be filed on docket and emailed as Word doc

The parties shall file these questions on the docket and submit a Word version to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
joint filing

Joint proposed jury instructions must be filed in proposed order

The parties shall file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Modifications to form instructions must be plainly identified

Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Disputed instructions must be identified with specific format

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as 'Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,' with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

One-page explanation required for each disputed instruction

Following each set of proposed versions of a disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the Court should give that party's proposed instruction.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Disputed instruction language must be provided with specific format

If the parties dispute whether a particular instruction should be given at all, the proponent of the instruction shall provide proposed language, identified as 'Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,' with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

One-page explanation required for disputed instruction inclusion

Following the disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the instruction should or should not be given.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Disputes requiring resolution before opening must be raised when filing instructions and at pretrial conference

If either party believes that a dispute about jury instructions must be resolved before opening statements, it must be raised when the proposed jury instructions are filed and at the pretrial conference.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement

Joint Pretrial Conference Statement must include claims/defenses and relief sought

The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement that contains the following: a. a brief description of all claims and defenses that remain to be decided (including whether any issues are for the Court to decide rather than the jury); b. a statement of all relief sought;

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial filing

Specific pretrial documents must be emailed in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov when filed.

In addition, the proposed supplemental jury questions, Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, jury instructions, involved individuals list, and verdict form(s) shall be submitted in Word format via e-mail to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov when they are filed.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit
Must include
physical copy, electronic copy

Trial exhibits must be deposited 5 days before trial: one binder set for judge and one thumb drive for official copy.

No later than 5 days before trial, the parties shall deposit one binder or set of binders (judge’s copy) and one thumb drive (official copy) with the Courtroom Deputy.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Audio video exhibit
Must include
agreed upon transcript

Audio/video exhibits require agreed-upon transcripts; failure to provide precludes admission.

The parties must provide agreed-upon written transcripts of the content of any audio or video exhibit to be used at trial. Failure to provide an agreed-upon transcript by the day an exhibit is offered will preclude the exhibit’s admission.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition designations
Must include
jointly file with other parties, include counter designations and objections

Parties must jointly file deposition/designation designations and objections 7 days before trial unless otherwise ordered.

Unless otherwise ordered, no later than 7 days before trial begins, the parties shall jointly file all designations of deposition testimony or other discovery it wishes to offer, as well as any counter-designations or objections to the deposition testimony or discovery offered by any other party.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Court reporter list
Must include
jointly created, include names places terms acronyms

Parties must provide jointly-created list of names/places/terms to Court Reporter 5 days before trial.

No later than five days before the start of trial, the parties must provide the Court Reporter a jointly-created list of names and places as well as any uncommon terms or acronyms that are likely to come up during the trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial filing
Must include
proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for bench trials.

In non-jury cases, all pretrial filings are due 7 days before the pretrial conference. They must include trial briefs not to exceed 10 pages each, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings must be brief, in plain English, and free of pejorative language.

Proposed findings shall be brief, written in plain English, and free of pejorative language.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
email submission
Format
DOCX

Proposed findings must be emailed to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov in Word format.

In addition to being filed, the proposed findings must be emailed to the Court (vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov) in Word format.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
thumb drive submission

Parties must submit thumb drive of admitted exhibits to chambers within 7 days of admissibility ruling.

Within 7 days of the Court ruling on the admissibility of exhibits used at trial, the parties will be required to submit a thumb drive of all exhibits admitted into evidence to chambers, attention Bhavna Sharma, Judge Chhabria's Courtroom Deputy.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Civil Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this standing order.

The parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing orders.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Extension request
Must include
proposed order

Extension requests must include proposed order and chart of current/proposed deadlines.

When the parties request an extension of time, the parties must submit a proposed order listing all future deadlines and the proposed extensions. The parties must also submit, alongside any stipulation or administrative motion to change deadlines, a chart that includes the currently scheduled deadlines and the parties' proposed deadlines.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders not needed for most substantive motions; required for administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and factual findings.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or preliminary injunction motions. The parties should submit proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and rulings that call upon the court to make factual findings (such as a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys’ fees). All proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Final briefs must be filed at least 14 days before the hearing.

The final brief for any motion should be filed at least 14 days prior to the hearing on the motion.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Class certification motions must include “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” section.

In any motion for class certification, plaintiffs’ counsel must include a section called “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” in which they explain precisely how the Court should handle any potentially individualized issues to ensure that they don’t render the trial unmanageable.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed verdict form required for class certification motions with individualized issues.

In cases that involve individualized issues, plaintiffs’ counsel must file a proposed verdict form in connection with the motion for class certification.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Modifications to form jury instructions must be plainly identified.

Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement

Initial case management statements must include a full litigation schedule with last day to amend pleadings, except class actions may propose a schedule through the first phase.

In their case management statement for the initial case management conference, the parties must propose a full litigation schedule, including a proposed last day to amend pleadings, regardless of whether they have received a ruling on any motion to dismiss. The only exception is proposed class actions, in which case the parties can propose a schedule through the first phase of the case, as discussed in the class action section of this standing order.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint discovery letter
Must include
proposed order

Both parties must submit proposed orders with their joint discovery dispute letter.

Both sides must submit proposed orders as well.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint discovery letter

Only the discovery request or response that is the subject of the dispute may be submitted as an exhibit with a joint discovery dispute letter.

No exhibits may be submitted with the letter other than any discovery request or response that is the subject of the letter.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation or motion

Parties must indicate at the beginning of a stipulation or motion for a protective order or ESI order whether the proposed order is based on a Northern District model order.

When filing a proposed order, at the very beginning of their stipulation or motion, parties must indicate whether they have based their proposed order on one of the Northern District’s model orders.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Parties must submit a redline comparison of their proposed order and the model order as an exhibit if the proposed order is based on a Northern District model order.

If they have, they must identify any deviations from the model order by submitting as an exhibit a redline comparison of their proposed order and the model order.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Class certification brief

Class certification motion briefs must include a section titled “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” discussing individualized issues and jury instructions to address manageability concerns.

In any motion for class certification, plaintiffs’ counsel must include a section called “Manageability of the Class Action Trial” in which they explain precisely how the Court should handle any potentially individualized issues to ensure that they don’t render the trial unmanageable. This section should generally include a discussion of jury instructions, especially jurisdictions.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary settlement approval motion

Motions for preliminary approval of class settlements must explain why the settlement survives rigorous scrutiny equivalent to final approval, and the proposed order must recite this standard.

The Court’s scrutiny of the proposed settlement will be as rigorous at the preliminary approval stage as at the final approval stage. Any motion for preliminary approval should explain why the settlement survives this level of scrutiny, and any proposed order should recite this standard.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement administrator declaration

Settlement administrators must submit a declaration with the preliminary approval motion detailing any compensation beyond the fee stated in the preliminary approval papers.

The proposed settlement administrator must submit a declaration in support of the motion for preliminary approval that describes (a) any money or thing of value the administrator will receive in connection with the settlement beyond the fee described in the preliminary approval papers, including interest or float on settlement deposits,

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Declaration

Proposed class counsel's declaration must describe due diligence on the proposed administrator, conflict of interest disclosures, and the basis for concluding the administration arrangements serve the settlement class's best interests.

Proposed class counsel’s declaration shall describe what due diligence counsel performed regarding the proposed administrator’s approach to each of the above issues, any potential conflict of interest or potential appearance of conflict of interest for counsel in the selection of the administrator (including any financial relationship), and the basis for counsel’s conclusion that the proposed administration arrangements serve the best interests of the settlement class.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed notice

Proposed notices requiring written objection as a prerequisite to court appearance must state that good cause can excuse this requirement.

If a proposed notice to class members (or prospective class members) requires a written objection as a prerequisite to appearing in court to object to the settlement, the notice must specify that this requirement may be excused upon a showing of good cause.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders granting final approval of class settlements must list all settlement administration dates, including check mailing dates.

The proposed order granting final approval should list all dates relating to the administration of the settlement, including the dates for when the checks distributing the settlement fund payments will be mailed to class members.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders granting final approval of class settlements must specify the percentage of attorneys' fees to be withheld pending Post-Distribution Accounting.

The proposed order granting final approval should specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders granting final approval of class settlements must include language describing the required content of the Post-Distribution Accounting.

The proposed order granting final approval should also include language describing the Post-Distribution Accounting that class counsel will file, including, as relevant, when payments were made to class members, the number of members who were sent payments, the total amount of money paid out to members, the average and median recovery per class member, the largest and smallest amount paid to class members, the number and value of cashed and uncashed checks, the number of members who could not be contacted, the number of objections and opt-outs, the amount to be distributed to each cy pres recipient, any significant or recurring concerns communicated by members to the settlement administrator and counsel since final approval, any other issues in settlement administration since final approval, and how any concerns or issues were resolved.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement agreement

Proposed class action settlements involving monetary distribution should include a provision for redistributing unclaimed funds to class members who claimed their share, or include an explanation for the absence of such provision.

In a proposed settlement involving the distribution of money to a class, the parties should consider whether unclaimed funds should be redistributed to class members who claimed their share. If a provision of this type is absent, the parties should be prepared to explain why.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Motions for preliminary approval of class settlements must address whether the settlement requires class members to file claims or simply receive funds.

The parties should consider whether theirs is the type of settlement that requires class members to file claims, as opposed to simply receiving funds. The motion for preliminary approval should address this issue.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting

Post-Distribution Accounting must describe class member redemption details and progress on non-monetary relief.

Post-Distribution Accounting should also describe the number of class members availing themselves of such relief and the aggregate value redeemed by the class members and/or by an assignees or transferees of the class members’ interests. Where class members are entitled to injunctive and/or other non-monetary relief, the Post-Distribution Accounting should discuss the progress made on fulfilling the terms of that relief.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

Class counsel must submit a proposed order releasing remaining fees with Post-Distribution Accounting.

With the Post-Distribution Accounting, class counsel should submit a proposed order releasing the remainder of the fees.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for settlement approval

In wage and hour cases, parties must file a motion for settlement approval with an explanation of the settlement's fairness, reasonableness, and bona fide dispute resolution instead of a notice of voluntary dismissal.

not simply file a notice of voluntary dismissal. The parties must file a motion for settlement approval explaining why the proposed settlement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute. See Alder v. County of Yolo, No. 16-1682-VC, Dkt. No. 25 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2017).

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to dismiss

Defendants filing a motion to dismiss a Monell claim must be prepared to explain why the claim should not be stayed.

If a defendant chooses instead to file a motion to dismiss a Monell claim, the defendant should be prepared to explain why the claim should not be stayed instead.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire

No argument may be included in the proposed supplemental juror questionnaire submission.

However, no argument may be included in this submission.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Parties must file a joint set of proposed jury instructions arranged in the order they propose the court to give them.

The parties shall file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Modifications to Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions must be plainly identified.

Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must be identified with the specified format, and all versions of the same instruction must bear the same number.

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party’s proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as “Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. All proposed versions of the same instruction shall bear the same number.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Parties need not submit jury instructions from Ninth Circuit Manual Chapters 1-3 but must indicate which of those instructions should be included.

The parties do not need to submit instructions from Chapters 1-3 of the Ninth Circuit Manual, but they must indicate which of these instructions should be included.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Parties must raise jury instruction disputes to be resolved before opening statements when filing proposed instructions and at the pretrial conference.

If either party believes that a dispute about jury instructions must be resolved before opening statements, it must be raised when the proposed jury instructions are filed and at the pretrial conference.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement

Joint pretrial conference statement must contain a description of remaining claims and defenses, and a statement of all relief sought.

The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement that contains the following: a. a brief description of all claims and defenses that remain to be decided (including whether any issues are for the Court to decide rather than the jury); b. a statement of all relief sought;

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine reply

Reply briefs are not permitted for motions in limine.

The moving party shall not file a reply brief.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must be titled with the format “___________\u2019s Motion in Limine No. __ Re: ____________.”

Each motion should be clearly identified as “___________\u2019s Motion in Limine No. __ Re: ____________.”

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Request for relief motion in limine limit

Requests for relief from the five-motion limit must list the topics of each motion in limine each side intends to file.

That request for relief must list the topics of each motion in limine each side wishes to file.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Involved individuals list

The Involved Individuals List must be jointly filed by the parties.

The parties shall jointly file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, a list of people involved in the case.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict form

Parties must file either a joint proposed verdict form or separate ones if they disagree.

The parties shall file either a joint proposed verdict form, or, if they disagree, separate proposed verdict forms.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Statement of the case

The proposed Statement of the Case must be jointly filed by the parties.

The parties shall jointly file a proposed simplified Statement of the Case to be read to the jury during voir dire.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint exhibit list

Joint exhibit lists must be in tabular form with six specified columns.

The parties shall file a joint exhibit list in tabular form with the following columns: (1) exhibit number; (2) name or brief description of the exhibit; (3) the exhibit’s purpose and sponsoring witness; (4) a brief description of any objections to the admissibility of the exhibit or, alternatively, a statement that the parties have stipulated to the exhibit’s admissibility; (5) a brief response to any objections; and (6) a blank column for the Court’s use.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit

Parties must jointly prepare a single set of all trial exhibits for the official record and appeal.

The parties must jointly prepare a single set of all trial exhibits that will be the official record and, if applicable, used on appeal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit

Counsel must announce exhibit numbers when used during proceedings, even if already admitted.

Counsel must clearly announce the number of any exhibit used during the proceedings, even if it has already been admitted.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Audio video exhibit

Parties must provide agreed-upon written transcripts for audio/video exhibits or risk exclusion.

The parties must provide agreed-upon written transcripts of the content of any audio or video exhibit to be used at trial. Failure to provide an agreed-upon transcript by the day an exhibit is offered will preclude the exhibit’s admission.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits

Parties must follow the Court's instructions for exhibit preparation during evidentiary hearings.

When using exhibits during evidentiary hearings, the parties must abide by the Court's instructions regarding preparation of exhibits for trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury questions

No argument may be included in the jury questionnaire question submission.

However, no argument may be included in this submission.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must include relevant authority citation.

The parties should always indicate the relevant authority for a proposed instruction.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Stipulated jury instructions must use specific numbering format.

Instructions on which the parties agree must be identified as "Stipulated Jury Instruction No. Re ," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must use specific numbering format identifying offering party.

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as "Disputed Instruction No. Re Offered by ," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Parties must explain why court should give their proposed disputed instruction.

Following each set of why the Court should give that party's proposed instruction.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Parties must indicate which Chapters 1-3 Ninth Circuit instructions to include or omit.

The parties do not need to submit instructions from Chapters 1-3 of the Ninth Circuit Manual, but they must indicate which of these instructions should be included and which should be omitted.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list

Witness lists must include potential trial witnesses, excluding those solely for impeachment or rebuttal.

No later than 7 days before the pretrial conference, the parties must file, and send in Word format to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov, lists of potential witnesses to be called at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit

Each side must prepare a set of trial exhibits for witness use at trial and appeal.

Each side must prepare a set of its own trial exhibits to be used with the witnesses at trial and, if applicable, on appeal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Word format to specific email, except for most motions under Civil L.R. 7-2.

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redline comparison

Amended pleadings must include a redline comparison to the previous version.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
certificate of conference

Stipulated protective orders require confirmation of no changes or redline with explanation.

When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn't differ in any respect from the model order, or (ii) a redline comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, along with an explanation of any changes.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Hearing
Must include
certificate of appearance

Parties must arrive 10 minutes early to state appearances to Courtroom Deputy.

Litigants and lawyers shall arrive at least ten minutes before their in-person or virtual hearing or conference to state their appearances to Judge Krishnan's Courtroom Deputy, Kim Means.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Word format to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov, except for Civil L.R. 7-2 motions (except injunctive relief).

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redline comparison

Amended pleadings must include a redline comparison to the previous version.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Microsoft Word format to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov; not required for Civil L.R. 7-2 motions except those seeking injunctive relief.

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include a redline attachment comparing against the previous version.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial filing packet
Must include
proposed order

Parties must file a Proposed Final Pretrial Order, joint jury instructions, trial briefs, proposed verdict forms, and exhibit objections at least 7 days before the Final Pretrial Conference.

At least seven days prior to the date of the Final Pretrial Conference the parties shall do the following: 1. In lieu of preparing a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, the parties shall meet and confer, and then prepare and file a jointly signed Proposed Final Pretrial Order that contains: ... 2. File a joint set of proposed instructions on substantive issues of law arranged in a logical sequence. ... 3. File trial briefs not to exceed ten (10) pages that shall address controlling issues of law and any other issues that may arise during trial. 4. File proposed verdict forms, joint or separate. 5. File and serve any objections to exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

One official set of record exhibits must be provided to the Court seven days before the Pretrial Conference, with label dividers and spine labels.

The parties shall provide the Court with one official set of the record exhibits seven days before the Pretrial Conference. Each exhibit must be separated with a label divider identifying the exhibit number. Spine labels should indicate the numbers of the exhibits that are in the binders.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
proposed order

Jury instruction requests must be renewed at the charging conference or they are waived; omitted instructions must be affirmatively re-requested.

Any instruction request must be renewed specifically at the conference or it will be deemed waived, whether or not it was requested prior to trial. If, however, a party still wishes to request an omitted instruction after reviewing the Court's draft, then it must affirmatively re-request it at the charging conference in order to give the Court a fair opportunity to correct any error. Otherwise, as stated, the request will be deemed abandoned or waived.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Certificate of service
Must include
certificate of service

Parties must file a certificate of service with the Clerk after serving the Standing Order.

file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement

Joint statement for discovery disputes must include all unresolved issues and each party's final proposed compromise.

they must file a joint statement of at most 5 single-spaced pages (12-point font or greater) with 2.5 pages allotted per side that: (1) describes each unresolved issue; and (2) states each party’s final proposed compromise with respect to each unresolved issue.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders are not required for Civil L.R. 7-2 motions except those seeking injunctive relief.

Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Certificate of service
Must include
certificate of service

File a certificate of service with the Clerk reflecting service of this Standing Order per Civil L.R. 5-5.

(b) to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include a redline comparison against the prior pleading as an attachment.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement

Joint statements for unresolved discovery disputes must describe each unresolved issue and each party’s final proposed compromise.

they must file a joint statement of at most 5 single-spaced pages (12-point font or greater) with 2.5 pages allotted per side that: (1) describes each unresolved issue; and (2) states each party’s final proposed compromise with respect to

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

Parties must use model protective orders when practicable for necessary protective orders.

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they shall when practicable use one of the model protective orders, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/rules-forms-fees/northern-district-guidelines/model-protective-orders.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Stipulated protective order proposed orders must be accompanied by either a conformity statement or a redline with explanation of changes.

When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn’t differ in any respect from the model order, or (ii) a redline comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, along with an explanation of any changes.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege and work product claims must be detailed and informative, not generalized.

Claims of privilege or work product protection must be sufficiently detailed and informative to justify the privilege or protection claimed; generalized claims of privilege or work product protection are not permitted.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must be promptly provided and updated periodically as documents are reviewed for production.

Privilege logs shall be promptly provided, and updated periodically, as documents are reviewed for production.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint Case Management Statement must comply with Civil Local Rule 16-9 and the Northern District’s “Contents of Joint Case Management Statement” standing order.

No later than seven days before the initial case management conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with Civil Local Rule 16-9 and the Northern District of California’s standing order entitled “Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.”

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Microsoft Word format to a specific email address.

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must file a Joint Case Management Statement at least seven days before the initial case management conference, and updated statements seven days before each further conference.

No later than seven days before the initial case management conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with Civil Local Rule 16-9 and the Northern District of California’s standing order entitled “Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.” For further case management conferences, the parties shall file an updated joint statement seven days before the scheduled conference.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed as Word documents to agtpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day as e-filing.

Any stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to e-filing should, in addition to being e-filed, be submitted by email to agtpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a Word document on the same day the document is e-filed. This email address should be used only for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
joint statement

Joint case management statement required 7 days before conference

Prior to an initial or further case management conference, counsel must meet and confer and then, no later than seven days before the conference, file a joint statement, or file separate statements if permitted by Civil Local Rule 16-9.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
redlined version

Redlined version required with amended pleadings

Any party who files an amended pleading must concurrently file a redlined version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
separate filing, sequential numbering

Exhibits must be filed separately on ECF with sequential numbering

When exhibits are included with a motion, opposition brief, or reply brief, the exhibits should be filed separately on ECF. For example, if a motion is Docket No. 30, and a declaration with 10 exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A should be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B should be filed as Docket No. 31-2, and so on.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
evidence preservation

Parties must preserve relevant evidence and suspend document destruction

Parties must take the steps needed to preserve information relevant to the issues in the litigation, including suspending document-destruction programs that, if not suspended, could result in evidence spoliation.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery joint statement
Must include
definitions, disputed requests, disputed responses

Joint statements must include disputed discovery requests, responses, and definitions

Relevant declarations and exhibits may be attached to the joint statement. If specific discovery requests, i.e., interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admission, are in dispute, the parties must attach the following to their joint statement: a copy of the disputed requests, a copy of the disputed responses, and a copy of the definitions of any defined terms used in the disputed requests.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery joint statement
Must include
ecf filing

Discovery joint statements must be e-filed under specific ECF category

Joint statements must be e-filed (unless the case is exempt from e-filing requirements) under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief."

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
model order

Use model protective orders when practicable for protective order requests

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they must when practicable use one of the model protective orders, available at www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/model-protective-orders.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulated protective order
Must include
model order comparison

Stipulated protective orders require confirmation or redline vs model order

When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn't differ in any respect from the model order, or (ii) a redline comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, along with an explanation of any changes.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must be promptly provided and sufficiently detailed.

Privilege logs must be promptly provided and sufficiently detailed and informative to justify the privilege. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5).

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must include specific document information and privilege basis.

Privilege logs must contain the following: • the title and description of the document, including the number of pages or Bates- number range; • the subject matter addressed in the document; • the identity and position of its author; • the identity and position of all addressees and recipients; • the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date on which it was sent to or shared with persons other than its author; and • the basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition notice

Depositions of fact witnesses must be noticed at least 30 days before close of fact discovery.

Depositions of fact witnesses must be noticed at least 30 days before the close of fact discovery.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition notice

Counsel must consult with opposing counsel to schedule depositions.

Counsel must consult in advance with opposing counsel to schedule depositions at a mutually convenient time and location.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition

Speaking objections are prohibited during depositions.

Speaking objections are prohibited.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition

Witness must answer questions about privilege existence/extent/waiver unless privileged.

When privilege is claimed, the witness must answer questions relevant to the existence, extent, or waiver of the privilege unless such information is itself privileged.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Dispositive motion

When filing a dispositive motion, the moving party must file its consent or declination at the same time.

If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to dismiss or a motion to remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination simultaneously with the motion.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Consent declination form

Consent or declination filings must meet the Civil Local Rule 73-1 deadline.

In no event shall the consent or declination be filed later than the deadlines specified in Civil Local Rule 73-1.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation or proposed order

Stipulations and proposed orders in e-filed cases should also be emailed to chambers the same day they are e-filed.

Any stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to e-filing should, in addition to being e-filed, be submitted by email to agtpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a Word document on the same day the document is e-filed.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement

Before initial or further case management conferences, counsel must meet and confer and file a joint (or permitted separate) statement at least seven days in advance.

Prior to an initial or further case management conference, counsel must meet and confer and then, no later than seven days before the conference, file a joint statement, or file separate statements if permitted by Civil Local Rule 16-9.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

A party filing an amended pleading must concurrently file a redline against the prior operative pleading.

Any party who files an amended pleading must concurrently file a redlined version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
certificate of conference

Discovery joint statements must include meet-and-confer attestation, each party’s position with factual and legal support, and each party’s final compromise proposal.

1. an attestation that counsel for the parties met and conferred in person or by videoconference in good faith to resolve their dispute before filing the joint statement; 2. each party’s position, including pertinent factual background, requested relief, and citations to relevant legal authority; and 3. each party’s final proposed compromise.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement

When specific discovery requests are disputed, the joint statement must attach the disputed requests, disputed responses, and definitions of defined terms.

If specific discovery requests, i.e., interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admission, are in dispute, the parties must attach the following to their joint statement: a copy of the disputed requests, a copy of the disputed responses, and a copy of the definitions of any defined terms used in the disputed requests.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement

Discovery joint statements must be e-filed under the specified Civil Events ECF category, unless exempt from e-filing.

Joint statements must be e-filed (unless the case is exempt from e-filing requirements) under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.”

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order

When practicable, parties seeking a protective order must use one of the court’s model protective orders.

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they must when practicable use one of the model protective orders, available at www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/model-protective- orders.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

A stipulated protective order submission must include either a no-differences statement or a redline plus explanation of changes versus the model order.

When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn’t differ in any respect from the model order, or (ii) a redline comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, along with an explanation of any changes.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must be provided promptly and include enough detail to justify privilege claims.

Privilege logs must be promptly provided and sufficiently detailed and informative to justify the privilege. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5).

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs must include specified identifying, distribution, date, subject, and privilege-basis details.

Privilege logs must contain the following: • the title and description of the document, including the number of pages or Bates- number range; • the subject matter addressed in the document; • the identity and position of its author; • the identity and position of all addressees and recipients; • the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date on which it was sent to or shared with persons other than its author; and • the basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Settlement conference statements must be emailed as PDF to specific address at least 7 days before conference.

Each party shall prepare a settlement conference statement, which must be emailed to the Court in .pdf format, at agtsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov, no later than seven days prior to the conference. Paper copies should not be provided.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement conference statements must be served on opposing counsel; confidential statements may be sent directly to court.

Settlement conference statements must be served on opposing counsel. Any party may email an additional confidential statement to the Court, the contents of which will not be disclosed to the other parties.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Confidential statement

Defendants must notify court in confidential statement if unable to offer monetary compensation at least 7 days before conference.

If a defendant plans to assert that it lacks resources and is unable to offer monetary compensation or that it otherwise does not intend to offer monetary compensation as part of a settlement, it must notify the Court of this in a confidential statement no later than seven days prior to the conference.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement conference statements must include specific content: facts, claims, evaluation, proceedings summary, relief sought, settlement position, and history.

The settlement conference statement shall include at least the following:  a brief statement of the facts of the case;  a brief statement of the claims and defenses;  a candid evaluation of the party’s likelihood of prevailing;  a summary of the proceedings to date and any pending motions;  the relief sought;  any discrete issue that, if resolved, would facilitate resolution of the case; and  the party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseCRITICAL
Applies to
Consent form
Must include
case number, signature blocks

Consent/Declination form must be filed within 2 weeks of receipt in cases assigned to Judge Spero

In cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Spero for all purposes, a Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form will be mailed to all parties. The parties are requested, within two weeks from receipt of the form, to complete and file the form indicating their consent or request for reassignment to a District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. SperoCRITICAL
Applies to
Preservation letter
Must include
certificate of service

Parties must immediately preserve all evidence including electronic records upon notice of this order

As soon as a party has notice of this order, the party shall take such affirmative steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action, including, without limitation, interdiction of any document destruction programs and any ongoing erasures of emails, voice mails, and other electronically recorded material to the extent necessary to preserve information relevant to the issues presented by this action.

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. SperoCRITICAL
Applies to
Consent to magistrate
Must include
case number, signature blocks

Consent/declination to magistrate judge assignment required promptly, no later than L.R. 73-1(a) deadlines.

In civil cases randomly assigned to Judge Westmore for all purposes, the parties should file their written consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes or their written declination of consent as soon as possible, and in no event later than the deadlines specified in Civil L.R. 73-1(a).

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to amend
Must include
redline comparison

Motions to amend pleading require redline comparison attachment showing changes.

(e) If a party files a motion for leave to amend a pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparison of the proposed amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders and approved stipulations must be emailed in Word format to kawpo@cand.uscourts.gov on filing day.

Proposed orders filed by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Word format (.doc or .docx) via e-mail to kawpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day the document is e-filed. This requirement also applies to stipulations that require court approval, which must include a proposed order on the face of the stipulation. This e-mail address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint letter
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Joint letter must be e-filed under specific Civil Events category, not under "Letter" event.

The joint letter must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings>Motions--General>Discovery Letter Brief." Do not file under the "Letter" event, because the filing will not be designated as an open motion that requires court resolution.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition memorandum
Must include
opposition memorandum

Failure to file opposition memo constitutes consent to granting motion.

The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
lodging

Settlement Conference Statement and Confidential Letter must be lodged via mail/hand delivery 14 days before conference.

Each party shall prepare a Settlement Conference Statement and may prepare an optional, Confidential Settlement Letter, which must be LODGED via mail or hand delivery with the undersigned’s chambers (NOT electronically filed), and must be received no later than 14 calendar days prior to the conference.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
email submission

Settlement Conference Statement and Confidential Letter must be emailed in PDF format.

Each party shall also email their Settlement Conference Statement and Confidential Settlement Letter, if applicable, in .pdf format to KAWsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
lodging

Failure to lodge Settlement Conference Statement may result in conference being vacated.

Failure to timely lodge a settlement conference statement may result in your settlement conference being vacated.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
current demand, current response

Current demand and response required before settlement conference.

There must be a current demand and response made before the settlement conference, and those must be included in the settlement conference statements.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Updated settlement conference statement
Must include
updated settlement positions, no repetition of previous information

Updated settlement statements due 14 days before further conferences.

