Court Rules

Privacy Enforcement Tracker

1,285 enforcement actions from 14 federal and state jurisdictions. Every event traced back to its official government source.

1,285

Total Actions

14

Jurisdictions

$35.3B+

Total Fines Tracked

Access this data programmatically:MCP Server API Docs
FTCEnforcement ActionMultistate

RivX Automation Corp.(RivX)

Consumer fraud case where the FTC and Florida shut down RivX for deceiving consumers with false trucking investment opportunities. The court entered an $8.39 million judgment and banned the defendants from business opportunities. This protects consumers from business opportunity scams.

HighSecurity Failure

$8.4M

FTCEnforcement Action

Cliq, Inc., Andrew Phillips, John Blaugrund(Cliq)

The FTC filed a motion in federal court seeking to hold payment processor Cliq, Inc. and its operators in contempt for systematically violating a 2015 consent order. The defendants are accused of processing payments for high-risk and prohibited merchants, failing to screen for deceptive practices, and facilitating fraud avoidance tactics. The FTC is requesting at least $52.9 million in consumer relief, a permanent ban on the individuals from payment processing, and appointment of a receiver.

HighConsent FailureSecurity Failure

$52.9M

FTCConsent Decree

Illusory Systems, Inc.(Nomad)

The FTC has taken action against Illusory Systems, Inc. (doing business as Nomad) for failing to implement adequate data security measures, which led to a breach where hackers stole $186 million from consumers. The company is required to return the stolen funds and implement an information security program.

LowSecurity FailureData Breach

$186.0M

FTCConsent Decree

Illuminate Education, Inc.(Illuminate Education)

The FTC proposed a consent order against Illuminate Education, Inc. for failing to secure student data, leading to a breach affecting over 10 million students. The company allegedly had security failures and delayed breach notifications. The order requires a data security program, data deletion, and a retention schedule.

LowSecurity FailureBreach Notification DelayStudent Data
FTCSettlement

Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.(Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical)

The FTC distributed refunds to consumers who purchased deceptively marketed treatment plans from Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical. The company and its medical director were barred from making unsupported health claims about curing COVID-19, cancer, and Parkinson's disease after a court order in September 2025. Over $40,700 was sent to 578 consumers, with additional claims possible until May 2026.

MediumSecurity Failure

$103K

FTCWarning Letter

Akamai, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Cloudflare, Discord, GoDaddy, Meta, Microsoft, Reddit, Signal, Snap, Slack, X(Akamai)

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent warning letters to major technology companies, urging them not to weaken data security or censor American consumers' speech in response to foreign government demands. He reminded them that such actions could violate the FTC Act's prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices, particularly if companies break promises about encryption and security. The letters cite foreign laws like the EU's Digital Services Act and UK's Investigatory Powers Act as pressures that might lead to non-compliance.

LowSecurity Failure
FTCWarning Letter

Various technology companies

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent warning letters to over a dozen major technology companies, reminding them of their obligations under the FTC Act to protect American consumers' data security and privacy, even when facing pressure from foreign governments to weaken encryption or censor content. The letters warn that weakening security measures or censoring speech in response to foreign demands could constitute deceptive practices under the FTC Act.

LowSecurity Failure
FTCConsent Decree

GoDaddy Inc. and GoDaddy.com, LLC(GoDaddy)

The FTC settled charges against GoDaddy Inc. and GoDaddy.com, LLC for misleading customers about their data security protections and failing to adequately secure their website hosting services. The company allegedly did not implement reasonable security measures, leaving customer websites vulnerable to attacks that could harm both the customers and visitors to those sites. The case resulted in a consent order requiring GoDaddy to improve its security practices.

LowNotice FailureSecurity Failure
FTCConsent Decree

GoDaddy Inc., et al.(GoDaddy)

The FTC settled charges against GoDaddy Inc. and GoDaddy.com, LLC for misleading customers about their data security protections and failing to adequately secure their website hosting services. The company's security failures left customers' and website visitors' data vulnerable to attacks. The final order requires GoDaddy to implement comprehensive data security measures.