Unless explicitly relieved of this requirement, the parties shall lodge updated settlement conferences statements 14 days prior to the further settlement conference to inform the Court of the status of the action and any developments that have occurred since the last settlement conference, including updated settlement positions. The updated statement shall not repeat information previously provided in the original submissions.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement
Must include
immediate filing

Immediate notice of settlement required if case settles before conference.

If the case settles prior to the settlement conference, the parties shall immediately file a notice of settlement, and notify chambers by e-mailing both KAWcrd@cand.uscourts.gov and KAWsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov that the case has settled.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders in criminal cases must be sent to Courtroom Deputy, not civil proposed orders email.

Proposed orders shall be sent to Judge Westmore’s Courtroom Deputy at kawcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall not send proposed orders in criminal matters to the proposed orders e-mail address, which is reserved for civil matters.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
lodged with chambers

Settlement Conference Statement and Confidential Letter must be lodged via mail/hand delivery (not ECF) 10 days before conference (14 days if 4+ parties)

Each party shall prepare a Settlement Conference Statement and may prepare an optional, Confidential Settlement Letter, which must be LODGED via mail or hand delivery with the undersigned's chambers (NOT electronically filed), and must be received no later than 10 calendar days prior to the conference (or 14 days prior if there are four or more separately represented parties).

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Settlement Conference Statement must include specific sections on substance of suit and relief sought

The Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following: a. Substance of the Suit. Describe briefly the substance of the suit, including the following: i. A brief statement of the facts of the case. ii. The claims and defenses, including the statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded. iii. A summary of the proceedings to date, including a list of the motions previously made, the dispositions, and any pending motions. iv. A statement of facts not reasonably in dispute. v. A list of the key facts in dispute and the specific evidence relevant to a determination of those facts. vi. Any discrete issue that, if resolved, would facilitate the resolution of the case. vii. A brief statement of issues of law with respect to liability and damages. The statement must include citations to statutes and cases, but extended legal argument is not necessary. b. Relief Sought. A statement of the relief sought, including an itemization of damages and any non-monetary relief sought.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
personal attendance

Personal attendance at settlement conference is mandatory, excused only for extraordinary hardship with written authorization

Personal attendance of a party is mandatory and will rarely be excused by the Court, and then only upon a written request that is timely under the circumstances and that demonstrates extraordinary hardship. Personal attendance may be excused only upon written authorization from the Court.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement statement

Exhibits must include deposition citations and relevant transcript pages; video must be streamable without registration.

The parties are encouraged to provide the Court with deposition testimony, video footage, and other evidence referred to in the statements that are subject to dispute or believed to be dispositive. In the interest of judicial economy, the parties shall provide citations to the deposition testimony in their statements, and attach only the relevant pages of the transcript. Video must be available for streaming on the cloud without registration or download, and the submitting party shall provide time stamps for the portions they wish the Court to view, along with a short explanation of what the video (or video clip) shows.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Updated settlement statement

Updated settlement statements must be lodged 10 days prior to further settlement conferences.

Unless explicitly relieved of this requirement, the parties shall lodge updated settlement conferences statements 10 days prior to the further settlement conference, in accordance with Sections 6 and 7, to inform the Court of the status of the action and any developments that have occurred since the last settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Updated settlement statement

Updated statements and confidential letters must be emailed in .pdf format to KAWsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov.

In addition to lodging hardcopies, the parties shall email their updated statements and confidential letters, if applicable, in .pdf format to KAWsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement

If case settles before conference, file notice of settlement and notify Judge Westmore’s Courtroom Deputy at (510) 637-3525.

If the case settles prior to the settlement conference, the parties shall immediately file a notice of settlement, and notify Judge Westmore’s Courtroom Deputy at (510) 637-3525 that the case has settled.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
separate statements prohibited

Separate statements of undisputed facts are prohibited; joint statements (if used) must cite admissible evidence.

The parties may not file separate statements of undisputed facts. See Civil Local Rule 56-2. Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful. Any joint statement must include — for each undisputed fact — citations to admissible evidence.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Scheduling conference
Must include
certificate of conference

Lead counsel must discuss settlement conference logistics with clients and opposing counsel before scheduling conference

Before the scheduling conference, lead counsel must discuss with their clients and each other: • The optimal time for a settlement conference; • Their mutually available dates; • The availability of insurance; • Individuals with settlement authority and their attendance; • Information to be exchanged before the settlement conference; • The time needed to evaluate demands and responses; and • Any other relevant issues.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Lead trial counsel, all parties, and individuals with full settlement authority must attend settlement conference

Lead trial counsel, all parties, and individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the case must attend the settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Corporations must send knowledgeable person with final settlement authority or designate representative to recommend to approving body

A party that is not a natural person (e.g., a corporation or association) satisfies the attendance requirement if represented by a person (other than outside counsel) who is knowledgeable about the case and has final settlement authority. If settlement authority is vested solely in a governing board, claims committee, or equivalent body and cannot be delegated, the party must designate a person with authority to attend and participate in the settlement conference and, if a tentative settlement agreement is reached, to recommend the agreement to the approving body for approval. ADR L.R. Rule 7-3(a).

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Government entities must send knowledgeable representative with settlement authority to recommend to approving body; individuals must attend if government acts on their behalf

A government-entity party satisfies the attendance requirement if represented by a person (in addition to counsel of record) who (1) has, to the greatest extent feasible, authority to settle, (2) is knowledgeable about the case facts, the government entity's position, and the policies governing settlement decisions, and (3) has the authority to recommend a tentative settlement agreement to the government entity for approval. ADR L.R. 7-3(b). If the action is brought by the government on behalf of one or more individuals, at least one such individual must attend. Id.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Settlement statements must include specific required sections about parties, facts, claims, and settlement positions.

Settlement statements must include: • Attendees and their roles; • Relevant facts, including disputed facts and key evidence; • Relevant court rulings; • Claims and defenses; • Legal issues about liability and damages; • Prior settlement discussions and mediation efforts; • The current demand and response; • Fees and costs incurred to date and projected through trial; • A candid assessment of settlement risks and the parties’ needs; • Obstacles to settlement and proposed solutions; and • Any other information relevant to settlement.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial filings

Parties must file and lodge deposition designations, interrogatory/admission designations, and objections to exhibits and depositions; objections not raised are waived.

Second, the parties must file and lodge deposition designations for witnesses appearing only by designation, copies of designations of interrogatories and admissions, and objections to exhibits and use of depositions (as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3)(B)). Objections not raised are waived.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition designation final packet

Final deposition designation packet must be provided to the court 14 days before the pretrial conference, with objections highlighted and annotated, and exhibits if needed.

Counsel for the proffering party must collate and assemble a final packet that covers all remaining issues and provide it to the court fourteen days before the pretrial conference. Any objections must be highlighted and annotated as described in this section. If exhibits are needed to resolve the objections, designating counsel must include copies, with the relevant passages highlighted and tagged.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format on filing day.

Proposed orders in civil cases shall be submitted in Word format (.doc or .docx) via email to ljcpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the day of filing.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate of conference

Motions must include certification of meet and confer compliance.

All motions or non-stipulated requests shall include a certification, which may be submitted separately or included in the body of the filing, that the parties have complied with this meet and confer requirement.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Non-compliant filings may be stricken by the Court.

The Court may strike filings that do not comply.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
declaration

Protective order must be filed with one of three specified declarations.

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they are encouraged to use one of the Court’s model protective orders (available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-orders). Parties shall file one of the following with their proposed protective order: (1) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (2) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order; or (3) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log
Must include
privilege log

Privilege log required when withholding information as privileged.

If a party withholds responsive information by claiming that it is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall produce a privilege log. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5).

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Privilege log

Privilege logs due within 14 days of disclosures/discovery responses.

The privilege log will be produced as quickly as possible, but no later than fourteen (14) days after its disclosures or discovery responses are due, unless the parties stipulate to, or the Court sets, another date.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
objection type restricted

Deposition objections limited to privilege or form only; speaking objections prohibited.

Deposition objections must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
privilege related answers

Witness must answer privilege-related questions unless information itself is privileged.

When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the existence, extent, or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement, unless such information is itself privileged.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
private conferences prohibited

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys prohibited except for privilege determination.

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of interrogation, including a line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
privilege or form objections only

Deposition objections limited to privilege or form only; speaking objections prohibited.

Deposition objections must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
privilege related answers required

Witness must answer privilege-related questions unless privileged.

When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the existence, extent, or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement, unless such information is itself privileged.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
private conferences prohibited

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys prohibited except for privilege determination.

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of interrogation, including a line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial preparation
Must include
certificate of service

Exchange papers 28 days before pretrial conference (but don't file).

Not less than twenty-eight days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall exchange (but not file or lodge) the papers described in Civil Local Rule 16-10(b)(7), (8), (9), and (10), and their motions in limine.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

14 days before pretrial conference, file joint pretrial conference statement with action details and factual basis.

Not less than fourteen days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall file the following: (a) Pretrial Conference Statement. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement containing the following information: (1) The Action. (A) Substance of the Action. A brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided. (B) Relief Prayed. A detailed statement of all the relief claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed. (2) The Factual Basis of the Action.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement conference statement due 7 days before conference

No later than 7 days prior to the settlement conference, counsel for each party shall email a pdf of their settlement conference statement to ljcsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall serve a copy of the settlement conference statement on all parties.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
exhibit list

File exhibit list 14 days before pretrial conference; premarked exhibits to Clerk's Office; no exhibits without leave.

(b) Exhibit List and Objections. The exhibit list shall list each proposed exhibit by its number (see Civil L.R. 30-2(b)), description, and sponsoring witness, followed by blanks to accommodate the date on which it is marked for identification and the date on which it is admitted into evidence. No party shall be permitted to offer any exhibit in its case-in-chief that is not disclosed in its exhibit list without leave of the Court for good cause shown. Parties shall also deliver a set of premarked exhibits to the Courtroom Deputy at the Clerk’s Office. Do not deliver these exhibits directly to chambers. The exhibit markers shall each contain the name and number of the case, the number of the exhibit, and blanks to accommodate the date admitted and the Deputy Clerk's initials. Any objections to exhibits which remain after the pretrial meeting shall be indicated in the pretrial statement.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
joint statement, estimated duration, testimony substance

Witness list must include joint statement of testimony substance and estimated direct exam duration; no undisclosed witnesses without court leave.

(c) Witness List. In addition to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(A), parties must also submit a brief joint statement describing the substance of the testimony to be given by each witness who may be called at trial, as well as an estimated duration for direct examination off each witness. No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of Court for good cause shown.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery responses
Must include
conference confirmed, objections indicated, designations identified

Discovery responses must be identified for trial use; objections and conference required within 7 days of filing.

(d) Use of Discovery Responses. In addition to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(A), parties must identify any designations of excerpts from interrogatory answers or from responses for admissions intended to be offered at trial. Within seven days from when the disclosures are filed with the Court, counsel shall indicate any objections to use of these materials and that counsel have conferred respecting such objections.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial briefs
Must include
procedural issues, evidentiary issues, significant disputed issues

Trial briefs required on all significant disputed legal issues remaining after pretrial meeting.

(e) Trial briefs. Briefs on all significant disputed issues of law, including foreseeable procedural and evidentiary issues, which remain after the pretrial meeting.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
joint proposed, agreed questions, disputed questions separated

Joint voir dire questionnaire required for jury trials; agreed questions included, disputed questions submitted separately.

(g) Joint Proposed Voir Dire (jury trials only). The attached voir dire questionnaire will be given to the venire members, and copies of the responses will be made available to counsel at the beginning of voir dire. Counsel may submit a set of additional requested voir dire, to be included in the questionnaire or posed by the Court, to which they have agreed at the pretrial meeting. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree shall be submitted separately. Counsel may be allowed brief follow-up voir dire after the Court's questioning.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
joint submission, table of contents, argument authority included +1 more

Joint proposed jury instructions required with table of contents; disputed instructions marked and argued separately; must email to ljcpo@cand.uscourts.gov in Word format.

instructions 1.2 through 1.21, 2.1 through 2.13, and 3.1 through 3.3 from the Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions for the Ninth Circuit (most recent edition) will be given absent objection. Counsel shall jointly submit one set of additional proposed jury instructions, to which they have agreed at the pretrial meeting. The instructions shall be ordered in a logical sequence, together with a table of contents. Any instruction that is based on a form or model instruction (including but not limited to Ninth Circuit model jury instructions and Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI)) must indicate the number of the form instruction and any alterations made by the parties. Any instruction on which counsel cannot agree shall be marked as “disputed,” and shall be included within the jointly submitted instructions and accompanying table of contents, in the place where the party proposing the instruction believes it should be given. Argument and authority for and against each disputed instruction shall be included as part of the joint submission, on separate pages directly following the disputed instruction. The parties shall email to ljcpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed jury instructions in Word format. The subject of the email should include the case name, the case number and a description of the document.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Verdict forms
Must include
jury trials only, joint or separate

Proposed verdict forms required for jury trials, may be joint or separate.

(i) Proposed Verdict Forms, Joint or Separate (jury trials only).

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Findings conclusions
Must include
email submission, numbered paragraphs, findings of fact first +2 more

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for bench trials in numbered paragraphs; must email to ljcpo@cand.uscourts.gov with hyperlinks to evidence.

(j) Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (bench trials only). Each party shall file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, presenting in numbered paragraphs all findings of fact followed by all conclusions of law. The parties shall email to ljcpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in Word format. The subject of the email should include the name of the case, the case number and a description of the document. The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence, and arrange for either electronic file transfer or delivery of a USB drive containing the hyperlinked exhibits.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Confidential settlement letter

Confidential settlement letter due 7 days before conference

No later than 7 days prior to the settlement conference, each counsel shall email a pdf of their confidential settlement letter to ljcsettlement@cand.uscourts.gov. The confidential settlement letter shall not be served upon the other parties.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Lead trial counsel and parties with full settlement authority must attend settlement conference.

Lead trial counsel must attend the settlement conference with the parties and persons having full authority to negotiate and settle the case.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Corporations must send representative with full settlement authority (up to opposing party's demand/offer).

A party other than a natural person (e.g., a corporation or association) satisfies the attendance requirement if represented by a person (other than outside counsel) who is knowledgeable about the case and has final authority to settle up to the full amount of the opposing party's existing settlement demand or offer.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

If settlement authority cannot be delegated, designate representative to recommend tentative agreements to governing body.

If authority to settle is vested in a governing board, claims committee, or equivalent body and cannot be delegated, a party must designate a person with authority to participate in the settlement conference and, if a tentative settlement agreement is reached, to recommend the agreement to the appropriate body for approval.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Zoom attendance requests must be made at pre-settlement conference or well in advance.

Such requests must be made at a pre-settlement conference meeting with the Court, or well in advance of the settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Government entities must send representative with settlement authority and knowledge of entity's policies.

A party that is a government entity satisfies the attendance requirement if represented by a person (in addition to counsel of record) who (a) has, to the greatest extent feasible, authority to settle, (b) is knowledgeable about the facts of the case, the government entity's position, and the positions and policies under which the government entity decides whether to accept proposed settlements, and (c) has the authority, if a tentative settlement agreement is reached, to recommend the agreement to the government entity for approval.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

When government sues on behalf of individuals, at least one individual must attend settlement conference.

If the action is brought by the government on behalf of one or more individuals, at least one such individual also must attend.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Insured parties must bring carrier representative with full authority to negotiate up to coverage limits.

An insured party must appear with a representative of the carrier who has full authority to negotiate up to the limits of coverage.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance

Representatives requiring consultation before settlement do not have full authority.

A person who needs to call another person, not present, before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Settlement conference statements are confidential and inadmissible at trial if case doesn't settle.

Statements made during the conference are confidential and will not be admissible at trial if the case does not settle.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Late Zoom requests must be filed 30 days in advance as Motion for Administrative Relief or Stipulation.

If a request is not made at a pre-settlement conference meeting, the request shall be submitted at least 30 days in advance of the settlement conference by filing either a Motion for Administrative Relief (if the request is opposed) or Stipulation (if the request is unopposed), pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, respectively.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

For Zoom participants, counsel must provide names and email addresses to CRD.

For settlement conferences in which all parties or some individuals have been allowed by the Court to participate via Zoom, counsel must provide to the CRD the names and email addresses for those settlement conference participants.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Email addresses required to send Zoom invitations.

Without these email addresses, a Zoom Invitation to join the settlement conference cannot be sent.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference

Contact information must be emailed to ljccrd@cand.uscourts.gov at least 7 days before conference.

This contact information shall be emailed to ljccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 7 days before the settlement conference.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Email Word format copies of stipulations and proposed orders to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov on same day as e-filing.

In addition to e-filing, the parties must email a copy of all stipulations and proposed orders in Word format to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day they e-file these documents.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute

Discovery disputes require direct conversation (in person, phone, or video), not just written exchanges.

For all discovery disputes, the parties must meet and confer to attempt to resolve their dispute. The meet and confer must be a direct conversation in person or by telephone or video. A mere exchange of letters, emails, or messages does not satisfy the requirement to meet and confer.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery statement

Discovery statements must be filed in ECF under Civil Events > Motions: General > Discovery Letter Brief.

The statement(s) must be filed in ECF under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings > Motions: General > Discovery Letter Brief.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
attendance in person

All parties must attend settlement conference in person with authorized representatives

All parties and their counsel are required to attend the settlement conference in person, not by telephone. Non-natural persons must be represented by a person with unlimited authority to negotiate a settlement. An insured party must appear with a representative of the carrier with full authority to negotiate up to the limits of coverage. A person who must call another person not present at the conference before agreeing to a settlement does not have unlimited authority.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
format pdf, not filed in ecf

Settlement conference statement due 7 days prior via email PDF to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov with 9 required elements

No later than seven days prior to the conference, each party must submit a settlement conference statement via email in PDF format to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Each party must also serve its statement on opposing counsel. The statement must not be filed in ECF. The statement must include: (a) the identity of the attorney(s) and clients attending the settlement conference; (b) a brief statement of the facts of the case; (c) a brief statement of the claims and defenses raised, including statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded; (d) a candid evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; (e) a candid evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the parties' respective positions; (f) a summary of the proceedings to date; (g) a listing of all pending motions; (h) the relief sought; (i) the party's position on settlement, including present demands, offers, and a history of past settlement discussions.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
format pdf, not filed in ecf

Settlement conference statement due 7 days prior via email PDF to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov

No later than seven days prior to the conference, each party must submit a settlement conference statement via email in PDF format to ncpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
service on opposing counsel

Settlement conference statement must be served on opposing counsel

Each party must also serve its statement on opposing counsel.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement

Joint statements for discovery disputes cannot include attachments without leave of court.

The parties may not attach declarations, exhibits, proposed orders, etc. to the statement absent leave of Court.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
red line version

Amended pleadings must include a red-line version showing changes.

All proposed amended complaints, answers, counterclaims, or other pleadings shall be filed contemporaneously with a separate red-line version of the amended document showing the changes made to the previously operative pleading.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Scheduling changes require proposed order with stipulation or motion for administrative relief.

No changes to the Court’s schedule shall be made except by order of the Court. Parties seeking to continue hearings, request special status conferences, modify briefing schedules, or make any other procedural or scheduling changes shall submit a proposed order and fully executed stipulation explaining the need for the requested modification, or, if stipulation is not possible, a motion for administrative relief. See Civil L.R. 7-11.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +3 more

Joint case management statement due 7 calendar days before conference.

The Parties to an action shall file their joint case management conference statement no later than seven (7) calendar days in advance of the case management conference date. The statement must include all elements requested in the 'Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.' See Civil L.R. 16-9.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Motions, declarations, and exhibits must be filed as separate ECF documents.

All motions and declarations shall be filed as separate documents. This includes motions and declarations e-filed with the Court. All exhibits to motions should be separately filed on ECF.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
local rule certificate

Motions to seal must include statement about sealing request under Civil Local Rule 79-5.

For motions to seal, any Party who submits a request to file a document or material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 shall include a statement to inform the Court: (1) whether the...

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order with relief sought and rationale.

Each Party filing a motion shall also file and serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be filed with the motion or opposition.

Any proposed order should be filed contemporaneously with the motion or opposition.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed stipulations/orders in e-filed cases must be emailed in Word format.

any proposed stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall also be sent in Word format by email to PHKpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief

Briefing must comply with Civil Local Rules 7-2 through 7-5.

Briefing shall comply with Civil Local Rules 7-2 through 7-5.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Separate statements of undisputed facts or conclusions of law are prohibited.

Separate statements of proposed undisputed facts and/or conclusions of law are prohibited, and thus, will not be considered by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Deposition transcript excerpts must highlight relevant portions for summary judgment motions.

If Parties submit excerpts of deposition transcripts in support of or opposition to a motion for summary judgment, they shall highlight the relevant portions for ease of reference.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
proposed order

Parties must submit stipulation and proposed order with briefing schedule and subject matter description before first brief.

Before the first brief is filed, the Parties shall submit a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing schedule for the cross-motions and a general, one-sentence description of the subject matter of each of the cross-motions.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-generated documents must include disclosure in table or separate notice

Any brief, pleading, or other document submitted to the Court the text of which was created

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
ai disclosure

Must maintain records identifying AI-generated portions of documents

Counsel shall maintain records sufficient to identify, if requested by the Court, those portions of the text of a pleading, brief, or document submitted to the Court which was created or drafted by an AI tool.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
ai disclosure

Prohibited from filing AI-hallucinated citations or uncorroboratable assertions

Parties and counsel shall not file or otherwise present to the Court any briefs, pleadings, materials, other documents, or argument which contain AI-hallucinated citations to law, case or legal citations which are fictitious or non-existent, or any uncorroboratable assertions of law or fact.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
ai disclosure

Failure to verify AI-generated citations is grounds for sanctions

A pro se party or a counsel's failure to confirm or double-check the accuracy, veracity, or even existence of a case or legal citation (or assertion of fact) created by an AI tool is grounds for potential sanctions.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Evidence
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-generated evidence must be disclosed in discovery to be considered

If a Party or counsel seeks to file or otherwise present to the Court any such AI-generated evidentiary material, no such material shall be considered unless previously disclosed or produced timely in discovery

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Evidence
Must include
ai disclosure

Must serve notice identifying AI-generated evidence to opposing party

Contemporaneous with the production or disclosure of any such AI-generated evidentiary material, counsel shall serve a Notice to the opposing Party or side identifying such material with sufficient specificity to locate it

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
ai disclosure

AI tools must be used responsibly with competent training and understanding of limitations.

If a Party or counsel chooses to use an AI or other automated tool as part of a process for creating exhibits, demonstratives, or other material to be filed or presented to the Court, they shall only do so consistent with their ethical and legal obligations and shall use such tools responsibly and with competent training, knowledge, and understanding of the limitations and risks of such automated tools.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-generated exhibits must be identified in title/caption, table, or separate notice.

Any exhibit, demonstrative, or other material to be filed or presented to the Court which was created or drafted with any assistance or use of an AI tool shall be identified as such in its title or caption, in a table preceding the body of exhibit, demonstrative, or other material, or by a separate Notice filed contemporaneously with the document or material.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
ai disclosure

Counsel must maintain records identifying AI-generated portions of exhibits.

Counsel shall maintain records sufficient to identify, if requested by the Court, those portions of that exhibit, document, or material created or drafted by use of an AI tool.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
ai disclosure

AI-hallucinated assertions, uncorroborated statements, and fictitious citations are prohibited.

Parties and counsel shall not file, proffer, or otherwise present to the Court exhibits, demonstratives, or other evidentiary or factual material which contain AI-hallucinated assertions of fact, uncorroboratable statements as to factual matters or evidence, or any fictitious or non-existent references or citations to law or fact.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
ai disclosure

Failure to verify AI-generated facts may result in sanctions.

A pro se party’s or a counsel’s failure to confirm or double-check the accuracy, veracity, or even existence of a basis for an assertion of fact or evidence created by an AI tool is grounds for potential sanctions.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff must serve copies of Standing Order to all parties within 7 days and file certificate of service.

Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing Defendant) is directed: (a) to serve copies of this Standing Order upon all other Parties to the action within seven (7) calendar days of the appearance of these other Parties, including any subsequently joined Parties, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 5; and (b) to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil L.R. 5-5.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition

Deposition objections limited to privilege or form only; speaking objections prohibited.

Deposition objections shall be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections or those calculated to coach a deponent are prohibited.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition

Counsel may only instruct deponent not to answer to preserve privilege, enforce court limitation, or under Rule 30(d)(3).

Counsel may not instruct a deponent not to answer a question except when necessary to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation directed by the Court, or to present a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3).

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys during interrogation are prohibited except to determine privilege.

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of interrogation, including a line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Document production

Parties must take affirmative steps to preserve evidence upon notice of this Standing Order.

As soon as a Party has notice of this Standing Order, the Party shall take such affirmative steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Evidence

Items not produced during fact discovery cannot be used as evidence except for good cause.

Except for good cause, no item will be received in evidence if the proponent failed to produce that item during the fact discovery period in the face of a reasonably specific and proper discovery request seeking production of that item or in the face of an obligation to disclose that item under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a).

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint letter
Must include
proposed compromises, identification of disputes, substantive description of positions

Parties must jointly file detailed letter within 5 business days after meet and confer.

Within five (5) business days of the in-person meeting between lead trial counsel referred to above, the Parties shall jointly file a detailed letter with the Court which will include an identification of the matters remaining in dispute, a detailed substantive description of each side's position on each such issue, and a description of each side's proposed compromise on each such issue.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Settlement Conference Statements must include specific content: facts summary, claims/defenses overview, key issues and evidence, proceedings summary, relief sought, attendee list, and for entities, approval process description.

A Party’s Settlement Conference Statement must include the following: 1. A brief summary statement of the facts of the case. 2. A brief overview statement of the claims and defenses including, but not limited to, the statutory or other grounds upon which the claims or defenses are founded. 3. A brief description of the key factual and legal issues that are in dispute and a plain and concise statement of the specific evidence relevant to their determination. Portions of any exhibits relied upon by the Parties shall be referenced and highlighted. 4. A summary of the proceedings to date and any pending motions. 5. The relief sought, the basis for any damage calculations, and a description of any non-monetary relief sought or non-monetary components of any previously exchanged settlement offers or demands. 6. A list of the names, titles, and email addresses of all persons who will be attending the Settlement Conference on behalf of each Party. 7. Where a Party is a governmental or corporate entity, a description of which persons or entities must approve a proposed settlement agreement before it can be executed, whether such persons or entities (or their representative) will attend the Settlement Conference (and if not, whether they can or should), and a brief description of the nature and duration of that approval process.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in MS Word format to specific address

Proposed orders should be emailed in MS Word format to rmipo@cand.uscourts.gov. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Consent or declination to proceed before a Magistrate Judge must be filed simultaneously with any dispositive motion.

In civil cases that are assigned to Judge Illman for all purposes, each party should file a consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, or a request for reassignment to a district judge, as soon as possible. If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent/declination simultaneously with the motion.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be emailed in MS Word format to rmipo@cand.uscourts.gov; this address is for proposed orders only.

Proposed orders should be emailed in MS Word format to rmipo@cand.uscourts.gov. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement statement

Settlement Conference Statement must include facts, claims/defenses, proceedings summary, relief sought, and settlement position.

The Settlement Conference Statement ... shall include the following: a. A brief statement of the facts of the case; b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses including, but not limited to, statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded, and a candid evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; c. A summary of the proceedings to date and any pending motions; d. The relief sought, including an itemization of damages; and e. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
proposed order

Stipulations and proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to skpo@cand.uscourts.gov on same day as e-filing.

Any stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to e-filing should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by email to skpo@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day the document is e-filed.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
joint statement

Joint Case Management Statement required 7 days before case management or status conferences.

No later than seven (7) days prior to the any scheduled case management or status conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with the Northern District of California’s General Standing Order for civil cases entitled “Contents of

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
authority to enter stipulations, prepared to address joint case management statements

Lead trial counsel or pro se party must attend case management conferences with full authority to enter stipulations.

Each party shall be represented in person at the Case Management Conference by lead trial counsel (or a party if pro se), who shall be (1) prepared to address all of the matters referred to in the Northern District of California’s General Standing Order on Joint Case Management Statements; and (2) have full authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to that order.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
compliance with local rules, compliance with federal rules

Discovery must comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26-37 and Northern District Local Rules.

Parties shall propound disclosures and discovery in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37 and the corresponding Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
declaration about model order compliance

Protective order filings must include declaration about model order compliance or modifications.

Parties shall file one of the following with their proposed protective order: (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
declaration of meet and confer attempts, available dates for telephonic conference

Request for telephonic conference must include declaration of meet and confer attempts and available dates.

The written request shall include a declaration which states any attempt to meet and confer and/or obtain the joint letter, the reasons for the inability to comply with the standing order, and (if possible) three dates and times at which all parties are available for a telephonic conference.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Joint discovery letter must be e-filed under specific ECF category.

The joint letter must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings>Motions--General>Discovery Letter Brief."

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Exhibits must be separately filed on ECF with specific numbering and in searchable OCR format.

All exhibits to motions and/or discovery dispute letters should be separately filed on ECF. For example, if the motion is Docket No. 30, and the declaration with ten exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A should be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B should be Docket No. 31-2, and so on. All exhibits should be filed in a searchable OCR format where possible.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Subsequent case management report
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Subsequent Case Management Report due within 30 days of claim construction ruling.

Within thirty days of the filing of the claim construction ruling, the parties shall file following topics: a) whether either party wishes to certify the claim construction ruling for immediate appeal to the Federal Circuit; b) the filing of dispositive motions and timing of those motions; c) if willful infringement has been asserted, whether the allegedly-infringing party wishes to rely on the advice of counsel defense. If so, the parties should be prepared to address proposals for resolving any attorney-client privilege issues that arise, and whether the parties believe bifurcation of the trial into liability and damages phases would be appropriate; d) anticipated post-claim construction discovery; e) any other pretrial matters; and f) the progress of settlement discussions, if any.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimCRITICAL
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
proposed order

Stipulations and proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to chambers on same day as e-filing

All stipulations and proposed orders are to be emailed in Word format to svkcrd@cand.uscourts.gov on the same day as the documents are e-filed.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
proposed order

Motions to seal must follow specific table format for proposed orders under Civil Local Rule 79-5

Motions to seal shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5. When submitting a proposed order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(3), the table format included in the order shall comply with the below format: Document Text to be Sealed Basis for Sealing [redacted portions to be identified by page and line number]

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Response to motion to seal

Designating Party must attach proposed public redacted version of documents when responding to motion to seal under Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)

Where a party (“Filing Party”) files a motion to consider whether another party’s (“Designating Party”) materials should be sealed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), the Designating Party’s statement and/or declaration in support of sealing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3) shall attach as exhibit(s) the proposed, public, redacted version of the document(s) sought to be sealed to the extent the proposed redactions differ from the redactions proposed by the Filing Party.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
chambers copy

Word versions of joint chart exhibit and proposed orders must be emailed to chambers

Word versions of the joint chart exhibit and each party’s proposed order must also be emailed to svkcrd@cand.uscourts.gov

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
All submissions
Must include
ai disclosure

AI disclosure required - counsel must verify accuracy of AI-generated content and maintain records

Counsel is responsible for providing complete and accurate representations in any submission (including filings, demonstratives, evidence and oral argument) to the Court as required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Professional Conduct, and any other applicable legal or ethical guidance. Use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc., in preparing submissions to the Court is not prohibited, but counsel and self-represented parties must at all times personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any content generated by these tools. The signature of counsel or a self-represented party on any submission containing AI-generated content, including citations generated by AI, constitutes a certification that the signing attorney (or self-represented party) has personally verified the content’s accuracy. The Court will impute any errors by such AI tools to the attorney or party whose signature appears on the document containing those errors. Failure to verify the accuracy of submissions, particularly the accuracy of citations to law and evidence, may be grounds for sanctions. Counsel is responsible for maintaining records of all prompts or inquiries submitted to any generative AI tools in the event those records become relevant at any point.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
proposed order

Joint statements for discovery disputes must include each party's proposed order as an exhibit.

The joint statement must also include each party's proposed order as an exhibit.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statements must include the case schedule as the first item.

Joint case management statements must include as the first item the case schedule, if it has been set, as well as all information required under the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Case dispositive motion

Dispositive motions must be filed simultaneously with written consent to magistrate jurisdiction or request for reassignment.

If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination simultaneously with the motion.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
caption

Exhibit cover pages must include exhibit number and title/description.

The cover page of any exhibit submitted in connection with briefing on a motion must include the exhibit number and the title or brief description of the exhibit (e.g., "Ex. 1 – 1/1/2023 email from Joe Smith to Nancy Jones").

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief

Word versions of joint chart exhibit and proposed order must be emailed to chambers.

Word versions of the joint chart exhibit and each party's proposed order must also be emailed to svkcrd@cand.uscourts.gov

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint

Amended pleadings must include redline exhibit showing changes; pro se parties exempt.

If a party filed an amended complaint or other amended pleading, they must also file as an exhibit to the pleading a redline version showing what changes have been made to the most-recent version. Self-represented parties are not required to comply with this requirement.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
ai disclosure

Signature on AI-generated submissions certifies personal verification of accuracy.

The signature of counsel or a self-represented party on any submission containing AI-generated content, including citations generated by AI, constitutes a certification that the signing attorney (or self-represented party) has personally verified the content's accuracy.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Electronic equipment must be requested 5 days before trial and tested in courtroom.

If a party wishes to use electronic equipment or other large items (such as bookshelves), the party must file a request and proposed order with the Court no later than 5 days prior to trial. Equipment not provided by the Court must be tested in the courtroom prior to the day when it will be used. Arrangements for such testing may be made with the Courtroom Deputy.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statement must include case schedule first and all required information per standing order.

Joint case management statements must include as the first item the case schedule, if it has been set, as well as all information required under the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California — Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order for sealing

Proposed order for sealing must include a table with columns 'Document Text to be Sealed' and 'Basis for Sealing'.

When submitting a proposed order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(3), the table format included in the order shall comply with the below format: Document Text to be Sealed Basis for Sealing [redacted portions to be identified by page and line number]

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply

Replies to motions in limine are prohibited without leave of Court.

No party may file a reply without leave of Court.

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Redlined/highlighted version required with amended pleadings

If a party files a motion to amend or the Court orders a party to file an amended pleading, that party shall concurrently file a redlined or highlighted version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Exhibits must be separately filed on ECF in searchable OCR format

All exhibits to motions and/or discovery disputes should be separately filed on ECF. For example, if the motion is Docket No. 30, and the declaration with 10 exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A would be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B would be Docket No. 31-2, and so on. All exhibits shall also be filed in a searchable OCR format where possible.

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Proposed orders must be emailed in Word format to tshpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Any proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be emailed in Word format to tshpo@cand.uscourts.gov. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders must be submitted in Word to vkdpo@cand.uscourts.gov, except for Civil L.R. 7-2 motions (except injunctive relief).

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to the following email address: vkdpo@cand.uscourts.gov. This email address shall not be used for any other purpose. Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery dispute letters must be filed using the Discovery Letter Brief event in CM/ECF

The joint discovery dispute letter shall be filed using the “Discovery Letter Brief” event under “Motions-General” in the CM/ECF system.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
exhibits

Discovery dispute letter may only include specific discovery materials as attachments

as an attachment to the letter, the specific discovery material at issue, including the responses, if any, to it (e.g., disputed document requests, disputed interrogatories, privilege log, subpoena, deposition excerpt, proposed protective order, etc.); no other exhibits may be attached to the letter, absent leave of Court.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter
Must include
signature block

Discovery dispute letters must be signed by lead counsel

The joint discovery dispute letter must be signed by lead counsel.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Sanctions motion

Sanctions motions under Rule 37 must follow Civil L.R. 37-4, not the expedited discovery dispute procedure

Any party seeking an award of attorney fees or other form of sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 may not use the expedited joint discovery dispute letter procedure described above, but instead must file a motion conforming to the requirements of Civil L.R. 37-4.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Deadline
21 days before pretrial conference
Applies to
Pretrial materials
Must include
exhibit list, witness list, deposition designations +4 more

Parties must serve pretrial materials 21 days before pretrial conference

At least 21 days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall serve (but not file) the following materials:

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Deadline
14 days before pretrial conference
Applies to
Pretrial objections
Must include
objections to exhibits, objections to witnesses, objections to jury instructions +3 more

Parties must serve objections to pretrial materials 14 days before pretrial conference

At least 14 days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall serve (but not file) the following materials:

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Deadline
7 days before pretrial conference
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
joint pretrial statement

Parties must file Joint Pretrial Statement 7 days before pretrial conference

At least 7 days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement that includes the materials described below

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
counsel conference

Counsel must confer to prepare Joint Pretrial Statement before filing deadline

Counsel for the parties (and any parties appearing pro se) shall confer in person, by telephone or by videoconference to discuss preparation of the Joint Pretrial Statement sufficiently in advance of the filing deadline to ensure the statement is timely filed.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
evidence objections discussion

Counsel conference must discuss objections to evidence for trial

The conference of counsel must include discussion of any objections to evidence (witness testimony, deposition designations, exhibits) that a party proposes to offer at trial.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Sequential numbering system required for trial exhibits with gaps permitted.

The parties must use a sequential numbering system for exhibits to be offered at trial. Gaps in the sequence are permitted.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Settlement Conference Statement must be emailed and delivered to chambers 7 days before conference.

No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party participating in the conference must lodge a Settlement Conference Statement with Judge DeMarchi’s chambers by emailing the statement in text-searchable .pdf format to vkdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov and delivering a hard copy to chambers.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Confidential settlement letter

Confidential Settlement Letter must be emailed and delivered to chambers 7 days before conference.

No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party participating in the conference must lodge a Confidential Settlement Letter with Judge DeMarchi’s chambers by emailing the letter to vkdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov and delivering a hard copy to chambers.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for non-jury trials.

For matters tried to the Court without a jury, each party shall file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, with citations as appropriate to evidence proposed to be offered at trial.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Witness list required as separate appendix, excluding impeachment witnesses.

A list, attached as a separate appendix, identifying each witness the parties intend to call at trial, other than solely for impeachment.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Deposition designation table required as separate appendix with page/line numbers.

For any witness testifying by deposition, a table, attached as a separate appendix, identifying by page and line number the specific testimony to be offered at trial, any objections that have not been resolved, and any counter-designations.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Exhibit list required as separate appendix, excluding impeachment exhibits.

A list, attached as a separate appendix, of all documents, summaries and other items to be offered as exhibits at trial, other than solely for impeachment.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Proposed voir dire questions required as separate appendix for jury trials.

A set of proposed voir dire questions, attached as a separate appendix, the parties wish the Court to ask, and if the parties do not agree as to all questions, a short statement of their respective positions on which questions should and should not be asked.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Proposed jury instructions required as separate appendix with specific formatting for jury trials.

A set of proposed substantive instructions, attached as a separate appendix. Each instruction shall begin at the top of a page, and shall include the text of the instruction, followed by its source (e.g. Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit), the authority supporting the instruction, any unresolved objections, any alternative instruction, and the source of such alternative instruction.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Exhibit numbering must be unique - no duplicate numbers for different documents or vice versa.

The numbering system for trial exhibits must not assign the same exhibit number to multiple different documents and must not assign different exhibit numbers to the same document.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Exhibit List, Deposition Designations, and Jury Instructions must be emailed to vkdpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

The parties shall email a copy of their jointly filed Exhibit List and Deposition Designations in Microsoft Word or Excel format to vkdpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The parties shall email a copy of their jointly filed Jury Instructions in Microsoft Word format to vkdpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Trial exhibits must be lodged 7 days before Pretrial Conference in paper and electronic form.

At least 7 days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall lodge with the Court all proposed trial exhibits in both paper and electronic form.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Electronic trial exhibits must be delivered on thumb drive to chambers.

The electronic copies of the exhibits should be provided by delivering electronic media (e.g., thumb drive) to chambers.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement conference statement
Must include
certificate of service

Settlement Conference Statement must be served on all other parties.

Each party must serve a copy of its statement on all other parties participating in the conference.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
certificate of service

Witness list with descriptions due 35 days before pretrial conference

At least 35 calendar days prior to the pre-trial conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall lodge and serve a list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial (including those appearing by deposition), other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, together with a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given (such a statement is not necessary for witnesses that are plaintiffs/defendants). Parties are to limit their descriptions to non-cumulative testimony. No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case in chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court for good cause;

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
certificate of service

Exhibit lists with descriptions due 35 days before pretrial conference

At least 35 calendar days prior to the pre-trial conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall lodge and serve separate lists of all documents and other items to be offered as exhibits at the trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, with a brief statement following each, describing its substance or purpose and the identity of the sponsoring witness;

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint juror questionnaire
Must include
certificate of service

Joint juror questionnaire, voir dire questions, and case statement due 28 days before jury selection

At least 28 calendar days prior to the date for jury selection, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file (1) a joint juror questionnaire, (2) a set of proposed voir dire questions, and (3) a joint simplified statement of the case to be included in the questionnaire and read to the jury during voir dire. These submissions should be supplemented as necessary with separate requests. The Court will only ask jurors questions that are reasonably necessary to ensuring an impartial jury, and will seek to avoid asking questions that may unduly infringe on jurors' privacy.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed pretrial order
Must include
certificate of service

Joint proposed pretrial order due 21 days before pretrial conference

At least 21 calendar days prior to the pre-trial conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall lodge and serve a joint proposed pre-trial order, signed and vetted by all counsel, containing the following information:

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
citation, explanation of disputed instructions

Proposed jury instructions must be filed 7 days before pretrial conference in Word format on CD and email, with hard copies.

At least 7 calendar days prior to the pre-trial conference in a jury trial, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file a a joint set of proposed instructions on substantive issues of law. These should be filed in Microsoft Word format on a CD and via e-mail to crbpo@cand.uscourts.gov, and in hard copies (three-hole punched on the left). Even if stipulated, an instruction must be supported by citation. If disputed, each version of the instruction shall be inserted, along with a brief explanation (no more than one page) of why the party believes the instruction is (or is not) appropriate. The Court generally prefers to use the instruction in the current edition of the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions. Any deviance from the form instruction must be plainly identified.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Special verdict form

Joint proposed special verdict form must be filed 7 days before pretrial conference.

At least 7 calendar days prior to the pre-trial conference in a jury trial, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file a joint proposed special verdict form.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Transcript arrangements

Transcript arrangements must be made 10 days before trial with Court Reporting Services.

Should a daily transcript and/or real-time reporting be desired, the parties shall make arrangements with the Supervisor of Court Reporting Services at Transcripts@cand.uscourts.gov at least ten calendar days prior to the trial date.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial schedule

Trial schedule: 9 AM to 4 PM daily with breaks; counsel must arrive by 8:45 AM.

Unless otherwise ordered, trial will be held on every business day from 9 a.m. to 4 with two 15-minute breaks and lunch. Counsel must arrive by 8:45 a.m. or earlier, as needed, for any matters to be heard out of the presence of the jury. Please be prepared to start with the jury at 9 a.m.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list

Witnesses not on pretrial list require good cause; rebuttal witnesses exempt except experts.

A witness not included in the pre-trial list may not be used without good cause. This rule does not apply to true rebuttal witnesses (other than experts). Defense witnesses are normally case-in-chief witnesses, not “rebuttal” witnesses.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list

Counsel must provide daily witness order and exhibit lists before trial begins.

Throughout the trial, all counsel are entitled to know a firm order of witnesses for the next full court day and the exhibits that will be used on direct examination (other than for impeachment of an adverse witness). All other counsel shall provide any objections to such exhibits and shall provide a list of all exhibits to be used with the same that the first such notice be provided before trial actually begins.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list

Counsel must have next witness ready in courthouse; failure may constitute resting.

Counsel must always have their next witness ready and in the courthouse. Failure to have the next witness ready or to be prepared to proceed with the evidence will usually constitute resting.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
exhibits

Expert testimony limited to report scope; exhibits must be in report; cross may open door.

A recurring problem in trials is the problem of expert witnesses trying to go beyond the scope of their expert reports on direct examination. FRCP 26(a)(2) and FRCP 37(c) limit experts to the opinions and bases contained in their timely reports (absent substantial justification or harmlessness). The Court regularly enforces these rules. FRCP 26(a) even requires that any “exhibits to be used as summary of or support for the opinions” be included in the report. Accordingly, at trial, the direct testimony of experts will be limited to the matters disclosed in their reports. Omitted material may not ordinarily be added on direct examination. This means the reports must be complete and sufficiently detailed. Illustrative animations, diagrams, charts and models may be used on direct examination only if they were part to the expert’s report, with the exception of simple drawings and tabulations that plainly illustrate what is already in the report, which can be drawn by the witness at trial or otherwise shown to the jury. If cross-examination fairly “opens the door,” however, an expert may go beyond the written report on cross-examination and/or re-direct examination. By written stipulation, of course, all sides may relax these requirements.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Use numbers only for exhibits, preferably same as deposition numbers, with blocks assigned to each party.

Use numbers only, not letters, for exhibits, preferably the same numbers as were used in depositions. Blocks of numbers should be assigned to fit the need of the case (e.g., Plaintiff has 1 to 100, Defendant A has 101 to 200, etc.).

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
clean copy, original copy, corrections available

Bring original and clean copies of depositions on first day of trial with corrections readily available.

On the first day of trial, bring the original and clean copies of any deposition(s) for which you are responsible. Any corrections must be readily available. If you are likely to need to use the deposition during a witness examination, then give the Court a copy with any corrections at the outset of your examination. This will minimize delay between the original question and the read-ins of the impeaching material. Opposing counsel should have their copy immediately available.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
advance notice

Provide deposition testimony to all parties at least 5 calendar days before trial use.

Deposition testimony should be provided to all other parties at least five calendar days before it will be used in court. For the rare case of voluminous designations, more lead time will be required. Please be reasonable.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
photocopy designation, conform exhibit numbers, mark proffered portions +1 more

Designate deposition testimony by photocopying specific pages and marking proffered portions.

To designate deposition testimony, photocopy the cover page, the page on which the witness is sworn, and each page from which any testimony is proffered, crossing out any portions of such pages not proffered, as well as objections or colloquy (unless needed to understand the question). Please make sure any corrections are interlineated and that references to exhibit numbers conform to the trial numbers.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
review and return, highlight additional blue, highlight objections yellow

Other parties must review and return deposition packets with objections highlighted in yellow and additional passages in blue.

All other parties must then promptly review and return the packet, highlighting in yellow any passages objected to, and in blue additional

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

All exhibits must be referred to as “Trial Exhibit No.” not by party ownership.

To avoid any party claiming “ownership” of an exhibit, all exhibits shall be marked and referred to as “Trial Exhibit No. ,” not as “Plaintiff’s Exhibit” or “Defendant’s Exhibit.”

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Daily time report
Must include
daily time report

Daily time conference required to report time used and remaining.

At the end of each day, counsel must confer over the time used and the time remaining for all parties and advise the Court.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Settlement
Must include
stipulated dismissal or judgment

Parties must be prepared to proceed unless stipulated dismissal/judgment is filed.

Unless and until a stipulated dismissal or judgment is filed or placed on the record, all parties must be prepared to proceed with the final pretrial conference as scheduled and to proceed to trial on the trial date, on pain of dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution or entry of default judgment.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required with all motions and opposition papers

Counsel shall submit a proposed form of order with all motion and opposition papers.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include concurrent redlined version comparing to prior pleading.

If a party files an amended pleading, it shall concurrently file a redlined version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
guidelines range, appellate rights waiver

11(c)(1)(B) plea agreements must include Guidelines range or appellate rights reservation as specified.

Plea agreements pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) must include the following: 1. If the agreement includes a Sentencing Guidelines calculation, then it must also state that the parties agree that the adjusted offense level results in a Guidelines range of ___ to ___ months depending on the defendant's Criminal History Category. 2. If the agreement includes a waiver of appellate rights, it must also reserve the...

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed final pretrial order

Do not prepare joint pretrial conference statement; file joint proposed final pretrial order 7 days before conference instead.

Please do not prepare a joint pretrial conference statement. Nor should counsel invest time on deposition designations or extracts from interrogatories or requests for admissions at the pretrial conference stage. Instead, please file seven calendar days in advance of the final pretrial conference the following:

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint proposed final pretrial order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Joint proposed final pretrial order must contain specific elements including claims, relief, stipulated facts, factual issues, exhibit list, and witness lists with testimony summaries.

a. In lieu of preparing a joint pretrial conference statement, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint proposed final pretrial order that contains: (i) a brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided, (ii) a statement of all relief sought, (iii) all stipulated facts, (iv) a list of all factual issues which remain to be tried, (v) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit, a column for when it is offered in evidence, a column for when it is received in evidence, and a column for any limitations on its use, and (vi) each party’s separate witness list for its case-in-chief witnesses (including those appearing by deposition) providing, for all such witnesses other than an individual plaintiff and an individual defendant, a short statement of the substance of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will give. If non-cumulative testimony is not spelled out, then the Court will presume the witness is cumulative. For each witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for the direct examination (only).

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Each party must file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law 7 days before pretrial conference with hyperlinks to evidence.

b. Each side’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Each party shall file at least 7 days prior to the Pretrial Conference proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on all material issues. The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence. Proposed Findings shall be brief, written in plain English, and free of pejorative language, conclusions and argument. Parties shall deliver to Chambers with a label including the name of the case, the case number and a description of the submission

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial brief
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Each party must file a trial brief.

c. Each side’s trial brief.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list required

Witnesses not on pre-trial list require good cause to be used.

A witness not included in the pre-trial list may not be used without good cause.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibit list
Must include
exhibit lists required, witness order required

Counsel must exchange witness order and exhibit lists before trial begins.

Communication with opposing party. Throughout the trial, all counsel are entitled to know a firm order of witnesses for the next full court day and the exhibits that will be used on direct examination (other than for impeachment of an adverse witness). All other counsel shall provide any objections to such exhibits and shall provide a list of all exhibits to be used with the same witness on cross-examination (other than for impeachment). This requires that the first such notice be provided before trial actually begins.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness availability
Must include
witness ready required

Counsel must have next witness ready or risk being deemed to have rested.

Counsel must always have their next witness ready and in the courthouse. Failure to have the next witness ready or to be prepared to proceed with the evidence will usually constitute resting.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
clean copies required, corrections available, original copies required

Bring original and clean copies of depositions on first day of trial.

On the first day of trial, be sure to bring the original and clean copies of any deposition(s) for which you are responsible. Any corrections must be readily available. If you are likely to need to use the deposition during a witness examination, then give the Court and the witness a copy with any corrections at the outset of the examination.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition testimony
Must include
advance notice required

Deposition testimony must be provided to all parties at least 5 calendar days before use.

Deposition testimony should be provided to all other parties at least five calendar days before it will be used in court. For the rare case of voluminous designations, more lead time will be required. Please be reasonable.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition packet review
Must include
explanations required, blue highlighting required, yellow highlighting required +1 more

Opposing parties must review and return deposition packets with specific highlighting.

All other parties must then promptly review and return the packet, highlighting in yellow any passages objected to, and in blue additional passages as needed to cure the completeness objection. Please cross out any irrelevant portions of any additional pages. A completeness objection should normally be made only if a few extra lines will cure the problem. The parties must provide brief explanations for any additions or deletions. They must also return any counter designations at the same time.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Final deposition packet
Must include
advance notice required, court delivery required

Final deposition packet must be provided to Court at least 2 calendar days before use.

The parties must meet and confer as reasonable. Counsel for the proffering party must then assemble a final packet, including objections and responses to objections, and provide it to the Court at least two calendar days before the proffer will be used. Ordinarily, argument will not be needed.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Bench binder
Must include
exhibit list

Provide bench binder with exhibits on first day of trial using 1-1/2-inch binders with locking rings.

Bench copy: Deposit your exhibits with the deputy clerk (Lashanda Scott) on the first day of trial. A bench binder containing a copy of each side’s exhibits must be provided to the Court on the first day of trial. Each exhibit must be separated with a label divider. Please use 1-1/2-inch binders with locking rings. (Heavier binders are too hard to handle.)

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit filing
Must include
joint certification

Exhibits must be filed on docket within 10 days of verdict with Joint Certification of Counsel.

Exhibits offered and admitted during trial shall be filed on the docket within ten days of a trial verdict pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (g). The parties shall file through the exhibits shall be accompanied by a Joint Certification of Counsel that the exhibits are true and correct copies of the exhibits submitted to the trier of fact in the matter.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness representation

Only one lawyer per witness per party allowed for all purposes.

There can only be one lawyer per witness per party for all purposes, including objections.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
timing requirement

Plaintiffs must file summary judgment motions 6 weeks before cut-off date.

If Plaintiffs wish to file a motion for summary judgment, they shall do so six (6) weeks before the cut-off date.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment
Must include
timing requirement

Defendants may file summary judgment 5 weeks before cut-off if no Plaintiff motion.

If Plaintiffs do not file a motion for summary judgment, Defendants may file one five (5) weeks before the case-dispositive motion hearing cut-off date and the schedule in Local Rule 7-3 shall apply.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
hearing date awareness

Civil motions heard Wednesdays at 2:30 PM; check website for unavailable dates.

Civil motion calendar is conducted on Wednesdays at 2:30 p.m. Parties need not reserve a hearing date for civil motions; however, parties must check the legal newspapers or the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov for unavailable dates.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
timing requirement

Case management conference held on cut-off date regardless of motions filed.

A Further Case Management Conference will be held on the case-dispositive motion hearing cut-off date, whether or not dispositive motions are filed.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial preparation
Must include
exchange without filing

Exchange papers 28 days before pretrial conference without filing.

Not less than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall exchange (but not file or lodge) the papers described in Civil L.R. 16-10(b)(7),(8),(9), and (10), and their motions in limine.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement
Must include
joint statement

Joint pretrial conference statement required 14 days before pretrial conference.

Not less than fourteen (14) days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall submit the following: (a) Pretrial Conference Statement. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement containing the following information:

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits not on pretrial list require court permission

No party shall be permitted to offer any exhibit in its case-in-chief that is not disclosed in its exhibit list without leave of the Court for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial statement
Must include
witness list

Witnesses not on pretrial list require court permission

No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of Court for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format with specific subject line.

The parties shall email to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed jury instructions in WordPerfect or Word format. The subject of the email should include the case name, the case number and a description of the document.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact conclusions of law
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be emailed to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format with specific subject line.

The parties shall email to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in WordPerfect or Word format. The subject of the email should include the name of the case, the case number and a description of the document.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings of fact conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact must be hyperlinked to supporting evidence.

The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
joint letter

Discovery disputes require joint letter (max 8 pages) with up to 12 pages of attachments, filed under specific ECF category.

the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than eight (8) pages explaining the dispute. Up to twelve (12) pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions--General > Discovery Letter Brief.”

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list

Witnesses not on the witness list require court leave for good cause.

No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case-in-chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of Court for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial preparation
Must include
exchange without filing

Exchange papers 28 days before pretrial conference without filing.

Not less than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall exchange (but not file or lodge) the papers described in Civil L.R. 16-10(b)(7),(8),(9), and (10), and their motions in limine.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement
Must include
joint statement

14-day deadline to file joint pretrial conference statement.

Not less than fourteen (14) days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel shall submit the following: (a) Pretrial Conference Statement. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement containing the following information:

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits not on the exhibit list require court leave for good cause.

No party shall be permitted to offer any exhibit in its case-in-chief that is not disclosed in its exhibit list without leave of the Court for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be emailed to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format with specific subject line.

The parties shall email to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in WordPerfect or Word format. The subject of the email should include the name of the case, the case number and a description of the document.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed jury instructions must be emailed to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format with specific subject line.

The parties shall email to cwpo@cand.uscourts.gov a copy of their proposed jury instructions in WordPerfect or Word format. The subject of the email should include the case name, the case number and a description of the document.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact must be hyperlinked to supporting evidence.

The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must include a table of contents and be in logical sequence.

The instructions shall be ordered in a logical sequence, together with a table of contents.

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must include argument and authority on separate pages.

Argument and authority for and against each disputed instruction shall be included as part of the joint submission, on separate pages

Senior Judge Claudia WilkenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

All motions filed after September 1, 2022 must comply with this standing order.

All motions filed after September 1, 2022, must conform to this Order. Failure to comply with any rule or standing order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions when appropriate.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Letter

Letters seeking relief are not reviewed; use stipulation/proposed order or motion instead.

Judge Davila does not review or respond to letters or letter briefs providing case information or seeking relief from the Court even if the letter is filed on the docket. All requests requiring the Court to take action shall be made either by Stipulation and Proposed Order or by appropriate motion filed pursuant to the Civil Local Rules.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Amended complaint

Amended complaints must include a red-line document showing changes.

All amended complaints shall attach as an exhibit a red-line document showing the changes made to the previously filed complaint.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders not needed for most motions; required for administrative/injunctive motions; send to ejdpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss. The parties should only file proposed orders in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, and motions that ask the Court to order specific injunctive relief (e.g., a motion for a preliminary injunction or an application for a temporary restraining order) or to make factual findings (e.g., a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys’ fees). All proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word format to ejdpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management conference statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Case Management Conference Statement due 10 days before CMC on Thursdays at 10:00 a.m.

Civil Case Management Conferences are heard on Thursdays at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement at least 10 days prior to the Case Management Conference unless the filing of separate statements is authorized by Civil Local Rule 16-9(a).

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint final pretrial conference statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement due 14 days before FPTC.

No later than 14 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall file and serve a Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement containing the following information:

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint witness list
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Witness List must be filed 14 days before Final Pretrial Conference.

No later than 14 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall file a Joint Witness List which contains a list of witnesses likely to be called at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, together with a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint exhibit list
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint Exhibit List must be filed 14 days before Final Pretrial Conference.

No later than 14 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall exchange copies of all exhibits, summaries, and diagrams to be used at trial other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal and shall file a Joint Exhibit List which contains a list of all documents and other items to be offered as exhibits at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, along with a brief statement for each describing its substance or purpose and the identity of the offering party.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial exhibits
Must include
judge name, case number

Three sets of trial exhibits must be delivered 7 days before trial.