LowSecurity FailureNotice Failure
FTCConsent Decree

GoDaddy

The FTC finalized an order with GoDaddy for failing to implement adequate data security measures and misleading consumers about its security and Privacy Shield compliance. The order prohibits misrepresentations, requires a comprehensive security program, and mandates independent assessments.

LowSecurity FailureData Breach
FTCConsent Decree

GoDaddy Inc.(GoDaddy)

The FTC settled charges against GoDaddy for failing to implement adequate data security measures for its web hosting services, which led to multiple breaches and misled customers about its security protections. The proposed order requires GoDaddy to establish a comprehensive information security program and hire an independent assessor for regular reviews.

LowSecurity Failure
FTCConsent Decree

Marriott International, Inc. and its subsidiary Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC(Marriott)

The FTC finalized an order against Marriott International and Starwood Hotels for failing to implement reasonable data security, which led to three data breaches affecting over 344 million customers. The companies must implement a comprehensive security program, delete unnecessary personal information, allow U.S. customers to request deletion, and restore stolen loyalty points. They are also prohibited from misrepresenting their data security practices.

LowSecurity Failure
FTCConsent Decree

Marriott International, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC(Marriott)

The FTC charged Marriott International and Starwood Hotels with failing to implement reasonable data security, leading to three data breaches affecting over 344 million customers. Under a proposed consent order, the companies must implement a comprehensive information security program, certify compliance annually for 20 years, and provide customers with ways to delete personal information and restore stolen loyalty points.

LowSecurity FailureData Breach
FTCConsent Decree

Verkada

Verkada, a security camera company, failed to secure customer data, leading to a hacker accessing over 150,000 cameras and sensitive health information. The company also violated the CAN-SPAM Act by sending spam emails without proper opt-out mechanisms. To settle, Verkada will pay $2.95 million and implement a comprehensive security program with audits.

HighSecurity FailureOpt-Out FailureNotice Failure

$3.0M

FTCConsent Decree

Blackbaud Inc.(Blackbaud)

The FTC finalized a consent order against Blackbaud Inc. for alleged security failures that led to a data breach exposing personal data of millions of consumers. Blackbaud must delete unnecessary data, implement a security program, and not misrepresent its policies. No monetary penalty was imposed.

LowSecurity FailureData BreachNotice Failure
FTCSettlement

Cerebral, Inc.(Cerebral)

The FTC settled with telehealth firm Cerebral, Inc. for sharing sensitive consumer mental health data with third parties like LinkedIn, Snapchat, and TikTok for advertising without proper consent, employing sloppy security practices, and misleading consumers about cancellation policies. Cerebral must pay over $7 million (with $2 million due upfront), is permanently banned from using health information for most advertising, must implement a comprehensive privacy program, delete unnecessary data, and provide easy cancellation.

HighUnauthorized Data SharingSecurity FailureNotice Failure

$7.0M

FTCConsent Decree

X-Mode Social and Outlogic, LLC(X-Mode Social)

The FTC settled with data brokers X-Mode Social and Outlogic for selling precise location data without informed consent and failing to protect sensitive information. The proposed order bans the sale of sensitive location data, requires deletion of collected data, and mandates a comprehensive privacy program. This is the FTC's first action against a data broker for sensitive location data practices.

LowConsent FailureGeolocation DataOpt-Out Failure
FTCGuidance

Website and Online Service Operators Covered by COPPA(COPPA-Covered Operators)

The FTC has proposed amendments to the COPPA Rule to enhance children's privacy protections. Key changes include requiring separate parental consent for targeted advertising, prohibiting conditioning access on data collection, limiting push notifications, strengthening data security and retention requirements, and restricting commercial use in educational technology. The proposal shifts responsibility from parents to companies to safeguard children's data.

LowChildren's DataConsent FailureUnauthorized Data Sharing
FTCConsent Decree

Rite Aid

The FTC settled charges that Rite Aid deployed AI facial recognition technology in hundreds of stores from 2012 to 2020 without reasonable safeguards, resulting in false-positive matches that disproportionately harmed women and people of color. The proposed order bans Rite Aid from using facial recognition for surveillance for five years and requires comprehensive biometric data safeguards, data deletion, consumer notifications, and a certified security program.