No later than 7 days before the commencement of trial, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall deliver three sets of all pre-marked exhibits organized in three-ring binders to Judge Davila's Courtroom Deputy.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition designations
Must include
judge name, case number

Deposition and discovery designations must be filed 14 days before Final Pretrial Conference.

No later than 14 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall file and serve any excerpts of deposition testimony or other discovery to be offered at trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Expert objections
Must include
judge name, case number

Objections to expert designations must be filed 10 days before trial.

Any objections to the use of designated experts and any counter-designations or deposition testimony shall be filed and served no later than 10 days prior to the commencement of trial.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury materials
Must include
judge name, case number

Jury materials must be jointly filed 10 days before Final Pretrial Conference.

No later than 10 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered, the parties shall jointly file and serve: Proposed jury voir dire questions; Proposed jury instructions; Proposed jury verdict forms; and A short neutral statement of the case which the Court can read to prospective jurors.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed jury instructions must be submitted in paper and Word format to Courtroom Deputy.

Sets of proposed jury instructions shall be submitted both on paper and in Microsoft Word format to Judge Davila’s Courtroom Deputy at ejdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law must be submitted in paper and Word format to Courtroom Deputy.

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law shall be submitted both on paper and in Microsoft Word format to Judge Davila’s Courtroom Deputy at ejdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Findings of fact must be in simple numbered declarative sentences without pejorative language.

The findings of fact shall set forth in simple separately-numbered declarative sentences all factual contentions relied upon by the party in support of its claims or defenses and shall be free from pejorative language and argument.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Conclusions of law must be supported by appropriate legal citations.

Conclusions of law shall be supported by appropriate citation to legal authority.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement
Must include
caption, case number, signature blocks

Notice of Settlement must be filed immediately with signatures from all parties or attorneys.

The parties shall immediately notify the Court of the settlement of any action by filing a Notice of Settlement which provides an estimate of when the parties expect the action will be finally resolved through stipulated dismissal or otherwise. All parties subject to the settlement or their attorneys shall sign the Notice of Settlement.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Notice of settlement
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Settlement after Final Pretrial Conference requires Notice of Settlement and email to Courtroom Deputy.

For settlements that occur after the Final Pretrial Conference and prior to the commencement of trial, the parties shall immediately file a Notice of Settlement and e-mail a copy of the notice to Judge Davila’s Courtroom Deputy at ejdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. Jury costs may be assessed for failure to timely file a Notice of Settlement.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Administrative request telephonic appearance
Must include
proposed order, certificate of service

Administrative Request to Appear Telephonically or via Zoom must be filed one week before hearing.

Parties wishing to appear by telephone or via Zoom shall file and serve an Administrative Request to Appear Telephonically or via Zoom and Proposed Order at least one week prior to the scheduled hearing date.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Summary judgment motions must comply with standing order and may be terminated if non-compliant.

Format: All Motions for Summary Judgment, Partial Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication must comply with the requirements of this Standing Order in addition to any requirements or limitations described in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Local Rules. Any non-compliant motion may be summarily terminated by the Court.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Moving party must include separate statement identifying claims with no genuine issues.

Moving Separate Statement: Any party moving for summary judgment, partial summary judgment or summary adjudication must include a separate, short and concise statement identifying each claim or defense to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Moving separate statement must identify elements, list material facts, and cite undisputed evidence.

For each claim, defense, or part thereof, the Moving Separate Statement must (a) identify the relevant elements or issues, (b) list the asserted material facts establishing those elements or issues, and (c) cite to record evidence demonstrating that the asserted material facts are undisputed (e.g., deposition testimony, declaration or discovery response).

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
separate statement

Moving party must provide separate statement to other parties in electronic format.

Upon filing, the moving party shall provide the Moving Separate Statement to all other parties in an electronic, word-processing format for ease of response thereto.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Opposing party must include responsive separate statement incorporating moving statement and indicating disputed facts.

Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment, Partial Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication must include one Responsive Separate Statement which (a) incorporates the Moving Separate Statement, (b) indicates whether each of the facts listed in the Moving Separate Statement is disputed or undisputed, and (c) identifies any additional material facts the party contends will establish a genuine issue to be tried.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition

Opposing party must cite evidence when disputing facts in responsive separate statement.

If the opposing party contends that a fact is in dispute, the opposing party must cite to evidence in the record establishing the dispute.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
certificate of service, local rule certificate

Parties must comply with this Standing Order and all related court rules and orders.

Parties and counsel shall comply with all aspects of this Standing Order, the Standing Order for Civil Cases, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil and Patent Local Rules, and all General Orders of the Northern District of California.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Terms must be designated as disputed or presumed undisputed in joint claim construction statement.

Any disputed terms, phrases, and clauses (hereinafter, for simplicity, 'terms') shall be designated as disputed; all other terms shall be presumed undisputed.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Parties must agree on the identity of disputed terms.

For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on the identity of the term.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint statement must list disputed terms with each party's proposed construction and support side by side.

With regard to disputed terms, the joint statement shall list each term, each party's proposed construction, and support for each party's construction side by side.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
exhibit list

One copy of each patent in dispute must be attached to the joint claim construction statement.

Parties shall attach to the joint claim construction statement one copy of each patent in dispute.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction brief

Court will initially construe only terms designated as 'most significant' by parties.

As an initial matter, the Court will construe only those terms designated by the parties as 'most significant' pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3(c).

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction brief

Claim construction briefs must address only the 'most significant' terms.

The claim construction briefs shall address each of those terms and only those terms.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Exchange exhibits/visual aids one week before hearing; submit 3 bound copies to Court.

No later than one week prior to the tutorial and/or claim construction hearing, counsel shall exchange copies of any exhibits and visual aids, and shall submit to the Court three bound copies of the exhibits and visual aids.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement due 7 days before conference.

In a joint case management statement to be filed no later than 7 days before the conference, the parties must address the following topics:

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial conference statement due 21 days before final pretrial conference

At least twenty-one (21) days prior to the final pretrial conference, the parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial conference statement must contain specific information

The statement shall contain the following information:

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must include brief description of claims and defenses

The Action. a. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which need to be decided.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must itemize all relief and damages sought

b. Relief Prayed. A statement of all relief sought, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must list all stipulated undisputed facts

Factual Basis of the Action. a. Undisputed Facts. A list of all stipulated facts, i.e., all facts parties to which the parties will stipulate to for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must list disputed factual issues organized by counts

b. Disputed Factual Issues. A list of all factual issues that remain to be tried, stating the issues with the same generality/specificity as any contested elements in the relevant jury instructions and organized by counts.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must include trial time estimates for each party

Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours needed for the presentation of each party's case.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must summarize settlement negotiation status

Trial Alternatives and Options. a. Settlement Discussion. A statement summarizing the status of settlement negotiations and indicating whether further negotiations are likely to be productive.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must address magistrate judge consent and feasibility

b. Consent to Trial Before a Magistrate Judge. A statement whether reference of all or part of the action to a master or magistrate judge is feasible, including whether the parties consent to a court or jury trial before a magistrate judge, with appeal directly to the Ninth Circuit.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must address proposed amendments or dismissals

c. Amendments or Dismissals. A statement of requested or proposed amendments to pleadings or dismissals of parties, claims, or defenses.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must address bifurcation or separate trial of issues

d. Bifurcation or Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues is feasible and desired.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Joint pretrial statement must include witness list with testimony substance and length estimates

Witnesses. The following information should be provided as an appendix to the joint pretrial conference statement. For each party, a list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial, including those appearing by deposition. For each witness, there should be a short statement of the substance of his or her testimony and an estimate regarding the length of testimony (including direct and cross-examination). If the witness is an expert witness, the short statement should

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Discovery letter briefs must be e-filed in specific ECF category.

Discovery letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > “Discovery Letter Brief.”

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
certificate of conference

Joint letter brief must attest to in-person meet and confer (phone only with good cause).

The joint letter brief: a. Must attest that, prior to filing the request for relief, counsel with full and complete authority on discovery matters met and conferred in person. A telephone meet and confer is permitted only where there is good cause (e.g., plaintiff’s counsel is located on the West coast while defense counsel is located

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Document production response
Must include
certificate of service

Document production responses must affirmatively state extent of production and confirm completion after diligent search.

In responding to requests for production of documents, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, a party shall affirmatively state in a written response the full extent to which the party will produce materials. In addition, the party shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that the party has produced all such materials so described that have been located after a diligent search of all locations where such materials might plausibly be found.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff/removing defendant must serve standing orders to all parties and file certificate of service.

Service of Standing Orders. Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) is directed (a) to serve copies of this standing order at once upon all parties to the action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5 and (b) to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Declaration
Must include
caption

Declarations must be filed as separate documents from motions.

All declarations shall be filed as separate documents. This includes motions and declarations e-filed with the Court. Supporting declarations must be filed as separate documents.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Communication
Must include
caption

Letters to the court are prohibited except for discovery disputes or with court permission; all communications must be in pleading form.

With the exception of discovery disputes (see the Civil Standing Orders on Discovery), or unless expressly permitted by the Court, parties shall not submit letters to the Court, and any communication with the Court must be in pleading form, including but not limited to status reports, requests for continuances, and requests for telephonic appearances.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Summary judgment motion
Must include
caption

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered.

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered by the Court.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Complaint
Must include
chart of statements

Plaintiffs in federal securities fraud cases must attach a chart of allegedly fraudulent statements or omissions to the complaint.

Where a plaintiff files a federal securities fraud case, the plaintiff shall attach to its complaint a chart regarding any allegedly fraudulent/misleading statement(s) or omission(s).

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion

Plaintiffs' counsel must include a 'Manageability of the Class Action Trial' section in class certification motions.

In any motion for class certification, plaintiffs' counsel must include a section called 'Manageability of the Class Action Trial' in which they explain precisely how the Court should handle any potentially individualized issues to ensure that they do not render the trial unmanageable.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed verdict form

Plaintiffs' counsel must file a proposed verdict form with class certification motions.

plaintiffs' counsel must file a proposed verdict form in connection with the motion for class certification.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each party filing or opposing a motion must serve a proposed order with the motion or opposition.

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision. The proposed order should be filed at the same time as the motion or opposition.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed final pretrial order

Proposed final pretrial order must contain specific content: description of claims/defenses, relief sought, stipulated facts, factual issues, joint exhibit list, and witness lists with time estimates.

This joint pretrial conference order should contain: (i) a brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided; (ii) a statement of all relief sought; (iii) all stipulated facts; (iv) a list of all factual issues that remain to be tried, stating the issues and organized by claims; (v) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank column for when it will be offered into evidence, a blank column for when it may be received into evidence, and a blank column for any limitations on its use; and (vi) each party’s separate witness list for its case-in-chief witnesses (including those appearing by deposition) providing, for all such witnesses other than an individual plaintiff and an individual defendant, a short statement of the substance of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will offer.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Bench binder
Must include
exhibit list

Counsel must provide one set of bench binders with labeled exhibit dividers to the Court on the first day of trial.

In general, the Court requires one set of bench binders that contain copies of the exhibits. Counsel shall provide these binders to the Court on the first day of trial. Each exhibit must be separated with a label divider. In large letters, the labels should identify the range of exhibit numbers contained in a binder.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit index
Must include
exhibit list

Before closing arguments, counsel must confer with the deputy clerk and prepare an index of admitted exhibits.

Before the closing arguments, counsel must confer with the deputy clerk to make sure the exhibits in evidence are in good order. Before the case goes to the Court, counsel shall prepare an easy to read index of admitted exhibits, which should include all exhibits actually in evidence (and no others) stating the exhibit number and a brief, non-argumentative description (e.g., letter from A. B. Case to D. E. Frank, dated August 17, 1999).

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Ex parte application

Ex parte Rule 17(c) subpoena applications must demonstrate necessity for ex parte proceedings, relevance, admissibility, specific identification, and good cause for advance production; documents produced to Court first.

If a defendant files an ex parte application for document subpoena(s), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c), the defendant is required to demonstrate that proceeding ex parte is “necessary to preserve the defendant’s overriding constitutional rights” because to do otherwise would “reveal[] his trial strategy.” See United States v. Tomison, 969 F. Supp. 587, 595 (E.D. Cal. 1997). In addition, the defendant is required to show that the information sought is: (1) relevant; (2) admissible; and (3) specifically identified. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 700 (1974). If the defendant seeks production in advance of trial, they are required to demonstrate good cause for advance production. See id. If the defendant is able to make the requisite showing above, Rule 17(c) requires production of the documents to the Court, not to the defendant. The Court will review the materials to determine whether they are responsive to the subpoena(s). Following the Court’s determination, both parties will be entitled to inspect the responsive materials unless defendant is able to demonstrate an overriding need for confidentiality. See Tomison, 969 F. Supp. at 597. The Court will deny any application that does not meet the required showing, and it will indicate if the ruling is with or without prejudice to renewing the request.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed final pretrial order

Parties must meet and confer and file a proposed final pretrial order 14 days before the Final Pretrial Conference, containing case description, stipulated facts, joint exhibit list, witness lists, and issues for the Court.

In lieu of preparing a joint pretrial conference statement, the parties shall meet and confer in person and prepare a jointly signed proposed final pretrial order fourteen (14) days in advance of the Final Pretrial Conference. In addition to the matters set forth in Northern District Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b), this joint pretrial conference order should contain: (i) a brief description of the substance of the case; (ii) if appropriate, all stipulated facts; (iii) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank column for when it will be offered into evidence, a blank column for when it may be received into evidence, and a blank column for any limitations on its use; and (iv) each party’s separate witness list for its case-in-chief witnesses (see N.D. Crim. L.R. 17.1-1(b)(9)). Items (ii) and (iii) should be appendices to the proposed order. The proposed order should also state which issues, if any, are for the Court to decide, rather than the jury.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
joint statement

Joint case management statements required 7 days before conference.

Joint case management statements are required and must be filed seven (7) days in advance of the case management conference date.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Declaration
Must include
separate document

Declarations must be filed as separate documents.

All declarations shall be filed as separate documents.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Brief
Must include
evidentiary objections

Evidentiary objections must be in briefs except for judicial notice or reply brief evidence.

Except for objections to requests for judicial notice or evidence submitted with a reply brief, all evidentiary objections to evidence submitted shall be contained in the parties' briefs.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required with each motion.

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also electronically file and serve a proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority, that the party requests the Court to adopt.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order

Word version of proposed order must be emailed to jswpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

A word version of the proposed order should be sent to jswpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing orders
Must include
certificate of service

Standing orders must be served on all parties and certificate of service filed.

Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) is directed to serve copies of these standing orders at once upon all parties to their action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4 and 5, and to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-6(a).

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Documents must be referred to by Bates-stamp number.

Documents shall be referred to by the Bates-stamp number assigned by the document depository.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction brief

Claim construction briefs must address only truly disputed terms in joint statement order.

Claim construction briefs shall address each disputed term, but only those that are truly disputed, following the order of the joint statement.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Reply brief

Amended final joint claim construction statement required when filing reply briefs.

At the time of filing the reply briefs, the parties shall file an amended, final joint claim construction statement, including only the remaining disputed terms, phrases, and clauses.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Objections limited to privilege or preservation of objection.

Counsel shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c)(2). Deposition objections may be made as to privilege or may be made only where required in order to preserve the objection.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Speaking objections and coaching prohibited.

Speaking objections or those calculated to coach the deponent are prohibited.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Instructions not to answer limited to privilege, court order, or Rule 30(d)(3) motion.

A person may instruct a deponent not to answer a question only when necessary to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation directed by the Court, or to present a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(3).

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Extra copies of documents must be provided to opposing counsel and deponent.

Extra copies of documents used during the deposition should ordinarily be provided to opposing counsel and the deponent.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
certificate of service

Deponents must be shown documents before examination, except for impeachment.

Deponents should be shown a document before being examined about it except when counsel seek to impeach or test the deponent's recollection.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Claim construction hearing

Demonstrative exhibits permitted if based on filed papers; exhibits exchanged 48 hours before hearing.

Demonstrative exhibits and visual aids are permissible at the hearing as long as they are based on information contained in the papers already filed. Counsel shall exchange copies of exhibits no later than forty-eight hours prior to the hearing.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
local rule certificate

Protective orders must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

All stipulated protective orders and filings shall comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed final pretrial order

Proposed final pretrial order must contain specific content including claims, relief, stipulated facts, factual issues, exhibit list, witness list, and issues for court vs. jury.

This joint pretrial conference order should contain: (i) a brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided; (ii) a statement of all relief sought; (iii) all stipulated facts; (iv) a list of all factual issues that remain to be tried, organized by claims; (v) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank column for when it will be offered into evidence, a blank column for when it may be received into evidence, and a blank column for any limitations on its use; and (vi) each party's separate witness list for its case-in-chief witnesses (including those appearing by deposition) providing, for all such witnesses other than an individual plaintiff and an individual defendant, a short statement of the substance of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will offer. If non-cumulative testimony is not detailed, the Court will presume the witness is cumulative. For each witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for direct and for cross examination. The Court uses this information to estimate the time limits to be allocated for trial. Items (v) and (vi) should be appendices to the proposed order. The proposed order should also state which issues, if any, are for the Court to decide, rather than the jury.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Joint proposed jury instructions must follow specific formatting and identification rules for stipulated and disputed instructions.

A joint set of proposed instructions on substantive issues of law arranged in a logical sequence. If undisputed, an instruction shall be identified as 'Stipulated Instruction No. __ Re __.' If a model instruction includes bracketed language or blanks, the parties must provide the Court with the appropriate language from the brackets and the blanks shall be completed. Even if stipulated, the instruction shall be supported by citation. If disputed, each version of the instruction shall be submitted together in their logical place in the overall sequence. Each such disputed instruction shall be identified as, for example, 'Disputed Instruction No. __ Re __ Offered by __:' with all blanks or bracketed language filled in as appropriate. All disputed versions of the same basic instruction shall bear the same number. Citations with pin cites are required. If the parties modify a form instruction, they must clearly identify those modifications in bold font or in italics. If a party does not have a counter version and simply contends that no such instruction in any version should be given, then that party should so state (and explain why in the separate memoranda required by paragraph 2(b)) on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate version.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Disputed instruction memorandum

Disputed jury instructions require a supporting memorandum and a responsive brief, both organized by instruction number and quoting controlling authorities.

To the extent they are unable to resolve their disputes, the Court requires complete briefing on disputed instructions. Thus, a party supporting an instruction must submit a separate memorandum of law in support of its disputed instructions, organized by instruction number. Counsel shall quote exact, controlling passages from the authorities. The party opposing a given instruction, or instructions, must include a responsive brief to the supporting party's memorandum, organized by instruction number and also shall quote exact, controlling passages from the authorities.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed voir dire questions

Joint proposed voir dire questions must be filed; separate requests only for good cause.

A joint set of proposed voir dire questions supplemented only if necessary by separate requests and for good cause shown.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition excerpts with objections

Deposition designations with objections must be filed as excerpts with basis for objection and response.

Excerpts of any deposition designations that are to be used in a parties' case-in-chief as to which there are objections. The parties should include with these excerpts the basis for the objection and the response thereto. If the parties do not have objections to deposition designations, they should follow the procedures set forth in Paragraph 29.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Interrogatory admission excerpts with objections

Interrogatory and admission responses with objections must be filed as excerpts with basis for objection and response.

Excerpts of responses to interrogatories and requests for admissions that are to be used in a party's case-in-chief as to which there are objections. The parties should include with these excerpts the basis for the objection and the response thereto. If the parties do not have objections to responses to interrogatories or requests for admissions, they should follow the procedures set forth in Paragraph 30.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit index
Must include
exhibit list

Counsel must prepare an index of admitted exhibits with exhibit numbers and brief descriptions before the case goes to the jury.

Before the case goes to the jury, counsel shall prepare an easy-to-read index of admitted exhibits, which should include all exhibits actually in evidence (and no others) stating the exhibit number and a brief, non-argumentative description.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Request for relief
Must include
proposed order

A proposed order must be electronically filed with any request for relief.

If the parties are requesting relief from the Court, they must electronically file a proposed order with the request.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Parties requesting relief must electronically file a proposed order with the request.

If the parties are requesting relief from the Court, they must electronically file a proposed order with the request.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Proposed order required with each motion, including relief sought and rationale with citations

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order setting forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority, that the party requests the Court to adopt.

Senior Judge Maxine M. ChesneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Parties filing or opposing a motion must submit a proposed order with relief sought and rationale including legal authority.

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order setting forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority, that the party requests the Court to adopt.

Senior Judge Maxine M. ChesneyCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Each motion must include a proposed order with relief sought and rationale.

Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order which sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority that the party requests the court to adopt.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
joint pretrial statement

Parties must meet and confer 35 days before pretrial conference to prepare joint pretrial statement.

Not less 35 days prior to the pretrial conference, all counsel and/or parties shall meet and confer regarding preparation of the joint pretrial statement.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
joint pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must be filed 28 days before pretrial conference; separate statements not accepted and may result in sanctions.

Not less than 28 days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel and/or parties shall: Serve and file a joint pretrial statement. (Separately filed statements will not be accepted by the court and monetary sanctions will be imposed upon the party failing to cooperate in the preparation of a joint statement).

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Deposition excerpt list
Must include
witness name, discovery responses, page and line references

List of deposition excerpts required for non-testifying witnesses.

Serve and file a list of deposition excerpts for witnesses who will not testify in person, (specifying the witness, page and line references) and other discovery responses that will be offered at trial;

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness name, testimony description

Witness list required with brief description of testimony.

Serve and file a list of all witnesses to be called at trial, in person or by deposition, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, with a brief statement describing the substance of the testimony to be given;

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
exhibit number, sponsoring witness, substance and purpose

Exhibit list required with description and sponsoring witness.

Serve and file a numerical list of exhibits that will be offered as evidence in a party's case in chief in support of a claim or defense, with a brief statement describing the substance and purpose of each exhibit and the name of the sponsoring witness;

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit set
Must include
number of sets

Two sets of exhibits for jury trials, three for court trials to Clerk's Office.

Submit two sets for jury trials and three sets for court trials of all premarked exhibits to the Clerk's Office (exhibits are not filed);

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint voir dire questions
Must include
joint jury instructions, joint voir dire questions

Joint voir dire questions and jury instructions required for jury trials.

Serve and file proposed joint voir dire questions and joint jury instructions for cases to be tried by jury;

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
findings of fact, conclusions of law

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law required for court trials.

Serve and file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for cases or claims to be tried by the court.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed verdict form
Must include
no party references

Proposed verdict form required with no party references.

Serve and file a proposed verdict form which contains no reference to submitting party.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness and exhibit disclosure
Must include
disclosure required, good cause required, court leave required

Witnesses and exhibits not disclosed require court leave and good cause.

No party shall be permitted to call any witness or offer any exhibit in its case in chief that is not disclosed in these pretrial filings without leave of court and for good cause.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition to motion in limine
Must include
no replies allowed, due 14 days before pretrial

Opposition to motions in limine due 14 days before pretrial conference, no replies.

Not less than 14 days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel and/or parties shall serve and file any opposition to a motion in limine and any counter deposition designations. No replies shall be filed.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Plea agreement
Must include
plea agreement

Plea Agreement to chambers by 5pm day before; open plea notification to deputy by 5pm day before

Judge Hamilton does not use an Application for Entry of Plea. However, counsel for the government shall deliver a copy of the Plea Agreement to chambers by 5:00 p.m., the day before the plea is to be entered. Should the plea not involve a Plea Agreement, counsel for the defendant shall notify the courtroom deputy of the entry of an open plea by 5:00 p.m., the day before the plea is to be entered.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
affidavit or declaration

Motions must comply with Crim. L.R. 47-2(b) and Civil L.R. 7-5 for affidavits/declarations

All motions and oppositions to motions shall comply with Crim. L.R. 47-2(b), which requires that motions “presenting issues of fact . . . be supported by affidavits or declarations which comply with the requirements of Civil L.R. 7-5.” Civil L.R. 7-5, in turn, requires that “[f]actual contentions made in support of or in opposition to any motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration and by appropriate references to the record.” Moreover, other evidence in support of or in opposition to any motion “must be appropriately authenticated by an affidavit or declaration.” That rule further requires that affidavits and declarations contain factual contentions only, avoiding conclusions and legal argument, and “conform as much as possible to the requirements of FRCivP 56(e).”

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Joint claim construction statement must be truly joint, clearly designate disputed terms, and list each disputed term with proposed constructions side by side.

The joint claim construction statement required by Pat. L. R. 4-3 must be truly joint. Disputed terms, phrases, and clauses must be clearly designated as disputed. All other terms will be presumed undisputed. For any term in dispute, the parties must agree on what the term actually is. With regard to disputed terms, phrases, or clauses, the joint statement must list each disputed term, phrase, or clause (listed by claim); each party’s proposed construction; and support for each party’s proposed construction side by side.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Submission

The submission must include specified information about removal and diversity jurisdiction.

Upon removal of this action, the removing defendant or defendants shall, within ten (10) days of the date of removal, file and serve a submission providing the following information: 1. Whether all defendants served at the time of removal joined in the notice of removal. 2. Whether the notice of removal was dated more than thirty (30) days after the first defendant was served. 3. If the action has been removed on the grounds of diversity jurisdiction, whether any defendant served at the time of removal is a citizen of California. 4. If the action has been removed on the grounds of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of all named plaintiffs and all named defendants (including the citizenship of all members or partners in any non-corporate party).

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint letter
Must include
proposed resolutions, summary of positions, description of issues

Joint Letter must detail every disputed issue and each party's position

The Joint Letter must include a description of every issue in dispute and, with respect to each such issue, a detailed summary of each party’s final substantive position and its respective proposed resolution on each issue.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
sealing procedure

Protective orders with sealing provisions must include Civ. L.R. 79-5 compliance procedure

Therefore, all proposed protective orders submitted for court approval which contain provisions for filing documents under seal, must also provide a procedure for obtaining the sealing order that complies with Civ. L.R. 79-5.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
redline comparison

Redline comparison required for proposed protective orders and ESI orders

When filing a proposed stipulated protective order or ESI order, the parties must also file a redline comparison of their proposed order against its respective model order.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Confidentiality request
Must include
written request

Advance written request required to protect confidential documents/testimony at trial

Any party believing that a document, portions thereof, or witness testimony should remain confidential during trial must request in advance of trial that the court take extraordinary measures to protect the confidentiality of that information.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Confidentiality request
Must include
filing deadline

Confidentiality requests must be filed by pretrial papers deadline

The request must be made in writing and filed no later than the date on which pretrial papers are due.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
local rule certificate

Motions to seal must follow Civil Local Rule 79-5 or face summary denial.

Motions to seal shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Failure to follow the local rules may result in summary denial of the motion.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion to seal
Must include
certificate of conference

Meet and confer required before filing sealed documents designated by another party.

Before seeking to file under seal a document or portion of a document that another party has designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” counsel shall review the document. If in counsel’s good faith judgment portions or all of the document have been unnecessarily designated as confidential or no longer require confidential treatment, counsel shall meet and confer with counsel for the designating party to attempt to resolve the issue.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Declaration

Declarations must provide specific showing for sealing, not blanket statements.

The declaration in support of sealing or in support of redaction must make a specific showing explaining why the document or excerpt sought to be sealed may justifiably be sealed, rather than making a blanket statement about the grounds for sealing or redaction. The declaration must state whether the “compelling reasons” or “good cause” standard applies and why.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

Proposed orders on administrative motions to seal must follow a specific format with document portions, evidence, and order columns.

Proposed Orders on administrative motions to seal must conform to the following format: Document or Portion of Evidence Offered in Support Order Document Sought to Be of Sealing Sealed Motion at page 2, Lines 10 – 11 Jones Declaration ¶ 1 Motion at page 5, Lines 4-7 Jones Declaration ¶ 2

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

When narrowing a sealing request, the designating party must submit a new proposed order.

When a designating party files a declaration in support of another party's motion to seal, and the designating party narrows the submitting party's original sealing request, the designating party shall submit a new proposed order consistent with the narrowed request.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Class action settlement

Parties must comply with Northern District's Guidelines for Class Action Settlements.

Parties MUST comply with the Northern District's Guidelines for Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement
Must include
joint filing

Joint pretrial conference statement required 14 days before pretrial conference

The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement containing the following information:

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement

Pretrial conference statement due 14 days before pretrial conference

The statement is due fourteen days prior to the Pretrial Conference.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Pretrial conference statement

Counsel must meet and confer in good faith before complying with pretrial requirements

COUNSEL SHALL MEET AND CONFER IN GOOD FAITH IN ADVANCE OF COMPLYING WITH THE FOLLOWING PRETRIAL REQUIREMENTS.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Daily transcript
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Daily transcripts/realtime reporting must be arranged at least 14 days before trial.

If a daily transcript and/or realtime reporting is needed, the parties shall make arrangements with Kristen Melen, Court Reporter Supervisor, at (415) 522-2079 or Kristen_Melen@cand.uscourts.gov, at least fourteen days before trial commences. If transcripts will be requested immediately after trial, arrangements must be made with the court reporter at least fourteen days before trial commences.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement

Counsel must file a joint case management statement at least 7 days before the CMC.

Not less than seven days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint case management statement in compliance with the Civil Local Rules and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Proof of service
Must include
certificate of service

Proof of service must be filed within 95 days after filing the complaint, showing which defendants were served and how, and showing cause for any unserved defendant.

Within 95 days after the filing of the complaint, you must file proof of service indicating which defendants were served within the 90 days allowed under Rule 4 (m) and showing, in accordance with Rule 4 (i), how each of those defendants was served (for example, by attaching appropriate certificates of service). You must also show cause why a defendant not served within the 90 days allowed under Rule 4 (m) should not be dismissed without prejudice.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
certificate section

Motion filers must show exclusions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 and calculate excludable time.

The party filing any motion or opposition or other paper in this case shall show on the first page beneath the file number which, if any, of the exclusions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 may be applicable to the action sought or opposed by the motion or other paper, and his or her calculation of the amount of excludable time to the hearing date. Crim. L.R. 47-2(c).

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
exhibit list, witness list, trial memorandum +3 more

Government must file trial memorandum, witness list, jury instructions, verdict form, and exhibit lists.

counsel for the government SHALL: 1) Serve and file a trial memorandum briefly stating the legal bases for the charges and the anticipated evidence, and addressing any evidentiary, procedural or other anticipated legal issues; 2) Serve and file a list of all witnesses who may be called, together with a brief summary of the testimony of each; 3) Serve and file proposed jury instructions on all substantive issues and on any procedural issue not adequately covered by the Court's standard instructions (which are published in the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions). Counsel shall email a copy in Word format to SIPO@cand.uscourts.gov; 4) Serve and file a proposed form of verdict and proposed questions for jury voir dire; and, 5) Serve and file exhibit lists; and serve copies of all marked exhibits on all parties. Counsel will email electronic Word versions of the lists to sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
jury instructions, voir dire questions, proposed verdict form

Defense counsel must file jury instructions, verdict form, and voir dire questions 7 days before pretrial conference.

Not less than seven days before the Pretrial Conference, defense counsel SHALL comply with subparagraphs (3) and (4) above, and, to the extent consistent with the defendant's right to an effective defense, with subparagraphs (1), (2) and (5) above.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
agreed voir dire questions

Counsel must submit agreed voir dire questions; separate submissions for disagreements; no counsel voir dire without leave.

Counsel should submit an agreed upon set of additional requested voir dire questions to be posed by the Court. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree shall be submitted separately. Voir dire by counsel will not be permitted absent leave of Court.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Deadline
7 calendar days
Applies to
Case description
Must include
word count, joint submission

Parties must jointly file 2-4 sentence case description 7 days before pretrial conference.

No later than seven days before the pretrial conference, the parties should jointly file, and send in Word format to sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov, a short (2-4 sentences) proposed description of the case. The description will be read to prospective jurors when they come to the courtroom. If the parties cannot agree on a description, they may submit one document with competing descriptions (but without any argument). The description of the case should not refer to the indictment or to the United States Code unless there is a compelling reason to do so.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
pre marked, sequential numbering

Exhibits must be pre-marked with sequential numbers; only lists filed with court; two copies lodged in binders.

Each exhibit SHALL be pre-marked; with sequential numbers (not lettered). Blocks of numbers should be assigned to fit the needs of the case (e.g., the Government has 1 to 100, Defendant has 101 to 200). The exhibits SHOULD NOT be filed with the Court; only the exhibit lists must be filed with the Court. However, counsel shall lodge with the Court two copies of the exhibits in binders along with an electronic copy of the exhibit lists.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
Admitted exhibits
Must include
judge name, case number

One party must file all admitted exhibits within 10 days of verdict per Civil L.R. 5-1(g).

Within 10 days of the Verdict being rendered Counsel will meet and confer and agree upon one party to file all admitted exhibits pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(g).

Senior Judge Susan IllstonCRITICAL
Applies to
General
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow FRCP, Civil Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this Standing Order.

Parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's Standing Orders.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Case Management Statements must be filed one week before the Case Management Conference.

Case Management Statements must be filed one week prior to the Case Management Conference.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Standing order service
Must include
certificate of service

Plaintiff/removing defendant must serve all Judge Orrick Standing Orders and file certificate of service.

Plaintiff (or in the case of removed cases, any removing defendant) is directed to serve copies of all Judge Orrick Standing Orders at once upon all parties to the action, and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 5 and to file with the Clerk of Court a certificate reflecting such service, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(a).

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statement required 7 days before conference.

Not less than seven days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint case management statement in compliance with the Civil Local Rules and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
no in person surveillance

No in-person surveillance of jurors or their family members permitted.

No in-person surveillance, no matter how brief, of any home, neighborhood, or place of work of any prospective juror or any family member of a prospective juror is allowed.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Deadline
7 days before pretrial conference
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
witness list, exhibit lists, trial memorandum

Parties must serve and file trial memorandum, witness list, and exhibit lists 7 days before Pretrial Conference.

The government and, to the extent consistent with defendant’s right to an effective defense, the defendant shall do the following at least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference: (i) Serve and file a trial memorandum that briefly states the legal bases for the charges and the anticipated evidence, and addresses any evidentiary, procedural, or other anticipated legal issues; (ii) Serve and file a witness list that includes a brief summary of the testimony of each witness; and (iii) Serve and file exhibit lists and serve copies of all marked exhibits on all parties, as discussed in section 5, below.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Deadline
7 days before pretrial conference
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
annotations, joint submission, agreed instructions +1 more

Parties must jointly file jury instructions 7 days before Pretrial Conference on CD/DVD in Word format.

The parties shall jointly prepare a set of jury instructions, and shall file the proposed instructions at least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference. The submission shall contain both agreed-upon instructions (which shall be so noted), and contested instructions, all in the order in which they should be read to the jury. Where contested instructions are included, they should be annotated both with the proponent’s authority for seeking the instruction and the opponent’s reason for opposition. Counsel shall deliver to Chambers a copy of the joint submission, on a CD/DVD in Word format. The label shall include the case number and a description of the documents.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Service
Must include
certificate of service

Pro se parties without IFP must comply with service requirements.

If you are representing yourself and you have not been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) by the Court, you must comply with the service requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and 5.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Juror questionnaire
Must include
confidentiality

Confidentiality required for all juror questionnaires provided to counsel.

The confidentiality of all completed Juror Questionnaires provided to counsel shall be maintained by the parties, their counsel, and anyone working for a party or counsel.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Jury instruction

Jury instructions must be typed separately, include citations, be brief/clear/plain English, and avoid argument.

Each requested instruction shall be typed in full on a separate page and citations to the authorities upon which the instruction is based shall be included. Instructions shall be brief, clear, written in plain English, and free of argument. Pattern or form instructions shall be revised to address the particular facts and issues of this case.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Preliminary statement or instruction
Must include
joint preparation

Preliminary jury statements/instructions must be jointly filed 7 days before Pretrial Conference.

If the parties wish to have a preliminary statement read to the jury, and/or preliminary instructions given to the jury, they shall jointly prepare and file the text of the proposed preliminary statement and/or preliminary instructions at least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions
Must include
word format, cd dvd submission, labeling requirements +1 more

Non-jury parties must file proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 14 days before Pretrial Conference with hyperlinks, on CD/DVD in Word format.

In non-jury cases, each party shall file at least fourteen days prior to the Pretrial Conference proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on all material issues. The Court requests that the parties hyperlink each proposed Finding of Fact to any supporting evidence. Proposed Findings shall be brief, written in plain English, and free of pejorative language, conclusions and argument. Parties shall deliver to Chambers copies of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on a CD/DVD in Word format, with a label including the name of the case, the case number and a description of the submission.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list and copies
Must include
one set per party, complete exhibit list

Parties must provide one set of all proposed exhibits to other parties 14 days before Pretrial Conference.

The government and, to the extent consistent with the defendant’s right to an effective defense, the defendant shall provide every other party with one set of all proposed exhibits, charts, schedules, summaries, diagrams, and other similar documentary materials to be used in its case in chief at trial, together with a complete list of all such proposed exhibits, at least fourteen days prior to the Pretrial Conference.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit stipulation
Must include
good faith effort, stipulation to authenticity

Parties must make good faith effort to stipulate to exhibit admissibility 7 days before Pretrial Conference.

At least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall make a good faith effort to stipulate to exhibits’ admissibility. If stipulation is not possible, the parties shall make every effort to stipulate to authenticity and foundation absent a legitimate (not tactical) objection.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit objection statement
Must include
grounds for objection, offering party position, identified objected items

Parties must file exhibit objection statements 7 days before Pretrial Conference identifying objected items, grounds, and offering party's position.

Each party shall file a statement briefly identifying each item objected to, the grounds for the objection, and the position of the offering party at least seven days prior to the date set for the Pretrial Conference.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Court exhibit set
Must include
binders, chambers delivery, marked tabbed indexed

One set of exhibits must be provided to Court in Chambers on Friday before trial date in marked, tabbed, indexed binders.

One set of exhibits shall be provided to the Court in Chambers on the Friday prior to the trial date, in binders, marked, tabbed, and indexed in accordance with Local Rule 16-10(b)(7).

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Witness binder
Must include
for witnesses with 3 plus exhibits

Witness binders required for witnesses testifying about 3+ exhibits if exhibits don't fit in one binder.

If all of the exhibits in a case do not fit in one binder, then parties shall prepare a witness binder for each witness that will testify regarding three or more exhibits.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Filing
Must include
chambers copy

Three-hole punched copy for Judge’s chambers and witness/exhibit lists for court reporter required with filings.

Each document filed or lodged with the Court must be accompanied by a three-hole punched copy for use in the Judge’s chambers. In addition, one copy of the witness and exhibit lists should be furnished to the court reporter.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Motion
Must include
speedy trial exclusions, excludable time calculation

Motion filers must show Speedy Trial Act exclusions and excludable time on first page.

The party filing any motion or other paper in this case shall show on the first page beneath the file number which, if any, of the exclusions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 may be applicable to the action sought or opposed by the motion or other paper, and his or her calculation of the amount of excludable time to the hearing date.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
linkedin prohibited

LinkedIn prohibited for juror research due to notification features.

LinkedIn may not be used to conduct any research on any prospective juror. The reason for this restriction is that a prospective juror who is on LinkedIn may be notified of the identity of anyone who uses LinkedIn to view the prospective juror's profile or other information, or be notified that an 'anonymous' person viewed the prospective juror's profile or that an inquiry through LinkedIn has been made, even if an investigator uses an account that allows for 'anonymous' searches. Those notifications constitute 'contact' with the prospective juror.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
stories features prohibited

Stories features on Instagram, SnapChat, Facebook prohibited for juror research.

Some social media sites have features to automatically notify users that their posts have been seen by certain people, such as temporary 'stories' that provide the poster a list of accounts that have 'viewed' the post/post. These features may not be used to conduct any research on any prospective juror, even if they are posted publicly, because the automatic notification constitutes 'contact' with the prospective juror, as the individual may be notified of the identity of anyone who views their post. This applies to 'stories' on Instagram, SnapChat, and Facebook, and to any other form of social media with similar automatic notification features.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Opposition
Must include
speedy trial exclusions, excludable time calculation

Opposition filers must show Speedy Trial Act exclusions and excludable time on first page.

The party filing an opposition or other paper shall also show on the first page beneath the file number which, if any, of the exclusions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 may be applicable to the action sought or opposed by the motion or other paper, and his or her calculation of the amount of excludable time to the hearing date. Crim. L.R. 47-2 (c).

Senior Judge William H. OrrickCRITICAL
Applies to
Exhibit list

At close of evidence, counsel must jointly provide a revised list of admitted exhibits with numbers and brief descriptions.

At the close of evidence, counsel shall jointly provide a revised list of all exhibits actually in evidence (and no others) stating the exhibit number and a brief, non-argumentative description (e.g., letter from A. B. Case to D. E. Frank, dated August 17,1999).

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Witness list

Witness list must include all trial witnesses (except impeachment/rebuttal) with a brief statement of testimony; descriptions limited to non-cumulative testimony; undisclosed witnesses require leave.

the parties shall lodge and serve a list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial (including those appearing by deposition), other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, together with a brief statement following each name describing the substance of the testimony to be given (such a statement is not necessary for witnesses that are plaintiffs/defendants). Parties are to limit their descriptions to non-cumulative testimony. No party shall be permitted to call any witness in its case in chief who is not disclosed in its pretrial statement without leave of court for good cause;

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit list

Exhibit list must include all trial exhibits (except impeachment/rebuttal) with a brief statement of substance/purpose and sponsoring witness.

the parties shall lodge and serve separate lists of all documents and other items to be offered as exhibits at the trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, with a brief statement following each, describing its substance or purpose and the identity of the sponsoring witness;

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Juror questionnaire

Parties must file a joint juror questionnaire, proposed voir dire questions, and a joint simplified statement of the case.

the parties shall file (1) a joint juror questionnaire, (2) a set of proposed voir dire questions, and (3) a joint simplified statement of the case to be included in the questionnaire and read to the jury during voir dire.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial order

Joint proposed pretrial order must include: substance of action, relief prayed, stipulated facts, disputed factual issues, and disputed legal issues.

the parties shall lodge and serve a joint proposed pre-trial order, signed and vetted by all counsel, containing the following information: 1. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided; 2. Relief Prayed. A detailed statement of all relief claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed; 3. Stipulated Facts. A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts to which the parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits. The parties shall exercise good faith in stipulating to facts that are not reasonably disputable; 4. Disputed Factual Issues. A list of all factual issues which remain to be tried, stating the issues with the same generality/specificity as any contested elements in the relevant jury instructions, all organized by count; 5. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instruction

Each proposed jury instruction must be supported by citation; disputed instructions require a brief explanation not exceeding one page.

Even if stipulated, an instruction must be supported by citation. If disputed, each version of the instruction shall be inserted, along with a brief explanation (no more than one page) of why the party believes the instruction is (or is not) appropriate.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Briefs over 10 pages must include a summary of argument with case references.

Briefs exceeding 10 pages in length must contain an additional summary of argument, including reference to any important cases cited.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
proposed order

Parties should use model stipulated protective orders; if deviating, they must file a statement of modifications and a redline comparison.

If parties believe that a protective order is necessary, they shall, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated protective orders (available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/stipprotectorder). If the parties’ proposed protective offer differs materially from the model protective order, the parties shall file a statement explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must be accompanied by a redlined version comparing to the prior pleading.

If a party files an amended pleading, it shall concurrently file a redlined version comparing the amended pleading to the prior operative pleading.

charles-r-breyerWARNING
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
authorized counsel, lead trial counsel

Parties must be represented by lead trial counsel or authorized counsel at case management conferences; telephonic appearances are disfavored.

Each party shall be represented at case management conferences by lead trial counsel or counsel with authority to enter into stipulations and make admissions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) and (c), as well as fully prepared to address all of the matters in the CAND CMC Order and Civil L.R. 16-10(b). Failure to do so shall be considered grounds for sanctions. Because of the substantive discussions that occur during case management conferences, telephonic appearances are disfavored.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Discovery letter brief
Must include
caption, case number, limited legal authority

Joint letter brief may cite limited legal authority for dispositive issues only; no declarations allowed; specific discovery excerpts may be attached.

The joint letter brief may cite to limited and specific legal authority only for resolution of dispositive issues. The joint letter brief may not be accompanied by declarations; however any specific excerpt of disputed discovery material may be attached.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Brief

String citations without analysis or descriptive parentheticals will be disregarded by the Court.

String citations without any analysis or descriptive parentheticals will be disregarded.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
proposed order

Defense counsel must serve and file a witness list, exhibit list, and trial memorandum, consistent with the defendant's right to an effective defense.

To the extent consistent with the defendant's right to an effective defense, defense counsel shall also serve and file items (2) through (4) above.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial order
Must include
specific language

Parties must meet and confer and file a Joint Statement of the case for voir dire.

The parties shall also meet and confer and file a Joint Statement of the case to be read during voir dire.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must be marked as 'disputed' and included in the joint submission with supporting argument and authority on separate sheets.

Any instructions on which counsel cannot agree shall be marked as "disputed," and shall be included within the jointly submitted instructions and accompanying table of contents, in the place where the party proposing the instruction believes it should be given. Argument and authority for and against each disputed instruction shall be included as part of the joint submission, on separate sheets directly following the disputed instruction.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must be numbered in order of importance.

Each party shall number its motions in limine in order of importance, the first being the most important.

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition designations

Deposition designations must include cover page, swearing page, all designated testimony pages, redact objections/colloquy and non-designated/sustained testimony, interlineate corrections, conform exhibit numbers to trial numbers.

To prepare designated deposition testimony, counsel shall photocopy the cover page, the page where the witness is sworn, and each page from which any testimony is proffered, including pages containing a counter-designation made by opposing counsel. Counsel should redact objections or colloquy unless needed to understand the question. In addition, counsel should redact any testimony that has not been designated or any testimony to which an objection has been made and sustained by the Court. Any corrections must be interlineated and references to exhibit numbers must conform to the trial numbers. The finished packet should then be the actual script and should smoothly present the identification and swearing of the witness and testimony desired.

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement

The joint pretrial conference statement must include specified content: substance of action, relief, undisputed/disputed facts, legal issues, trial time estimate, trial alternatives, and witness lists.

The statement shall contain the following information: 1. The Action. a. Substance of the Action. A brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which need to be decided. b. Relief Prayed. A statement of all relief sought, particularly itemizing all elements of damages claimed. 2. Factual Basis of the Action. a. Undisputed Facts. A list of all stipulated facts, i.e., all facts parties to which the parties will stipulate to for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting testimony or exhibits. b. Disputed Factual Issues. A list of all factual issues that remain to be tried, stating the issues with the same generality/specificity as any contested elements in the relevant jury instructions and organized by counts. 3. Disputed Legal Issues. Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions. 4. Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number of hours needed for the presentation of each party's case. 5. Trial Alternatives and Options. a. Settlement Discussion. A statement summarizing the status of settlement negotiations and indicating whether further negotiations are likely to be productive. b. Consent to Trial Before a Magistrate Judge. A statement whether reference of all or part of the action to a master or magistrate judge is feasible, including whether the parties consent to a court or jury trial before a magistrate judge, with appeal directly to the Ninth Circuit. c. Amendments or Dismissals. A statement of requested or proposed amendments to pleadings or dismissals of parties, claims, or defenses. d. Bifurcation or Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific issues is feasible and desired. 6. Witnesses. The following information should be provided as an appendix to the joint pretrial conference statement. For each party, a list of all witnesses likely to be called at trial, including those appearing by deposition. For each witness, there should be a short statement of the substance of his or her testimony and an estimate regarding the length of testimony (including direct and cross-examination). If the witness is an expert witness, the short statement should

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement

Joint pretrial conference statement must include a joint exhibit list with specific columns and a joint statement identifying 15 exhibits for advance rulings.

A joint exhibit list in tabular form, with (a) a column that briefly describes the exhibit; (b) a column that describes for what purpose the party will offer the exhibit and identifies its sponsoring witness; (c) a column that states any objections to the exhibit; (d) a column that briefly responds to the objections; and (e) a blank column for the Court's use. ... In addition to the above, a joint statement in which each party identifies fifteen (15) of the opposing party's exhibits for which the identifying party seeks rulings on objections in advance of trial.

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement appendix

Joint pretrial conference statement appendix must include excerpts of discovery responses and joint memoranda for objections.

Excerpts of interrogatory responses, responses to requests for admission, and deposition testimony (with specific line references identified) that each party intends to present at trial. If there are objections to the use of written responses, the parties should include a joint memorandum that briefly states the objecting party's objection and the opposing party's response. ... If specific objections were made during the deposition that are still in need of a Court ruling, the parties should include a joint memorandum that identifies the deposition testimony at issue and that briefly states the objecting party's objection (including any counter-designation) and the opposing party's response (including any counter-designation).

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine should address a single topic.

Each motion in limine should address a single topic

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Preliminary statement

Parties must provide a simplified statement of the case for jury; should not exceed one paragraph.

In a jury trial, the parties shall provide a simplified statement of the case to be read to the jury during voir dire and as a part of the proposed jury instructions. Unless the case is extremely complex, this statement should not exceed one paragraph.

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Emergency conference request

If possible, parties must provide a short one-paragraph description of the dispute before an emergency conference call.

If possible, the parties shall provide a short (one paragraph) description of the dispute prior to any conference call.

edward-m-chenWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
exhibit list

Exhibits not provided as required may be excluded at Court's discretion

All exhibits that have not been provided as required are subject to exclusion in the reasonable exercise of the Court's discretion.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Settlement
Must include
stipulated dismissal

Stipulated dismissal ordinarily required for settlements

A stipulated dismissal will ordinarily be required.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Witness list

Failure to disclose witnesses may result in exclusion at Court's discretion

Failure to comply with this order may, in the discretion of the Court, be grounds for exclusion of any witness who was not properly disclosed.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement must follow Northern District Standing Order; no incorporation by reference.

Unless otherwise ordered, the parties’ statement must comply with the terms of the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California: Contents of Joint Case Management Statement. Parties must not incorporate prior case management statements by reference.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must be in logical sequence and include a table of contents.

The parties' set of proposed jury instructions must be ordered in logical sequence and include a table of contents.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Deviations from model jury instructions must be identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

Proposed deviations from the model instructions, no matter how minor, must be clearly identified by red-lined copy and supported by authority.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must be marked as 'disputed' and include argument and authority.

Any instruction to which the parties disagree must be marked as 'disputed' and followed by concise argument and authority in support of and against the use of the instruction.

jon-s-tigarWARNING
Applies to
Any submission
Must include
ai verification certification

Failure to include AI verification certification may result in sanctions.

Failure to include this certification or comply with this verification requirement will be grounds for sanctions.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Footnotes cannot cite legal authorities or evidence; citations must be in brief body.

Footnotes shall not be used to cite to legal authorities or evidence. All citations to legal authorities or evidence shall be in the body of the brief. Excessive footnotes will be disregarded.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine may address only one issue.

Each motion in limine is limited to 5 pages and may address only one issue.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Daubert motions raised as motions in limine must be filed separately for each expert and count toward the 5-motion limit.

If a party raises a Daubert motion as a motion in limine, the party must file a separate motion for each expert to which the party raises a Daubert challenge. Each Daubert motion is included in the 5 motion maximum for motions in limine.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine must be filed as a separate document and numbered sequentially.

Each motion shall be presented in a separate document and shall be numbered as, for example, 'Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude. . . .'

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs should summarize the party's theory, identify key evidence, and brief controlling legal issues.

A trial brief is most helpful to the Court when it summarizes the party’s theory of the case, identifies key evidence, and provides summary briefing on any controlling issues of law.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Stipulation

Stipulations must be in writing and signed by all parties.

Any stipulations submitted before or during trial shall be in writing and signed by all parties.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must be submitted as a joint set with specific formatting for stipulated and disputed instructions, including citations and arguments.

The parties shall submit a complete joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in a logical sequence, which incorporates the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit to the extent feasible and appropriate. If an instruction is undisputed, it shall be identified as “Stipulated Instruction No. ___ re ____________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. Even if stipulated, the instruction shall be supported by citation to the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit or other authority. If an instruction is disputed, all versions of the instruction shall be inserted together in the logical place for the instruction in the overall sequence. A disputed instruction shall be identified as “Disputed Instruction No. ___ re ____________ offered by ____________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. All disputed versions of the same instruction shall bear the same number. If a party does not have an alternate version but contends that no such instruction should be given, that party should so state on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate version. Each party should support its position regarding a disputed instruction with a brief argument and citation to relevant authority, set forth immediately following the disputed instruction.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Verdict form

Parties must submit a joint proposed verdict form, or separate forms if unable to agree.

The parties shall submit a joint proposed verdict form. If the parties are unable to stipulate to a verdict form, each party shall submit a proposed verdict form.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Jury questionnaire

Counsel must inform the Court if they want a jury questionnaire and submit a proposed questionnaire for review.

Counsel shall inform the Court if they wish to use a jury questionnaire and, if so, shall submit a proposed questionnaire for the Court’s review.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Footnotes may not contain citations to legal authorities or evidence; all citations must be in the body of the brief. Excessive footnotes will be disregarded.

Footnotes shall not be used to cite to legal authorities or evidence. All citations to legal authorities or evidence shall be in the body of the brief. Excessive footnotes will be disregarded.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanWARNING
Applies to
Conference request
Must include
extensive meet and confer efforts demonstrated

Conference requests should be limited and only after extensive meet-and-confer efforts.

Such requests should be made on an extremely limited basis after extensive efforts to meet and confer in person or by videoconference.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
proposed order

Late fee motions require re-sending of notices.

The Court will order parties to re-send notices if the motion for attorneys’ fees is filed late.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Post distribution accounting
Must include
proposed order

10-20% of fees withheld until Post-Distribution Accounting filed.

The Court will typically withhold between 10% and 20% of the attorneys’ fees granted at final approval until after the Post-Distribution Accounting has been filed.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Case management statement

Exception requests must be discussed in initial case management statement.

If the parties believe their case merits an exception to this rule, they should discuss their views in the initial case management statement.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Brief

A party must submit a short request to the Court if proposing a new construction in its brief that differs from the joint statement.

If for some exceptional reason a party needs to propose a different construction in its brief than that found in the joint claim construction statement, that party must submit a short request for consideration to the Court that clearly sets forth the new construction and explains the basis for the change.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Parties must file an amended final joint claim construction statement with the reply brief if positions changed.

If there has been any change in the parties' claim construction positions, the parties shall file an amended, final joint claim construction statement at the time of filing the claim construction reply brief.

Judge Eumi K. LeeWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Joint statements of undisputed facts optional but helpful; separate statements prohibited.

Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Separate statements of undisputed facts may not be filed.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Witness list

Witness list must include a brief summary of each witness's testimony.

Serve and file a witness list that includes a brief summary of the testimony of each witness;

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Pretrial statement

Joint pretrial statement must address all items in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

A joint pretrial statement shall be filed at least seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference and shall address all of the items listed in Criminal Local Rule 17.1-1(b).

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Trial memorandum

Trial memorandum must state legal bases, anticipated evidence, and address evidentiary/procedural issues.

Serve and file a trial memorandum that briefly states the legal bases for the charges and the anticipated evidence, and addresses any evidentiary, procedural, or other anticipated legal issue;

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions require each party to provide proposed language and a one-page explanation.

If, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties cannot agree on a proposed jury instruction, each party's proposed version shall be provided and identified as "Disputed Instruction No. __ Re _______, Offered by ________," with blanks filled in as appropriate. All proposed versions of the same instruction shall bear the same number. Following each set of proposed versions of a disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the Court should give that party's proposed instruction.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

When a party disputes whether an instruction should be given, the proponent provides language and each party explains in one page why it should or should not be given.

If the parties dispute whether a particular instruction should be given at all, the proponent of the instruction shall provide proposed language, identified as "Disputed Instruction No. __ Re _______, Offered by ________," with blanks filled in as appropriate. Following the disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page why the instruction should or should not be given.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Parties must meet and confer and file a joint set of proposed voir dire questions.

Proposed Voir Dire Questions. In cases tried before a jury, the parties are expected to meet and confer and file a joint set of proposed voir dire questions for the Court to ask. Unless otherwise indicated, the Court will conduct voir dire.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Disputed voir dire questions must be identified and submitted without argument.

If, after meeting and conferring in good faith, there are proposed questions about which the parties do not agree, each party may submit a list of disputed proposed questions they wish to be put to the venire. The proponent of each disputed question shall provide proposed language, identified as "Disputed Question No. __, Offered by ________," with blanks filled in as appropriate. No argument concerning why a disputed proposed question should or should not be asked shall be submitted.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Verdict form

Parties must meet and confer on a joint verdict form; if disputed, each party may submit a separate form with a one-page explanation.

Proposed Verdict Forms. The parties are expected to meet and confer and file a joint proposed verdict form. If, after a good faith effort to meet and confer, the parties cannot agree on a joint form, the parties may submit separate proposed verdict forms. If the verdict form is disputed, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why its proposed verdict form should be given.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be pre-marked with trial exhibit stickers and defendant's numbers must follow plaintiff's numbers.

Each exhibit shall be pre-marked with a trial exhibit sticker ("Trial Exhibit No.__"), not deposition exhibit label, and defendant's exhibit numbers shall be sequenced to begin after plaintiff's exhibit numbers.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Parties must agree on exhibit number blocks and withdraw duplicate exhibits, identifying them in the joint pretrial statement.

The parties shall agree on blocks of numbers to fit the needs of the case (e.g., Plaintiff has 1–100, Defendant has 101–200) and make a good faith effort to avoid marking the same exhibit in their respective blocks. If the same exhibit is marked by more than one party, the defendant shall withdraw the duplicative exhibit (but should not renumber its portion of the exhibit list). Section h) of the parties' joint pretrial statement and proposed order must identify the exhibit numbers of the exhibits withdrawn as duplicates.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Pretrial filing

Parties must attempt to stipulate to exhibit admissibility at least 14 days before the pretrial conference.

At least 14 days prior to the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall make a good faith effort to stipulate to exhibits' admissibility.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Exhibit list

Exhibit list must include specific columns with certain fields left blank.

The form exhibit list should include the following columns: (1) Exhibit Number; (2) Brief Description; (3) Sponsoring Witness; (4) Date Marked for Identification (left blank); and (5) Date Admitted Into Evidence (left blank).