HighBiometric DataSecurity FailureDark Patterns
FTCConsent Decree

Global Tel*Link Corp.(Global Tel*Link)

The FTC proposed a consent order against Global Tel*Link Corp. for failing to secure sensitive user data, leading to a breach affecting nearly 650,000 consumers, and for delaying notification for about nine months. The order requires the company to implement a comprehensive security program, notify affected users with credit monitoring, and report future breaches promptly.

LowSecurity FailureBreach Notification Delay
FTCConsent Decree

1Health.io(1Health)

The FTC finalized an order against 1Health.io for failing to secure genetic data and unfairly changing its privacy policy. The company must pay $75,000 for consumer refunds, destroy DNA samples, and implement security measures. It deceived consumers about data deletion and shared data without proper consent.

LowSecurity FailureOpt-Out FailureNotice Failure

$75K

FTCSettlement

1Health.io

The FTC settled with genetic testing company 1Health.io for failing to secure sensitive genetic and health data, deceiving consumers about data deletion, and unfairly changing its privacy policy without notice or consent. The settlement includes refunds totaling over $49,500 to 2,432 affected consumers.

LowSecurity FailureOpt-Out FailureNotice Failure

$50K

FTCConsent Decree

Ring LLC(Ring)

The FTC charged Ring LLC with allowing employees to access private customer videos without consent and failing to secure user accounts, leading to hackers controlling cameras. Under a proposed consent order, Ring must pay $5.8 million in refunds, delete unlawfully accessed data, and implement a privacy and security program.

HighConsent FailureNotice FailureSecurity Failure

$5.8M

FTCConsent DecreeMultistate

Easy Healthcare Corporation(Easy Healthcare)

The FTC charged Easy Healthcare Corporation, operator of the Premom fertility app, with deceiving users by sharing their sensitive health data with third parties for advertising without consent and failing to notify breaches as required by the Health Breach Notification Rule. Under a proposed consent decree, the company will pay a $100,000 civil penalty, be barred from sharing health data for advertising, and must implement privacy and security measures.

MediumUnauthorized Data SharingConsent FailureNotice Failure

$100K

FTCAdministrative Order

Meta

The FTC proposed modifications to its 2020 privacy order with Meta, alleging violations including non-compliance with the order, misleading parents about Messenger Kids, and unauthorized data sharing. The proposed changes include banning monetization of youth data, pausing new product launches, and strengthening privacy requirements.

LowChildren's DataConsent FailureNotice Failure
FTCSettlement

Ring

The FTC settled with Ring for failing to secure consumer videos, allowing unauthorized access by employees and hackers. Ring agreed to provide $5.6 million in refunds to affected customers and implement security measures.

LowData BreachUnauthorized Data SharingConsent Failure

$5.6M

FTCConsent Decree

Chegg Inc.(Chegg)

The FTC finalized an order against Chegg Inc. for failing to secure student data, leading to breaches that exposed personal information of about 40 million users and employees. Chegg must implement a comprehensive security program, limit data collection, offer multifactor authentication, and allow data access and deletion.

LowSecurity FailureStudent DataHealth Data
FTCConsent Decree

Drizly

The FTC finalized an order against Drizly and its CEO for security failures that led to a data breach exposing 2.5 million consumers' personal information. Drizly failed to implement basic security measures despite prior alerts. The order requires Drizly to destroy unnecessary data, implement a security program, and publicly detail data collection practices.

LowSecurity FailureData Breach
FTCConsent Decree

CafePress

The FTC finalized an order against CafePress for failing to secure consumer data and covering up a data breach. The company must implement comprehensive security measures, and its former owner must pay $500,000 in redress to victims.

MediumSecurity FailureData BreachBreach Notification Delay

$500K

FTCConsent Decree

Residual Pumpkin Entity, LLC and PlanetArt, LLC(CafePress)

The FTC took action against CafePress for failing to secure consumer data and covering up a major data breach. The company stored sensitive information insecurely and delayed notifying customers. As part of the settlement, Residual Pumpkin must pay $500,000 in redress, and both companies must implement comprehensive security programs.

MediumData BreachSecurity FailureNotice Failure

$500K

Explore Enforcement Data