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Witness list

Witness list must include specific columns with exhibits column left blank.

The form witness list should include the following columns: (1) Witness Name; (2) Brief Summary of Testimony; and (3) Exhibits (left blank).

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must follow a specific naming format.

Motions should be clearly identified as '___________'s Motion in Limine No. __ Re: ____________.'

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Exhibits necessary for a motion in limine must be attached to a supporting declaration.

If the content of an exhibit is necessary to the resolution of a motion in limine, that exhibit must be attached to a declaration in support of the motion.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Exhibit list

Exhibit lists must be filed, exhibits premarked with Government using 1-100 and Defendant using 101-200.

Serve and file exhibit lists and serve copies of all marked exhibits on all parties. Each item shall be premarked; generally, the Government shall use numbers 1–100 and the Defendant shall use 101–200 – modified to meet the needs of the case.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions must be filed jointly, use Ninth Circuit Model where possible, and show modifications with strikethrough/underline.

Jointly serve and file proposed jury instructions. The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, if they can agree, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions. The parties should use the Ninth Circuit Model jury instructions where possible. Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified to the Court. Any language a party proposes to be removed from a model instruction must be designated with a strikethrough and language proposed to be added to a model instruction must be underlined.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine

Motions in limine must be identified with party name, number, and subject.

Motions should be clearly identified as “___________’s Motion in Limine No. __ Re: ____________.”

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Trial exhibits must be jointly prepared, pre-marked with trial exhibit stickers, and defendant's numbers after government's.

The parties are to jointly prepare a single set of trial exhibits. Each item shall be pre-marked with a trial exhibit sticker (“Trial Exhibit No.__”), not a deposition exhibit label, and defendant’s exhibit numbers shall be sequenced to begin after the government’s exhibit numbers.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Transcript order form

Parties must e-file a transcript order form (CAND 435) at least 14 days before trial if daily transcript or real-time reporting is desired.

Should a daily transcript and/or real-time reporting be desired, the parties shall e-file a transcript order form (CAND 435), at least 14 days before trial.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Technology request
Must include
proposed order

Parties must file a written request and proposed order at least 7 days before trial to bring additional technology into the courthouse.

Should the parties wish to utilize additional technology, the United States Marshals Service requires a court order to allow equipment into the Courthouse. The parties must file a written request and proposed order no later than seven days prior to the beginning of trial if they wish to bring any such technology into the Courthouse.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.WARNING
Applies to
Individual statement

Individual statement (max 2 pages) allowed if joint statement impossible.

The parties are strongly encouraged to submit a joint statement, but in the rare instances when a joint statement is not possible, each side may submit a statement of not more than two pages (12-point font or greater). The statement shall explain why a joint statement was impossible.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Parties must file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, using Ninth Circuit Model instructions where possible, and clearly identify any modifications.

The parties must file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions. The parties should use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions to the fullest extent possible. Modifications and “custom” proposed instructions are discouraged. If offered, they should be clearly identified as such.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Undisputed instructions must be labeled 'Stipulated Instruction No. __ Re __________'; disputed instructions must be labeled 'Disputed Instruction No. __ Re _________ Offered by __________'; all versions of same instruction bear same number.

Undisputed instructions must be identified as “Stipulated Instruction No. __ Re __________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. For disputed instructions, each party’s proposed version must be provided and identified as, “Disputed Instruction No. __ Re _________ Offered by __________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. All proposed versions of the same instruction should bear the same number.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Verdict form

Parties must file a joint proposed verdict form using the same process as jury instructions.

The parties must also file a joint proposed verdict form, using the same process.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Preliminary instructions

Parties should not submit proposed preliminary instructions; the Court will prepare a draft.

The parties should not submit proposed preliminary instructions, which the Court will do on its own in a draft to which the parties may propose modifications.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Parties may file a joint set of proposed voir dire questions; basic background questions are not needed.

If the parties would like the Court to consider particular voir dire questions, they should file a joint set of proposed questions. There is no need to include basic background questions such as name, occupation, education and so on. The Court has standard questions prepared on those topics.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits must be marked and referred to as 'Trial Exhibit No. __' rather than by party designation.

To avoid any party claiming "ownership" of an exhibit, all exhibits shall be marked and referred to as "Trial Exhibit No. __," and not as "Plaintiff's Exhibit" or "Defendant's Exhibit."

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Signature block of discovery dispute letter must identify which party counsel represents.

The signature block of the letter should identify which party counsel represents.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

After discovery dispute conference or hearing, counsel must submit a proposed order agreed as to form.

After the telephone conference or hearing, if any, counsel should submit their proposed order (agreed as to form) by e-filing it.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Failure to file joint statement requires declaration and may result in sanctions.

Failure to file a joint statement must be accompanied by a signed declaration explaining the grounds for that failure. Absent good cause, the parties may be subject to sanctions.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Case management conference

Failure of lead counsel to appear may result in sanctions.

Failure of lead counsel to appear may result in sanctions.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
All submissions

Submission titles must be sufficiently descriptive of the relief sought

The title of a submission must be sufficiently descriptive to alert the Court to the relief sought; for example, please do not bury a request for continuance in the body of a memorandum.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Discovery
Must include
local rule compliance

Criminal discovery procedures strictly enforced per Local Rule 16-1 and Federal Rules.

The procedures for disclosure and discovery set forth in the Local Criminal Rules, in particular Criminal Local Rule 16-1, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure will be strictly enforced.

Judge James DonatoWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Special jury instructions must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, non-argumentative, and disputed instructions must include argument and authority.

The Court discourages the unnecessary submission of special instructions or modification of model instructions. Special instructions, if any, must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative. Any instruction to which the parties disagree must be marked as “disputed” and must be followed by concise argument and authority in support of and against the use of the instruction.

Judge Jon S. TigarWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
voluminous exhibits reduced

Voluminous exhibits must be reduced or summarized.

Voluminous exhibits must be reduced by elimination of irrelevant portions or through the use of summaries.

Judge Jon S. TigarWARNING
Applies to
Witness list

Non-compliance may result in exclusion of undisclosed witnesses.

Failure to comply with this order may, in the discretion of the Court, be grounds for exclusion of any witness who was not properly disclosed.

Judge Jon S. TigarWARNING
Applies to
Motion for final class action settlement approval

Motions for final approval of class action settlements should specify the proposed percentage of attorney’s fees to withhold and the reasoning.

The final approval motion should specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold and why.

Judge Jon S. TigarWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply briefs for motions in limine are not considered unless the court orders otherwise on good cause.

The Court will not consider reply briefs absent prior order on a showing of good cause.

Judge Jon S. TigarWARNING
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must explain any proposed deviations from the timeline.

Parties’ must explain proposals that deviate from the timeline set forth below.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Reply sumf

Reply SUMF must not introduce new material facts.

The Reply SUMF shall not introduce any new asserted material facts.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Responsive sumf

Responsive SUMF must be organized as a chart per Attachment A.

The Responsive SUMF must be organized in the form of a chart as shown in Attachment A.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Opening sumf

Opening SUMF must be organized as a chart per Attachment A.

The Opening SUMF must be organized in the form of a chart as shown in Attachment A.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Objections to evidence

Objections to evidence must be included in the brief, not filed separately.

Objections to evidence shall be contained within the objecting party’s brief and shall not be filed as a separate pleading.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Motion for attorneys fees
Must include
chart

Motion for attorneys' fees must include a chart summarizing hours expended on major tasks.

In addition to the motion, memorandum, and evidence, a party moving for attorneys’ fees must provide the Court with a chart, in the format set forth below, summarizing the hours expended on the major tasks in the case.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Sumf

SUMFs must not include argument or be used to circumvent page limits.

The separate SUMFs shall not include argument in support of the summary judgment motion and shall not be used to circumvent the page limits that apply to summary judgment briefing.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Motion for final approval

The final approval motion must specify the percentage of attorney's fees to withhold and the reasons.

The final approval motion should specify what percentage class counsel believes it is appropriate to withhold and why.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement
Must include
jury questionnaire modifications

Parties may modify standard jury questionnaire with up to 10 additional questions in joint pretrial statement.

The parties must explain whether they are seeking any modifications to the standard jury questionnaire, and if so, they must provide those suggested changes in a jointly-prepared exhibit to their joint pretrial statement. Jury Services has limited ability to add questions to the standard questionnaire. Parties should propose no more than ten total additional questions to the form.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Marshal requires court order to bring equipment into courthouse.

The United States Marshal requires an order to allow equipment into the courthouse. Any request

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
meet and confer

Parties must meet and confer immediately after exhibit exchange to stipulate admissibility.

Following the exchange, the parties must immediately meet and confer about the exhibits and any potential objections, and must make a good faith effort to stipulate to exhibits' admissibility. If the parties cannot reach a complete stipulation, they must make every effort to stipulate to authenticity and foundation absent a legitimate (not tactical) objection.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Exhibits not provided as required may be excluded at Court's discretion.

All exhibits that have not been provided as required are subject to exclusion in the reasonable exercise of the Court's discretion.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief
Must include
good cause, prior order

Reply briefs to MILs are generally not permitted without prior court order showing good cause.

The Court will not consider reply briefs absent a prior order on a showing of good cause.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Voir dire by counsel requires leave of court; brief voir dire generally permitted.

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47(a), voir dire by counsel will not be permitted absent leave of court. Time permitting, it is generally the practice of the Court to provide leave to each side to conduct a brief voir dire.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Witness exhibit list
Must include
timely filing

Non-compliance may result in exclusion of undisclosed witnesses or exhibits.

Failure to comply with this order may, in the discretion of the Court, be grounds for exclusion of any witness or exhibit not properly disclosed.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Witness exam guidelines
Must include
no conference during cross

Direct examination counsel cannot consult with witness during cross-examination except for privilege or court order compliance.

Once the cross-examination of a witness has commenced, and until cross-examination of the witness has concluded, counsel offering the witness on direct examination must not: (a) consult or confer with the witness regarding the substance of the witness’s testimony already given, or anticipated to be given, except for the purpose of conferring on whether to assert a privilege against testifying or on how to comply with a court order; or (b) suggest to the witness the manner in which any questions should be answered.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Witness availability
Must include
next witness ready

Parties must have next witness ready; trial time continues or party deemed to have rested if not.

Parties should always have their next witness ready and available in the Courthouse. If a party does not have a witness ready, that party’s trial time will still be running for the day, or the party will have deemed to have rested.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
balance, clarity, accuracy +2 more

Special jury instructions must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative.

Special instructions, if any, must be complete, accurate, balanced, clear, and non-argumentative.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
reduction required

Voluminous exhibits must be reduced by eliminating irrelevant portions or using summaries.

Voluminous exhibits must be reduced by elimination of irrelevant portions or by using summaries.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
minimum stipulation, authenticity and foundation

If parties cannot stipulate to admissibility, they must at least stipulate to authenticity and foundation.

If the parties cannot stipulate, they must make every effort to stipulate at least to authenticity and foundation absent

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Parties must review the court’s ESI guidelines and meet and confer on ESI and ADR prior to the initial case management conference; failure to meet and confer may result in sanctions.

Parties must review in detail the Northern District’s electronically stored information (“ESI”) guidelines and checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences, which are available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines. The Court discourages deviation from the ESI guidelines absent good cause. Failure to meet and confer regarding the required topics prior to the initial case management conference, including alternative dispute resolution and ESI, may, in the reasonable exercise of the Court’s discretion, result in sanctions or disciplinary action.

Judge Noël WiseWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
paper copies

Paper copies of exhibits must be available if requested.

The parties should plan to make such paper copies available for the Court’s use if requested.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Joint discovery letter

Only discovery requests or responses may be attached as exhibits to the joint discovery letter.

No exhibits may be submitted with the letter other than any discovery request or response that is the subject of the letter.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Evidentiary objections must be included in the party's brief, not filed as a separate document.

Objections to evidence must be contained within the objecting party’s brief. Judge Pitts does not consider objections filed as a separate pleading.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement

Moving party must provide separate statement in word-processing format to all parties; statement should not be filed on docket initially.

Upon filing any motion for summary judgment, the moving party shall provide a Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts to all other parties in a word-processing format. The statement should not be filed on the docket at that time.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement

Initial separate statement must be organized as identified in Attachment A.

The initial statement shall be no more than 15 pages and must be organized as identified in Attachment A.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement response

Response to separate statement must be organized as identified in Attachment A.

The response should add no more than five (5) pages to the statement and must be organized as identified in Attachment A.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement reply

Reply to separate statement must not introduce new asserted material facts.

The reply shall not introduce any new asserted material facts, and shall add no more than three (3) pages to the statement.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement

Separate statement must not contain argument; facts not cited in briefs will not be considered.

The separate statement shall not include any supporting argument or be used to circumvent applicable page limits. Facts that are not cited in the summary judgment briefs will not be considered.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Separate statement

Each separate statement must include an attestation signed by counsel or unrepresented party with specific language.

Each separate statement must be signed by counsel or unrepresented party who has reviewed the document and attests as follows: I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports or disputes the facts as asserted.

Judge P. Casey PittsWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint Pretrial Statement and Order must include specific recital above signature lines.

The Joint Pretrial Statement and Order described above shall recite, directly above the signature lines of each party, the following: The foregoing admissions having been made by the parties, and the parties having specified the foregoing issues of fact and law remaining to be tried

Judge Richard SeeborgWARNING
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings must be in simple declarative sentences, separately numbered, free of pejorative language; conclusions must cite legal authority.

The findings of fact shall set forth in simple declarative sentences, separately numbered, all factual contentions relied upon by the party in support of its claims for relief or defenses and shall be free of pejorative language and argument. Conclusions of law shall be supported by appropriate citation to legal authority.

Judge Richard SeeborgWARNING
Applies to
Deposition designation

Deposition designations must include a copy with page and line references.

A copy of the designated deposition testimony with page and line references, or the interrogatory response or admission shall be provided.

Judge Richard SeeborgWARNING
Applies to
Class action settlement

Court disfavors injunctions of other litigation; requires explanation if sought

The Court disfavors injunctions of current or future litigation in other courts based on conduct covered by the release, because the issue is generally better addressed by the assigned judges for such cases. If the parties seek an injunction, the motion for preliminary approval must explain why.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Motion to designate additional terms
Must include
certificate of service

Request for more than ten claim construction terms requires good cause and must be filed two weeks before deadline.

If a party genuinely believes that more than ten terms need to be construed, that party may request leave to designate additional terms for construction, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. The requesting party must demonstrate good cause and explain why other methods of limiting the terms at issue (such as the selection of representative terms or any grouping of terms by issues presented) would be ineffective. The request must be filed no later than two weeks before the deadline for filing the joint claim construction statement.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Joint proposed case description
Must include
avoid indictment and us code

Case description should not mention indictment or US Code unless compelling reason

Again, the description of the case should not refer to the indictment or to the United States Code unless there's a compelling reason to do so.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit list
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Failure to comply with exhibit list requirements may waive objections.

Failure to comply with this paragraph could be deemed a waiver of all objections. Do not submit blanket or boilerplate objections to the opposing party’s exhibits; those will be disregarded and overruled.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Joint proposed jury instructions
Must include
avoid indictment and us code

Jury instructions should not mention indictment or US Code unless compelling reason

The proposed jury instructions should not mention the indictment or the United States Code unless there's a compelling reason to do so. The instructions can simply refer to the defendant as having been charged in "Count One" with X, in "Count Two" with Y, and so forth.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire

No argument may be included in the proposed supplemental juror questionnaire submission.

However, no argument may be included in this submission.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Parties must file a joint set of proposed jury instructions arranged in proposed order.

The parties shall file a joint set of proposed jury instructions, arranged in the order the parties propose the Court give the instructions.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Parties should use Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions; modifications must be highlighted or tracked.

The parties should use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions where possible. Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified by highlighting or tracked changes.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Agreed instructions must be labeled as Stipulated Instruction No. __ Re __.

Instructions upon which the parties agree shall be identified as "Stipulated Instruction No. ____ Re ___________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Disputed instructions must be labeled with party name, same number, and each party must provide an explanation.

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate. All proposed versions of the same instruction shall bear the same number. Following each set of proposed versions of a disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the Court should give that party's proposed instruction.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

If parties dispute whether an instruction should be given, proponent must provide proposed language with naming convention, and each party must provide a one-page explanation.

If the parties dispute whether a particular instruction should be given at all, the proponent of the instruction shall provide proposed language, identified as "Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________," with the blanks filled in as appropriate. Following the disputed instruction, each party shall explain, in no more than one page, why the instruction should or should not be given.

Judge Rita F. LinWARNING
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
esi meet and confer, esi guidelines reviewed

Parties must review ESI guidelines and meet/confer on ESI topics before initial case management conference.

Parties must also review in detail the Northern District’s electronically stored information (“ESI”) guidelines and checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences, which are available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/eDiscoveryGuidelines. The Court discourages deviation from the ESI guidelines absent good cause. Failure to meet and confer regarding the required topics prior to the initial case management conference, including ESI, may, in the reasonable exercise of the Court’s discretion, result in sanctions or disciplinary action.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonWARNING
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
justify longer pretrial periods

Counsel must justify requests for longer pretrial periods at initial case management conference.

Counsel requesting longer pretrial periods must be prepared to justify that request at the initial case management conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Joint statements of undisputed facts are optional but helpful; separate statements not permitted.

Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful if completely agreed upon. Separate statements of undisputed facts may not be filed.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonWARNING
Applies to
Demonstrative exhibit

Duplicative visual aids are strongly discouraged for claim construction.

Demonstrative exhibits, PowerPoints, visual aids that are duplicative of the arguments made in the parties' claim construction briefs are strongly discouraged.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonWARNING
Applies to
Emergency application

Opposing party should not respond to emergency applications unless instructed by the Court.

When a party files an application for a temporary restraining order or other emergency relief, the opposing party should not file a response unless instructed to do so by the Court. The Court will almost never grant such an application without requesting a response from the opposing party.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders not required for most substantive motions.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or preliminary injunction motions. The parties should submit proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and rulings that call upon the court to make factual findings (such as a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys’ fees).

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Brief

Exhibits must be cited with declaration name, exhibit letter/number, and page number.

When citing exhibits (including deposition testimony), briefs should identify the declaration to which the exhibit is attached, the letter or number of the exhibit, and the relevant page number (for example: “Smith Decl., Ex. 1, at 22”).

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Motion for attorneys fees

Late attorneys' fees motion requires re-sending notices at parties' expense.

The Court will make parties re-send notices if the motion for attorneys’ fees is filed late, which can be quite expensive.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Settlement agreement

Must address redistribution of unclaimed funds or explain absence.

In a proposed settlement involving the distribution of money to a class, the parties should consider whether unclaimed funds should be redistributed to class members who claimed their share. If a provision of this type is absent, the parties should be prepared to explain why.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Proposed jury instructions should not mention indictment or U.S. Code unless compelling reason exists.

The proposed jury instructions should not mention the indictment or the United States Code unless there's a compelling reason to do so.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
safety measures

Extension cords must be taped to carpet for safety.

The parties shall tape extension cords to the carpet for safety.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Jury exhibit notebook
Must include
prior court permission

Jury exhibit notebooks require prior court permission.

Exhibit notebooks for the jury will not be permitted without prior permission from the Court.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Emergency motion

Opposing party should not respond to TROs or emergency relief unless instructed by Court.

When a party files an application for a temporary restraining order or other emergency relief, the opposing party should not file a response unless instructed to do so by the Court. The Court will almost never grant such an application without requesting a response from the opposing party.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Motion
Must include
local rule certificate

Only one chance to seek class certification; overreaching may prevent renewal.

Plaintiffs’ counsel are warned that they may only have one chance to seek class certification. If a plaintiff grossly overreaches on a motion for class certification, thereby forcing a defendant to waste significant time and money respond to a motion that had virtually no chance of being granted in the first place, the Court will be far less likely to allow a renewed motion.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions should not mention indictment or U.S. Code unless compelling reason exists.

The proposed jury instructions should not mention the indictment or the United States Code unless there's a compelling reason to do so.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Case description

Case descriptions should not refer to the indictment or United States Code unless a compelling reason exists.

Again, the description of the case should not refer to the indictment or to the United States Code unless there’s a compelling reason to do so.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Involved individual list

Involved individual lists must include counsel, defendants, potential witnesses, and other significantly involved people.

The list should include counsel, the defendant or defendants, potential witnesses, and any other people significantly involved in the case.

Judge Vince ChhabriaWARNING
Applies to
Motion in limine opening brief

All of a party's motions in limine must be included in a single opening brief.

All of a party’s in limine motions must be included in its opening brief

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Technology request
Must include
proposed order

Parties must file a written request and proposed order at least 7 days before trial to bring additional technology into the courtroom.

The parties must file a written request and proposed order no later than seven days prior to the beginning of trial if they wish to bring any such technology into the Courthouse.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Witness exhibit binder
Must include
exhibit list

Parties must provide individual witness exhibit binders with two copies: one for the witness and one for the Court.

At trial, the parties shall provide individual witness exhibit binders which contain all the exhibits the parties expect to use with the witness. The parties shall provide two copies of each witness binder: one for the witness and one for the Court.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits
Must include
exhibit list

Counsel must consult daily with each other and the deputy clerk to reconcile exhibits in evidence, and confer before closing arguments to ensure exhibits are in order.

Counsel must consult with each other and with the deputy clerk at the end of each trial day and compare notes as to which exhibits are in evidence and any limitations thereon. If there are any differences, counsel should bring them promptly to the Court's attention. Before closing arguments, counsel must confer with the deputy clerk to make sure the exhibits in evidence are in good order.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders are not required for motions under Civil L.R. 7-2, except for injunctive relief motions.

Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include a redline comparison to the prior pleading.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
proposed order

Parties should use model protective orders and must file a statement confirming no differences or explaining any differences.

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they shall when practicable use one of the model protective orders, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/rules-forms-fees/northern-district-guidelines/model-protective-orders. When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn't differ in any respect from the model protective order, or (ii) a statement identifying each difference and explaining why the difference is necessary.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Confidential statement

Defendant must file a confidential statement at least 7 days before the settlement conference if it intends to assert inability or unwillingness to pay monetary compensation.

If a defendant plans to assert that it lacks resources and is unable to offer monetary compensation or that it otherwise does not intend to offer monetary compensation as part of a settlement, it must notify the Court of this in a confidential statement no later than seven (7) days prior to the Conference.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Settlement Conference Statement must include statement of facts, claims/defenses, proceedings summary, relief sought, key issues, settlement position, and attendee list.

The Settlement Conference Statement shall include at least the following: a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses including, but not limited to, statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded, and a candid evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute. c. A summary of the proceedings to date and any pending motions. d. The relief sought. e. Any discrete issue that, if resolved, would facilitate the resolution of the case. f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions. g. A list of who will attend the Settlement Conference on behalf of each side, including counsel and insurance representatives.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Proposed order
Must include
proposed order

E-filing parties must submit proposed orders in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov; proposed orders are not required for Civil L.R. 7-2 motions except those seeking injunctive relief.

Proposed orders submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted in Microsoft Word to askpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Amended pleading

Amended pleadings must include a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

If a party files an amended pleading, it must file as an attachment a redline comparing the amended pleading against the last pleading.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Joint statement

The joint discovery statement must describe each unresolved issue and state each party's final proposed compromise.

If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, they must file a joint statement of at most 5 single-spaced pages (12-point font or greater) with 2.5 pages allotted per side that: (1) describes each unresolved issue; and (2) states each party’s final proposed compromise with respect to

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Stipulated protective order

Parties seeking approval of a stipulated protective order must file either a statement confirming conformance with the model order or a redline with an explanation of any changes.

When parties ask the Court to approve a stipulated protective order, they must file with the proposed order either (i) a statement in which they confirm that the proposed protective order doesn’t differ in any respect from the model order, or (ii) a redline comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, along with an explanation of any changes.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Motions for sanctions under Rule 37 must be filed as motions conforming to Civil L.R. 37-4 and may not use the expedited discovery dispute letter procedure.

Any party seeking an award of attorney fees or other form of sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 may not use the expedited joint discovery dispute letter procedure described above but instead must file a motion conforming to the requirements of Civil L.R. 37-4.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanWARNING
Applies to
Privilege log

Failure to provide required privilege log information may result in waiver.

Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseWARNING
Applies to
Case management statement

Initial case management joint statements must comply with the district standing order, while further conference statements need only address desired discussion points and changed matters.

For all initial case management conferences, the joint statement must comply with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, available here. For further case management conferences, the joint statement need only address matters that the parties wish to discuss and matters that have changed since the last conference.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseWARNING
Applies to
Privilege log

Untimely privilege-log disclosures may result in waiver of privilege or protection.

Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseWARNING
Applies to
Pleading

Social Security cases must use plaintiff initials only in pleadings to protect privacy.

Where a plaintiff seeks review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff Social Security benefits, the parties should use only the initials of the plaintiff in their pleadings to protect the plaintiff's privacy.

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. SperoWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Do not include entire deposition transcripts as exhibits; provide only relevant excerpts with reporter’s certification.

(c) Parties shall not include entire deposition transcripts as exhibits to their filings unless necessary. Parties shall instead provide only the relevant excerpts and a copy of the reporter’s certification.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Exhibits must be cited to specific page numbers.

All references to exhibits should cite to specific page numbers.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
table of contents

Joint jury instructions must include a table of contents, be supported by citations, and word copies must be emailed to lbpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

The parties must file joint instructions, using model instructions when possible, in the order that they should be given, and include separate proposed preliminary instructions and final instructions. They must submit word copies to lbpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The instructions must include a table of contents and be supported by citations to the authority for the instruction (e.g., to the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions or CACI).

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Undisputed instructions labeled 'Stipulated Instruction'; disputed instructions labeled with party name and same number; if no counter instruction, insert separate page stating no instruction should be given.

If undisputed, an instruction must be labeled 'Stipulated Instruction.' If disputed, the parties' versions must bear the same instruction number, be labeled with the sponsoring party's name, and be inserted back to back in the logical place in the overall sequence. If the opposing party does not have a counter instruction and instead contends that no instruction should be given, the party must say so in a separate page inserted in lieu of the alternate instruction.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Jury instructions

Modified model instructions must include a blackline showing changes and the original model instruction.

If the parties modify a model instruction, they must identify the modification clearly in a blackline and include the model instruction in the packet.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Preliminary instructions

Preliminary instructions must include a short statement of the case to be read during voir dire.

The parties must include a short statement of the case to be read to the jury during voir dire as part of the preliminary instructions.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Memorandum of law

Each party must file a memorandum of law on disputed jury instructions, organized by instruction number.

Each party must file a memorandum of law — organized by instruction number — regarding disputed jury instructions.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Trial exhibits

A hard copy of exhibits labeled 'Chambers Copy' must be lodged with the updated exhibit list in each binder.

The parties must lodge a hard copy of the exhibits labeled 'Chambers Copy' with any updated (and filed) exhibit list in each binder.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Exhibits

Counsel must meet and confer on exhibit numbering conventions; use numbers only, preferably same as deposition numbers; assign blocks; mark exhibits as 'Trial Exhibit No.'; affix tag on lower right corner or back.

Before submitting exhibit lists and binders, counsel must meet and confer to establish usable numbering conventions and eliminate duplicate exhibits. Use numbers only, and if possible, exhibit numbers should be the same numbers used in depositions. Otherwise, the deposition transcript must be conformed to the new exhibit number to avoid jury confusion and to ensure that every exhibit has a unique number. Blocks of numbers should be assigned to fit the needs of the case: e.g., Plaintiff has 1 to 99, Defendant A has 100 to 199, Defendant B has 200 to 299, et cetera. All exhibits must be marked 'Trial Exhibit No.,' not Plaintiff's Exhibit or Defendant's Exhibit. A single exhibit must be marked just once. The exhibit tag must be in the following form and must be affixed on or near the lower right-hand corner if possible and on the back if it is not.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Deposition designation packet

Deposition designation packet must include cover page, oath page, testimony pages with lines through non-proffered testimony and unnecessary objections/colloquy, and hand corrections.

To designate deposition testimony, counsel must photocopy the cover page, the page where the witness is sworn, and each page with any proffered testimony (with lines through testimony not proffered). Counsel must put lines through objections or colloquy unless they are needed to understand the question. Any corrections (including conforming exhibit numbers to trial exhibit numbers) must be done by hand. The finished packet must be the script that allows smooth presentation of the witness, the oath, and the testimony.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Deposition designation packet review

Reviewing counsel must highlight objections in yellow, completeness objections in blue, and return packets to proffering party.

Reviewing parties must promptly review the packet and highlight in yellow any passages objected to and write in the margin the legal basis for the objections. If a completeness objection is made, the objecting party must insert the additional passages needed to cure the completeness objection. Such additions must be highlighted in blue, and an explanation for the inclusion must be legibly handwritten in the margin. Counsel must line out any irrelevant portions of the additional pages. Reviewing counsel must return the packets to the proffering party to consider whether to accept the adjustments.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact must cite evidence; conclusions of law must cite model instructions, identify modifications, attach model and blacklined copies, and use pin cites in Ninth Circuit format.

Proposed findings of fact must be supported by citations to the evidence that will be offered at trial. Conclusions of law that rely on substantive-law instructions from the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions, CACI, or other model instructions must be cited, any modifications must be identified, and copies of the model and blacklined modified instructions must be attached. All conclusions of law — disputed or undisputed — must be supported by citation (including pin cites) in the format used by the Ninth Circuit Manual.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerWARNING
Applies to
Brief

AI tools permitted but parties remain responsible for accuracy and may face sanctions for errors.

Counsel and parties appearing without legal representation are responsible for providing complete and accurate representations in any submission to the Court to the extent required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Professional Conduct, and any other applicable legal or ethical guidance. Parties are not categorically prohibited from using any sort of lawful technological assistance in researching or drafting briefs, including artificial intelligence (AI) tools that assist in the preparation of material for submission to the Court. That said, attorneys and unrepresented parties must understand the limitations of any tools that they use, and they remain fully responsible for the final products they submit to the Court. The Court will impute any errors by computer-based tools to the attorney or unrepresented party whose signature appears on the document containing those errors. Failure to verify the accuracy of briefs, and particularly the accuracy of citations to law and evidence, may be grounds for sanctions and/or striking a filing.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosWARNING
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
mutual consultation

Depositions must be scheduled at mutually convenient times absent extraordinary circumstances.

Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at mutually convenient times and places.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosWARNING
Applies to
Joint statement

No declarations, exhibits, or proposed orders may be attached to joint statement without leave of Court.

The parties may not attach declarations, exhibits, or proposed orders to the statement absent leave of Court.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsWARNING
Applies to
Deposition

Abuse of emergency discovery dispute process or unreasonable delay may result in sanctions.

A Party or counsel may be subject to sanctions if they abuse this emergency discovery dispute process, or if they consistently impede, or otherwise unreasonably delay, the fair examination of a deponent.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangWARNING
Applies to
Deposition
Must include
designation of counsel

Each party should designate one attorney to conduct witness examination unless otherwise agreed or ordered.

Absent agreement of the Parties, or unless otherwise ordered by the Court, each Party should designate one attorney to conduct that Party’s examination of a fact witness deponent.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangWARNING
Applies to
Confidential settlement statement

Confidential Settlement Statements must include six specific content elements: case evaluation, expense estimate, settlement discussion history, realistic settlement figure, insurance/government barriers, and discussion of Section B subjects.

Each Party’s Confidential Settlement Statement shall include the following: 1. Separately for each principal claim and defense, a brief, forthright evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses and likelihood that the Party submitting the Confidential Settlement Statement will prevail. Citations to any key legal authorities relied upon by the Parties as part of this evaluation shall be provided. 2. An estimate of out-of-pocket expenses, attorneys' fees, and time: (a) spent to date and (b) to be expended for further discovery, pretrial preparation, and trial. If plaintiff seeks attorneys' fees and costs, counsel shall be prepared at the Settlement Conference to provide sufficient information to enable the fee claim to be evaluated for settlement purposes. 3. A history of any ongoing or past settlement discussions (without revealing communications, if any, whose disclosure to a settlement judge is prohibited by applicable law), a description of the principal impediments (factual, legal, or other) to reaching agreement to date, and the reasons the Parties' assessments of the settlement value of the case differ. 4. A realistic settlement figure or terms (including any non-monetary terms) that, given all the circumstances, the Party submitting its Confidential Settlement Statement would consider seriously. 5. Where the Party is insured or is a governmental entity, any foreseeable barriers to insurance coverage or approval of a proposed settlement, or special concerns that the insurer or governmental entity has raised or could foreseeably anticipate to be a topic of discussion. 6. A brief discussion of any of the subjects identified in Section B of this Order which that Party believes would be significant in the settlement dynamic.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangWARNING
Applies to
Letter

Discovery dispute joint letters may only include specific exhibits (interrogatories, requests/responses, privilege logs, deposition testimony).

The joint letter may not be accompanied by exhibits or affidavits other than exact copies of interrogatories, requests for production of documents and/or responses, privilege logs, and relevant deposition testimony.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Attorney fee sanctions in discovery disputes require a separate motion.

Any party seeking an award of attorney fees or other expenses as sanctions in connection with a discovery dispute shall file a separate motion as required by Civil L.R. 37-3.

Magistrate Judge Robert M. IllmanWARNING
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered.

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered by the Court.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit

Demonstrative exhibits must be exchanged 48 hours before hearing.

Demonstrative exhibits and visual aids are permissible at the hearing as long as they are based on information contained in the papers already filed. Counsel shall exchange copies of exhibits no later than forty-eight hours prior to the hearing.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Joint Pretrial Statement must include Proposed Order, jury/bench notification, witness list, expert witness list, and exhibit list with specific formatting.

At least 21 days before the Pretrial Conference, the parties must file in ECF a Joint Pretrial Statement that includes as attachments the items listed below. All items must be in text-searchable PDF format. A. Proposed Order Re: Trial Stipulations ... B. Jury or Bench Trial ... C. Witness List ... D. Expert Witness List ... E. Exhibit List ...

Magistrate Judge Susan van KeulenWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Discovery-related correspondence should not be included in discovery dispute letters

The Court does not want to read the parties’ discovery-related correspondence.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Discovery dispute letters should address only one discrete issue or closely related issues

A single joint discovery dispute letter should address only one discrete issue or a few issues that are closely related.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Multiple discovery dispute letters may be filed for separate disputes but not to avoid word limits

Multiple joint discovery dispute letters may be filed following a single conference of lead counsel if multiple discrete disputes remain unresolved, but parties should not use multiple letters to avoid the word limits set forth above.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Failure to participate in discovery dispute process may result in adverse orders or sanctions

Unjustified delay or refusal to participate meaningfully in the conference of lead counsel or in the preparation of the joint discovery dispute letter may be grounds for entry of an order adverse to the delaying or non-participating party or other appropriate sanctions.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Standard preliminary and closing instructions should not be submitted as proposed jury instructions.

The parties should not submit proposed jury instructions that cover standard preliminary instructions or standard closing instructions.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Confidential settlement letter

Confidential Settlement Letter must not be served on other parties.

The confidential letter should not be served on any other party.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Settlement conference statement

Settlement Conference Statement must not be filed on ECF.

The statement should not be filed.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Confidential settlement letter

Confidential Settlement Letter must not be filed on ECF.

The letter should not be filed.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiWARNING
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs (optional) must be filed 7 days before trial commencement.

Trial briefs in jury cases are optional and are most helpful to the Court on any controlling issues of law. They must be filed at least 7 days prior to the commencement of trial.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Opening statement
Must include
exhibits

Counsel must meet and confer to exchange opening statement visuals/exhibits and resolve objections before trial.

Counsel must cooperate and meet and confer to exchange any visuals, graphics or exhibits to be used in the opening statements, allowing for time to work out objections and any reasonable revisions. Be prepared for opening statements as soon as the jury is sworn.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Witness list
Must include
witness list

Multiple defendants must coordinate cross-examination to avoid duplication.

When there are multiple defendants, counsel are responsible for coordination of their cross-examination to avoid duplication.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Deposition exhibit numbers must conform to trial exhibit numbers when testimony is read to jury.

If an exhibit number differs from that used in a deposition transcript, however, then the latter must be conformed to the new trial number if and when the deposition testimony is read to the jury (so as to avoid confusion over exhibit numbers).

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Time tracking
Must include
time tracking

Counsel must track all parties' time usage.

Counsel must keep track of everyone's usage.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Settlement notice
Must include
timely written notice

Jury costs may be assessed for failure to provide timely written notice of settlement.

Local rule 40-1 provides that jury costs may be assessed as sanctions for failure to provide the Court with timely written notice of a settlement.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
model order

Protective orders should use model order; material differences require explanation and redline version.

If parties believe that a protective order is necessary, they shall, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated protective orders (available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/stipprotectorder). If the parties’ proposed protective offer differs materially from the model protective order, the parties shall file a statement explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Cross examination
Must include
coordination required

Multiple defendants must coordinate cross-examination to avoid duplication.

When there are multiple defendants, counsel are responsible for coordination of their cross-examination to avoid duplication.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerWARNING
Applies to
Brief
Must include
objections to evidence

Objections to evidence must be included in the party's brief, not filed separately.

Objections to evidence shall be contained within the objecting party’s brief and shall not be filed as a separate pleading.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaWARNING
Applies to
Dispositive motions
Must include
hearing deadline

Last day to hear dispositive motions is 10 Thursdays before Pretrial Conference

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions - 10 Thursday before Pretrial Conference

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Dispositive motions
Must include
filing deadline

Last day to file dispositive motions is 35 days before hearing

Las Day to File Dispositive Motions - 35 days before the hearing on dispositive motions

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Expert discovery
Must include
closing date

Expert discovery closes 21 days after rebuttal expert disclosure

Expert Discovery Closed - 21 days after rebuttal expert disclosure

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Rebuttal expert disclosure
Must include
due date

Rebuttal expert disclosure due 21 days after expert disclosure

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure - 21 days after expert disclosure

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Objections
Must include
due date

Objections due 10 days before Pretrial Conference

Objections - 10 days before Pretrial Conference

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Joint pretrial conference statement
Must include
due date

Joint Pretrial Conference Statement/Trial Briefs due 21 days before Pretrial Conference

Joint Pretrial Conference Statement / Trial Briefs - 21 days before Pretrial Conference

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Non expert discovery
Must include
closing date

Non-expert discovery closes Thursday after 10 Thursdays before last day to hear dispositive motions

Non-Expert Discovery Closed - Thursday after 10 Thursdays before last day to hear dispositive motions

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition

Deponents may only be instructed not to answer to preserve privilege, enforce court order, or under FRCP 30(d)(3).

A person may not instruct a deponent not to answer a question except when necessary to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation directed by the Court, or to present a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(3).

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition

Private conferences between deponents and attorneys during depositions are prohibited except for privilege determination.

Private conferences between deponents and their attorneys in the course of deposition are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition

When privilege is claimed, witness must answer questions about privilege existence, extent, or waiver unless privileged.

When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the existence, extent, or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of the communication, who made the statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement, unless such information itself is privileged.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition

Parties may face sanctions for consistently impeding or unreasonably delaying fair examination of deponent.

A party may be subject to sanctions if the party consistently impedes, or otherwise unreasonably delays, the fair examination of the deponent.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Deposition designation packet

Deposition designation packets must include cover page, swearing page, all designated testimony pages, redacted objections and undesignated testimony, interlineated corrections, and conformed exhibit numbers.

To prepare designated deposition testimony, counsel shall photocopy the cover page, the page where the witness is sworn, and each page from which any testimony is proffered, including pages containing a counter-designation made by opposing counsel. Counsel should redact objections or colloquy unless needed to understand the question. In addition, counsel should redact any testimony that has not been designated or any testimony to which an objection has been made and sustained by the Court. Any corrections must be interlineated and references to exhibit numbers must conform to the trial numbers. The finished packet should then be the actual script and should smoothly present the identification and swearing of the witness and testimony desired.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Notice
Must include
recusal bases

Parties must inform the Court of any reasonable bases for recusal as early as possible.

Parties are directed to inform the Court of any and all reasonable bases for recusal at the earliest possible date.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenWARNING
Applies to
Exhibit objections list

Exhibit objections list must be in tabular form with four columns: exhibit description, basis of objection, response, and space for court ruling.

A list of objections to each exhibit, in tabular form. The first column should describe the exhibit, the second column should briefly set forth the basis of the objection, the third column should set forth a brief response thereto, and the fourth column should provide a space for the Court’s ruling.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Motion

Motions and oppositions must support factual contentions with affidavits/declarations; declarations must avoid legal argument; non-compliance may result in striking.

All motions and oppositions to motions shall comply with Criminal Local Rule 47-2(b), which requires that motions “presenting issues of fact ... be supported by affidavits or declarations which comply with the requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-5.” Civil Local Rule 7-5, in turn, requires that “[f]actual contentions made in support of or in opposition to any motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration and by appropriate references to the record.” Moreover, other evidence in support of or in opposition to any motion “must be appropriately authenticated by an affidavit or declaration.” That rule further requires that affidavits and declarations contain factual contentions only, avoiding conclusions and legal argument, and “conform as much as possible to the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e).” In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-5, made applicable by Criminal Local Rule 47-2(b), any declaration or affidavit that does not comply with these requirements may be stricken.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Reply briefs are not permitted for motions in limine.

The Court does not permit reply briefs.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered.

Separate statements of undisputed facts will not be considered by the Court.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Simplified statement of case

A simplified statement of the case must be filed; it should not exceed one page unless extremely complex.

A simplified statement of the case to be read to the jury during voir dire and as part of the proposed jury instructions. Unless the case is extremely complex, this statement should not exceed one page.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Pretrial order

Pretrial order must include a tabular list of exhibit objections with columns for description, basis, response, and court ruling.

A list of objections to each exhibit, in tabular form. The first column should describe the exhibit, the second column should set briefly set forth the basis of the objection, the third column should set forth a brief response thereto, and the fourth column should provide a space for the Court's ruling.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Settlement notice

Failure to provide timely written notice of a settlement may result in jury cost sanctions.

Local Rule 40-1 provides that jury costs may be assessed as sanctions for failure to provide the Court with timely written notice of a settlement.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Change of plea

An Application for Entry of Plea is required only for open pleas (not plea agreements).

An application for Entry of Plea (available at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/criminalforms) is required only for open pleas.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Application to enter plea

An Application for Entry of Plea is required only for open pleas.

An application for Entry of Plea (available at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/criminalforms) is required only for open pleas.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteWARNING
Applies to
Bias video objections
Must include
objections due at pretrial

Objections to bias video must be raised at pretrial conference.

Counsel and/or parties shall be prepared at the pretrial conference to discuss any objections to showing this video to potential jurors before the jury selection process.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Bias video objections
Must include
objections waived if not raised

Objections to bias video waived if not raised at pretrial conference.

Any objections to the video that are not raised at the pretrial conference will be deemed waived.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Parties must attach copies of all disputed patents to the joint claim construction statement and make prosecution history available upon request.

Parties must attach to the joint claim construction statement copies of all patents in dispute. Parties must also make a complete prosecution history for each patent available to the court upon request.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Motion for leave

Motion for leave must demonstrate good cause and explain why other methods of limiting claims are ineffective.

If a party genuinely believes that it will require that more than approximately ten terms be construed, that party may move pursuant to Civ. L. R. 7-11 for leave to designate additional terms for construction. The requesting party must demonstrate good cause and explain why other methods of limiting the claims at issue (such as selecting representative claims or grouping claims by issues presented) would be ineffective.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Claim construction brief

Claim construction briefs must address only truly disputed terms in the same order as the joint statement and must notify the court if any terms are no longer disputed.

Claim construction briefs must address each disputed term, but only those that are truly disputed. The disputed terms must be addressed by both parties in the same order as they appear in the joint claim construction statement. Additionally, the parties shall advise the court terms disputed in the joint claim construction statement are no longer disputed in the briefs. And of course, the briefs may not address disputes that are not set forth in the joint claim construction statement.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Reply brief

Parties are discouraged from proposing new constructions in reply briefs; if necessary, must clearly state new construction, explain basis, and revise joint statement.

While the court encourages the parties to negotiate mutually agreeable constructions, the court discourages the parties from proposing new constructions for the first time in reply briefs or other filings which do not afford the opposing party an opportunity to respond. However, if it becomes necessary for a party to propose a different construction in its brief than that found in the joint claim construction statement, that party must clearly set forth the new construction and explain the basis for the change. Additionally, that party shall revise the joint claim construction statement, so that the court will have one document reflecting all current proposed constructions.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Case management statement

Case management statement must address specified topics including discovery, dispositive motions, willful infringement/advice of counsel, settlement, and other pretrial matters.

In the case management statement to be filed 7 calendar days prior to the conference, the parties must address the following topics: a) anticipated post-claim construction discovery; b) the filing of dispositive motions; c) if willful infringement has been asserted, whether the allegedly-infringing party wishes to rely on the advice of counsel defense. If so, the parties should be prepared to address proposals for resolving any attorney-client privilege issues that arise, and whether the parties believe bifurcation of the trial into liability and damages phases would be appropriate; d) the progress of settlement discussions, if any; e) any other pretrial matters.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonWARNING
Applies to
Declaration

If a joint statement is not filed, a signed declaration explaining the failure must be filed.

Failure to file a joint statement shall be accompanied by a signed declaration setting forth the grounds for such failure. Failure to show good cause for such failure may subject the parties to sanctions.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonWARNING
Applies to
Class action settlement

Class action settlements must comply with Northern District's Procedural Guidance.

Counsel are reminded to review and comply with the Northern District’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements available on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov/ClassActionSettlementGuidance.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickWARNING
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Failure to file joint case management statement may result in sanctions.

Failure to file a joint case management statement in compliance with the Civil Local Rules and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California may result in the imposition of sanctions for such failure. Failure to show good cause for such failure may subject the parties to sanctions.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickWARNING
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
no follow requests, no friend requests, only publicly available sources

Only publicly available profiles may be viewed; no follow/friend requests allowed.

Other social media sites and features may only be used to view publicly available profiles, feeds, and posts. No 'follow requests,' 'friend requests,' or the like may be sent to any prospective juror on any social media site, regardless of whether a profile is public or private. The reason for this is that these requests constitute contact, and a prospective juror who uses these sites may be notified of the identity of anyone who sends such a request. This applies to Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, SnapChat, Threads, and any other form of social media.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickWARNING
Applies to
Trial brief

Each side must file a trial brief.

Each side's trial brief.

charles-r-breyerINFO
Applies to
Deposition designation packet

Final deposition packet must include objections and responses to objections.

Counsel for the proffering party must then assemble a final packet, including objections and responses to objections, and provide it to the Court at least two calendar days before the proffer will be used.

charles-r-breyerINFO
Applies to
Proposed jury instruction

Any deviation from the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions must be plainly identified.

The Court generally prefers to use the instruction in the current edition of the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions. Any deviance from the form instruction must be plainly identified.

charles-r-breyerINFO
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
caption, case number

Pro se litigants may file separate case management statements instead of joint statements.

In cases involving litigants unrepresented by counsel, the parties may file separate case management statements.

Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez RogersINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Parties should not file more than five motions in limine.

Usually, each party or side should not need to file more than five motions in limine.

edward-m-chenINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Court will give specified model jury instructions absent objection.

Finally, absent objection, the Court shall give the following jury instructions from the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions (2017 ed.): 1.3-1.5, 1.9-1.15, 1.17-1.18, 1.20-1.21, 3.1-3.3, 3.5.

edward-m-chenINFO
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Counsel may submit agreed-upon additional voir dire questions; disputed questions may be submitted separately.

Counsel may also submit for the Court’s consideration an agreed upon set of additional voir dire questions to be posed by the Court. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree may be submitted separately.

edward-m-chenINFO
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial brief should summarize theory, identify key evidence, and provide summary briefing on controlling issues.

A trial brief is most helpful to the Court when it: (1) summarizes the party’s theory of the case, (2) identifies key evidence, and (3) provides summary briefing on any controlling issues of law.

edward-m-chenINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement must indicate magistrate judge consent in “Other References” section.

In the section of the joint case management statement addressing “Other References,” the parties must indicate whether all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. The parties are advised that they may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
All

Westlaw citations preferred for unpublished opinions not in Federal Supplement, Federal Rules Decisions, or Federal Appendix.

The Court prefers Westlaw citations for unpublished opinions that are not included in the Federal Supplement, Federal Rules Decisions, or the Federal Appendix.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Trial brief

Trial briefs optional but due 7 days before trial if filed

Trial briefs are optional, but any party wishing to file a trial brief must do so at least seven calendar days prior to the commencement of trial.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Joint case management statement must indicate consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

In the section of the joint case management statement addressing “Other References,” the parties must indicate whether all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. The parties are advised that they may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Parties must retain and produce files in original form and sequence for inspection.

To the maximum extent feasible, parties must retain and produce files and records in their original form and sequence, including file folders, and the originals should remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Depositions require advance consultation; must follow Rule 30(d)(1); speaking objections prohibited.

Counsel must consult in advance with opposing counsel to schedule depositions at a mutually convenient time and location. Counsel and parties must comply with Rule 30(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Speaking objections are prohibited. When privilege is claimed, the witness must answer questions relevant to the existence, extent, or waiver of the privilege unless such information is itself privileged.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement
Must include
judge name, case number

Parties must review Northern District ESI guidelines and checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences.

Parties must review in detail the Northern District’s electronically stored information (“ESI”) guidelines and checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences, which are available at

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Telephonic appearance

Telephonic appearances should use land lines when feasible.

Where feasible, parties must make telephonic appearances using a land line, rather than a mobile phone.

jon-s-tigarINFO
Applies to
Any submission
Must include
ai prompt records

Counsel must maintain records of AI tool prompts/inquiries.

Counsel is responsible for maintaining records of all prompts or inquiries submitted to any generative AI tools in the event those records become relevant at any point.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínINFO
Applies to
Proposed order

Electronic copies of proposed orders are not required unless specifically requested by the Court.

The Court also does not require electronic copies of proposed orders. If the Court requires electronic copies of a filing, it will specifically request it from the parties. Parties should not otherwise email amocrd@cand.uscourts.gov with electronic copies of filings.

Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínINFO
Applies to
Preliminary statement

The preliminary statement to the jury should not exceed one paragraph unless the case is extremely complex.

Unless the case is extremely complex, this statement should not exceed one paragraph.

Judge Beth Labson FreemanINFO
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
attorney authority

Attorney at case management conference must have full decision-making authority.

The attorney appearing at a case management conference must have full authority to make decisions about any issue that may come up during the conference but need not be lead counsel.

Judge Eumi K. LeeINFO
Applies to
All
Must include
ai disclosure

Counsel must maintain records of all AI tool prompts and inquiries.

Counsel is responsible for maintaining records of all prompts or inquiries submitted to any generative AI tools in the event those records become relevant at any point.

Judge Eumi K. LeeINFO
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
base on model orders

Protective order requests should be based on Northern District of California model orders.

Parties requesting a protective order are encouraged to base any proposed order on the model protective orders on the Northern District of California’s website (https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/model-protective-orders/).

Judge Eumi K. LeeINFO
Applies to
General

All in-person hearings held in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA.

4. All in-person hearings and appearances will be held in Courtroom 2 on the 4th Floor of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Case management conference

Civil case management conferences held via Zoom Webinar on Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m.

5. Civil case management conferences are generally conducted via Public Zoom Webinar on Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Pretrial conference

Civil pretrial conferences held in person on Tuesdays at 3:00 p.m.

6. Civil pretrial conferences are generally conducted in person on Tuesdays at 3:00 p.m.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Motion

Civil motions heard in person on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m.

7. Civil motions are generally heard in person on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
General

Litigants/lawyers may indicate pronouns and honorifics in letter, pleadings, or verbally.

11. Litigants and lawyers may indicate their pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/their) and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Mx., Dr.) by filing a letter, adding the information in the name block or signature line of the pleadings, or verbally informing the Court when making an appearance.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
General
Must include
caption

All hearings and appearances are held in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA.

3. All hearings and appearances will be held in Courtroom 2 on the 4th Floor of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
General
Must include
caption

Law and motion calendar at 2:00 p.m. Wednesdays; pretrial conferences at 3:00 p.m. Tuesdays.

4. The criminal law and motion calendar is generally conducted at 2:00 p.m. on Wednesdays at the Oakland Courthouse. Pretrial conferences are generally conducted at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesdays.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
General
Must include
caption

Trials conducted 8:30 a.m. - 1:30 p.m., Monday through Friday at Oakland Courthouse.

5. Trials are generally conducted from 8:30 a.m. until 1:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Oakland Courthouse. Please refer to this Court's Criminal Pretrial and Trial Standing Order for information regarding criminal trials.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Tutorial presentation

Tutorial allows 45 minutes per side for non-argumentative technology presentation; patentee presents first; demonstrations encouraged.

At the tutorial, each side will generally be permitted 45 minutes to present a short summary and explanation of the technology at issue. The patentee presents first. Non-argumentative demonstrations and visual aids are encouraged, and the Court generally prefers that someone other than counsel make the presentation. No argument will be permitted.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Parties must include proposed text for all jury instructions, even agreed ones, and label agreed instructions as 'Stipulated Instruction'.

The parties should include proposed text for all proposed jury instructions, even for any form preliminary instructions, general instructions, or concluding instructions on which they agree. Instructions upon which the parties agree shall be identified as “Stipulated Instruction No. __ Re __________,” with blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed jury instructions must be labeled with same number and identified as 'Disputed Instruction' with party name.

If, after meeting and conferring in good faith, the parties cannot agree on a proposed jury instruction, each party’s proposed version shall be provided and identified as “Disputed Instruction No. __ Re _______, Offered by ________,” with blanks filled in as appropriate. All proposed versions of the same instruction shall bear the same number.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.INFO
Applies to
Proposed order

Electronic copies of proposed orders are not required unless specifically requested

The Court does not require electronic copies of proposed orders. If the Court requires electronic copies of a filing, it will specifically request it from the parties. Parties should not otherwise email jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov with electronic copies of filings.

Judge Jacqueline Scott CorleyINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Proposed orders are not required for motions in limine.

No brief in support or opposition of a motion in limine may exceed 3 pages in length, and proposed orders need not be prepared. Reply briefs are not permitted.

Judge James DonatoINFO
Applies to
Case management conference

Pro se parties must appear at case management conference.

For parties without counsel, the party is expected to appear.

Judge James DonatoINFO
Applies to
Litigation anticipation

Parties must take action upon reasonable anticipation of litigation.

The Court expects that as soon as any party reasonably anticipates or knows of litigation, it will take the

Judge James DonatoINFO
Applies to
Sentencing memorandum
Must include
encouraged

Sentencing Memoranda encouraged but not required.

Although the parties are not required to file a Sentencing Memorandum except as set forth in Criminal Local Rule 32-5(b), the Court encourages the parties to submit a Sentencing Memorandum.

Judge James DonatoINFO
Applies to
Joint case management statement

Joint case management statement must indicate whether all parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

In the section of the joint case management statement addressing “Other References,” the parties must indicate whether all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

Judge Noël WiseINFO
Applies to
Witness management
Must include
no duplicate calls, cooperation required, out of order allowed

Parties must cooperate on witness scheduling; witnesses may be out of order; avoid calling witnesses twice.

Parties shall cooperate with each other to schedule and produce witnesses. Witnesses may be taken out of order if necessary. Parties should make every reasonable effort to avoid calling a witness twice (as an adverse witness and later as a party’s own witness).

Judge Noël WiseINFO
Applies to
Filing
Must include
filing deadline

Filing deadlines are 5:00 PM unless court orders otherwise.

All filing deadlines are at 5:00 p.m. unless otherwise ordered.

Judge Noël WiseINFO
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
attorney appearance

Attorney at CMC must have full authority to make decisions.

The attorney appearing at a CMC need not be lead counsel but must have full authority to make decisions about any issue that may arise.

Judge P. Casey PittsINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
prior adr completion

Settlement conferences with magistrate judges require prior completion of ADR.

Cases will generally not be referred for a settlement conference with a magistrate judge unless the parties have already completed a different form of ADR.

Judge P. Casey PittsINFO
Applies to
Amendment
Must include
rule 15 compliance

Do not unreasonably withhold consent to amendment under Rule 15.

Rule 15 requires the Court to “freely give leave” to amend “when justice so requires.” Do not unreasonably withhold consent to amendment.

Judge P. Casey PittsINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
westlaw citations preferred

Judge Pitts prefers Westlaw citations.

Judge Pitts prefers Westlaw citations.

Judge P. Casey PittsINFO
Applies to
Joint appendix
Must include
joint appendix preferred

Submit joint appendix of evidence if possible; cite existing exhibits instead of duplicates.

Submit a joint appendix of evidence if possible. Where each party relies on the same exhibit, cite an already filed exhibit rather than filing a duplicate.

Judge P. Casey PittsINFO
Applies to
Joint discovery letter
Must include
seeking party prepares first

Seeking party prepares joint discovery letter first.

The side seeking relief from the Court should prepare its portion of the letter first, and then provide that to the opposing side so that the opposing side may prepare its response.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
reference to model protective order

Protective orders should be based on model orders from court website.

Parties requesting a protective order are encouraged to base any proposed order on the model protective orders on the Northern District’s website...

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders are only required for administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and factual findings.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or preliminary injunction motions. The parties should submit proposed orders only in connection with administrative motions, ex parte applications, discovery disputes, and rulings that call upon the court to make factual findings (such as a motion to approve a class settlement or a motion for attorneys' fees).

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
All filings
Must include
ai disclosure

AI tools permitted but counsel must verify accuracy and bears ethical responsibility

Use of generative artificial intelligence tools is not prohibited, but counsel must personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any research conducted by these means, and counsel alone bears ethical responsibility for all statements made in filings.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Class action procedure

Court prefers liability summary judgment before class certification, but requires defendant consent

The Court is of the view that this approach will often save a great deal of time and money and is therefore often in the defendant's interest, but it requires the defendant's consent, since a grant of summary judgment in the named plaintiff's favor could end up giving unnamed class members a chance to opt in to a lawsuit where a legal issue has already been decided against the defendant.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Class action settlement

Court conducts searching inquiry at preliminary approval to avoid futile final approval

The Court conducts a searching inquiry at the preliminary approval stage to avoid the costs and pitfalls of proceeding to final approval of a settlement that is unlikely to satisfy Rule 23(e).

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
judge name, case number

Judge Lin generally permits jury questions and gives specific instruction at trial outset.

Judge Lin generally permits jury questions and gives the following instruction at the outset of the trial: "If, during the trial, you have a question that you believe should be asked

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Jury research

Jury research allowed from public sources without contacting jurors.

The Court does not restrict the parties, their counsel, or any agent, consultant, investigator, or anyone working for them from conducting research regarding a prospective juror, so long as the research is done only from generally available sources (i.e., those that are publicly available or derive their information from publicly available sources, free or paid) and that there is no actual contact or any reasonable possibility of contact with a prospective juror.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Prior statement
Must include
longer excerpt prepared

Court may require longer excerpt for context when using prior statements or recordings.

The Court may require you to read or play a longer excerpt to give the jury appropriate context, so be sure you are prepared to do so, including if you plan to play a recording.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Joint proposed case description
Must include
competing descriptions allowed

Competing case descriptions allowed without argument if parties disagree

If the parties can't agree on a description, they may file one document with competing descriptions (but without any argument).

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Trial equipment
Must include
share equipment when possible

Parties should share equipment to the maximum extent possible.

Counsel should share equipment to the maximum extent possible.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Jury selection research
Must include
publicly available sources only, no contact with prospective jurors

Research on prospective jurors allowed from publicly available sources only, with no contact.

The Court does not restrict the parties, their counsel, or any agent, consultant, investigator, or anyone working for them from conducting research regarding a prospective juror, so long as the research is done only from generally available sources (i.e., those that are publicly available or derive their information from publicly available sources, free or paid) and that there is no actual contact or any reasonable possibility of contact with a prospective juror.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
full litigation schedule, proposed last day to amend pleadings

Motion to dismiss dispositive of entire case may vacate initial case management conference.

If a defendant files a motion to dismiss that is dispositive of the entire case, the parties may stipulate to vacate the initial case management conference, which will be reset by the Court after the motion to dismiss hearing. If the Court sets an initial case management conference while a motion to dismiss remains pending, the case management statement shall propose a full litigation schedule, including a proposed last day to amend pleadings.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Motion

Proposed orders are not required for substantive motions like summary judgment, dismissal, or preliminary injunction.

Proposed orders are not necessary for most substantive motions, such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, or preliminary injunction motions.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
Stipulation
Must include
proposed order

Parties may submit a stipulation with proposed order for cross-motion briefing schedule by 14 days before hearing.

The parties may submit a stipulation and proposed order setting a briefing schedule for the cross-motions no later than 14 days before the hearing date.

Judge Rita F. LinINFO
Applies to
General

Parties may self-identify pronouns and honorifics in filings or verbally.

11. Litigants and lawyers may indicate their pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/their) and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Mx., Dr.) by filing a letter, adding the information in the name block or signature line of the pleadings, or verbally informing the Court when making an appearance.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
separate statements allowed for pro se

Pro se litigants may file separate case management statements.

In cases involving pro se litigants, the parties may file separate case management statements.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Adr stipulation
Must include
adr default timing 90 days

Default ADR timing is within 90 days of initial case management conference.

The default timing for ADR is within 90 days of the initial case management conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case management statement
Must include
adr dispute explanation

Disagreements on ADR form/timing must be explained in joint statement for conference discussion.

To the extent the parties cannot agree on form or timing, they should explain the dispute in the joint statement and be prepared to discuss it at the initial case management conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
trial timing 18 to 24 months

Trials are scheduled 18-24 months from initial case management conference.

Trials are approximately eighteen to twenty-four months from the initial management conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
pretrial conference 4 to 6 weeks before trial

Pretrial Conference is scheduled 4-6 weeks before trial.

Pretrial Conference is four to six weeks before trial.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case schedule
Must include
trial within 12 months expected

Court expects many cases to be tried within 12 months of case management conference.

The Court’s expectation is that many cases can and should be able to be tried within twelve months of the case management conference.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Case management conference
Must include
court may vacate conference

Court may vacate conference and issue order based on parties' case management statement.

After reviewing the parties’ case management conference statement, the court may vacate the conference and issue a case management order based on the parties’ statement.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Pleading

Parties may self-identify pronouns and honorifics in filings or verbally

Parties and lawyers may indicate their pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/their) and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Mx., Dr.) by filing a letter, adding the information in the name block or signature line of the pleadings, or verbally informing the Court when making an appearance.

Judge Trina L. ThompsonINFO
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Joint or separate statements of undisputed facts are not required for summary judgment motions.

The parties need not file joint or separate statements of undisputed facts in connection with summary judgment motions.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Motion

Manageability section should discuss jury instructions for subclasses or multi-state cases.

This section should generally include a discussion of jury instructions, especially in cases that involve subclasses, plaintiffs from multiple states, or law from multiple states.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Notice

Model notices are available at FJC website.

The parties should consider using the Federal Judicial Center’s model notices, which are available at www.fjc.gov/content/301253/illustrative-forms-class-action-notices-introduction.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Notice

Email and social media notice should be considered.

The parties should consider whether notice by email and/or social media is appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Notice

Substantial compliance with objection requirements is sufficient.

The Court will require only substantial compliance with the requirements for submitting an objection, and this should be made clear in any notice to class members.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Notice

Opt-out and objection forms encouraged for large settlements.

For large settlements, the parties are encouraged to include an opt-out form and an objection form.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
General

Parties must follow federal criminal rules and local rules except where superseded by this standing order.

The parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Criminal Local Rules, and the General Orders of the Northern District of California, except as superseded by this Court's standing order.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Motion to seal

Use Motion to Seal Summary Table for complicated sealing motions.

If you have a complicated sealing motion, or set of motions, consider filling out and filing the Motion to Seal Summary Table linked on the Standing Orders page of Judge Chhabria’s website.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Jury questionnaire

No need to ask about knowing involved individuals; list provided at jury call-in.

The parties need not include a question that asks prospective jurors whether they know any of the people involved in the case. The prospective jurors will be given an “Involved Individuals” list when they are called in.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Agreed instructions must be labeled 'Stipulated Jury Instruction No. __ Re _____'.

Instructions on which the parties agree must be identified as 'Stipulated Jury Instruction No. __ Re _____,' with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Disputed instructions must be labeled 'Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________'.

If the parties disagree on an instruction, each party's proposed version of the disputed instruction shall be provided and identified as 'Disputed Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,' with the blanks filled in as appropriate.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Instructions from Chapters 1-3 of Ninth Circuit Manual are optional but parties must indicate inclusion/omission.

The parties do not need to submit instructions from Chapters 1-3 of the Ninth Circuit Manual, but they must indicate which of these instructions should be included and which should be omitted.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Exhibit
Must include
caption

Publication methods: poster blow-up, electronic system, or other allowed methods. Highlighting enlargements is permitted if not on original.

Publication may be by poster blow-up, use of the courtroom electronic evidence presentation system, or such other method as is allowed in the circumstances. It is permissible to highlight, circle, or underscore in the enlargements as long as it is clear that the alterations are not on the original.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
technology review

Parties must consult court website for courtroom technology information.

The parties should consult www.cand.uscourts.gov/courtroomtech for information on the available courtroom technology.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Voir dire

No advance submission of voir dire questions required.

The parties do not need to submit proposed voir dire questions in advance of trial.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Jury selection
Must include
excusal hearing

Excusal hearing held before jury selection based on questionnaire responses.

A day or so before jury selection, the Court will hold an 'excusal hearing' for the purpose of determining which prospective jurors should be excused for hardship or cause based exclusively on their questionnaire responses.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
judge initial questions

Judge Chhabria discusses hardships and asks questions before lawyer voir dire.

Once the prospective jurors are in the courtroom, Judge Chhabria will discuss hardships with them. Judge Chhabria may then ask a few raise-your-hand questions before turning voir dire over to the lawyers.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Voir dire
Must include
involved individuals list

Court circulates list of involved individuals during voir dire.

During voir dire, the Court will circulate the list of involved individuals.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
witness statement guide

Parties must review witness statement guide on judge's website.

The parties should review the guide for using prior statements of witnesses and refreshing recollection at trial, which is posted in the Standing Orders section of Judge Chhabria's website.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Use Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions where possible

The parties should use the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions where possible.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Proposed jury instructions

Chapters 1-3 instructions not required but must indicate which to include

The parties do not need to submit instructions from Chapters 1-3 of the Ninth Circuit Manual, but they must indicate which of these instructions should be included.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Exhibit set
Must include
retain through appeal, arrange with clerk for record on appeal

Parties must retain full exhibit sets through appeal and arrange with Clerk to file record.

Upon the conclusion of the trial, each party shall retain a full set of exhibits through the appellate process. It is each party’s responsibility to make arrangements with the Clerk of the Court to file the record on appeal.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Deposition transcript
Must include
provide copy to court during cross examination

Deposition transcripts need not be lodged before trial; provide copy to Court when cross-examining witness.

There is no need to lodge deposition transcripts before trial. The lawyers should simply be prepared to hand to the Court a copy of a witness’s deposition testimony once it is time to cross-examine them.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Trial equipment
Must include
provide own equipment, share equipment with other counsel

Court may provide easel/electronic evidence system; parties must provide own equipment (laser-disk, graphics, models) and share to maximum extent possible.

The Court may be able to provide access to an easel and the courtroom electronic evidence presentation system. The parties should consult www.cand.uscourts.gov/courtroomtech for information on the available courtroom technology. During trial, counsel may wish to use laser-disk/computer graphics, poster blow-ups, or models. Such equipment must be provided by the parties. Equipment should be shared by all counsel to the maximum extent possible.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Proposed findings conclusions

Proposed findings of fact should be hyperlinked to exhibits and transcripts, and may be provided on a flash drive.

The parties should hyperlink the citations in the proposed findings of fact to the exhibits and trial transcripts and may provide the Court with the proposed findings of fact on a flash drive if needed.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Motion

Manageability section should discuss jury instructions for subclasses/multiple states.

This section should generally include a discussion of jury instructions, especially in cases that involve subclasses, plaintiffs from multiple states, or law from multiple states.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Proposed supplemental juror questionnaire

Parties are not required to include a question about prospective jurors knowing case-involved individuals in the proposed supplemental juror questionnaire.

The parties need not include a question that asks prospective jurors whether they know any of the individuals involved in the case.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Motion to seal

For complicated sealing motions, parties should consider filing a Motion to Seal Summary Table.

If you have a complicated sealing motion, or set of motions, consider filling out and filing the Motion to Seal Summary Table linked on the Standing Orders page of Judge Chhabria's website.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Case description

If parties cannot agree on a case description, they may file one document with competing descriptions (without argument).

agree on a description, they may file one document with competing descriptions (but without any argument).

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Exhibit

Exhibits need not be submitted with the exhibit list unless Judge Chhabria instructs otherwise.

They need not submit the exhibits themselves at this time, unless instructed otherwise by Judge Chhabria.

Judge Vince ChhabriaINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine should address a single, separate topic.

each motion should address a single, separate topic.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine and opposition must be properly identified with a numbered title.

Each individual motion and opposition should be properly identified, for example, 'Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine No. 1 to Exclude . . . .'

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Jury questionnaire proposed questions

Parties may add up to 10 case-specific questions to the jury questionnaire; they must meet and confer and file a joint list if possible, or separate lists if not.

The parties are allowed to add ten case specific questions to the questionnaire. The parties shall meet and confer and, to the extent possible, file a joint list of proposed questions to add to the questionnaire. To the extent that the parties cannot agree, they may submit separate proposed questions from which the Court will choose ten.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Proposed order

Proposed orders are not required for Civil L.R.7-2 motions except those seeking injunctive relief.

Proposed orders are not required for motions filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, except for motions seeking injunctive relief.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Additional confidential statement

Additional Confidential Statement may respond to the other party's statement or convey confidential information.

The Additional Confidential Statement may respond to the other party’s Settlement Conference Statement or may convey information that the party wishes to convey only to the settlement

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Draft settlement term sheet

Parties must bring an electronic draft settlement term sheet to the settlement conference.

Each party attending a Settlement Conference shall arrive at the Settlement Conference with an electronic version of a draft settlement term sheet that the party is prepared to share with the Court upon request.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Consent declination form

Parties in consent cases must promptly file a form indicating consent or declination to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

In civil cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Krishnan for all purposes, the parties will be asked to submit a form indicating their consent or declination to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The Court asks that the parties file this form promptly.

Magistrate Judge Ajay S. KrishnanINFO
Applies to
Discovery joint statement

Joint statements should address only related issues; file multiple if issues are discrete

A joint statement should address only one issue or a few issues that are inextricably related. Multiple joint statements should be filed if there are discrete issues in dispute.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseINFO
Applies to
Protective order

Court discourages stylistic edits to model protective orders

The Court endeavors to use the model orders and discourages making edits to them for purely stylistic reasons, even if all parties agree.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseINFO
Applies to
Document responses

Party files and records should be retained and produced in original form and sequence.

To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained and produced in their original form and sequence, including file folders, and the originals should remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseINFO
Applies to
Deposition transcript

If judge unavailable, deposition proceeds with objections noted for record.

If the judge is unavailable, the deposition shall proceed with objections noted for the record.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseINFO
Applies to
Protective order

The Court discourages purely stylistic edits to model protective orders, even by agreement.

The Court endeavors to use the model orders and discourages making edits to them for purely stylistic reasons, even if all parties agree.

Magistrate Judge Alex G. TseINFO
Applies to
Pleading

Parties may indicate pronouns and honorifics through confidential letter, docket filing, or pleadings.

Litigants and lawyers may indicate their pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/their) and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Mx., Dr.) by mailing a confidential letter to Judge Spero's chambers, filing a request on the case docket, or adding the information in the name block or signature line of the pleadings.

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. SperoINFO
Applies to
Class action settlement motion
Must include
post distribution accounting report

Class action settlement motions require consultation of Procedural Guidance and Post-Distribution Accounting Reports.

(f) For motions for preliminary approval of a class action settlement, the parties should consult the Northern District’s Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements and must file Post-Distribution Accounting Reports in accordance with the Guidance.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreINFO
Applies to
Pleading
Must include
pronouns

Parties may advise Court of pronouns via letter or name block on first page.

Parties and attorneys may advise the Court of their pronouns by filing a letter or by adding their pronouns in the name block on the first page of the pleadings.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference

Settlement conferences routinely last 3+ hours, parties should be prepared to work until 4:00 p.m.

Settlement conferences routinely last 3 or more hours, and the parties and their representatives should be prepared to work until 4:00 p.m. if necessary.

Magistrate Judge Kandis A. WestmoreINFO
Applies to
General
Must include
chambers pdf copy

Chambers PDF copies can be emailed instead of paper copies, except for certain certificates and notices.

Otherwise, the parties do not need to submit paper copies and instead can email a chambers PDF copy to lbpo@cand.uscourts.gov. Parties do not need to submit electronic copies of certificates of service, certificates of interested entities or persons, consents or declinations to the court’s jurisdiction, stipulations that do not require a court order (see Civil Local Rule 6-1), or notices of appearance or substitution of counsel.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerINFO
Applies to
Deposition designation

Counsel must meet and confer regarding deposition designation adjustments.

Counsel must meet and confer to address reviewing counsel’s comments and any other issues.

Magistrate Judge Laurel BeelerINFO
Applies to
Motion
Must include
opposition deadline

Failure to oppose a motion may be construed as consent to granting the motion unopposed.

The failure of the opposing party to file a timely response to any motion or non-stipulated request may be construed as consent to the granting of the motion or request as unopposed.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosINFO
Applies to
Brief
Must include
ai disclosure

AI tools permitted for brief preparation but parties remain fully responsible for accuracy.

Counsel and parties appearing without legal representation are responsible for providing complete and accurate representations in any submission to the Court to the extent required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Professional Conduct, and any other applicable legal or ethical guidance. Parties are not categorically prohibited from using any sort of lawful technological assistance in researching or drafting briefs, including artificial intelligence (AI) tools that assist in the preparation of material for submission to the Court. That said, attorneys and unrepresented parties must understand the limitations of any tools that they use, and they remain fully responsible for the final products they submit to the Court. The Court will impute any errors by computer-based tools to the attorney or unrepresented party whose signature appears on the document containing those errors. Failure to verify the accuracy of briefs, and

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference

Court may allow Zoom-only or partial Zoom attendance for settlement conferences.

The Court will consider requests to hold the settlement conference entirely on Zoom, or for an individual or subset of individuals to be excused from in-person attendance and allowed to participate via Zoom or telephone.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference

Settlement conferences typically last 3+ hours.

Settlement conferences regularly last three or more hours.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference

Parties should discuss settlement objectives, impediments, information needs, and creative resolutions during conference.

During the settlement conference, parties should be prepared to discuss such issues as: (1) their settlement objectives; (2) any impediments to settlement they perceive; (3) whether they have enough information to discuss settlement and, if not, what additional information is needed; and (4) the possibility of a creative resolution of the dispute.

Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosINFO
Applies to
Settlement conference
Must include
no additional materials unless requested

No additional materials to Court unless specifically requested

No further materials should be submitted to the Court unless requested.

Magistrate Judge Nathanael CousinsINFO
Applies to
Opposition

Opposing parties may file proposed orders if seeking specific rulings beyond denial.

Each Party opposing a motion may file and serve a proposed order (with a short statement of the rationale of decision) if that Party seeks a specific ruling by the Court other than mere denial of the motion.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangINFO
Applies to
Summary judgment motion

Joint statements of undisputed facts are encouraged if parties agree.

Joint statements of undisputed facts are encouraged and should be filed if agreed upon.

Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangINFO
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Joint statements of undisputed facts are optional but helpful if agreed upon.

Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required, but are helpful if completely agreed upon.

Magistrate Judge Sallie KimINFO
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
discovery requests, discovery responses

Joint statement must include discovery requests/responses and may include meet-and-confer correspondence.

The joint letter must attach the discovery requests and responses at issue. The parties may also attach any relevant meet-and-confer correspondence, exhibits or affidavits.

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonINFO
Applies to
Joint statement
Must include
ecf filing

Joint statement must be e-filed under specific category.

The joint statement shall be e-filed (unless the case is exempt from e-filing requirements) under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions – General > Discovery Letter Brief.”

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonINFO
Applies to
Protective order
Must include
model form explanation

Protective orders should use model form with explanation for modifications.

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they shall, where practicable, use one of the model stipulated protective orders (available at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/forms/model-protective-orders/). If the parties’ proposed protective offer differs materially from the model protective order, the parties shall file a statement explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order.

Magistrate Judge Thomas S. HixsonINFO
Applies to
Discovery dispute letter

Discovery dispute procedures do not apply to trade secret identification or patent contention motions

These procedures for the resolution of discovery disputes shall not apply to motions challenging the sufficiency of the identification of trade secrets under California Code of Civil Procedure § 2019.210, or to motions to strike or to compel amendments to infringement or invalidity contentions in patent cases. Such motions should be noticed and filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiINFO
Applies to
Pleading
Must include
pronouns

Parties may advise Court of pronouns via letter or name block.

Parties and attorneys may advise the Court of their pronouns by filing a letter or by adding the pronouns in the name block on the first page of the pleadings.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiINFO
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Neutral statement of case must be suitable for jury instructions in jury trials.

For jury trials, the statement should be suitable for reading to the jury as part of the Court’s preliminary jury instructions.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiINFO
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Proposed juror questionnaire optional as separate appendix for jury trials.

If desired, a proposed juror questionnaire, attached as a separate appendix, to be provided to prospective jurors before voir dire begins.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiINFO
Applies to
Joint pretrial statement

Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit will be used as starting point for all jury instructions.

The Court intends to use the Model Jury Instructions of the Ninth Circuit, modified and supplemented as necessary, as the starting point for jury instructions, including preliminary instructions and closing instructions.

Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchiINFO
Applies to
Expert report
Must include
exhibits

Past damages cut-off is expert report date; future damages allowed if standards met.

As to damages studies, the cut-off date for past damages will be as of the expert report (or such earlier date as the expert may select). In addition, the experts may try to project future damages (i.e., after the cut-off date) if the substantive standards for future damages can be met.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerINFO
Applies to
Joint proposed final pretrial order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number +2 more

Exhibit list and witness lists should be appendices to the proposed final pretrial order.

Items (v) and (vi) should be appendices to the proposed order. The objective is to convert the proposed order to a final order with the benefit of any discussion at the final pretrial conference.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerINFO
Applies to
Video deposition
Must include
packet preparation required

Deposition packets must be prepared even for video depositions.

When the packet is read, the examiner reads the questions (and any relevant colloquy) from the lectern and a colleague sits in the witness stand and reads the answers. When a video-taped deposition is to be played instead, the packets must still be prepared, as above, in order to facilitate rulings on objections. The video should omit any dead time, long pauses, and objections/colloquy not necessary to understand the answers.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerINFO
Applies to
Objection

Stand when making objections and state only legal basis promptly.

Counsel shall stand when making objections. State the legal basis only. Speak up promptly.

Senior Judge Charles R. BreyerINFO
Applies to
Trial schedule

Trials typically held Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM with lunch break.

Trial proceedings are typically conducted on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., with a break for lunch. The trial schedule may be adjusted and additional sessions may be added at the discretion of the Court.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaINFO
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
caption, judge name, case number

Standing Order applies to all patent infringement and declaratory judgment cases before Judge Davila.

Unless otherwise indicated by the Court, this Standing Order applies to all actions asserting claims for patent infringement and for declaratory judgment of non-infringement assigned to Judge Edward J. Davila.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaINFO
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement

Proposed constructions should be suitable for incorporation in a jury instruction.

Parties are reminded that proposed constructions should be suitable for incorporation in a jury instruction.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaINFO
Applies to
Joint claim construction statement
Must include
exhibit list

Complete prosecution history must be available to Court upon request.

Parties shall also be prepared to make the complete prosecution history for each patent available to the Court upon request.

Senior Judge Edward J. DavilaINFO
Applies to
Meet and confer
Must include
due date

Meet and Confer required 21 days before Pretrial Conference Statement

Meet and Confer - 21 days before Pretrial Conference Statement

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenINFO
Applies to
Expert disclosure
Must include
due date

Expert disclosure due same as close of non-expert discovery

Expert Disclosure - same as close of non-expert discovery

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenINFO
Applies to
Trial schedule
Must include
trial date, trial time

Trial scheduled for Monday at 8:30 a.m., approximately one year from first CMC

Trial - Monday at 8:30 a.m. (approximately one year from first CMC)

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenINFO
Applies to
Pretrial conference
Must include
pretrial conference date, pretrial conference time

Pretrial Conference scheduled for 4 Tuesdays prior to trial at 2:30 pm

Pretrial Conference - 4 Tuesdays prior to trial at 2:30 pm

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenINFO
Applies to
Deposition

Extra copies of documents used during deposition should be provided to opposing counsel and deponent.

Extra copies of documents used during the deposition should ordinarily be provided to opposing counsel and the deponent.

Senior Judge Edward M. ChenINFO
Applies to
Exhibit objections list

Exhibit objections must be filed in tabular form with specific columns.

A list of objections to each exhibit, in tabular form. The first column should describe the exhibit, the second column should set briefly set forth the basis of the objection, and the third column should set forth a brief response thereto.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine must be in a separate memo with proper identification.

Each motion should be presented in a separate memo and properly identified, for example, 'Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude...'

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Disputed instructions memorandum

Parties must submit separate memoranda for disputed jury instructions, organized by instruction number.

a party supporting an instruction must submit a separate memorandum of law in support of its disputed instructions, organized by instruction number. ... The party opposing a given instruction or instructions must include a responsive brief to the supporting party's memorandum, organized by instruction number

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Motion for summary judgment

Joint statements of undisputed facts are optional but helpful if agreed upon.

Joint statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful if completely agreed upon.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Tutorial presentation

Court prefers non-counsel presenter for technology tutorials.

The Court prefers that someone other than counsel make the presentation.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Tutorial presentation

Visual aids encouraged for technology tutorials.

Visual aids are encouraged.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Motion in limine

Each motion in limine must be in a separate memo and properly identified with a number.

Each motion should be presented in a separate memo and properly identified, for example, 'Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. | to Exclude... .'

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Brief

Counsel should notify the Court in their brief if an evidentiary hearing is necessary.

If counsel believes an evidentiary hearing is necessary, they should notify the Court of that fact in their brief.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Brief

Counsel should notify the Court in their brief if an evidentiary hearing is necessary.

If counsel believes an evidentiary hearing is necessary, they should notify the Court of that fact in their brief.

Senior Judge Jeffrey S. WhiteINFO
Applies to
Unconscious bias video review
Must include
url provided, video review required

Counsel must review unconscious bias video before pretrial conference.

In advance of the pretrial conference, counsel and/or parties shall review the court-approved video entitled Understanding the Effects of Unconscious Bias, available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/attorneys/jury-video, which is designed to educate potential jurors about the role of unconscious bias in the work of juries.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Special accommodations
Must include
accommodation requests due at pretrial

Special accommodation requests must be raised at pretrial conference.

If counsel, parties and/or witnesses will require any special accommodations during trial, such requests shall be raised at the pretrial conference.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Voir dire questionnaire
Must include
copies to counsel

Voir dire questionnaire must be distributed to venire and copies provided to counsel.

The attached voir dire questionnaire shall be given to the venire members and copies of the responses will be made available to counsel at the beginning of voir dire.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Voir dire questions

Joint voir dire questions required; disagreements may be submitted separately.

Counsel shall submit a joint set of additional voir dire questions to be posed by the court. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree may be submitted separately.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Voir dire

Brief follow-up voir dire permitted after court's questioning.

Counsel will be permitted brief follow-up voir dire after the court's questioning.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Specific jury instructions from Ninth Circuit Manual shall be given absent objection.

The following jury instructions from the Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions Civil (2017 Edition) shall be given absent objection: 1.3 - 1.7, 1.9 - 1.18, 1.20 - 1.21, 3.1 - 3.3, and 3.5.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Joint jury instructions required; disagreements may be submitted separately.

Counsel shall submit a joint set of these instructions along with a joint set of case specific instructions using the Ninth Circuit Manual where appropriate. Any instructions on which counsel cannot agree may be submitted separately.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions

Jury instructions must be typed on separate pages with citations and party references; blind copies required.

Each instruction shall be typed in full on a separate page with citations to the authority upon which it is based and a reference to the party submitting it. A second blind copy of each instruction shall also be submitted omitting the citation to authority and the reference to the submitting party, but retaining the title of the instruction.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Jury instructions
Must include
electronic version required

Electronic jury instructions must be emailed in Word format to specified address.

An electronic version of the proposed instructions in Microsoft Word format (.doc or .docx) must be emailed to the court's proposed order mailbox: pjhpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Trial schedule

Trial schedule: 8:30 AM - 1:30 PM with two 15-minute breaks on Mon, Tue, Thu, Fri.

The court's trial schedule is 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. with two fifteen-minute breaks, on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.

Senior Judge Phyllis J. HamiltonINFO
Applies to
Trial preparation
Must include
notice of electronic filing

Parties must review courtroom technology information on court website.

All parties are instructed to review the information regarding the use of courtroom technology and electronic evidence presentation (EEPS) which is provided on the Court’s web site at http://cand.uscourts.gov/courtroomtech, and to prepare accordingly.

Senior Judge Susan IllstonINFO
Applies to
Standing order
Must include
local rule certificate

Parties must follow Judge Orrick’s Standing Order on Juror Questionnaires and Social Media Research.

The parties shall review and follow Judge Orrick’s Standing Order Regarding Juror Questionnaires and Social Media Research, which is incorporated by reference into this Order.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickINFO
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
no contact allowed, sources must be publicly available

Research allowed from generally available sources without contact.

I do not restrict the parties, their counsel, and any agent, consultant, investigator, or anyone working for them from conducting research regarding a prospective juror, provided that it is done only from generally available sources and that there is no actual contact or any reasonable possibility of contact with a prospective juror.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickINFO
Applies to
Juror research
Must include
private databases based on public sources allowed

Private databases based on public sources permitted for juror research.

Only sources that are publicly available and private sources that derive their information from publicly available sources may be used to research a prospective juror. This includes private databases maintained by third parties based on open-source or other publicly available information, notwithstanding the fact that a subscription or fee may be needed to access those databases.

Senior Judge William H. OrrickINFO
Common questions about Northern District of California document filing requirements

What must be included with general filings in Northern District of California?

The rule requires local rule certificate. Parties must follow FRCP, Local Rules, and General Orders except where superseded by this standing order.

What must be included with extension request filings in Northern District of California?

The rule requires proposed order. Extension requests must include a proposed order and chart of current/proposed deadlines.

What must be included with case management statement filings in Northern District of California?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. CMC statements must include full litigation schedule with proposed amendment deadline.

What must be included with discovery dispute letter filings in Northern District of California?

The rule requires joint letter, proposed order, and legal argument. Discovery disputes require joint letter (max 5 pages) with proposed orders, no exhibits except disputed requests/responses.

What must be included with proposed order filings in Northern District of California?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. Proposed orders must be in Microsoft Word format and emailed to vcpo@cand.uscourts.gov.

View ruleSource: page 7, section PROPOSED ORDERS

What must be included with brief filings in Northern District of California?

The rule identifies required filing content or certificates. Final briefs must be filed at least 14 days before motion hearing.